Slashdot Mirror


Ogg Vorbis 1.0

uvasmith writes "According to the Ogg Vorbis website... Release 1.0 is now ready and tagged as 'vorbis1_0_public_release' in CVS. This is a full release of a 1.0 encoder, decoder and tool set. The encoder, decoder and tools now implement all Vorbis 1.0 specification features including low-bitrate, cascading and channel coupling." Update: 07/19 17:05 GMT by C :It seems someone jumped the gun a bit in mentioning the release, but now it's official! Check out the download page, the letter from their CEO and (if you wish) cough up a few bucks at the donation page! For those audiophiles among us, you can check out a side-by-side audio comparison here. Oh, and don't forget the free music!

17 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Debian packages by calc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ogg Vorbis 1.0 is already uploaded to Debian sid and should be installed today. It should be compiled for all arch within a few days.

  2. oggenc -1 mode by calc · · Score: 5, Informative

    oggenc now has a -1 quality mode with a nominal bitrate of 45kbps. It actually sounds very good try it out.

    1. Re:oggenc -1 mode by RadioheadKid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well for music, WMA 64kbs vs. Ogg 64kbs, I definetly believed WMA beat ogg vorbis RC3, but not anymore. Ogg Vorbis 1.0 at 64kbs (quality setting 0) is amazing. Beats WMA hands down. In a some cases Ogg Vorbis 64kbs beats the poorer MP3 encoders at 128kbs.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  3. The Vorbis Way by boa13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    To quote irc.openprojects.net/#vorbis:

    <xercist> sites are down, and staying that way until it's ready. period.

    And slightly afterwards:

    <xiphmont> Hello. Slashdot jumped the gun. So that we can actually get to our own servers, xiph.org and vorbis.com have both been taken down so that we can finish the release in peace. Or at all.

  4. Re:Serious question: iTunes by pigpen_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can get a beta quicktime component that will allow you to play oggs in iTunes and other quicktime aware apps. The iPod does it's mp3 decoding on hardware and there is not currently a solution for software decoding. I wouldn't expect one any time soon either.

    --
    Zambozay! My brain must've been eatin' a sandwich!
  5. Re:Still no specification by Skuto · · Score: 5, Informative

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    A reference implementation is great and all, but until they get off their arses and release an exact specification of the Ogg format and codec, it's never going to take off.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>

    Vorbis 1.0 comes with a full specification.

    --
    GCP

  6. gcc licensing by MenTaLguY · · Score: 4, Informative

    Programs written in GCC have to be published opensource because they use special embedded "assembler" code. Also look out for programs like bison.

    There's also the basic C runtime stubs (e.g. crt1.o), though I think that's part of glibc.

    However, if you actually bother reading the licenses on the code that gets embedded by bison and gcc, special excemptions are made --

    Thus, code compiled with gcc may be distributed under any license you want. Sorry, thanks for playing.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  7. Ogg Vorbis is public domain, BSD, and GPL. by kjoonlee · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Ogg Vorbis format itself is public domain.

    The reference library is BSD-ish.

    The reference tools are GPLed.

  8. Try Speex too by jmv · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought some of you could be interested in my project Speex (http://speex.sourceforge.net), which is like Vorbis but optimized for speech. Bit-rates ranging from 8 kbps to 32 kbps for good quality speech...

  9. Blame can lie in any of 4 places by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find that when I "rip" music from CDs into OOG Vorbis Format that it has poor playback quality (very crackly).

    Does the same thing happen when you rip from CD into .wav without encoding to .ogg or .mp3? What happens when you look at the .wav in a spectrogram?

    If you hear crackling from the .wav, and you can see it on a spectrogram (it'll look like vertical lines through the whole spectrum), then you're seeing copy protection or some other form of physical CD damage.

    If you hear crackling from the wav, but you can't see it on a spectrogram, check your audio drivers.

    If you don't hear crackling from the wav, then use the reference encoder and decoder (oggenc and ogg123) to turn .wav into .ogg into .wav. If you get crackling from this, then libvorbis is at fault.

    If wav->ogg->wav->player works, but wav->ogg->player doesn't work through the same player, contact the developers of the player.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  10. Re:Lesson Learned... by boa13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lesson to be learned here:
    Mirror everything before announcing the release.


    Tell that to Michael. The Vorbis team was mirroring everything when he leaked the story. The release has not been announced yet.

  11. Re:Depends if you use GCC to compile it by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    " Programs written in GCC have to be published opensource because ..."

    You don't work for Microsoft do you ?

    There are zero, nada, none, zilch, 0 licencing restrictions on code created with gcc. There are specific statements to that effect in the code and licencing. Perhaps you should read them.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  12. Re:Yay! by 13Echo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Moog is Bob Moog's last name. Maybe you don't know who he is, or how it is even pronounced. Regardless, I'll fill you in on something. He was the pioneer of the synthesizer.

  13. Transcoding == Bad by xercist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, since I see this asked 5x a day on #vorbis, I'm going to tell everyone now.

    If you have an mp3 collection, and want to use ogg instead, please do not convert the mp3s to oggs. It's like faxing a document, then re-faxing the fax. It just gets all unreadable. The result is that people will hear the ogg file and think "Oh my god this sucks! Ogg really blows! I'm not using this format!".

    If you have the original CD, rip it and encode. If you don't, keep the mp3s.

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
  14. -q Quality:Bitrate graphs by xercist · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've spent time generating graphs of vorbis 1.0 encoder's output bitrate vs the -q (quality) setting input. They're very cool looking. enjoy.

    http://www.lammah.com/~xercist/vorbis/bitrate-grap h/1.0/

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
  15. Re:(don't flame me) Why? by FooBarWidget · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are several reasons why Ogg Vorbis is cool.

    - Quality & File Size
    Ogg Vorbis files sound better than MP3s at the same bitrate.
    Or, if you don't care about quality, think it as this: Ogg Vorbis with the same quality as MP3s are smaller. Which means that Ogg Vorbis can save you a lot of space.
    You can probably squeeze your 15 GB music collection down to 10 or 8 GB, while preserving the same quality.

    One thing you must NOT do is convert MP3s to Ogg Vorbis! Both MP3 and Vorbis are lossy audio codecs, which means that the codec throws away information in order to make a file smaller. MP3 throws away information, Vorbis throws away other information, and throws it away differently. The end result is a file that sounds worse than the original MP3.
    What you should do instead is rip the CD directly to Vorbis. CD -> Vorbis = good; CD -> MP3 -> Vorbis = bad.
    Think CD->MP3->Vorbis as sending a fax, then fax the fax. You lose quality.

    Other reasons:

    - The file format is more flexible. Ogg Vorbis can be easily streamed. Perfect for Internet radios. Vorbis has a flexible tag system; in MP3s, all you can speficy is the name, year, type of music, and some other comments. Vorbis however supports freefield tags. You can add *any* information you want, and it can be as big as you want.

    - It's open source (BSD-style license), which means that you can do anything you want with it (including using it in your commercial programs).

    - It's not patented. No need to pay $$$ to patent holders.

  16. Re:The march of OSS by GeckoX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Moz unuseable with DHTML?
    Um, stick to the standards dumbass, not the IE standards and you'd be just fine.

    Um, untested...You don't consider 3 YEARS of open public testing and bug tracking to be testing?

    I know you're just flaming, but you're also a fuckwit.

    --
    No Comment.