Slashdot Mirror


NetBSD 1.5.3 Released, 1.6 On The Way

djcdplaya writes: "The highly portable NetBSD has reached a new milestone. OSNews.com is reporting that NetBSD 1.5.3 has been released. 1.5.3 was released correcting some bugs and adding some additional security. It also has improved device driver support." Part of the same announcement: "Please note that a new major release of NetBSD, version 1.6, is currently in beta test and should be released within a few weeks.

11 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. Changelog by tps12 · · Score: 3, Funny
    New ports added include:
    • Atari 2600 and 5200
    • GE appliances
    • Nintendo Game&Watch products
    • Boeing 747
    • Deep Blue, and
    • NuBus PowerPC
    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  2. old news really by josepha48 · · Score: 2
    I had ssaid that a few days ago .... -> http://bsd.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=36307&cid= 3913089

    One more thing to note is that the web site stil has not bee updated and some of these binaries are about a month old... guess I'll upgrade tomorrow afternoon... something to do at work ;-)

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  3. Lets Thank All the Developers! by Cardhore · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have had NetBSD for about 6 months now, and all I can say is that the software is brilliant. I am genuinely stunned by how good this is. And I am genuinely thankful to all the people who made this possible. I know it is a little unfair to mention anyone by name but;

    Richard Stallman; I think you are a genius.

    Linus; many thanks for making your magnificent kernel available to us all forever via the GPL. If I had ever written anything this good, I would have been reluctant to part with it, but you gave it away. I hope you are soon rich as well as famous.

    ESR; what can I say, keep up the good work I guess. Try not to take everything that is said too personally. Like all the others, I don't agree with everything you say, but I think your contribution is overwhelmingly positive. And I think you write well. This is something not all good programmers can do, or want to do.

    So far I have NetBSD running on 3 machines. I have the complete home LAN going with IP masquerading and all that. I have never had a crash, but to be honest sometimes I have screwed up my systems so badly the best way to recover was just to reboot and start again. Quicker than reading the manual if you know what I mean, just hit it with a bigger hammer. I have a real talent for screwing up routing tables.

    I would guess that Linux has saved me at least USD$5,000-00, and maybe USD$10,000-00. I base this estimate on the software savings (the missing BLOATware), hardware savings and over priced upgrades to both that I can now permanently avoid. My gateway/server box is a P75 for instance, with an 8 gig drive. Intra-LAN pings take 0.5 milliseconds on 100 meg PCI cards with a 10 meg hub. Me, I can wait 0.5 microseconds for a packet. Especially when it puts 10 grand in my pocket.

    There was an 'astroturfed?' thread here a while ago about everyone who uses Linux having a ton of books and CD's lying around essentially as papers weights with no useful system to show for it. In my case, I have 4 distributions already, but I also have a very useful system. I will try an explain... I have all these distributions because they are so cheap, and because whenever I want some new component for the system, like StarOffice 5.1 for instance, the download is too big and if you buy it from StarDivision (here in Freemont) they want $39-00. If you go to Fry's (the local electrical store) you can find a complete distribution containing the single thing you want, plus upgrades for all the others for $24-95. I am thinking of Caldera 2.2 here. So why not just take the whole thing? So invariably, I do.

    In summary, it is difficult to believe that something this good could be produced in such an unusual way. If I had not seen it with my own eyes I would not have believed it.

    My advice to anyone is just try it. You will save a small fortune, learn a lot, have a lot of fun.

    1. Re:Lets Thank All the Developers! by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 2

      yhbt. hand.

      A very funny troll too, I might add.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
  4. NetBSD for workstations? by pschmied · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wow, am I ever pleasantly surprised! I'm running a recent beta snapshot of NetBSD 1.6. What has really impressed me is the ownership the pkgsrc (similar to the ports, but with some extra goodies) people have taken of their ports.

    The pkgsrc version of KDE 3.0.1 is _very_ high quality. Everything works as expected (except ksirc in the kmenu which must have the path specified).

    Seriously folks, if you haven't looked at NetBSD because you wondered what its niche is, try it for your workstation. A lot of people recommend FreeBSD for workstations and servers, OpenBSD for firewalls, and NetBSD for your toaster that should be running *BSD. Don't believe it. NetBSD is a very comfortable workstation.

    Some other things that have impressed me with NetBSD:

    • The new init system. Starting services is logical and a snap
    • How much better disk performance is than I remember it.
    • /usr/X11R6/bin/xf86cfg. NetBSD is one of the few distributions that has really configured this to work. This program autodetects all of my hardware. All I need to do is set what screen resolutions I want. (right click on the monitor in the "screen" section.
    • The very high quality of the pkgsrc collection. Everything that I have built has gone off without a hitch.
    • ...there's a lot more folks.
    NetBSD has really impressed me with this version (1.6), and it isn't even fully released. I strongly recommend it to anyone interested in a robust, easily maintained workstation.

    -Peter

    1. Re:NetBSD for workstations? by Arandir · · Score: 2

      I don't even have to do step 2. Get with the program :-)

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  5. Well, that's an intelligent story by The+FooMiester · · Score: 5, Informative
    No links to netBSD from slashdot. I guess that's why MY submission of the story was rejected.

    Here ya go, click and drool:

    netbsd.org
    ftp.netbsd.org
    official text of the release
    Mirror listing, for when the ftp server gets slashdotted

    --
    The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
    1. Re:Well, that's an intelligent story by jschauma · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Also, FreeBSD's new scheduler gets on the main page, every semi-serious release of Debian-, Slackware-, Mandrake-, and Foo-Linux get on the main page, premature announcements of *any*thing get on the main page, but a long awaited release of the most portable operating system in the world does not get on the main page.

      I wonder if 1.6, when it is announced, will be considered worthy.

      --

      -- "Tradition is the illusion of permanence."
  6. Re:Ez-Drive by josepha48 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I installed NetBSD on a machine that has windows and it recgonized the windows partition and allows me to boot of that partition.

    I also have netbsd installed on what used to be the windows d drive so I'm sure it is possible to boot from the non-first hd.

    lastly you'd be best off visting the netbsd.org web site and seeing if there is support for the hard drive you mention. I'd suspect it would work, unless there is something really weird about the drive.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  7. Re:Ez-Drive by dinivin · · Score: 2


    You can easily chainload the NetBSD drive/partition.

    An entry from my GRUB menu:

    title NetBSD - 1.5.2
    root (hd3,0)
    chainloader +1

    Simply enough :-)

  8. Re:Nice. by batobin · · Score: 2

    I agree. I started out on Linux, moved to FreeBSD, and ended my search for the "right" OS with NetBSD. I found that even somewhat mainstream hardware wasn't supported on FreeBSD, while NetBSD already had every problem worked out.

    Net also just seems higher quality. FreeBSD ports would shove stuff all over my system, but NetBSD has a very well laid out tree where files go. FreeBSD seems to be quick to jump on the bandwagon, but NetBSD seems to do it right.

    Just my 2 cents. I never tried out NetBSD until FreeBSD didn't work. Since then, I've installed it on all my boxes, even those that are supported by FreeBSD.