Slashdot Mirror


OpenBSD 3.0 Honeypot Whitepaper

Tortured Potato writes "This white paper, by Michael Anuzis, details how he set up an OpenBSD 3.0 honeypot, watched it get cracked and then analyzed it -- all within 28 hours. Fascinating stuff...this is the first OpenBSD honeypot I've heard of."

4 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. First OpenBSD honeypot by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Informative
    this is the first OpenBSD honeypot I've heard of

    Which is not very surprising for an OS that has had "One remote hole in the default install, in nearly 6 years!". An interesting read 'though.

    By the way, there is a slashbox for OpenBSD Journal, which can be enabled here. It featured this story yesterday.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  2. Re:What is a honeypot? by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can learn a lot about honeypots and network security in general on the Honeynet site. Browse the challenges, and the results, and be amazed ;)

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  3. Info on the 'Hacker' by DeeEm · · Score: 5, Informative

    If anyones interested, the website for the 'hacker' is omegapunx.org, his msn name is omegakidd@hotmail.com
    E-Mail: omegakidd@tfz.net
    E-Mail2: omegakidd@cheguevara.zzn.com
    aim: eromlenosam
    aim2: shoogy maple
    aim3: satan the killer
    msn: omegakidd@hotmail.com
    yahoo: omegakidd
    irc@efnet: omegakidd

  4. Re:Obligatory anti-linux statement by phoxix · · Score: 4, Informative
    Stuff that effects Redhat not only effects redhat, but the rest of the open source community itself. Last time I checked, redhat used mostly standardized open source software to get the job done. (i.e. openssh for sshd, apache for httpd, etc)

    So when redhat has a new securty flaw, it isn't so much as a redhat problem as it is to a open source community security flaw.

    Sunny Dubey