Slashdot Mirror


Search Engines Take Their Time Disclosing Paid Links

An anonymous reader says "This CNN.com article talks about how most search engines have not disclosed the difference between a paid ad and an 'objective' result. The one exception of course is every geek's favorite search engine, Google. Once again, hooray for Google!" We mentioned the FTCs Mandate that search engines be clear about who's paying for what. Apparently all the non-google engines are on vacation ;)

10 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. It's only a recommendation by Telecommando · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not like they're required by law to do it.

    Yet.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    1. Re:It's only a recommendation by bravehamster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is about advertising. There are no ethics in advertising. It's a business. They probably feel like disclosing who paid for the ad is the same as devaluing the ad.

      That's a load of crap. Just because something is a business doesn't mean that ethics are thrown out the window. This is sadly too often the case, but there's a reason you have to take a class called "Business Ethics" to get an MBA. As for disclosing who paid for the ad, that's not what we're talking about here at all. This is about telling people that the link they're clicking on is an ad! In order for the internet to maintain it's usability, Search Engines must be trusted sources of information. That's not the same as saying they aren't allowed to make money. They can make all the money they want, just so long as they aren't screwing with the results to favor someone who dropped some cash in their laps.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:It's only a recommendation by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm very close to advertising. I've watched some of the decision making. It's not ethical.

      Ever see a picture of strawberries? Chances are, that strawberry is covered in lipstick to make it an appealing shade of red. Everybody knows that McDonald's burgers look nothing like their picture. Car commercials feature locations that nobody'd ever take the car too. Heck, one showed a Jeep outrun a helicopter up a mountain. Ads, as a general business, are deceptive. Ever see that popup that looks like a message box saying 'you have 1 new message'? Heh.

      If advertising was ethical, products wouldn't be held in such a ludicrously high light. They take whatever means are necessary to get people to come visit, with no regard to whether or not they're being deceptive. This is why search engines must disclose paid links.

  2. Credibility by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that search engines really get users on credibility.
    I know that with Google, I won't get popups, not too many banners, no porn ads.
    More importantly, getting what you search for is important. I know with google, I can find anything almost, and their Cache and Translate features really help out. I know with confidence that Google will give me the results I want.

    So, why are these other Engines killing their credibility by jumping on this bandwagon, and not telling the users what they are getting? Less people will use it, and the service will die.

    In addition: Check out this.. It's google's beta of their answer service. Ask a question, and Pay for the answer. Kinda cool if you have a complex or hard to find problem.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Credibility by nyquist_theorem · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In addition: Check out this. [google.com]. It's google's beta of their answer service. Ask a question, and Pay for the answer. Kinda cool if you have a complex or hard to find problem.

      Am I the only one that's rather impressed by this? The quality and depth of some of the answers provided to some pretty straightforward or simple questions is remarkable.

      EG, for $20, you can ask "abc television had a story on a lady in cambodia who set up a orphinage and her relationship with a cambodian pilot" and get this. Or, for two bucks, you can ask why your site isn't listed on google and they'll tell you. Lastly, if you're wondering how to help American businesses expand into Romania, for $30 you can find out.

      The best part is that they even give you the search terms they used on google, as well as any other resources they used. For those of us that have been using search engines since Altavista was good, feeding a search engine a balanced diet is pretty straight forward - but if you've seen someone new to the net try to work a search engine, you can understand how useful this is - the whole "teach a man to fish" bit, I suppose.

      Wow.

      --
      -- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
  3. Non Google Engines on Vacation? by 5h4k4-2u1u · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently all the non-google engines are on vacation ;)

    You mean there are other search engines?!

    --


    --
    I've had to create 4 new accounts trying to avoid karma... dammit!
  4. Re:silly by liquidsin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You, sir, are high. Or drunk. Just because someone springs the money for more advertising doesn't mean they offer superior products/services/information. The beauty of the web lies in the basic idea that it's a medium for everyone. Anyone can get a message out on the internet. The more that diminishes, the less useful the web becomes.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  5. Has anyone else noticed this Google problem? by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the last few weeks I've noticed a disturbing trend when using google. I'll search for something using keywords, and the page that google spits back is 50% full of links to third-tier sites that read "Advance search for [your keywords]". If you go to those pages they are full of ads and do not have the information you're looking for. It looks like someone found an unfortunately effective way to poison google's results.

    1. Re:Has anyone else noticed this Google problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a thread on usenet about this issue.

      The current hypothesis is that the search44 guys have a lot of domains, and a lot of pages with different keywords.

    2. Re:Has anyone else noticed this Google problem? by frankie · · Score: 4, Informative

      yes, Yes, YES! It is really annoying as hell to see mighty Google getting bombed like this. There's a Hacker Sith Lord out there laughing at us.

      If you see this happening in a search result that you care about, please report it either by email (search-quality at google) or by web form.

      Here's some of the sites I've seen that are abusing cross-linking to spam Google:

      costa-dorada.net
      e-bevs.com
      elevenacceleration.c om
      ije-ir.org
      ims-corp.com
      indonesiahelp.com
      i ndowebdesign.com
      kluthe.net
      laserprintersbymte.c om
      makingmusic.net
      myownpoll.com
      ocean-press.co m
      onesmack.com