Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Search Engines Take Their Time Disclosing Paid Links

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the no-shocker-here dept.

An anonymous reader says "This CNN.com article talks about how most search engines have not disclosed the difference between a paid ad and an 'objective' result. The one exception of course is every geek's favorite search engine, Google. Once again, hooray for Google!" We mentioned the FTCs Mandate that search engines be clear about who's paying for what. Apparently all the non-google engines are on vacation ;)

4 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. Credibility by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that search engines really get users on credibility.
    I know that with Google, I won't get popups, not too many banners, no porn ads.
    More importantly, getting what you search for is important. I know with google, I can find anything almost, and their Cache and Translate features really help out. I know with confidence that Google will give me the results I want.

    So, why are these other Engines killing their credibility by jumping on this bandwagon, and not telling the users what they are getting? Less people will use it, and the service will die.

    In addition: Check out this.. It's google's beta of their answer service. Ask a question, and Pay for the answer. Kinda cool if you have a complex or hard to find problem.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Credibility by nyquist_theorem · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In addition: Check out this. [google.com]. It's google's beta of their answer service. Ask a question, and Pay for the answer. Kinda cool if you have a complex or hard to find problem.

      Am I the only one that's rather impressed by this? The quality and depth of some of the answers provided to some pretty straightforward or simple questions is remarkable.

      EG, for $20, you can ask "abc television had a story on a lady in cambodia who set up a orphinage and her relationship with a cambodian pilot" and get this. Or, for two bucks, you can ask why your site isn't listed on google and they'll tell you. Lastly, if you're wondering how to help American businesses expand into Romania, for $30 you can find out.

      The best part is that they even give you the search terms they used on google, as well as any other resources they used. For those of us that have been using search engines since Altavista was good, feeding a search engine a balanced diet is pretty straight forward - but if you've seen someone new to the net try to work a search engine, you can understand how useful this is - the whole "teach a man to fish" bit, I suppose.

      Wow.

      --
      -- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
  2. Has anyone else noticed this Google problem? by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the last few weeks I've noticed a disturbing trend when using google. I'll search for something using keywords, and the page that google spits back is 50% full of links to third-tier sites that read "Advance search for [your keywords]". If you go to those pages they are full of ads and do not have the information you're looking for. It looks like someone found an unfortunately effective way to poison google's results.

    1. Re:Has anyone else noticed this Google problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a thread on usenet about this issue.

      The current hypothesis is that the search44 guys have a lot of domains, and a lot of pages with different keywords.