Slashdot Mirror


Ogg Vorbis 1.0

uvasmith writes "According to the Ogg Vorbis website... Release 1.0 is now ready and tagged as 'vorbis1_0_public_release' in CVS. This is a full release of a 1.0 encoder, decoder and tool set. The encoder, decoder and tools now implement all Vorbis 1.0 specification features including low-bitrate, cascading and channel coupling." Update: 07/19 17:05 GMT by C :It seems someone jumped the gun a bit in mentioning the release, but now it's official! Check out the download page, the letter from their CEO and (if you wish) cough up a few bucks at the donation page! For those audiophiles among us, you can check out a side-by-side audio comparison here. Oh, and don't forget the free music!

19 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Argh Too Early by boa13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wait a few more minutes, the mirrors and the website are being uploaded. :(

  2. Re:Woohoo! by Sinistar2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WTF are you talking about?

    Backwards compatibility with pre-release versions? Uh, yeah. Since the RC's were started, OGGs have worked right up through the chain (or at least mine have).

    Now, if the next release means you can't play any previously encoded OGGs, then go ahead and repost your rant.

  3. The march of OSS by BeowulfSchaeffer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mozilla 1.0, OpenOffice 1.0, now Vorbis 1.0. This year should be considered a watershed year for open source software. It is great to see things coming together like this.

  4. All servers down - thank you slashdot! by Skuto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All xiph.org and vorbis.com servers have been taken down to prevent slashdotting untill the mirroring is completed.

    Thank you slashdot, you just ed us.

    --
    GCP

    1. Re:All servers down - thank you slashdot! by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just how long is it going to take to mirror Ogg Vorbis? Last time I downloaded it all three[1] tar.gzs together were less than a meg. It's not like they're mirroring Gnome or Mozilla. Heck, I can CVSup and entire FreeBSD ports tree quicker than these guys are mirroring Ogg.

      [1] libogg, libvorbis, and vorbistools

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:All servers down - thank you slashdot! by sporty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's time slashdot doesn't do software announcements since you have to download the software from their site to begin with. And since we have access to all cvs code up to release, this doesn't help.

      Why not let the freshmeat.net handle the software stuff. At least then, it is a matter of the author announcing it and all you have to do is point to freshmeat and say, "look! it's out! see!?"

      -s

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  5. Ogg at Emusic.com by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yesterday's roundtable disaster on the subject of DRM raised a few good points about pay-per-download services like Emusic.com. Users are free to do whatever they like with medis files they have legally download.

    The problem is that Emusic uses mp3. If they would offer songs in ogg vorbis they would be greatly increasing the quality of their product, giving listeners less reason to pirate and more reason to do legit consumer purchasing. I might even consider joining their service myself.

  6. Now begins the hardest part... by atcurtis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Adoption.

    Any piece of technology, no matter how open, free or innovative is useless unless adopted and widely used.

    Microsoft uses Market Development Funds to "assist" adoption of their stuff... Such funds are usually in the form of paid holidays to some exotic location for some key executive/manager of companies.

    Opensource usually cannot afford such gimmics and rely solely on the merits of the technology.

    We can hope (and prey for the religeous among us) that the powers that be at the corporations like the BBC, CNN, ITN, News-Corp etc realise what is the best way to go and don't get their decisions bought by a company which is willing to spend millions of dollars on MDF.

    --
    -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
    -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
    1. Re:Now begins the hardest part... by Darkwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, Microsoft does considerably more than provide paid holidays to execs to assist the adoption of their technology. I work for a company that got millions in M$ dollars (In regards to shared marketing, credits towards other products, consulting hours, etc) to push a certain new technologies. I'm intentionally not going into detail, but when MS does a push, they do a full court press - It's significantly more than just buttering up a single individual.

      Since OGG doesn't have ~$50 billion in the bank to promote itself, it's up to us to tell companies that we want this technologies in our iPods, Rios, or player-du-jour. You can have the best piece of tech in the world, but if there's no consumer demand (Read: Money) behind it, it'll fail.

      Not intended as a troll or flame, just stating facts as I see them.

    2. Re:Now begins the hardest part... by sacrilicious · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Any piece of technology, no matter how open, free or innovative is useless unless adopted and widely used.
      I don't think this is a supportable statement. True, the greater the number of people using vorbis then the greater the likelihood that people will find vorbis-encoded material on the internet... but vorbis also is useful to any number of individuals who use it for either its sound quality or its freedom from patents. I suspect that your post was intended to convey the part about the usefulness of large numbers of users, which I agree with, but to declare vorbis otherwise "useless" seems worth straightening out.

      .

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  7. Use Google, silly by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    from (http://www.nouturn.com/goodies/):

    Goodie #1: Ogg Vorbis QuickTime Component
    This allows the user to play Ogg files in most QuickTime applications. As for iTunes support, this will soon be available. At the moment, iTunes doesn't use the standard QuickTime protocol, so it doesn't automatically take advantage of the component. Bad Apple! Not following your own standards!


    A quick search turns up several iTunes plug-ins for visualizations, but not for audio codecs. I don't think the new iTunes 3 changes this. Developing plug-ins for iPod would be a whole 'nother ball o' wax. So I think you're out of luck.

  8. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Future OGG players will decode any Vorbis-file.

    Today many (hardware) MP3 players do not play for example VBR-coded MP3-files.

    Maybe there are more MP3-users because Vorbis was released today?

  9. Radios streaming in Ogg? by mutende · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could you please point me to your favorite ogg streaming radio? I only know of Radio WOPN and I need some change...

    Cheers!

    --
    Unselfish actions pay back better
  10. Re:Hopefully, R3mix.net will pick this up by miracle69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well,
    What is the recommendation for OGG to produce CD-Quality sound - regardless of bitrate?

    Is it still 256k? Is it 192k? Do you tell the VBR to go between 192 and 320? I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of ogg (yet), but I will convert as soon as I find some (or do some) good analysis between OGG and CD audio.

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  11. Re:Try Speex too by jmv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I never tested it myself, but many people reported having no problem getting Speex to work under Win32 and even WinCE. Actually, most of Speex is just a pure ANSI C library that can probably compile on about any platform. Then, there's the file-based encoder/decoder that require libogg and gettext, that's all.

  12. Re:Serious question: iTunes by pigpen_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The iPod uses a PP5002B-C chip made by PortalPlayer. It decodes as well as encodes MP3, WAV, and AIFF. Too bad Apple didn't include a sound in jack. AnandTech did a review of the iPod. Now Apple could always code a nice ogg decoder and flash it to the firmware. This would involve codnig an integer decoder for vorbis and would also likely decrease the long battery life the iPod gets. Like I said before, I don't see ogg coming to the iPod anytime soon. And considering the fact that apple is putting all their weight behind Mpeg4 and AAC, I bet we see AAC on the iPod before we see ogg.

    --
    Zambozay! My brain must've been eatin' a sandwich!
  13. Re:(don't flame me) Why? by saarbruck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think in your case, you've got a slick setup that works, so why change it?

    Some of us are a little more nuts, and don't mind re-ripping a couple hundred CDs when the Next Best Format comes along. Maybe it's cool, maybe it's a little bit better quality, maybe there's a certain satisfaction in disassociating yourself from a format that's not open (MP3, Real, Windows Media). When you get down to nuts and bolts, they're all pretty darn impressive compression schemes with a host of bitrate options and quality settings.

    Once upon a time, I had my entire CD collection encoded as RealMedia, because I was going for space-saving over quality and Real was perceptibly better at low bitrates at that time. But I got so tired of the way their software takes over your desktop, keeps processes running in the background that you can't easily disable, and especially the constant bickering between Real and Microsoft about who broke whose compatibility. So I switched to MP3 because the hassle of re-encoding my collection was easier to bear than using products from annoying companies.

    So, I'm like you... I think Ogg's great, and in fact I'm using it in a side project of mine for playback, but my entire CD collection is now MP3 and I don't intend to re-rip it unless there's a compelling ease-of-use reason.

    To each his or her own. Don't let it bake your noodle.

    s.

    --
    I am the very model of a modern major general!
  14. Re:Try Speex too by Turing+Machine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've played with it a little bit under both Windows and Linux.

    One problem that turns up when compiling with Visual C++ is that all the float[] arrays initialized with constants cause the compiler to emit thousands of warnings about casting const double to float. It's not an actual error, of course, but it IS irritating. I could be wrong, but I think the ANSI spec does state that a constant like 1.234235 is considered double by default. It's possible that it's just a M$ thing, though.

    Nice work, though! I'm looking forward to the final version.

    On the patent issue which you (and many others in OSS) are facing: I've often wondered if perhaps these projects might make good projects for law students specializing in intellectual property. You know, the sort of deal where the student does all the work under the supervision of a professor.

    I have no idea if law students do anything like this. It's pretty common in engineering and computer science.

  15. Re:Why the equalizer is fluff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Except for those in the population who might have hearing problems and may well need to amplify certain ranges in order to hear them. Different people have different sensitivities to different ranges. Just because you might not see a reason for people wanting to mess with an equalizer doesn't mean that no one has reason to want to.