Slashdot Mirror


Shuttle SS51 Reviewed

hilldaddy writes "AnandTech has a review up of the new Shuttle SS51 XPC. Looks like they finally added an AGP slot. Read the review." We've done several previous stories on the Shuttle mini-PC systems.

72 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. The Shuttle by JPriest · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a shuttle bare bones system a while back for LAN gaming. I really like the system, it's quiet and about as large as my toaster, but I ended up replacing the C3 with something faster.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  2. Ratter stupid name by MouseR · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    considering a very resembling STS-51 less successful one.

    1. Re:Ratter stupid name by Plutor · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Actually, the Challenger mission was actually mission "51-L". STS-51 came 7 years later, and involved a four-times-aborted launch of the Discovery.

  3. not very appealing to the eyes. by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Anyone else find it not the greatest looking thing around? I guess it doesn't matter if you shove it under a desk, but I"m not sure it's something I'd want on top of my desk or sitting out in the open. The SS50 at least looked decent, but they added too much flashy stuff to it, and it looks silly.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:not very appealing to the eyes. by zaren · · Score: 2

      I dunno... it looks a lot nicer than a lot of other cases that I've seen, and a damn sight better looking than some "name brand" machines you could buy at a major retailer. It's a cute size, too...

      I've never built a machine from scratch before, being a Mac guy and all, but a compact, well-designed box like this might tempt me to build one someday.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  4. Nice alternative to... by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Rack mounts, but costs aside...Wouldn't you rather have a 4 space ATA rack case with a 1u computer, a 1u UPS, 1u keyboard/LCD and a 1u 24port switch all within a nice carryable package that it doesn't hurt throw in the back of the car?

    These are really cool though for their small footprint, but personally I have been carrying around a Supermicro S-760 case for a few years now fully loaded, and its pretty heavy, but I really don't mind- it's strong enough to hold up one end of the table, or to be able to sit my UPS on top. These could be cool for LAN parties, but the exact reason I bought such a large case was for massive expandablity- multiple scsi drives, cdr, dvd, multiprocessor, etc...

    It really could be cool for Lans though, but that LianLi alumnium case also fixes weight problem too.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  5. one more step ... by timothy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was interested to see that Shuttle has a new case out with an AGP slot, but it's still one-off from what I'd like, because it doesn't take AMD chips, which I prefer.

    Does anyone know of a similar case for Durons / Athlons? I hope this is Shuttle's next move, because these cases are quite nice looking.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:one more step ... by H3XA · · Score: 3, Informative

      that would be the SS40G..... no AGP slot though - wait and there should be a AMD equivalent of the SS51 soon.

      http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2002q3/shuttle- ss40g/index.x?pg=1

      - HeXa

  6. Change in view? by taeric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In times past (oh, you know, 2 years ago.), it seemed eveyone I knew wanted a full sized tower. At the least, a mid tower was preferred.

    Now, however, it seems things are hopefully turning around. It is quite encouraging to think that in the near future I can finally get rid of all of the crap that clutters my desk due to the computer. Pair this with a flat-panel monitor and you now have noticeably more room above and below your desk.

    Now, I just need to find a way to consolidate all of my power and accessory cables. Those are probably the largest hassle when cleaning for me.

    1. Re:Change in view? by paradesign · · Score: 2

      zip ties are you friend, remember that. if your setup is fairly static, just zip up everything in the back into one nice little bindle and only let cables out where they need to . i do this and it is a night and day difference in terms of noticable clutter. the down side is, what happens if you need to move your computer? or you buy a new monitor, you need to redo all of your hard work... but worth it in my opinion. oh yeah, velcro works to for a more temporary solution, they make it double sided so you can easily make rings with it.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    2. Re:Change in view? by Junta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While an expensive solution, apple seems to have cable reduction high on their list. You have one cable between monitor and system driving power and signal, one cable to keyboard and mouse (since mouse plugs into keyboard, which makes a *hell* of a lot more sense than the traditional PC way, Sun and Apple have it right..). But if apple is unacceptable, their are keyboards and monitors with built in USB hubs, so you can have a more convenient spot to plug stuff in. Of course, if you have a monitor with speakers and a USB hub you want to use, you have speaker, display, usb, and power cable going to it... Nasty... Technically you can get away with 4 cables out of a mac, network, power, display, keyboard, but add one for sound for a decent rig... Hell, get an iMac and not worry about the display cable at all, just worry about not being modular and having something in need of repair or upgrade...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Change in view? by stinkydog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cleaning?

      I think a have a Vic-20 composting at the bottom of my cable pile. Just plug antoher power strip in and add another hub and you are good to go. I figure in a couple of years the cable pile will be nice and fertile and I will be able to plant some optrons there.

      SD

      --
      âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
    4. Re:Change in view? by Junta · · Score: 2

      Wireless is good, and I think the flaw in execution with the keyboard/mouse is not so much being plugged in, but the mouse cable tends to be too short, causing stuff like you describe... If you had a PC mouse plugged in, your cable would be so long that problem wouldn't happen... but then again you have too much ugly cable again... Perhaps more ubiquitous bluetooth might help..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:Change in view? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      But the question remains... Can you put christmas lights inside it?

      I dont think so!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  7. Hexus .co.uk review...... by H3XA · · Score: 5, Informative

    in case you manage to /. Anand's servers.

    Hexus - http://www.hexus.co.uk/review.php?review=395

    - HeXa

  8. Need AMD version... by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone in touch with people building system component by component realizes a great majority of these are AMD based, since they get to see the processor price difference and know the price/performance problems with P4 vs. Athlon. I personally have been eagerly awaiting a version with AGP for AMD, and then I might buy in... I want to have an All-in-Wonder in one of these babies to integrate into my entertainment system...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Need AMD version... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      look up a few parent posts....

      - HeXa

  9. Bought an SV24 by carambola5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks great with the aluminum casing. Was pretty cheap too at $300 for the case, proc, mb, power supply and RAM. Yes, no hdd, fd, or cdrom. This is going to be a diskless system, and I'd have to say that the SV24 fits the bill quite nicely. I'll put up a page when the project is finished.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  10. oops... by H3XA · · Score: 4, Informative

    .... fogot the other two reviews...

    http://www.viahardware.com/ss51xpc_1.shtm
    http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/shuttle/ss51/ss51g p1.htm

    - HeXa

    1. Re:oops... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      My karma is already excellent so why would I bother karma-whoring?

      Most people prefer a second (or third or fourth) opinion on a product before they consider a purchase.

      As for your bitch about not being a clickable link..... it would be clickable if I knew how - I haven't learnt the /. way to do it yet :(

      .... thanks anyway for making them clickable.....

      - HeXa

    2. Re:oops... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      sorry to be wasting your time Mr T. - please don't hit me with your gold chains.

      - HeXa

  11. Re:interesting by gosand · · Score: 3, Funny
    Many mac people claim that they have the best computers because of their size and portablity. Perhaps Windows (or hopefully linux) will be able to show people that we to can make really weird looking small computers too.

    Psst. Windows and Linux are operating systems, not computers.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  12. Re:This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by Junta · · Score: 2

    This thing is clearly targetted at areas like Home Theater, where there aren't really relevant dongle-requiring apps.. If you are running something that requires a dongle, then you probably are at a business buying pre-built systems, not rolling their own..

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  13. I agree. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine is looking into upgrading his machine or simply getting a new one.

    I was thinking of reccommending the SS51 to him... Until I saw that it was a P4 machine.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:I agree. by Junta · · Score: 2

      ummm, still no confirmation of an agp slot there.... I don't care if it has the highest FPS in town, I want something as functional as an all-in-wonder... I know it says 'tv-encoder' but that often means encoding signal *to* tv, and even so, tv capture support under linux may not be possible... Of course with zoomplayer there is actually an acceptable Media player for windows for the role of a home theater pc...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  14. NICE audio feature! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anyone notice that the three audio ports can be remapped between input and output at the user's discretion? Want surround output, set them all to output. Want to record something? Switch a port to input. VERY nice - But is the audio quality up to snuff?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:NICE audio feature! by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. There is no certification for Dolby Digital. All you have to do is match the spec, which is pretty broad.

      The only actual certification process out there is THX, and it's not as great as one might think. THX has bastardized itself into so many sub-varients that you can get crappy little computer speakers that are "THX certified" and still sound like junk. The THX certification process for speakers as a whole has been suspect for a long time now. THX certification for pre-amps, amps, and receivers is another matter, and some of the additional processing it requires (such as reduction of high frequencies) is very valuable (although often available even w/o the THX logo now -- getting that logo is expensive).

    2. Re:NICE audio feature! by Coplan · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's interesting that you bring up audio quality. My friend has one of the old Shuttle bare bones systems, and the sound quality is comparable to the average gaming platform sound card (SB). It's not bad, and it can play MP3s and the like pretty well. Problem is, it's a no-frills on-the-motherboard sound card. So you can't expect nice features like the SB Audigy.

      You especially can't expect anywhere close to the S/N ratios or the Response curves that you get with professional quality sound cards. FYI, The SB Audigy, even though SB would like you to believe so, IS NOT professional quality.

      Good for a hobiest or a gamer. But if you want to write music...the Shuttle small profile systems are not for you. For that matter, anything on the motherboard is often not good enough.

  15. Just what the Dr. ordered by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is what I've been waiting for. Assuming the mobo problem was just a glitch, I'll be getting one of these shortly. I've got a bunch of 50's (the original version) for work and while they're not exactly stealth-quiet, they're great little machines and look quite nice. Space is a premium, since each desk has to have 2 computers (w/KVM switch).

    This is gonna be my main box at home and primary LAN party box. My old box is gonna be relegated to the role of an Apache server. I'll put up a review of how well the SS51 runs my favorite distro when I get the thing in.

  16. Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like so many sites, the folks who did the web pages for Shuttle Computer Group seem to think that nothing can be done without Javascript - you cannot even view their site with JS turned off. I do wish these so-called web designers would realize that some of us either cannot run JS, or choose not to.

    I went to the Shuttle site trying to see if they had non-P4 systems - I'd rather get a 1800MHz processor that runs like 2200MHz than a 2200MHz processor that runs like 1800MHz. Also, I'd like to know how compatible this system is with Linux.

    Lastly, while it has 2 optical SPDIF ports, I'd like to have a unit with a co-ax port. Why? My stereo has one optical and one co-ax input, and the optical is being used by my DirectTivo - I'd like to use the co-ax for my MP3 player.

    Of course, what I'd really like is a simple USB -> SPDIF converter - no other I/O, just USB in and SPDIF co-ax out.

    1. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Let's see - pay $110 for a device that is basically nothing more than a single-chip USB interface and a couple of optical drivers?

      That's my problem - I have a pretty good idea what the Bill Of Materials on something like this is, and the price is just too steep.

      I realize they aren't getting the volumes that, say, a joystick might get, but COME ON!

    2. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by adolf · · Score: 2

      You must be looking very hard for the things you seem to want...

      RadioShack springs to mind as a place to pick up an optical switch for toslink, fairly cheaply. Whether it uses mirrors, or close-coupled light pipes, or whatever, it probably works justfine.

      Midiman sells a converter (called "CO2", IIRC) which converts between optical and coaxial SP/DIF. They pop up on Ebay from time to time, and work well for a variety of tasks (SCMS stripping, anyone?).

      The inexpensive Audio Alchemy DDE v1.1 that I use as a DAC for my computer has coaxial and optical inputs, as well as an isolated, re-clocked coax output which just mirrors whatever input is selected.

      Edirol has a product here which has five connections: USB, toslink in/out, and coaxial in/out.

      Finally, as configurable as the sound support is on the Shuttle board, I'd be very surprised if one couldn't turn one of its three multi-purpose jacks into a coax output using nothing but a software switch.

    3. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Acutally, I have looked long and hard for what I want:

      The Radio Shack solution isn't - I want to be able to switch under electronic control, not manual. If I have to run downstairs to the server room every time I want to change from video to MP3 I could just as easily pull cables by hand.

      The MidiMan CO-2 looks interesting, but I still would have to get SPDIF out on my sound server, which is currently running a SB64. If I have to buy a new card, I can buy one that has co-ax SPDIF on it, so the MidiMan doesn't solve my problem.

      The Audio Alchemy seems to run about $100 - once again, rather pricy considering the BOM in such a unit. Having quality DACs does drive the price up, but that is why I'd rather have a unit that just had digital output - it should be cheaper.

      The Edirol is also too expensive (see previous paragraph, as well as previous post in this thread).

      So far, I've not found anything that fits my needs. What is maddening to me is that a device that fits my needs needn't be expensive - a single chip solution is easily achievable. However, I guess there is just not the market to drive the development of such a device.

      Thanks for the leads, though - they were at least worth checking out.

    4. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by adolf · · Score: 2

      You didn't mention you wanted it -cheap-. ;)

      If you can spare a PCI slot, buy a Zoltrix Nightingale and the toslink adapter for it. Should cost less than $25, shipped.

      The card is a bit limited in the scope of what it can do (for instance, it -only- supports 44.1 or 48KHz, has no internal synth or resampling or DSP or anything else), but is bit-perfect from end to end - a claim that no other consumer-oriented card I know of can make.

      The card+daughtercard combo I have of that gives me toslink I/O, coax out, and 4 (nearly worthless) channels of analog out. I've never used the coax out, but the toslink worked fine within its very predictable set of limitations.

      I find, however, that I'm happier with the SB Live 5.1 that I snagged for a $30-35, which includes a coax output. Every now and then, I want to play non-windows games, or do non-44.1/48k things, and the Zoltrix card was making that too hard. The Live 5.1 card makes it easy. *shrug* Some people complain that the coaxial output on it is completely devoid of any similarity to any written standard for SP/DIF, but it Works Fine (tm) with the aforementioned Audio Alchemy box which predates it by several years.

      Or, your Soundblaster 64's E8k chip has a coaxial SP/DIF output, already. The trick is to get MP3s to play using the synth chip instead of however it's normally done - I saw patches for this, ages ago... On my AWE 32s, there's a two-pin jumper next to a fat, square IC labeles Ensoniq which is the digital out, though I've never tried it myself.

    5. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      I'd thought about the SPDIF hacks on the AWE64 (why the designers felt the wavetable deserved digital and the PCM didn't is beyond me...), but for some of the things I do, I want the device to act just like /dev/dsp...

      I guess when I rebuild the server next, I'll have to try to use a system that has built-in digital audio out... My server currently has three NICs, a SCSI, a second IDE card, and is FULL!

  17. will anybody ever figure it out??? by j1mmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they put a headphone jack, usb ports, and firewire up front, but the KEYBOARD AND MOUSE PORTS ARE STILL IN BACK. Are designers just dense? Many people actually use ps/2 mice and keyboards. If you're going to put ports up front, why not these too?

    1. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by Junta · · Score: 2

      Putting everything in front will look too crowded. If you are using ps/2 components, you probably are not hot-plugging them, so they can afford to be in back. If you want to have a nice setup coming out of the front with a decent reach, get a usb keyboard with integrated usb hub and plug a USB mouse into that keyboard. Why the hell would you want keyboard and mouse both to go all the way to the system when they just need a single connection...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by zrodney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      buy yourself a new keyboard and mouse -- usb

    3. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by Webmonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only ports that people need frequent access to belong in the front. If you're constantly changing your keyboard and mouse, you should stop eating soup over your computer.

  18. That's not a stability issue... by Thag · · Score: 2
    ...For Shuttle, at least:
    We ran into a number of stability issues that could be attributed to the FS51; including a strange problem where a Word document became corrupt while it was open on the system.
    What's strange about that? Every version of Word after 95 spontaneously corrupts documents in a number of ways! Too bad OpenOffice isn't quite there yet...

    Jon Acheson
    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  19. oops SV24 by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2

    Rather, I have a bunch of SV24's, not 50's as I wrote before. We have about 10 or so of these and they're great little office boxen. Only had to RMA one bad power supply. Rest are hummin' (literally) along.

  20. Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by pogle · · Score: 2

    A friend and I have been tossing around the idea of a backpacked minirig system for some time now, making use of small scrap cases from HP or something and the smallest form factor parts we could find. We wanted to build the entire thing into a backpack, so we just unzip a pocket, pull out a power cord and cat-5, and plug them in to go. This would be for both LAN parties and just doing work on the fly, and much less expensive than a laptop; more upgradeable too.

    The Shuttle setups seem almost ideal to this, as they've already solved some of the cooling problems we were finding with our minirigs. I'm just waiting to see what a Shuttle w/nForce2 looks like, and maybe some AMD support instead of Intel.

    I noticed recently a new rollup keyboard on thinkgeek as well, which would be suited, so long as it works well; small factor mice are readily available for laptops, so those arent an issue.

    Have any other /.ers tried/accomplished anything like this? Also, for those of you who've used them, whats your personal opnions on Shuttles other models? I'm especially interested in the cooling issues, as building a computer into a backpack creates even more :)

    --
    http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    1. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2

      A word of advice: don't tip the box.

      I just bought a SS40G, based on an Athlon XP chip. The heatpipe-based CPU cooler is nice, but its design seems to be based on the assumption that the box will be flat on the desktop, with the CPU fins/tubes flat, level and below the radiator fins/tubes. Not a bad assumption, I suppose, but the upshot is that if you tip it back (so the front is raised), then the heatpipes don't work properly, and the fan has to kick up to higher speeds = more noise. I suspect that if you tried to run it on its side, or upside down, you'd have some major cooling issues. YMMV.

      (Actually, I'm starting to wonder if mine is defective, because it seems to be running hotter than any of the reviews would suggest. The AnandTech review did mention QC problems...)

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by pogle · · Score: 2

      I was actually wondering about this, thanks.

      I was thinking of building a frame into a backpack, and using straps to secure the chassis into the air in the middle of the frame. Add some flexible shock protection (elastic or something), and it would ensure a stable base when sitting still, and shock protection for transport. This would also keep the space free from all around the case for heat and airflow issues.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    3. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by pogle · · Score: 2

      So would you recommend this keyboard to someone lookng for both LAN party gaming and typing the occassion paper or coding? I'm preparing a rather large order from thinkgeek of some other stuff, and would like to include this if its a decent keyboard. Definitely seems the best for small space storage, anyways :)

      Thanks.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
  21. SV24 Power Supply by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 3, Informative
    I RMAed my power supply directly to shuttle and they sent it back. I duct-taped an ATX power supply to the SV24 until the new one came in, then just swapped them out. Contact them and see if they'll replace just the power supply. If not, ask them if you can just buy a power supply. They've been very accomodating with me so far and components do fail, so they should be more than willing to sell you one - even if they won't replace it.

    (note - I'm not affiliated with Shuttle in any way, shape, or form)

  22. I'm Waiting for the NForce2 Shuttle. by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although this is a good P4 machine, I'm an AMD fan, so this machine really doesn't interest me too much.

    The one I'm waiting for is the Nforce2 Shuttle that will be released soon. It's for AMD, it's Onboard Video and Audio is very good so you wont need to replace it as soon unlike other onboard components, where it's almost necessary, and it's upgradeable just like the SS51 is.

    The Nforce2 Shuttle wil be a good LAN gaming machine out of the box, whereas the SS51 needs a Video and Possibly an audio card right off the bat

  23. Another review.. by rehabdoll · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firingsquad also has a review up.

    http://firingsquad.gamers.com/

  24. Not all of us have a surround system. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Over the years, my computer has replaced more and more of my media systems.

    Why not replace an expensive AC3 decoder with onboard decoding and some external cheap amps? (I'm not saying get a noname amp - I'm saying get a good name amp that is a decade or so old. Sound quality's the same, the only difference is all sorts of doodads you don't need.) Or one of the recent sets of PC speakers designed for use with surround-capable soundcards?

    But as I asked earlier, I wonder what the quality of the onboard audio is. The onboard audio on my Epox EP-8KHA (VIA chipset onboard) is just plain unacceptable for ANY use - HORRENDOUS feedback/squealing.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  25. Want to buy. UK source? by mccalli · · Score: 2
    Seriously, this machine is exactly what I'm looking for.

    Anyone know a UK source, or someone willing to import?

    Cheers,
    Ian

  26. Cooling and Air Pressure by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The single fan in the SS51 pulls air from the inside of the case and exhausts it through the rear vents. Holes in the sides of the case act as cool air intakes that are functional through the low pressure that's created on the inside of the case courtesy of the single exhaust fan.

    As an aside, wouldn't low pressure air absorb less heat? Wouldn't it be better to direct the airflow in, thus having the pressure be higher at the heat sink?

    Then, of course, you'd be blowing hot air around the inside of the computer case. Still... anyone have some actual knowledge to drop on this subject?

    -jim

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  27. Re:Gnah, almost but not quite. by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

    I'm sure heat is one of the main factors prohibiting them from adding an AMD version. Intel CPUs run much cooler than their AMD counterparts [I tried finding a link to Tom's Hardware (www.tomsharware.com) video where he takes the heat sinks off and the AMD chips fry) so I imagine it would be much tougher to implement a cooling solution in such a small case.

    That's not really it. Simply put, Shuttle hasn't put one together yet. The article states that they are working on an nForce2-based model on the SS51 for use with AMD CPUs. Since the nForce2 boards haven't hit the street yet then you won't see the AMD model for a little while.

    Shuttle does already make versions of their XPC that take AMD processors and they don't have any heat problems. The only difference is that their existing AMD and Intel lines (until the SS51) did not have an AGP slot.

  28. Re:Parallel port.. by mccalli · · Score: 2
    Every time I've gotten to the point of almost buying one, I've stopped because there's no parallel port, and I need one to plug my SNES pad into.

    Perhaps these USB to parallel adaptors would help. Bit pricy perhaps - ~$40 for the cheapest there.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  29. Graphics for the Shuttle SS50? by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    I bought a Shuttle SS50 this month (gee, if I'd waited, I could have gotten an AGP slot...). Nice system, runs a bit hot, I wonder if the SS51 heat pipe can be retrofitted.

    However, I would like to put a PCI graphics accelerator in it for LAN gaming. Question is, what's a good midrange PCI 3D card for this purpose? GeForce cards are out of the picture 'cause the reviewers point out that this chipset is too data-transfer-intensive to work well over a PCI bus. Suggestions, anyone? JPriest, what card did you use, and how much did it improve things? (Seems to me the internal on-board video's faster data path might reduce its slowness relative to a PCI plugin card, but I might be wrong...)

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  30. Re:What's missing ... by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

    Also, it looks (from the photos on their site) like the case is getting slightly bigger in the newer models. Soon we'll have a (gasp) mini-tower again!

    It isn't really bigger than the old ones. From the article:

    The chassis is about 8" wide, 5" tall and 11.5" deep (20.32 x 12.7 x 29.21 cm), making it around the size of a toaster but not quite as small as Apple's PowerMac G4 Cube.

    There is a small photo at the top left of each page of the review that makes it look like it's much taller than it really is, but that's only because for some reason they stretched the image vertically.

  31. Re:This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by mccalli · · Score: 2
    If you are running something that requires a dongle, then you probably are at a business buying pre-built systems, not rolling their own..

    I understand your point, but I'm interested in running Cubase on this. I'm specifically interested in the box because it's very quiet, but Cubase requires a dongle which connects via the parallel port.

    The problem can be solved, I think, by getting a USB to parallel adaptor.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  32. Pressure difference is insignificant by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    The difference in density of the cooling air due to the pressure rise or drop across the fan is utterly negligible in terms of heat capacity per unit volume, and may well be swamped by the results of heating of the air by the CPU heatsink (in those cases where the air path goes that way; the SS51 doesn't do that.)

    The pressure across the fan is way less than 0.1 PSI, compared to 14 PSI ambient pressure at sea level, so a crude analysis would say the effect is way less than 0.5%, most likely hundreds of times less.

    If you pass the air across the CPU first and then through the power supply as in the SS50, you likely get hotter PS temperatures 'cause the temp difference is lower, reducing the amount of heat transfer until the PS heats up more.)

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  33. Re:Upgradability goes further than just the mobo by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why this computer isn't for everyone. When you buy small, integrated systems, you instantly sacrifice some level of upgrades and expansion for the small box.

    Small, expandable, inexpensive. Pick two.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  34. Nifty design, but not that quiet by koreth · · Score: 4, Informative
    Three cheers to Shuttle for taking noise into account in their design, but I hardly think it's reasonable to describe 51dB as "near-silent" like the review does. With careful selection of components and some custom tweaks (replacing power supply fans, etc.) it's not too outrageously difficult to get a reasonably powered PC in the mid-30dB range. My desktop PC is about 35dB and it's still louder than I'd like.

    If you're willing to go with water cooling or something like the CALM System's evaporative cooling, you can get even quieter than that. Or you can do what I did and run cables under the floor so you can put the thing in a closet and shut the door.

    Yahoo's Silent-PC list and AVS Forum have lots of good info on building PCs a lot quieter than the new Shuttle.

    But not as tiny!

  35. Re:last page of the article by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Woooo! That's going to be the ultimate Shuttle bitty box...nForce2-based. The first nForce already has very usable sound onboard and the first decent onboard video of any all-in-one kit.

    This is going to be the LAN party hot setup. Maybe Santa will leave one under the tree this Xmas. ;-)

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  36. Is the SS51 The Next Big Thing ?? by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    All of my coworkers are excited about the SS51, I have a feeling it's going to be a huge seller... perhaps even one of the best selling pieces of PC kit this year. I wouldn't be too surprised if, over the next six months or so, we start seeing this little wonder popping up all over the place... offices, retail point-of-sale, on sitcom sets, etc.

    In a related note, I'm curious about the "optional parallel port"... is it nothing more than a USB adapter? I would love a real parallel port as I perfer parallel for printers.

  37. Yup, the SS50 does look cool. by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    IMHO, better'n the SS51. A brushed aluminum cube looks spiffier to me than the same with a clear plastic faceplate tacked on.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  38. Thanks. Good to know by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    I run Win98 SE on mine (amazingly, I was still able to buy a copy), Win2K is a bit more resource-hungry IIRC, and XP is *not* to come into my house or it'll get shot on sight. If this weren't a LAN-party box, I'd have it dual-booting Mandrake. HL/CS, Operation Flashpoint (great game, BTW) and StarCraft are the major uses for it, and it seems to do all right in terms of frame rate, though testing is still in progress...

    73 de N1XNX

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  39. Differing definitions of "good" by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for your input. If it's comparable to any SB, then it's pretty good for an onboard sound chipset. Not that I'm saying SB is better than most - Even super-cheapie Yamaha chipset cards are "acceptable", i.e. I can't tell the difference for gaming/home multimedia use.

    My definition of "bad" is the onboard audio on VIA KT266 chipsets, such as my Epox EP-8KHA. It SUCKS. It has this obscenely loud high-pitched squealing that gives you a splitting headache on 1-2 minutes flat. Needless to say, I'm now VERY wary of onboard audio solutions.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  40. Re:Need AMD version... it's coming! by frankie · · Score: 2
    awaiting a version with AGP for AMD

    Wait another couple months. The SN40 is coming. It's based on the nForce2 chipset, but otherwise expect similar specs to the SS51.

    SN40 is probably the machine that will get me to switch my home computer from PPC to x86.
  41. Another review... by Polo · · Score: 2

    Here is another review by Thresh's Firingsquad.

  42. USB Dongles by Thag · · Score: 2

    Hardware keys are available in USB flavors too.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  43. 3x2=6 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Simlple - Each port has 2 channels (Stereo)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  44. Re:Need at least 2 5.25" bays by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

    One thing: Lian Li PC-9300, perhaps? No idea about availability, I sure haven't seen it around these parts yet, but... Check out the other similar case mentioned in the review, too, perhaps. And start reading Dan's stuff, and give him plenty of donations so I don't have to. Thank you. ;^)

    --
    main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  45. Re:it exists - ss40G by Junta · · Score: 2

    No AGP slot though, which is what I need for my ideal system. It is in the works, however, as other posts have pointed out...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  46. Re:This is a legit question! Not troll! by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 2

    I'm running a SS50 right now, and it runs Linux fine- The biggest problem is the video is an SIS part that is not fully supported under linux- they won't release their IP. There is one page that has some details on what it takes to get it going (code and so-forth) but it's not simple- it takes a bit of work.

    I like my ss50 a lot- a little pricey for a barebones system, but it is relatively quiet, and has been running without a hitch for a couple weeks now. The only thing I'm really missing at this point is a decent way to monitor the temperature sensors and fan speed under linux- I haven't had much luck with the lm-sensors package.

  47. Do-it-yourself for the rest of us? by hoggoth · · Score: 2

    I want a Shuttle SS51. It's exactly what I need for my "living room" PC. (I like the P4 > AMD for it's better heat handling)

    But unlike many Slashdot readers I have no clue what parts to get to flesh out a barebones system.

    If I ordered the SS51, what do I do next?
    Are there some good FAQs for building your own system?

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)