Slashdot Mirror


The Chronoliths

Brooks Peck writes: "The Chronoliths, by the underappreciated* Robert Charles Wilson, is a finalist for the 2001 Hugo Award and Campbell Award. The tale begins in 2021 with the abrupt arrival of the first Chronolith, a 200-foot-high monument of unknown composition that memorializes a military victory. It's dated twenty years in the future. More Chronoliths follow, blinking into existence with explosive force--usually in the centers of cities. Each is grander than the last, and each lauds another victory by a leader who does not currently exist." The Chronoliths author Robert Charles Wilson pages 301 publisher Tor Books rating 8.5 reviewer Brooks Peck ISBN 0812545249 summary Big honking monoliths beam in from the future.

Witness to it all is our narrator, Scott Warden. There's nothing special about this guy. He's no clever scientist, no tough soldier. He's just a computer programmer who happens to be close to the location of the first arrival. After that he's pulled into the Chronolith investigation by a series of seeming coincidences. But where the manipulation of time is involved, coincidence becomes a slippery concept--something his co-investigators are well aware of.

I consider this quiet, unassuming novel to be on the cutting edge of science fiction for this reason: it creates a literary metaphor for our current view (and fears) of the near future. Just as giant, mutant bugs stood for our fear of the bomb in the '50s, the Chronoliths represent our fear of what's just around the corner today. But today we can no longer easily predict what the future holds. Science changes things too quickly--so quickly that we can only say with confidence that we cannot say what the future will be like.

Science fiction writers have devised a variety of means to cope with this threat to their livelihood. Vernor Vinge pulls off a plausible (and excellent) space opera in A Fire Upon the Deep by having the universe limit how far science can progress depending on its location in the galaxy. Other writers retreat to the very near future. The rise in popularity of alternate history stories could be another byproduct of this dilemma.

But in The Chronoliths Wilson doesn't resort to any tricks. The novel is all about the unknowableness of the future, as represented by the Chronoliths themselves: impenetrable, unstoppable, and, most importantly, of our own making.

*Perhaps one reason Wilson isn't as well known as he should be is that his novels are not as strong as his short fiction. The Chronoliths, interestingly, is his first novel written in first-person, the point of view he chose for many of his best short stories including "The Perseids" and "The Inner Inner City."

You can purchase The Chronoliths from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

11 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Er... This doesn't sound right... by dmarien · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "t's dated twenty years in the future..."

    Okay, i'm with you so far...

    "and each lauds another victory by a leader who does not currently exist."

    So, teenagers are winning the wars fought in the future? I knew the dexterity I had built up with a gamepad would come in handy some day... My giant robot remote controlled robot can beat yours anyday!

    --
    dmarien
  2. Review is confusing by pgpckt · · Score: 2, Insightful


    What exactly is this book about? I find this book review lacking in the detail and length of normal book reviews. I would have expected a better review of the book, perhaps chapter by chapter highlights.

    From the review, it sounds like big statues to future events randomly appear. But I don't know what that means to the characters. How do people react to this? Do people try to prevent the wars before they start? Does it matter who the victor is? Does anyone ever figure out why these statues are appearing? Assuming they are being sent by humanity from the future, what is the motivation of those that send the statues? Are they warnings?

    I am having a hard time understanding the genre of the book and its plot from the review. If anyone else has read it, post your experiences.

    On an unrelated note, anyone else notice the karma system has changed? Apparently, my karma is now "excellent." Man, I want a point system back!

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    1. Re:Review is confusing by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chapter by chapter highlights? Are you certain you are not looking for the Cliff Notes version of the book instead?

      I suppose it's fairly common to confuse the concept of a review vs. Cliff Notes....

    2. Re:Review is confusing by jmoriarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I most respectfully disagree about this review. It gave me exactly what I needed to know to decide if the book might be something I would want to invest my time in.

      Of course, I also loathe movie trailers that give away most of the plot. From any summary medium like a review or a trailer, I want to know what the subject matter is about, not the details of what the subject matter is.

      Ow... I think I accidentally got Zen there for a moment and gave myself a headache...

    3. Re:Review is confusing by DrVxD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Sounds like 2001 to me. Except those monoliths somehow sparked great changes in humanity
      And didn't come from the future. But you're right, they both have monoliths.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  3. Good scifi by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But today we can no longer easily predict what the future holds. Science changes things too quickly--so quickly that we can only say with confidence that we cannot say what the future will be like.
    Science fiction writers have devised a variety of means to cope with this threat to their livelihood.

    Science fiction has _never_ been about "this is what the future will be like!". Well, some of the crappy stuff is. The best science fiction is all about what-if. Good science fiction places characters in strange circumstances that may or may not bear any relation to a plausible future for humanity. The fun is in seeing how humans (or aliens for that matter) would deal with these circumstances. What-if there was an alien loose on your ship with acid for blood and lightning quick reflexes? What-if a colony of nanobots became self-aware? What-if we found the sun was inhabited with creatures who were slowing down the fusion processes at the center? The plausibility of these scenarios _actually happening_ is slim to none. But that has nothing to do with whether or not this is good science fiction. For me personally, if the story is based on hard science, then thats when I stop caring about the plausibility of the story.

    Any science fiction writer who sees himself as a prophet for the future needs to find a new line of work, like say, I don't know, start a cult for instance.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Good scifi by charlesc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why people still care about "The Martian Chronicles", even so far as to make it required reading in some schools. The sense of wonder and the unknown and opportunity that the characters feel really jumps out and makes the reader feel the same wonder, even though we know none of that stuff is really going to happen in the time frame laid out by the book (or maybe ever).

      All the aliens and doodads and gizmos and bending universes and lasers and exploding planets in the world don't make up for a shitty story and paper doll characters.

      --
      "So many ways to skin a cat, and still everyone uses a great big knife."
  4. I found this book... by eaeolian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...unsatisfying. While the premise is very interesting - always a good start in SF - the execution is somewhat lacking, as the plot elements are very guessable in a lot of places. I also thought the way the social unrest was depicted was overly-simplified, and the ending left something to be desired.

    On the plus side, the characters do come to life, and the story sweeps you along pretty well, and has a couple of interesting sub-plot twists. Overall, not a bad read, but it's not something I'll stand on the rooftops and shout about, either.

  5. Why? by arcmay · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This "review" is essentially only two paragraphs long. While I know most people don't want to see spoilers, I'd rather see something a bit more meaty. Beyond mentioning that it is in the first person, there is absolutely no discussion of the style or flow of the book. Is there action? How is the character development? Most Amazon reader reviews go into more depth.

    That being said, I have read this book and it is quite good. Also, I found it refreshingly short: Average readers will finish it in just a few sittings. Wilson manages to tell a complete and satisfying SF story in a few hundred pages, which is occurring less and less often.

    Anyway, if your curiosity is piqued, check out a more complete review here: http://www.sfsite.com/10b/cl114.htm

  6. Read this book, but skim it by Precipitous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Author's strength is ability structure his books around unique social themes, and populate his books with a number of interesting ideas. The reviewer pointed out that the main character is a programmer - but his job is actually to 'evolve code', producing algorithms that he doesn't always understand. Unlike many sci-fi stories, where the earth unites around a common enemy - we have a hundred sub sects worshipping these cronoliths or trying to destroy them. That the book is full of such speculations on where our society is headed and how it responds keeps it interesting.

    That said, the editor could have taken a chain saw, shredded half the book at random, and it would have been a better read. The authors mediocre style and character development don't warrant the long development sections. This yields a how-to-read it suggestion: If a section starts to bore you: just skip a few paragraphs or pages at a time. You won't miss anything.

    As an aside, has anyone noticed the new assumption behind many current works of fiction? In the 90's, we had consipiracy theories. Before that, there were all the Apocolyptic novels. In the past 2 years, many of the near future sci-fi books that I've read take the fall or decline of the United States as a foregone conclusion. Cronoliths is no exception to this new pessimism.

    --
    My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
  7. Re:Good book, read it recently. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, give us a spoiler summary. Someone! I'm never going to read this book, but my curiosity is getting the better of me and I want to know what happens.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!