Slashdot Mirror


Narrative and Weblogs: the Blognovel

Diego writes "A few days ago I started Plan B -- a blognovel as a way of exploring the narrative constraints created by a weblog, and whether it is at all possible to use it as an artistic medium to produce interesting work. It also presents some interesting challenges on the UI side: what kind of navigation to use besides the basic calendar navigation of the blog? How could it be made obvious that it's not intended to replace print or even ebooks? I thought the slashdot community would have a lot useful things to say about all of these issues. I've also put together a short intro page and a FAQ that I think will be useful to start the conversation: What is Plan B? and the Plan B FAQ."

202 comments

  1. So you can sit me here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and argue over who posted first?

    Operation Packrat is 1% complete.

  2. f p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yea

  3. I tried that myself once. by Teknogeek · · Score: 1

    Way back in the early days of my LiveJournal, I was working on a fantasy story called 'Chronicles of the Sunsword'.

    I dropped a paragraph or two in each day.

    Unfortunately, it didn't really work out for me.

    Still, it's nice to see this as happening, and I hope he sticks with it longer than I did.

    --
    I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
  4. Let me save you some effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    as a way of exploring... whether it is at all possible to use [a weblog] as an artistic medium to produce interesting work.

    No.

    1. Re:Let me save you some effort by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh come on.

      It's not just 'No.'

      It's 'Fuck no' or 'Hell no', depending on your bend.

      --

      --
      You sure got a purty mouth...

    2. Re:Let me save you some effort by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      How about the blog as a political medium to influence opinion. Matt Drudge was able to parlay his blog into a Fox news talk show (until folk discovered he is really a clueless dweeb).

      For a completely unbiased, bipartisan view of US politics I always go to the Bush Impeachment Countdown.

      However I do protest at the posters transparent attempt to increase their position in the rankings page by using the sladshdot effect.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Let me save you some effort by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2

      The blog stuff does get news out that the mainstream media does not print. So a reference in a blog on MSNBC to an article in a small paper that reveals that Harken oil was using an offshore tax haven in the caymans to cheat the IRS while Bush was a director gets picked up by the Bush Impeachment Coundown, and I am now posting it here - all in less time than it takes Chris Mathews to give a fawning interview to Ann Coulter.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  5. Pick another title, Plan B is already a novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plan B is already the title of a novel by Sharon Lee and Steve Miller. Please pick another title. ;)

  6. Seems to me... by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that people start diaries/journals/blogs/what have you and then realize they've wasted their time, so they try to make money/fame/something useful out of it.

    1. Re:Seems to me... by dev0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i beg to differ. i have had a blog since the beginning of 2000, and i have never felt as if i was wasting my time. blogs are great ways to experiment with writing, to get out your feelings, and to generate discussion amongst your peer group.

    2. Re:Seems to me... by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood me. I wasnt saying that it was a waste of time. I was saying that once certain people realize they've wasted their time, they try to make it into something useful.

    3. Re:Seems to me... by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      they try to make money/fame/something useful out of it.

      Um, I think you've managed to state the goals of everthing any person has ever done. So maybe you should quit your job because it only gets you money. Don't post on slashdot so you have no chance of fame (yeah right), and go shoot yourself since you're probably trying to do something useful with your life.

    4. Re:Seems to me... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

      It's more of a waste of time to read a blog than it is to write one.

  7. I like the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a interesting idea one that has been done befor to an extent, but it was interesting then and interesting now. Hopefully you can go further than the last guy. Make sure you post the url when you have it running I know alot of people that will love to read it.

  8. Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I buy a book at least I can be sure of correct grammar and punctuation. In other words, I can actually follow what the author is trying to say rather than spew out. Why should I read something that's going to annoy the crap out of me with incorrect grammar and poor use of punctuation?

    Oh, and if this post is full of grammar and punctuation mistakes then knock yourselves out, I'm not trying to claim to be an author, this guy is.

    1. Re:Grammar by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Just because a flash site can be bad, doesn't mean it will be.

      Same goes for web logs. Especially since it's intended as a project more than an online diary.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Grammar by Kikaid. · · Score: 0
      The misuse of grammer, punctuation, (and even spelling errors), are things inherrent to blogs and online forums, probably because of the speed at which people post comments. Its part of "cyber-speak" for lack of better term. Like all this "l33t" stuff and emoticons. I find it creative and I could see at as a viable way to help tell stories. It would also point out the fact that the story itself was a democratic, community effort.

      2 things to consider: the poems of ee cummings and the fact that often times in fiction certain characters are annoying.

      --

      (This post does not contain emoticons or l337.)

    3. Re:Grammar by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      Well, I try to be careful with that too. :) There is nothing more annoying than grammatical/syntactical mistakes that get in the way of fiction. Light editing doesn't necessarily mean crappy content, at least not to me, and the nature of the weblog allows corrections if necessary.

  9. this is retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares about his blog..

    journals are self-indulgent wankfests

  10. Blogs are for stupid surveys. by Zaphod+B · · Score: 2

    The limits of the narrative style are many, especially because every novel would have to start with "If I were a $OBJECT, I'd be..."

    --
    Zaphod B
    When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
  11. blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am blog. I have the voice. Hahahahaha.

    1. Re:blog by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      We are the Blog. Resistance is futile. You will be a-similie'd.

  12. Very similar concept to Memento by OneStepFromElysium · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Memento used a storytelling style very similar to what you are describing. In fact, it's easy to see that story being done in a blog style.

    1. Re:Very similar concept to Memento by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      Except that Memento relied on the backwards flow to tell the story. If you watched each scene in the right order, it would have been a pretty dumb movie. He's proposing more of a "random-access" story.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    2. Re:Very similar concept to Memento by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, did you see that video clip on the net about the guy that puts a Memento in his girlfriend's pussy so that he can eat her! So a blog is like a girl with some sort of genital disease, right?

    3. Re:Very similar concept to Memento by micromoog · · Score: 2
      Dude, you should really check your links before posting.

      He's naughty, He's nice, and He's coming to save Christmas.

    4. Re:Very similar concept to Memento by tom.allender · · Score: 1
      If you watched each scene in the right order, it would have been a pretty dumb movie.

      You can actually do that with the DVD release of Memento, however dumb it may seem...

  13. Purpose of a novel by moebius_4d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've tried my hand at a novel before, as my half-shelf of writing books will attest. It seems to me that the whole reason for a novel, or fiction generally, is to communicate an emotional state to the reader. Even SF boils down to this - otherwise, why have characters, why not just write speculative monographs about technology? It's about exploring the human condition and sharing the results.

    So what I'd like to understand is how you think this medium and method will enhance that purpose. Why should access to unfinished work, or continuous feedback from reader of that work, help an author convey what must initally be an internal state or vision?

    It's an interesting topic more generally, since by and large (I except computer games) computers haven't really added any new media at all. And while Doom may have scared the shit out me at times, it's clear that the richness of the experience was far behind Shakespeare, or even Lovecraft.

    Thanks for starting what could potentially be an interesting discussion.

    1. Re:Purpose of a novel by Triv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You wanted an interesting discussion, so here goes.

      I've tried my hand at a novel before, as my half-shelf of writing books will attest.

      Yep, I've got one of those too (just to establish my pseudo-credentials).

      It seems to me that the whole reason for a novel, or fiction generally, is to communicate an emotional state to the reader.

      Partially. I mean ok, if you graph from far enough away that's true, but that creation of emotional response really needs to be broken down some. Fiction can impart a lesson or moral, can create a sense of location (I'm currently reading Anthony Powell's "Dance to the music of Time" series. 3,000 pages - all you get is an incredibly detailed picture of what inter-bellum Brittan was like. Take that away and you've got a soap-opera) It can craft basic emotion, but honestly if that's all there is, I see no point. Romance novels do that quite well.

      To me, fiction is about style. It's not what you say really, it's how it's said. Donald Antrim, Harold Pinter, even Douglas Adams do wonderful things to language. Antrim's a wonderful liar - he shatters his novels in the last 20 pages and you never see it coming. Pinter relies on what's not said, lets you draw your own conclusions - he thinks out his plots and writes around them. Adams was an amazing describer - "His arm muscles moved around each other like volkswagons parking." He made images jump to your imagination. His radio background did that - he had to plant a vivid picture, otherwise Hitch-hiker wouldn't exist.

      Continuous feedback, in my mind, should be avoided. You finish the damn thing and then show it to someone. Asking for input chapter by chapter could be confusing. But then again, we're not really talking about a novel here.

      Honestly, I'd say go for it and see what happens. If it sucks you'll know what to do differently next time around.

      Best of luck.

      Triv

    2. Re:Purpose of a novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So what I'd like to understand is how you think
      > this medium and method will enhance that purpose.
      > Why should access to unfinished work, or
      > continuous feedback from reader of that work,
      > help an author convey what must initally be an
      > internal state or vision?

      Many people here in slashdot and on Salon have compared this to serialized novels. Serialized works can be interesting (both Tolstoy's Ana Karenin and Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist as a young Man were serialized) but I think the format of the weblog with its mix of "serialized" day by day content and hyperlinks/permalinks should allow for new directions, without falling into a more "standard" hypertext-novel. At a minimum, I find that the story has to be told differently that in would in paper, and because the blog is (by nature) a day-by-day enterprise, it will allow me to introduce references to current events as well.
      I am still thinking about the serialized-story comparison and will certainly add an entry in the FAQ soon regarding that.

    3. Re:Purpose of a novel by weakethics · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the whole reason for a novel, or fiction generally, is to communicate an emotional state to the reader
      You hear this kind of thing batted about a lot between those who think a lot about writing.
      The whole reason for a novel, or fiction generally is to entertain. That's why people shell out the dough -- to escape in one way or another. For some people careful vicarious introspection is entertaining. For others, Penthouse Forum is the height of entertainment. The reason to write a work of fiction is money.

      --
      "I like to play with things a while... before annihilation!" Ming the Merciless
    4. Re:Purpose of a novel by moebius_4d · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your reply.

      Well, let me restate my thesis. The reader comes away from non-fiction with something besides an altered emotional state. That's not the case with fiction. Even historical fiction, which you reference, isn't reliable in any sense. For example, there are a wealth of interesting details in _Shogun_, but some of them are wrong. And, I would argue that if a writer of a historical novel had to sacrifice one of historical accuracy and literary quality, the former should be the first to go

      So while I agree that fiction isn't simply about the kind of boiler-plate romance novels you cite, and that all of the things you mention are important aspects of good fiction writing, the reason that they are is because they contribute to the reader's experience, and nothing else. Yes, Douglas Adams showed exceptional skill at making English do things one didn't expect, but that was part of the reason you bought and enjoyed his work, right? Otherwise he'd just publish the plot outline.

      Just because crappy romance novels are badly written and appeal to the lowest common denominator of human emotions doesn't mean that better fiction is after a different target. For example, there's a tremendous amount of philosophy in Shakespeare, but we are exposed to it through a vehicle designed to cause us to identify with certain characters and rejoice and suffer with them. I guess that goes back to Aristotle's _poetics_, which for its faults isn't all bad either.

    5. Re:Purpose of a novel by Triv · · Score: 2

      Round two, eh? :)

      The reader comes away from non-fiction with something besides an altered emotional state.

      I would say in addition to an altered emotional state, but that's semantics. Pure history is just stories, like fiction, they just happened to be REALLY true instead of a creation of an over-active imagination. If you're talking about a technical manual, THAT'S pure information, and I agree that an emotional stake is limited.

      And, I would argue that if a writer of a historical novel had to sacrifice one of historical accuracy and literary quality, the former should be the first to go

      Absolutely. Look at the film treatment of "A Beautiful Mind". For the sake of narrative the screenwriter decided to leave out the troubling fact that Nash's wife left him for 20-odd years only to return to him later. I feel the story is stronger (if less 'true') with that omission.

      Just because crappy romance novels are badly written and appeal to the lowest common denominator of human emotions doesn't mean that better fiction is after a different target.

      No, but there is a fundamental and critical difference - when appealing to the lowest common denominator all emotion is stripped of its complexity to be relatable by all. It doesn't make you think, which I believe is the most fundamental achievement of good fiction over emotional involvement (pulling the heartstrings is easy) - one walks away from a good novel thinking 'hmmmm...' instead of simply reading to pass the time.

      Also, by attempting to appeal to everyone you have to, bluntly, communicate to the stupidest person in the audience. Good novels require a sense of history, a knowledge of its precursors and a willingness to work to enjoy it. Just look at the difference between Brittish sitcoms and American (I'm generalizing here). 'Blackadder' (as I posted somewhere else on slashdot recently) requires a pretty good knowledge of history to understand - it appeals to the educated on the show's highest level. 'Friends', on the other hand, is ALL about embarassing situations and pratfalls. There is no higher level.

      Don't get me wrong, I agree with you almost completely. I'm just fleshing some things out for ya. :)

      Triv

  14. I never want to hear the word blog again by corrosiv · · Score: 1


    Should be spelled bl0g to identify the speaker as a dork

    1. Re:I never want to hear the word blog again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldnt that be dr0k?

  15. Michael? by dmccarty · · Score: 1

    Is Katz writing under a pseudonym these days?

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  16. Blogging as an art form by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a navigation system, I think the slashdot-style topics would make a great addition. This way you can progressively follow the entire log, or you can pick a topic that the author has made, and follow a sequence of topical notes and opinions.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Blogging as an art form by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a good idea! The question now is whether the topics should relate to plotlines or to the ideas behind them... something definitely interesting though.

  17. I don't get it. by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why are people facinated with blogs? They simply offer a more limited subset of the creativity allowed by vanilla html, in exchange for added ease of use and "structure". Why not just use web pages, or better yet flash, or another multimedia form to create unique arts?

    1. Re:I don't get it. by dev0n · · Score: 1

      Why are people facinated with blogs?

      because they're usually comprised of snippets of real people's experiences and thoughts. unedited and raw. there are a ton of bad blogs, sure.. but there are at least an equal amount of great ones.

      Why not just use web pages, or better yet flash, or another multimedia form to create unique arts?

      i personally believe that each person's blog is unique. my thoughts are certainly different from other people's thoughts, and i take great pride in the fact that i have maintained a blog for over 2 and a half years now.

      sure, some of it is boring. and yeah, most of slashdot's readers would hate it. (i make a lot of references to very personal emotional experiences - most men don't "get it"..) but i am still convinced that blogging is an art form.

      just because it's trendy doesn't make it bad.

    2. Re:I don't get it. by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      Because he's a writer, not an animator.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    3. Re:I don't get it. by casings · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't get it either. I dislike everything that weblogs stand for. I don't care about other people's daily life. I don't care what happened to somebody on the street. I don't care about what one person finds funny about this waiter at his/her favorite restaurant. These things should be left to his/her self, like a diary.

      The only reason i can see that someone would want to have a log of their daily life, is for an auto-biography, which should be left to someone who has been in the public eye quite a bit, and whos private life has been affected by it. Face it, most everyone that does one of these online journals is just not interesting. I even hate the stupid word 'blog' that people use to describe them. Its just a buzz word that stupid people use to sound important, like 'proactive' and 'paradigm.'

      I'm fired now, aren't I?

    4. Re:I don't get it. by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      Telastyn writes:
      "Why are people facinated with blogs? They simply offer a more limited subset of the creativity allowed by vanilla html, in exchange for added ease of use and "structure". Why not just use web pages, or better yet flash, or another multimedia form to create unique arts?"

      If I understand this correctly, you're asking why substance can't take a backseat to style?

      It's not a flame, but as best as I can see, that's your gripe -- that more interesting delivery methods exist and should, ipso facto, be used. Suppose all you want to convey is the written word? If so, then is the written word good enough?

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    5. Re:I don't get it. by ruzel · · Score: 1
      Translation: Only famous people are important and have anything worthwhile to say.

      That's a wonderful attitude to take towards your fellow man. As if fame has anything to do with intelligence or ability.

      The only difference between a famous writer and one who writes in a blog is that one of them is famous.
      ______________

    6. Re:I don't get it. by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

      You forgot "synergy".

    7. Re:I don't get it. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Certainly, but why limit the form and stylization that your written word may take? Certainly the poster was looking for something that wasn't just a book or ordinary novel, where the written word is by far enough.

    8. Re:I don't get it. by casings · · Score: 1

      No im saying this as a reality check. I don't like auto biographies. And most famous people don't deserve them. Just the ones who have had a troubled private life as a result of fame or publisity. Average Joe Schlub doesn't need to need to have an auto biography. But Ms Susie Survivor of Some Grave Thing or Some Targeted Human, does deserve it, because these are 'helpful' and interesting readings.

      Anyway, back the whole web jounral thing. As i see it the whole shebang was started by some bored designer trying to have a hobby and a personal site, and now its been blown way out of proportion. Voyeurs and Exhibitionists come to mind. Neither one is really condoned but somehow the public doesn't seem to mind the exhibitionists but really shun the voyeurs. Although they arent all that different (they just disclosure of humanity), some for personal gain others for curiosity.

    9. Re:I don't get it. by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      I agree, though I'm just saying that you could do the same thing (much better) by "doing it yourself" so that it takes on a more personalized and/or stylistic touch.

      And they certainly aren't bad. I enjoy reading through blogs, and it's a great way to keep abreast with someone's life. But imo there's far too much attention given to them as though they are a monstrous achievement. Despite their great following and popularity, they aren't exactly new or revolutionary. Hell .plan files have existed longer than the web...

      Furthermore IRC chat is imo more "unedited and raw" as far as people's unchecked thoughts and feelings go. It's a place without retribution, thus allowing only conscience to interviene...

      Though that is another debate...

    10. Re:I don't get it. by 1+(smarterThanYou) · · Score: 1

      I disagree with you. The underlying purpose of a weblog is to make the writer feel important. No matter what kind of ruse is adopted for a particular weblog, it is designed to pull the wool over the eyes of the reader, the goal being to convince someone else that goon writer x is not a run-of-the-mill...it is an identity issue, a confidence issue. It is incredibly sad that we live in a world where people are not happy with themselves. Weblogs are pitiful attemps at making oneself appear important. No matter what though, this is an empty game that isn't fooling anyone. Soon enough the empty sense of imporance these things provide will ebb; the logs themselves will rot away like the readers who have nothing better to do than to marvel at their own existence and charitable contribution to the filth and waste that is becoming the Internet. Who better than we prideful Americans to adopt such a self-centered, vain mecca to ourselves? Especially when we could be converting this obvious talent and intelligence into something that actually aids mankind instead of distracting it. Let us now bow down to the shrine of Earl, local pin monkey by day, Super Thought Provoker by night. Hooray! Oh, I also think that following the lives of celebrities who earn it through entertainment is also a ridiculouse farse. And I do agree that the only people worth listening to have obtained fame; that's why I read the stories of Hemingway and grasp at the concepts of Einstein, as opposed to the scientific discoveries of Bubba Joe Smith. People with fame earn it because they have something worth giving them notice or mention; they contribute.

    11. Re:I don't get it. by Dmitri+Baughman · · Score: 1
      I'm just now starting such an experiment with audio content. The site can be visited at ZapKerPow. Amongst the usual message forums, live chat areas, etc. you'll find the main feature: an audio stream built entirely from listener contributions. Submissions can be called into our "studio line" at 206-219-6706 or submitted as MP3 files via an online upload form.

      While the audio mix is lacking a central theme or organization now, I'm hoping for some feedback and ideas. Thoughts along this line include special weekly segments, rotating through content on a set schedule, holding contests and give-aways, etc.

      More information on the project can be read here.

      --
      http://www.darker-side.com
    12. Re:I don't get it. by Kikaid. · · Score: 0
      But imo there's far too much attention given to them as though they are a monstrous achievement.

      Who's claiming that blogs are "monstrous achievements"? And how are you qualified to say if it is or isn't? Sounds like you're complaining about technology not being bleeding edge enough for you, when the issue is really about content.

      --

      (This post does not contain emoticons or l337.)

    13. Re:I don't get it. by Kikaid. · · Score: 0
      Its odd that you go on about how weblogs promote self-important, self-consumed "goons" suffering from identity crisis', and then go on to extoll the virtues of Hemingway. He is probably the most over-rated, machoistic, bullshit hack in all of high school english reading cirriculum.

      Unless your entire post was being sarcastic.

      --

      (This post does not contain emoticons or l337.)

    14. Re:I don't get it. by shayne321 · · Score: 2

      Face it, most everyone that does one of these online journals is just not interesting. I even hate the stupid word 'blog' that people use to describe them. Its just a buzz word that stupid people use to sound important, like 'proactive' and 'paradigm.'

      SAT Question time:
      1) 'blogs' are to the 2000's as websites were to:
      a) the 1860's
      b) 1975
      c) the late 90's
      d) CoyboyNeal

      Remember the Mad Website Rush of the late 90's? Little Timmy gets his own site. Here's a picture of my dog. Here's a picture of my sister. Look at this animated ninja I swiped off my dork friend Johnny's site. Who the fuck cares?

      Like it or not, blogs are now in vogue. Anyone who's anyone has one (guess I'm not anyone - I haven't updated my slashdot journal since march). It's just another way to make unimportant people feel important.. Not to mention feel like a part of the 'in' crowd.

      The only one I have ever read with any regularity is Alan Cox's diary, and that's only cause it was a non-time consuming way to keep up with some of the bleeding-edge kernel stuff without having to get tangled up in the mess that is the linux-kernel list. Even then, it annoys me to read about taking his In laws out for Thai food, for example. Why the hell should I care about his love of Thai food? Yeah, I know "if it annoys you don't read it". Well, I don't any more.

      Shayne

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    15. Re:I don't get it. by ergo98 · · Score: 2

      Like it or not, blogs are now in vogue. Anyone who's anyone has one (guess I'm not anyone - I haven't updated my slashdot journal since march).

      Huh? "Blogs" were in vogue years ago, and if you think this is some new fangled thing then I'd say that you're a little late to the party.

      It's just another way to make unimportant people feel important....Even then, it annoys me to read about taking his In laws out for Thai food, for example. Why the hell should I care about his love of Thai food? Yeah, I know "if it annoys you don't read it". Well, I don't any more.

      This just blows me away. Exactly as you alluded to yourself (just as you alluded to the fact that you tried your hand at having a journal through the Slashdot system) if you don't like it, then don't god damn read it. The irony of reading your, and other, posts about "unimportant people trying to feel important", or people with "confidence issues", the only people who have a frothing problem with blogs, websites, whatever, are people with grotesque confidence issues and a serious chip on their shoulders. I've seen these people take jabs at Jamie Zawinski, Joel (on Software), etc: It's a sad envy that these people have people who find their writings interesting. Of all the human traits, raw envy has got to rank as one of the most profounding depressing and deplorable.

    16. Re:I don't get it. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I don't care about other people's daily life.

      Good for you. And we don't care that you don't care about it, yet here you are...

      I don't care what happened to somebody on the street

      Good for you. And we don't care that you don't care what happened to them on the street, yet here you are...

      These things should be left to his/her self, like a diary.

      Don't you have a diary you should be writing this in? "WHY EVERYONE SUCKS", by casings

      The only reason i can see that someone would want to have a log of their daily life, is for an auto-biography, which should be left to someone who has been in the public eye quite a bit, and whos private life has been affected by it.

      Oh, so you're the one who chooses who can write about themselves? I'd say that you've assigned yourself quite a degree of self-importance, wouldn't you agree? Blogs, auto-biographies, whatever, are voluntary (are you forced to read them), and if you don't like it then don't read it. This idea that only people that you feel are interesting should have the right to write down their thoughts which other people who want some entertainment can voluntarily read is unbelievable.

      You show your sense of self-importance when you pick on the term "blog": I saw something similar in a local newspaper recently in the "Ask Some Random Columnist" column where a writer wrote in raving about how their friend used a longer word instead a shorter synonym, and how much this drives her nuts. You see, she believes the friend is doing it to "sound intelligent". Yet here's this lady doing everything she can to show her friend as being an idiot for using whatever word she feels is appropriate: Maybe it rolls off the tongue better for her, or she just likes the feel of it. How bitterly ironic. In the case of "Blog", I may not like the term, and as an acronym it's pretty weak, but to many people that is the word that they picked up as a description for what they do and it's a part of the vernacular, oops, language now.

    17. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I don't get? What's so insightful about people who ask "What's so great about X? Isn't it just a thing that fucking sucks? I think it sucks. Why not do something that doesn't suck?"

      SCORE: 5, INSIGHTFUL!

      Someone please explain that to me.

    18. Re:I don't get it. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The underlying purpose of a weblog is to make the writer feel important. No matter what kind of ruse is adopted for a particular weblog, it is designed to pull the wool over the eyes of the reader, the goal being to convince someone else that goon writer x is not a run-of-the- mill...it is an identity issue, a confidence issue.

      What a depressing take on your fellow man. As the old saying goes "Every man has a story to tell". Apparently to a few of you only a select few have a story to tell. I suggest that you should lighten up a bit, and perhaps realize that there is no such thing as a "run of the mill" person (perhaps you need some confidence training): Everyone lives a unique, fascinating life, at least to those who care to listen and learn. To those who don't: No one's asking you to stay.

      And I do agree that the only people worth listening to have obtained fame; that's why I read the stories of Hemingway and grasp at the concepts of Einstein

      This is supposed to be a humorous attempt at irony given your earlier "it is an identity issue, a confidence issue". I'll bet you listen to classical music and only drink latte too, right?

    19. Re:I don't get it. by Sophacles · · Score: 1

      I agree, though I'm just saying that you could do the same thing (much better) by "doing it yourself" so that it takes on a more personalized and/or stylistic touch.

      Remember back in the early days of the "bubble" when geocities came online? It was hearalded as the greatest thing. Everyone could have a webpage. (This was before most ISPs offered a webpage with an account). I bet you, or your equivelant was there complaining about how all these web pages would dilute the web. Now you say, lets keep with the geocities approach.

      That being said, I disagree that doing it yourself is a better idea. Have you ever wandered through geocities, or visited a friends homepage? Personal and stylized pages that are guady and impossible to navigate. Light text on light background eye killers, blink tags, marquee text, bad javascript or html that only works with x browser, and my favorite permanent under construction graphics.

      That is why blogs are great. They form a clear concise way for people to express their thoughts, and many allow for some stylizing and customization. All of a sudden all those people with bad web pages can have blogs that are at least readable. They follow a fairly standard format, so you can keep up with you pals without dealing with eyesores or broken pages half the time. Its one step closer to this universal connectedness at our fingertips. It may be bad but its a step above.

      Maybe they aren't revolutionary, hell blogs existed long before the term. Many people had "home pages" with the news section on the front page. The news even displayed in a backwards order. A blog. Years and years back. Its crazy.
      The new and revolutionary thing is that they are now easily doable, and everyone can get one, and they are fun for some people. If you don't like it, dont choose to participate. It's your right, and to fight against it when instead you can ignore it with out any effort or detrimental effect is inefficient.

      --
      To live till you die is to live long enough. -Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
    20. Re:I don't get it. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I made a comment about .plan files as well somewhere (time based "what I'm doing that everyone can read").

      I mainly dislike that people do not have enough technical knowledge to realise that any 8th grader should have the know how to do the same EXACT thing using simple html, or even, God forbid, a "web page creation tool" that isn't stripped down so terribly far to the lowest common denominator like blogging software.

      I don't dislike blogs, or journals, or people posting garrish websites. I dislike that people are so technically inept to require the tool to post things to a web site.

    21. Re:I don't get it. by casings · · Score: 1
      It's funny, that you think i said something about opinion. I said nothing about opinion. There is a HUGE difference between opinion and disclosure of private life. Everyone does have the right to an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. Everyone has the right to express their opinion. But private lives should remain private. I JUST DON'T GET IT!
      In the case of "Blog", I may not like the term, and as an acronym it's pretty weak, but to many people that is the word that they picked up as a description for what they do and it's a part of the vernacular, oops, language now.
      oh yea and could you explain why you think 'blog' is an acronym? Since we're taking the personal insult route, heres the definition of acronym.

      acronym n.
      A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC for Women's Army Corps, or by combining initial letters or parts of a series of words, such as radar for radio detecting and ranging.

      i fail to see how Blog is an acronym.

      and about this whole self-righteous thing, who are you to defend every online journal writer. Like you're their leader.

      Someone needs to go back to elementary school to learn what the meaning of big words such as opinion and acronym mean.
    22. Re:I don't get it. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really got me there, didn't you genius? I'll go back to school to learn that blog is a "part of a series of words", in this case "Web Log". That's pretty sad if that's your big coup d'états. Maybe I coulda added a comma to a couple of those sentences too, but apparently you missed that in your misguided attempt at redemption.

      Also, it might surprize you to know that everything that comes out of a human beings mouth is "opinion". If I write about what's "funny" then I'm stating an opinion. If I talk about going to a thai food place for dinner, I'm implicitly stating an opinion. Observations are really experience clouded by opinion.

      So, if I'm "like their leader", then you're the self appointed leader of the anti-blog crusade? In reality I'm not a blog kinda person, and I don't read them myself just because I'm into different things, but it drives me nutty seeing envious, shallow people slathering psychoanalysis on any behaviour that isn't the behaviour that they sanction. We've seen it for people who watch TV, people who like movies, people who listen to Britney Spears, people who play video games, on and on and on: Always the self-righteous assholes ready to profess as to why all "those other" people are wrong. Now if someone was doing something that personally affected you, then sure you have a voice, but when we're talking about people doing something that has absolutely no affect on your whatsoever, then that's just sad.

    23. Re:I don't get it. by dev0n · · Score: 1

      i'm certainly not technically inept just because i use a tool to blog. i WROTE my first blogging tool. i've since switched to moveable type because i was too lazy to re-write my archiving scripts and they badly needed it.

    24. Re:I don't get it. by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I see where you're going with this. The problem is not the medium, then, it's the form in which you're used to seeing it. A blog is only as limiting as the software that makes it happen. For example, livejournal is pretty constrained. You can change some items, but you can't really do as you please. As far as I know, anyway. Something like Blogger offers you a lot more room with the ability to make the design precisely as you wish and the option of using a template.

      So ...if someone isn't really HTML-knowledgeable, there is a spot for them. For those that do, there is a bit more latitude for creativity. At the extreme end, you can just DIY. My blog is 100% hand-rolled (and kinda crappy, I'm working on that). You're only as constrained as you constrain yourself.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    25. Re:I don't get it. by casings · · Score: 1

      ok, this is good.

      Now i see some substance.

      I was wrong. It's easy to say that, but i still don't see why your original reply was needed when i was obviously making just a tiny little bit of light of my own post (in the post), the whole simpsons reference in case u missed it being the last few lines.

      but if i may,

      pot calling the kettle black?

    26. Re:I don't get it. by seanyboy · · Score: 1

      I don't care about other people's daily life. I don't care what happened to somebody on the street. I don't care about what one person finds funny about this waiter at his/her favorite restaurant.
      Moderate -1 Asperger's.

      --
      Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    27. Re:I don't get it. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Indeed, given the percentage of blogs that are livejournals, I fear that the common man is likely to not differentiate the two.

    28. Re:I don't get it. by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      That actually raises an interesting question. What percentage of blogs *are* with livejournal, deadjournal, freeopendiary, opendiary, blogger, etc. Are you aware of any stats that show "market share" for each? I'm making my own tool, so that'd be interesting to know.

      Thanks for the info in advance!

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
  18. My Project by xtremex · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have developed a project called JSPBlog which is a Weblog written in JSP.
    I found a million and one written in PHP, so I developed mine in JSP and servlets...
    I always loved the idea of a weblog. You can take a look at it at http://jspblog.sf.net

    --
    If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  19. Read slashdot at -1 by sulli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and you'll see all sorts of interesting stories. Novels, no, but not short either!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Read slashdot at -1 by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, the one about Taco snotting is quite a gripping documentary, and the various literary works from the Dead Penis Bird leave me pondering the meaning of life, while the never tiring page-widening-post leaves me in stitches every time.

  20. The death of the original thought by bentini · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This isn't meant to be a flame.

    It seems to me that this is similar to other ideas, both that the author recognizes and some that he may not. Dickens, for instance, first published much of his canon in a serial form. Great Expectations, e.g., was first published in pieces (which you can notice if you read it). This aspect of the "new" art form seems to me to be fairly old.

    The one "new" aspect may be the "unedited" nature of the medium. The web allows publishing to be cheap enough that few enough people's financial futures are at stake to require that the produced content be of any conceivable literary merit or commercial quality. On the other hand, the radio show of HHGTTG seemed to be done in a manner that may not have had that much time to go back over it. So that's close.

    All in all, it's an interesting idea that may bring together old art forms with the new medium, but I wouldn't say it's revolutionary or necessarily that experimental, in the sense of wondering "whether it is at all possible to use it as an artistic medium to produce interesting work." Of course it is. You may be shooting yourself in the foot by not using an editor, though.

    1. Re:The death of the original thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Expectations, e.g., was first published in pieces (which you can notice if you read it)

      Shouldn't that be "which you notice if you can read it"? Oy vey, that book sucked!

    2. Re:The death of the original thought by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      All that you say is true. However, I never said that it was "revolutionary" or anything remotely like that. The connection with serialized works is strong yes, but I sense the blog structure might have other things to add to it. In any case, the idea is not to replace a novel. You can't replace a print novel with anything, not an ebook, not hypertext novels, not websites. Each has its category. In blogs (as in webpages) the content mixes in part with the user interface, and this is probably where the most interesting things are to be found: how navigation changes content, and viceversa.

  21. Doesn't sound too well thought out. by Nurlman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I notice this in your FAQ:

    entries are "improvisational," by which I mean that you usually sit down, write it, and post it. There isn't a lot of preparation, hours of editing or things like that. You write it, you post it.

    "Preparation" and "hours of editing" are the difference between good writing and bad. Don't be fooled by the medium-- even a good blog entry has lots of thought, preparation, and editing behind it.

    Unless you've already sat down and thought about storylines, character development, plotting, and pacing, your story is likely to end up an unreadable, uninteresting mess. Real authors of novels don't just sit down and blurt out whatever comes into their head at any given moment. Don't assume that the immediacy of the blog format will substitute for good preparation and planning.

    1. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by guttentag · · Score: 2
      "Preparation" and "hours of editing" are the difference between good writing and bad.
      Not necessarily. There's something to be said for extemporaneous writing -- sometimes it's good to publish something before you've had the opportunity to second-guess it. Personally, I like to edit copy to death, but that's my preference. Whether extemporaneous or meticulously edited, I think the work should be judged on its own merits. You can't assume something is bad based on time frame in which it was written.
    2. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. There's something to be said for extemporaneous writing -- sometimes it's good to publish something before you've had the opportunity to second-guess it. Personally, I like to edit copy to death, but that's my preference. Whether extemporaneous or meticulously edited, I think the work should be judged on its own merits. You can't assume something is bad based on time frame in which it was written.

      Johnson's Rasselas was I believe written in about a week - from his mother's death until the time when he had to pay the undertaker's bill! But it is edited, do not doubt that.

      Editing does, in fact, affect the quality of written work. Unedited work is usually unreadable. But one can, if one is particularly focused, do a whole lot of editing and rewriting in a short amount of time.

      Ultimately a blog novel would be nothing more than a diary novel with more than one person entering information in a diary. Not revolutionary, but an interesting idea. At one point I was working on an email novel - the entire novel would be made up of the emails written among a group of characters. But this is little more than a variation on the epistolary novel.

      It's a decent idea, but hardly worth too much fuss about.

    3. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by gwernol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Real authors of novels don't just sit down and blurt out whatever comes into their head at any given moment. Don't assume that the immediacy of the blog format will substitute for good preparation and planning.

      Not so. Like all art forms there are authors who do in fact just sit down and write, and those who plan meticulously and then re-edit through many drafts before they are ready to "go live". And of course lots of authors somewhere in between these two extremes.

      There really are artistic "idiot savants": by all accounts Mozart was like this - essentially a gibbering fool in life but also capable of apparently spontaneously creating some of the most moving and complex music ever written. At the opposite end of the spectrum was Beethoven who also created astounding - and astoundingly beautiful - music yet who sweated over every note and constantly re-wrote and fine-tuned his creations.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    4. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      Two other replies make good points against this argument. Personally I can say that, although the entries are written without much preparation, that doesn't mean that I don't think about them at all. And the story is always there, whether you are thinking about it consciously or not.

    5. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by belloc · · Score: 2, Informative

      by all accounts Mozart was like this - essentially a gibbering fool in life

      If you think this, you are a gibbering fool, and you know nothing about the life of Mozart. There are lots of myths about Mozart; the "idiot savant" myth is merely one of many. Lord knows how they get started; certainly the movie "Amadeus" itself was responsible for fanning the flames of many of the extant myths.

      Get your hands on some letters that Mozart wrote. Find a good, well-researched biography; there are lots out there. Most myths are spread by people who don't bother to read accurate histories. You'll see clearly that he certainly was no gibbering fool.

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    6. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by j1mmy · · Score: 1

      ... your story is likely to end up an unreadable, uninteresting mess.

      You ain't seen nuthin' yet!

    7. Re:Doesn't sound too well thought out. by theefer · · Score: 1

      Actually, many writers *did* write this way. Emile Zola didn't know the end of most of his books while starting to write them.

      I think this is just another way to see litterature. It's not gonna be plot-oriented (f.i. Hyperion), but it's much more impulsive. You follow some people lives and see what happens. This can make good books too, although I prefer a good plot (strictly personal).

      --
      theefer
  22. I AGREE WITH THIS POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



  23. Problem with Blog Novels... by b0r0din · · Score: 1

    There are some inherent problems with this. A good story gets changed a million ways from sunday; blogs can be edited, but in keeping a viewership interested on a daily basis, you might find your viewership getting tired of having to read the retread story.

    Weblogs in themselves are interesting, and journals are useful for novel creation, but I don't see this as an extremely useful or profitable enterprise. If you're Asimov, and can write as much crap as you want w/o having to re-edit your work, as I've seen him claim (either Asimov or Piers Anthony; neither would surprise me), then it might be an interesting venture. But if you're like most people, a novel requires a lot of thought and a lot more editing, and a daily weblog may not be the best way to go about it, unless you want feedback.

    1. Re:Problem with Blog Novels... by calarts_nutmeg · · Score: 1

      It seems that a blog novel isn't stricly a blog, as a blog is supposed to be a "tour of the web", according to weblogs.com, with a link and some editorial info about that link. You should check out Eastgate.com, they make great software for hypertext writing, which I think is a more powerful way of writing electronic text. That being said, though, more power to you for trying to be creative and do something unusual!

      --
      Check my site out for ogg vorbis music produced with linux.
  24. I know you're in there JonKatz! by dmccarty · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Boy oh boy! Katz will do anything to get around the thousands of Slashdot posters who've filtered him out of the story authors.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  25. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blognovel. Blognovel. Blognovel. I don't know about you, but I like the sound of that word.

  26. Navigation ideas by BlakeStone · · Score: 1

    what kind of navigation to use besides the basic calendar navigation of the blog?

    How about related articles? You could keep track of a story thread by providing links to related stories, so I, for example, could read about a biking trip you took, and then go back/forward to read more biking tales. Also, will the whole thing be free, or would you consider charging for certain sections?

    This sounds interesting. Good luck to you!!

    1. Re:Navigation ideas by entrippy · · Score: 1

      This has already been done, in a sense by 253 - an novel and website by Geoff Ryman.

      The wonder of Rymans novel is the intertwined stories of normal life that unfold as you read (or browse) - well worth a look for anyone interested in this kind of thing

  27. Fictional blog community by mattbelcher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had the idea a while back of creating a whole fictional community of blogs through which to tell a story. Basically, I would set up a network of sites, one for each character, and they would relate the events of the story from their own points of view. Characters that knew one another would have links to each other's sites, thus informing the reader of the connections. This approach might lead to something more like War of the Worlds and other fictional journalism, as opposed to a fictional diary, as in the proposed work.

    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    1. Re:Fictional blog community by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty good idea. It'd be almost impossible to do live, though, due to the amount of planning involved. Something else I just thought about: you would be sure to have links from blogs outside "your" community. It would be quite interesting to see the effect your characters have on those works.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    2. Re:Fictional blog community by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I too was going to write a fictional blog community. Eventually this idea morphed into a rampant homoerotic tale rife with auto erotic asphyxiation and manham canning sessions. It appears that this idea is inherently homosexual and anyone that persues this avenue of creativity is either a repessed and in denial, or blatant

      --
      If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  28. when did the blog... by Sebastopol · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Ok, so I've been surfing since Mosaic 1.0 in 1994, and ftp'ing pr0n for zurich.ai.mit.edu since 1990, and the first time I heard of a 'blog' was a few months ago. The odd thing is, this discussion of blogs came out of the news websites and not the nerd websites.

    when the hell did blogs become so famous? and are they just the modern equivalent of .plan? i get the impression they are the creation of low-tech people in the high-tech world. not that there's anything wrong with that, of course, but it took me by surprise that it became such a phenomenonemon.

    ?

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:when did the blog... by dev0n · · Score: 2, Informative

      rebecca blood wrote a very good essay on the history of weblogs that you may want to check out. she's since authored two books about blogging.

    2. Re:when did the blog... by guttentag · · Score: 2
      and are they just the modern equivalent of .plan?
      No. .plan is a tool for hiding ASCII porn or witty sayings on the campus network where most people will never think to look. At least that's all I've ever seen it used for...

      By contrast, blogs contain narratives.

    3. Re:when did the blog... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1
      are they just the modern equivalent of .plan?


      They are the modern equivalent of a dot-friggin'-DIARY! They are DIARIES! Fourteen-year old girls have been keeping them and clutching them close to their self-important breast since Victorian times.

      A class of software has come along that makes the keeping of a diary easy (a good idea, for those inclined to be diarists) and also publish them on the Web for all to see (an idea so absolutely fey and bizarre as to border on the incomprehensible to any heterosexual man born before 1965).

      The only thing more amazing about the large group of people taking the time to document their day-to-day lives on the Web is the second large group of people who take time out of their day-to-day lives to read what the first group is writing. Let the circle-jerk be unbroken! Once admonished by family and counselor to "Get a Life!," these "early-adopters" have responded by stitching that life to their virtual sleeves. "Look, Ma! I've got an URL, and I'm getting 30 hits a day. I'm somebody! Aren't you proud of me, Ma?"

      Guys, call me old fashioned, but I just don't care what a sysAdmin in Poughkeepsie had for breakfast, or how the barista on the late-shift in the third Tacoma Starbucks fared at his college reunion last week. There are just four or five thousand other sources for news and entertainment that I am likely to scope out first. What can I say?

      I find some small solace by looking on the bright side: at least blogs are predominantly text/HTML. These bloggers could just as easily be training webcams on their cats and puppies, with the resulting bandwidth monopolization bringing the Internet -- and perhaps Western Civilization -- to a screeching halt.
    4. Re:when did the blog... by boa13 · · Score: 1

      While your comment adequately sums up the opinion I had about blogs, and is pertinent to the majority of blogs out there, I suggest you take some time to read Rebecca Blood's essay, which link has been given above in this thread. There's more to blog than this, it seems.

  29. It bears a passing resemblance to . . . by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

    . . . an epistolary novel. Look it up.

    1. Re:It bears a passing resemblance to . . . by Leliel · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      Isn't a blog just an online version of your standard paper diary? Writing a novel as if it were a diary, or even turning a diary into a novel, isn't exactly new. (The first example to come to mind is Anne Frank: Diary of a Young Girl)

      I don't see where the author is breaking new ground, except possibly that we get to see the work in progress, rather than as a finished piece? Certainly stories have been published piecemeal before (esp in magazines and the like), though I have not personally seen any serial stories written in diary-entry style.

      As a side note, there are many cases of people who make blogs for ficticious people, which seems to be an analogous style of work.

      Just my $0.02
      -Leliel

  30. the end of writing? by tps12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I applaud any and all attempts to update the antiquated form of the novel for the modern era, I think it may be a classic case of "too little, too late." When you use the Internet as a medium, you are by necessity targetting the Internet demographic, which can be described as middle class Americans and Western Europeans in the 12-28 age bracket. That means the oldest people in your target audience will have been born when disco was in full swing.

    These people came of age in the early 80's. They grew up with cartoons, MTV, hair bands and cocaine. They've been disillusioned, become disillusioned with their disillusionment, and are jaded and cynical as a result. With middle age creeping up on them, they have neither the time nor the desire to sit down and read, whether in a library or on a computer screen.

    But is this so terrible? I'd propose that, no, it isn't. Look at what has gone before: we've lost great art forms such as traditional oral storytelling, the inscription of heiroglyphics into stone tablets, papyrus scrolls. The printing press upset the wonderful tradition of books copied and illuminated (illustrated) by monks. Yes, it is sad when traditional and familiar art forms fade away, but it also signifies progress.

    We're reaching a point where the sheer amount of information available exceeds the expressive power of the book. Flash, DVD, and video games are the media of the future. This attempt to adapt what is essentially a dying and doomed art form to modern tastes is touching, but ultimately doomed to failure. And while we should (and probably will) all look back fondly on the Book Era, we should not shy from our destiny in the Information Age.

    We are on the verge of accomplishing great things for Mankind. This is a time like no other previous, and with all probability like none to come. Let us not be distracted by nostalgia and wistful dreams.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:the end of writing? by elmegil · · Score: 2
      That means the oldest people in your target audience will have been born when disco was in full swing.

      Nice troll. Many of us were born when LSD was in full swing, thank you very much.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:the end of writing? by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

      Some of us were even conceived that way.

    3. Re:the end of writing? by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

      This post really made me think. I thought it was 100% serious until I read the last two paragraphs, and I'm still not sure it isn't.

      middle class Americans and Western Europeans in the 12-28 age bracket. ... With middle age creeping up on them,

      As somebody just past 28, I have to disagree that anybody younger than me can see middle age over their shoulder.

      But is this so terrible? I'd propose that, no, it isn't. Look at what has gone before: we've lost great art forms such as traditional oral storytelling, the inscription of heiroglyphics into stone tablets, papyrus scrolls. The printing press upset the wonderful tradition of books copied and illuminated (illustrated) by monks. Yes, it is sad when traditional and familiar art forms fade away, but it also signifies progress.

      I think some of these are a loss (oral storytelling particularly) but I don't think stone carvings or papyrus are missed. The latter are still "print media" - just like a book but more unwieldy.

      We're reaching a point where the sheer amount of information available exceeds the expressive power of the book. Flash, DVD, and video games are the media of the future.

      I don't see any of these as a bigger threat to books than the "moving pictures" we've had for many decades. Interactivity is certainly making leaps and bounds in entertainment, but it is not a full replacement of non-interactive media.

      This attempt to adapt what is essentially a dying and doomed art form to modern tastes is touching, but ultimately doomed to failure. And while we should (and probably will) all look back fondly on the Book Era, we should not shy from our destiny in the Information Age. We are on the verge of accomplishing great things for Mankind. This is a time like no other previous, and with all probability like none to come. Let us not be distracted by nostalgia and wistful dreams.

      Discuss.

      --
      Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    4. Re:the end of writing? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Nah,I don't see it as "too little, too late" at all. It's simply "too little". The side-effect of the Internet being brought, inexpensively, to the masses is the ability for anyone to publish anything to the world at almost no cost.

      You have a flood of poor quality web sites with poor quality writing. It seems to me that many folks are looking for a new method of presentation as the "solution" to make their web site stand out - when in reality, the answer is to publish something substantial and worth reading!

      I've been on very popular web sites that use nothing but plain HTML, in only the default font size and style - and almost no graphics or illustrations. People keep coming back because of the quality of information found there. Typically, they fill a niche. (EG. Someone offers a comprehensive online database of police scanner frequencies. This fills a need for hobbyists with police scanners, and saves them money buying books with similar information - so they go there.)

      I think the "blog" is simply the latest hyped-up Internet fad. The mass media keeps covering it because they don't want to miss out, if it really does take off.

      Like everything else, *some* blogs will become successful and popular - but only because they're written by good authors.

    5. Re:the end of writing? by Black_Logic · · Score: 1

      Sorry to ask an off-topic question, but--
      on my personal info page, it very recently stopped giving a number for my karma and replaced it with the much less exacting "positive".

      I'm asking you because your sig looks like my info page now.

      Sorry again for being off-topic.

      --
      Ansi's and stupid tricks!
    6. Re:the end of writing? by tps12 · · Score: 1

      It is a new-ish slashcode "feature" known as "karma obfuscation." There was a hidden discussion set up to explain it, but it was not archived, so it is lost. Here is sllort's journal on it. He link's to CmdrTaco's journal on the change as well, and also talks about some other recent changes.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  31. This is the best blog i've read. by americanFatCat · · Score: 1

    here Although it is not a novel, it has some similarities.

  32. Plan B? by prator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Isn't this where you accuse someone else of the crime to create reasonable doubt? ...

    Sorry, I've got a season pass for "The Practice" on my Tivo. Too much pseudo-lawyer speak in my brain.

    Just to stay completely off-topic, don't you love the way that the jury always comes back quick on that show. The lawyers are always so shocked.

    -prator

  33. interesting concept by neonowl+jerm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ideally, you should also be able to navigate the text in different directions, which means that the story will be more "experiential" than plot-oriented. I hate plot-oriented stories anyway.

    So basically, you're creating a character who will then tell 'their story' through the blog?
    I didn't fully read all the entries, but is the character supposed to be posting on the blog, or is the blog itself just the medium?

    Also, I couldn't immediately ascertain this by reading the story, but does time for the character correspond to the time and date on the blog?

    I think these would be important things for the audience to be able to figure out quickly, to help them get into the story and get to know the character.

    All in all, I think this is a cool concept, and would be interesting alongside traditional fiction, perhaps even movies. E.G. You could be reading a story set in a certain time period about a character or two, and go online and read a character's blog about occurances during that time period to get a better idea about small events that might not advance the plot, but would be otherwise interesting in regards to the development of that character.

    i bet a lot of minor characters would have entries complaining that the main character is always in the limelight. =)

    1. Re:interesting concept by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      I'll try to answer these the best I can in a short time. The questions are great though and I'll make sure I add them to the FAQ. > So basically, you're creating a character who > will then tell 'their story' through the blog? not necessarily. It is told in first person because I thought it would be easier to adapt into the blog format (considering all the other unknowns). > I didn't fully read all the entries, but is the > character supposed to be posting on the blog, > or is the blog itself just the medium? The blog is the medium, but I think that the medium is affecting the story. The character is not posting on the blog, it's just telling the story, but in self-consistent chunks. > Also, I couldn't immediately ascertain this by > reading the story, but does time for the > character correspond to the time and date on > the blog? No. This is something that I've been grappling with, because it's confusing, but many people expect blogs to have timestamps. I might change it though. > I think these would be important things for the > audience to be able to figure out quickly, to > help them get into the story and get to know > the character. I agree. After a few days I will try to find ways to fix these problems or at least "document them" enough so they are less confusing.

  34. Storylines by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    In most stories, there are various tales to follow. For instance, one might detail your relationship with your wife at home, another may deal with your extended family, another focuses on the daily odyssey you call a commute, while another paints a sinister picture of the evil man in the next cubicle over who plays the same two Creed songs through his computer speakers all day long.

    You could organize your blog according to topic, and then add entries under each heading:

    The Angel of My Life
    • The best sex ever
    • My life changed forever when I met her
    Satin? You Want the Next Cubicle Over
    • I used to like Creed
    My Daily Odyssey
    • Turn signals are not a sign of weakness
    • Where's the fire?
    • The philosophy of "Stop and Go"
    People I Can't Seem to Get Rid of...
    • My mom makes the best chocolate chip cookies
    • Aunt Helen, the nitpicker
    • My cousin the wench
    • My cousin the wench, Part II
    The Person No One Knows
    • Covert excursions to the park
    • My day as a troll
    Would it be "interesting?" I guess that's up to you.
    1. Re:Storylines by guttentag · · Score: 2

      (Yes, I misspelled Satan, because most bloggers can't spell anyway. It lends an air of authenticity.)

    2. Re:Storylines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good save.

    3. Re:Storylines by daeley · · Score: 2

      Hey, you could call it guttenblog! :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  35. Wiki as Blog by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think a much better (and ready-made) UI for an experiment like this would be a Wiki; if you really want the calendar style navigation you've got the 'RecentChanges' page, but otherwise navigation is much more organic, and from an authoring standpoint it's much more stream of conciousness; creating a new page is as simple as creating a link to it.

    I began using a Wiki for my own site a few weeks ago and I like it a lot better than the chronological format that seems to be the standard for "Blogs"; information becomes contextual and meaningful as crosslinks develop between pages. You don't have the compartmentalization that comes with organization by date and/or category.

    As an added experiment in meaningful context, I integrated the top five Google search results as sidebar links for each and every Wiki page on my site... sometimes the links aren't really all that related to the page's topic, but most of the time they're dead on. My next plan is to include the top five referring URLs on each page as well, which should get some interesting feedback happening in combination with Google's links.

  36. Dandelion Wine by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 1
    Ray Bradbury wrote an excellent book called Dandelion Wine. It gives the summer adventures of two fictional young boys as a collection of short stories. The stories follow a roughly chronological sequence and contain elements introduced in other stories, but each one can be read and understood independently of all the others. It is unlike Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles because there is a definite overall plot in the aggregation of stories. The Martian Chronicles is just a collection of related stories that do not compose an overall plot.

    If I understood you correctly, these were some of the ideas you had. These two books are worth a read if you'd like to see what's been done before.

  37. Link to "Memento" the novella and comments by ciurana · · Score: 2

    I've sold fiction and non-fiction works. The effort in getting something published that is also suitable for human consumption is much larger than most people realize. Anyone can publish on the web, but, as agents and editors often point out, who's doing the quality control? I don't think that weblogs are suitable for writing or reading compelling fiction. Good writing is hard, and demands endless revisions, rewritings, and editing. Any professional writer knows this. Consumers seldom see the first draft of an article or story.

    OneStepFromElysium indicated that Memento might be a good work produced as a blog. I beg to disagree; the novella and the movie are very carefully crafted. I believe a novel COULD BE MADE TO LOOK like a weblog, much like Bram Stoker's Dracula is made to look like a collection of journals, telegrams, and newspaper clippings. The nature of real weblogs may hinder character development, plot development, and narrative.

    For comparison, check the original Memento story out, published by Esquire Magazine. Could something like this have been written as a weblog? Hm... something to think about...

    Cheers!

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    1. Re:Link to "Memento" the novella and comments by jmu1 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So what about all those books that I paid good money for that were under such stringent "quality control" that had so many spelling errors, etc in it?

    2. Re:Link to "Memento" the novella and comments by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Writing a novel in a blog (as the author is apparently doing) doesn't really work. Creating a fictional blog OTOH ala Dracula could work, well even if the writing was good. Just writing a novel on a blog site breaks up the narrative unnesscessarily. Could you write a novel using fortune cookie fortune slips? yes. should you? probably not.

      --
      Why not fork?
    3. Re:Link to "Memento" the novella and comments by seanyboy · · Score: 1

      Didn't Charles Dickens write his novels as a form of Steam-Blog. (serialised, weekly, etc) It's certainly a possibility. I'd refer you to this link.
      The most interesting comment is A Tale of Two Cities" (135) is actually the result of weekly serial publication, a form which Dickens had tried three times previously, and which had given him, as he confessed to his friend John Forster, "perpetual trouble." "The small portions [of weekly installments] . . . drive me frantic," he complained

      --
      Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    4. Re:Link to "Memento" the novella and comments by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Theres a difference between serializing a novel and publishing as you write. I am sure Dickens work was complete when they serialized it, merely inducing people to pick up the next copy of the magazine, book, etc. A blog based novel doesn't lend itself well to revision, or consistency even. Once something is out there its out there. I have no problems with serializing a work provided its complete in the first place. I don't think a blog can be an effective medium for a novel unless ala Dracula the novel is told thru blog entries.

      --
      Why not fork?
  38. My blognovel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a blog novel, Check it out

  39. ATTENTION TROLLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Scott Rosenberg's weblog. He is the editor of the very liberal Salon.com, which is slated to be delisted from NASDAQ on August 13.

    Start trolling the trendy liberals while you still can!

  40. Re:Very similar concept to Memento:Corrected Link by j2brown · · Score: 1

    Try this link instead.

  41. How is this news?? by topham · · Score: 2

    How is this news?

    I mean really. Blogging is someone putting a paragraph or 2 (or a dozen) a day, a week, etc into an online journal. They are often trivial. Personally I think thats why people like them. They show that other people involve themselves in the trivial aspects of their own lives as much as the rest of us.

    As for a story, go ahead and write one. But the difference between yours, and everyone else who blogs is, theirs might actually be true.

    Then again, maybe they are already telling a story, and we don't know it yet.

  42. Like George Clinton said: by Kikaid. · · Score: 0
    Like George Clinton said:

    Free your mind

    and your ass will etc...

    --

    (This post does not contain emoticons or l337.)

  43. I AGREE WITH THE GUY ABOVE WHO SAID "POOP" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. One possible "artistic" endeavour by Aexia · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine started a parody blog of the blogs that overwrought, overdramatic teens sometimes write. A soap opera in blog format so to speak.

    Most people think blogs are uninteresting snippets of uninteresting people. Why not invent an interesting person?

  45. A Time to Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now's the time, fellow trollers. The mods have blown their points smacking down those posters correcting the spelling of "ludacris" in a previous article. Very few mods have any points left.

    This is a good way to get them to blow their points. Wait for a CmdrTaco post and all trolls should make as many posts as possible correcting it. Once they've all been smacked down, you're free to troll in future articles.

  46. Technology Induced Beat Generation Dreams Of Today by glubbs · · Score: 1
    As far as this goes, in the FAQ:

    "new readers that might arrive at any day in the weblog (and hence the story) and old readers that might skip one or more days in it. As long as each entry has some meaning on its own, it should be possible to create something interesting (even something coherent!)."

    It sounds a lot like William S. Burroughs' idea that he used in his book Naked Lunch. The idea is that the reader can open up the book to any page, at any point, begin reading and get a story, not just a section of a whole story. I suggest reading that novel to get a better picture of how he accomplishes this (which he does, for the most part), and as a general guide on what you think works/doesn't work. Be warned, though: that book isn't for everyone.


    As far as this goes, in the FAQ:

    "entries are "improvisational," by which I mean that you usually sit down, write it, and post it. There isn't a lot of preparation, hours of editing or things like that. You write it, you post it. Maintaining this should not be hard, mainly it would seem to remove most of the editing phase from the writing process."

    This feels like the point of view that Jack Kerouac had with his writings, not to mention a whole lot of the others in the Beat Generation. If you haven't I'd suggest getting your hands on anything from that time period, not only wil you probably like it (as it goes along the lines of your blognovel idea), it may also help you get this thing going.

  47. You're looking under the wrong rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...possible to use it as an artistic medium to produce interesting work... I thought the slashdot community would have a lot useful things to say about all of these issues.

    The Kuro5hin.org community could help you out a lot more than the anti-community of Slashdot. This is a news site, whereas kuro5hin is a 'blog / discussion arena. So try your posting elsewhere unless you really really wanted to plow through 100 Fist Psots

    1. Re:You're looking under the wrong rock by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      It might be true that Kuro5hin.org is more appropriate for it, but I think a lot of interesting ideas where posted here, regardless of the flame or the complaints.

  48. useful tool by OpenMind(tm) · · Score: 2

    The blog format is just another potential tool for the literary process. It is thus important to consider the properties of this tool to decide how to use it.

    What new capabilites does the blog bring to the table? What new stories does it allow you to tell? What new writer-reader dynamics does it allow? Fiction in the form of journal entries is not a new thing. Done well, it can create a sense of intimacy between the writer and the reader. Long running web comic strips such as Sluggy Freelenace show that you can get away with a long running plot in little daily chunks on the web.

    At the same time, you have to consider the bad properties of such a tool. As with many serial novels, people may be unlikely to start in the middle, or backtrack years to catch up. Many people tend to find it tiresome or slightly painful to read novel length stretches of text off of a computer screen.

    I'd say, if you have a story to tell that fits the form, go ahead. I don't tend to see it as such a breakthrough for literature, just another slight variation in the art of storytelling.

  49. What about Trolls? by Brightest+Light · · Score: 1

    Lets not forget that although offtopic most of, if not all of the time; some of the troll posts on slashdot make for good reading (try browsing at -1 for a bit, most of the interesting stuff is down there anyway (as long as you dont click on the links!)) Take, for example, the postings of BankofAmerica_ATM. Quite well written, in my opinion. Or, for a more amusing example, the writings of Migor. Not very coherent, but damn funny stuff.

    1. Re:What about Trolls? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      BankofAmerica_ATM.

      I'll second this, that guy (gal, whatever) isn't a troll, he's an author. Regular readers can clearly see the progression of the artists writting style and technique, and the story is darn interesting.

      Or at least it was, I haven't checked it out in a few months.

  50. It can work by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

    There was a message board on a BBS I used to go on(long since perished in the rise of the Internet) that was for such a thing... It worked fairly nicely. As for navigation, just make it clear when each entry was made. Ideally, I'd have it start with the first entry, so that its easy to follow the story from beginning to end. Perhaps use cookies so that repeat visitors can start off again where they left off last time... If not cookies, use some means of bookmarking exact locations.

  51. okay now people.. this is ridiculous by sugrshack · · Score: 2
    okay there've been a number of negative opinions about blogs expressed here that I just have to laugh at...

    common complaint: "I'm not interested in anyone else."
    Then why do you read slashdot? it's much like a set of interactive blogs... and yes some blogs are indeed interactive... people link back and forth.

    Also, though they are a public forum for a person's thoughts, they really aren't intended for a huge growth in traffic... they're a place to keep one's thoughts...

    Sure some are for the purpose of artistic expression, but my view of art is that it is mainly for the individual who creates it. Yeah yeah yeah, they're public so others can view it, but most wont... who cares?

    Identity is not such a simple concept that a person is the same in every situation.. we all play roles which are different for different people or places. For me, sometimes I have a hard time keeping track of who I am all the time; by having a blog, I can help myself create some continuity... after all, it's just a journal, but one that I can update from anywhere, as long as I'm near a computer with web access.

    but as many people have suggested here, I've probably already bored you, because you're not interested in what other people say... so off I go to my own thoughts again...

    --
    I can't believe it's not lard!
  52. Surrrrre. by budalite · · Score: 1

    Let's see a show of hands of /.ers that read or even write blogs. Wow. I see about 10000000 hands. Hmm? Oh, sorry. That would be binary.

    Blogs. Jeez. Can't we get back to the User Vs. the Machine stuff now?

  53. I hate plot-oriented stories anyway. by yotto · · Score: 2, Funny
    "I hate plot-oriented stories anyway.

    Yeah, I hate it when plot gets in the way of a good story...

    1. Re:I hate plot-oriented stories anyway. by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      I said *plot-oriented* as in Tom Clancy's books for example, as opposed for example to Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow.

    2. Re:I hate plot-oriented stories anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno...could you maybe given an example?

  54. Reminds me of... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 2

    the Choose Your Own Adventure books I used to read, at least in the non-linear navigation aspect.

    I'm not too familiar with blogging, but to set up a blognovel, wouldn't you need to write something where the concept of "what happens next" is unimportant? Can one write an story without chronology? I suppose Naked Lunch was pretty devoid of a timeline.

    --
    "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    1. Re:Reminds me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it reminds me of even more is something I saw the other day when going through my bookmarked interactive fiction sites.

      Portal was an interactive novel published in 1986 about an astronaut who returns to earth in the future after a 100-yr period of suspended animation.

      There are no humans left, and the main character figures out what happens by logs in a computer network. Much of the interactive novel reads like a series of blog entries.

      The site linked to above is a web version of the original novel. I'm not sure if I should link to it here, because the author posted a message on the main page that basically says "Please don't slashdot me!" I suppose it's probably okay, though, because it's not the main story, and I'm posting anonymously anyway.

      The parallels between the blognovel and the 1986 interactive novel are very interesting in my mind.

  55. And why is this on Slashdot? by Darkwalker · · Score: 1

    Not trying to be a troll, but why did this make slashdot? Blogs aren't anything new. Novels aren't anything new. Using a blog to tell a story is about 5 minutes older than the first blog. Why is this more intereting than This [spam-scams] or This [Cyber athletes] or even This [Pure shock value].

  56. Historical citing by wytcld · · Score: 2

    You might look at Invisible Seattle's 1984 BBS-based in.s.omni, a collaborative effort that involved putting kiosks at art shows and in the basement cafe of the Elliot Bay Book Company, along with dial-in access. It used a room-based BBS arrangement plus the assumption of the names and personae of literary-artistic semi-obscure but mythic characters by the principals. As I remember it, it was a lot more fun - and smarter - than anything on the Web. But we were satisfied with such simple toys then.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  57. Exactly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we please stop encouraging the use of the idiot-word "blog"? It hurts my gums to even THINK it.

    It's a WEBLOG. "blog" is a cave-man word. It goes side-by-side with the pseudo-words "ugh!" and "unf!".

    Sample usage:
    "UGH! UNF! ME BLOG BRONTASAURUS! UGH UGH!"

  58. Re:Fictional blog community:bolded by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For Clarity:
    I too was going to write a fictional blog community. Eventually this idea morphed into a rampant homoerotic tale rife with auto erotic asphyxiation and manham canning sessions. It appears that this idea is inherently homosexual and anyone that persues this avenue of creativity is either a repressed and in denial, or blatant Fag. Best of luck to you Mary.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  59. are you famous? by urmensch · · Score: 0

    who the fsck are you and why should I care?

    yeah most 'blogs might be masturbation, but does that make the concept (publishing your thoughts, questions, hopes...) invalid? I guess I diagree with you about the "underlying purpose of a weblog".

    analogy:
    plenty of people don't speak the english language very well, so I suppose the language is flawed and should be disregarded intirely.

  60. Already Interesting blognovel (in progress) by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 2

    since I'm fascinated with his tale, I'd like to point out the work of jorm, who's currently writing a (superhero?) story told episodically via livejournal.

    He's left me chomping at the bit for more.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  61. You're thinking of blogs generally by xant · · Score: 2

    Most blog apps have this already. b2 which is my favorite certainly employs this feature, so you can filter by category. I'm not sure what this would add to a novel's narrative format, though. If it's not a linear progression through a story, it shouldn't be called a novel, although it may be no less meaningful a form of art. A blog can be a linear progression, but not if you filter out part of it by categorizing it.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  62. Old news. by invispace · · Score: 1

    That's waaay old news... nothing new. No offense, but people should do research before going off and saying they're doing something original. I have several friends that have similar projects, after having done it myself. I sometimes wonder if people just want to get their names in lights, or just want to do something unique.

    --
    -- -- A truly great man never puts away the simplicity of a child
    1. Re:Old news. by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      No offense taken! There are many things that have been mailed, commented or referenced since I started that are similar, either on- or offline. That doesn't mean they are easy to find, or that people are aware of them. As for the similar projects, if you post the links I will certainly link to them. I will certainly add a section to the FAQ with references to previous work, and I think this whole discussion has been great to unearth them.

    2. Re:Old news. by invispace · · Score: 1

      heh.. it's kind of funny... I never read the replies to posts... maybe I should now.

      I'll troll for some of the stuff on LiveJournal. Actually there's a community on LiveJournal, if I can find it, where they've basically been doing a handoff story for the last year. It's pretty neat. Each post is by someone different continuing the story.

      Cheers

      --
      -- -- A truly great man never puts away the simplicity of a child
    3. Re:Old news. by DiegoPlanB · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll look for it (although handoff stories are a different concept than what I wanted a blognovel to be, since they are written by many different people). If you come across anything else I'd be interested as well.

  63. It boils my blood... by lukew · · Score: 1

    .. how people make these god awful abbreviations.
    I call upon the light side of the Slashdot community to join me in a good old fashioned mob lynching.

    Translation for the to-be victims:
    i sh0ut out to the l33t side of the dotcrew to join me in some m0b ching 0wn4g3. no n00bz!!!!

    Tossers.

  64. Blogs blow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  65. Maybe not a novel... by vanyel · · Score: 2

    ...but a long time ago, in an era far far away (the late 80's, pre-public internet when bbs's were king), there was a BBS in Portland, OR that was basically a simple front to two CPM 8" floppy disks in append-only mode. As each floppy filled up, the system would switch to the other and the full one would be replaced with an empty one. People posted anonymously and creatively and it had a loyal following for several years... A limited audience probably helped the signal-to-noise ratio, but it sounds like a less structured version of what you're talking about here, and it worked pretty well...

  66. Here's the most interesting weblog I've ever seen by pcx · · Score: 2

    This is the weblog of a girl who clerks at an adult video store. The subject is rather interesting and its well written. It's probably, unfortunately, the pinacle of weblogs at least for me. The adult video store weblog was an intersting read, the one on salon made me wish I was reading an adult video store weblog :)

    Some of us might remember The Spot A now defunct weblog that tried to make a go of commercializing this form of entertainment (they failed, they even manage to fail at the pinacle of the dot com craze). And they managed to fail with PICTURES!

    I guess the moral of the story is, if you're going to do a weblog, make it something interesting like a clerk at an adult video store or maybe a massage parlor or something where you have a lot of quirky personalities to talk about. :-)

  67. Plan-B sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plan-B is garbage when compared to BankOfAmericaATM and The Turd Report!

  68. Life the Universe and Everything by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2

    Back in the BBS days (*sigh* ... pause for warm fuzzy memory) here in Australia there was an echo-mail area called "Life the Universe and Everything". The whole point of this area was the development of a semi-continuous complex-as-buggery story. The story was created by the participants over time. It was a very weird experience to jump in the first time. The main point seemed to be to impress everyone else with your creativity, wit and dramatic flair. The story was so convoluted that newbies had practically no chance.

    Still it was an interesting area. People got severely addicted to it. But it wasn't a novel, it was however a kind of fiction. It reminds me of a blind double date I once went on. I knew the other girl, she was really really smart. We ended up having a coded, semi-fictional fantasy exchance across the table that just kept escalating in complexity ... the others couldn't follow it. That's what Life etc was like.

    Good luck. But don't expect a novel. A novel is a very particular kind of fiction. A lot of enjoyable fiction that is called a "novel" today is not a Novel.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  69. noir-cyberfurry-SF-detective-horror fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I attempted to write a short story in a Live Journal about a year ago, but abandoned the process after I discovered that blogs are more suited to chronological stories than flashbacks. That much should have been obvious before I started, but it wasn't. Since LJ allows for the backdating of entries and even the foredating of entries, but keeps the reading order in the order of posting; I assumed I would be able to post a flashback/forward dated 2125, and have the post bannered as such, but appear on reader's pages on the day I wrote it. That much worked, at least technically.

    The problem? Readers were complaining that they couldn't follow the tale, because even though posts would show up properly; the reader was forced to reference the date field and cross-reference to the previous post to see whether the item was a flashback or not. I ended that first attempt after 4 posts.

    I licked my wounds and finding my ego only slightly bruised I began again. Three weeks ago, I started posting yet another novel to LJ and am up to my sixth post and going strong. The trick, I've found is to have a great amount of the first draft written so that what is transfered to the blog is the second or third draft. More importantly, keep the story as linear as possible, write in vignette, short-attention span style so that the reader walks away each day with a memorable mouthful, no more and no less. Never depend on the date to orient the reader.

    So is noir-cyberfurry-SF-detective-horror fiction anybody's cup of broth?

  70. piss off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chalk up one more point for pot-heads with
    webservers. in what remote, minute way is
    this original, or interesting, at All? Just
    because it has the word 'blog' in it?

    good christ, you people are Idiots.

  71. Oh phoey by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1

    My software firm is called "Plan B Software Labs". Hopefully this guy won't become too famous or I'll have to think up another name. ;-(

  72. Most posts here miss the point by jcarley · · Score: 1

    If it is intended to be a literary work or some other form of art, it fails.

    The style and technical aspects of his writing are just not that good IMHO.

    The medium may be interesting - potentially even the future of serialised stories - but I doubt the author is the one to make best use of it.

  73. Amazing insight, says I - Crappy idea Blogman! by thefluxster · · Score: 1

    Your little idea that you've posted here just plain sucks - no on on SlashDot cares for this kind of crap.

    --

    Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.

  74. how bad.... by tq_at_sju · · Score: 1

    How bad am i sick of writers on the web doing things new and creative, just write a damn book would you ? The whole point of writing is not pretty pictures or stupid thoughts about how i should design my web page creatively, it's about the writing. I think its really lame that they are almost trying to say this is a science experiment, your not fregin albert einstein. You don't need the scientific method to write a book, but you do need a good solid storyline

    --
    http://www.vanillaafro.com - take me seriously and I will shoot you
    1. Re:how bad.... by tq_at_sju · · Score: 1

      yeah i know i said your instead of you're, but thats besides the point hehe..

      --
      http://www.vanillaafro.com - take me seriously and I will shoot you
  75. hypertext stories by Luyon · · Score: 1
    The blogstory really falls into the category of hypertext stories, which have been around for awhile. I had a college seminar on hypertext writing three years ago, and at the time everything was focused around eastgate

    A great (and free) hypertext story is available here

  76. Re:Here's the most interesting weblog I've ever se by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

    i recently came across this blog and i thought the same. I've read some few blogs before, but this one is very thoughtful and funny. Also very well written imo :)

  77. What a great idea... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 2

    ...so great in fact, it'll never work.

    Why? Because you'll get feedback, good or bad, that will (at the very least subliminally) change your mind about where the story should go.

    The story is first. No matter what book(s) you read about writing and fiction, the story should be king. If it's not, you might as well hang up those typing hands and give it up.

    The problem with this is that first of all, and this happens ALL the time, you'll just plain ole run out of ideas. But then, you'll protest, by all of the feedback you're getting you'll get more ideas. Well, here we have the Too Many Cooks In The Kitchen scenario that plagues most writerly "collaborations." Everyone wants to have their say, and when you start in one direction, even a tiny bit, by the time you get another hundred pages or so, you've altered your original narrative in such a way that you'll hardly recognize it anymore.

    The second, and most important problem? No rewrites. Lemme land a quote on ya: "The first draft of everything is shit." - Ernest Hemingway. Smart guy. He's right too. The simple fact is that when you finish a writing a large or small piece of fiction, there is at least 10% fluff that needs to be trimmed. Normally more, but I myself shoot for 10% at the least. The problem with the blognovel is that, once you get so far into the story, and you realize something is off, there's no way to change it without editing what may amount to dozens of entries. Then you get frustrated. Then you panic. Then you give up.

    You note Great Expectations and its episodic format. But what you don't realize, and what I'd stake my life on, is that Dickens probably finished at least two or three large sections, rewrote the first one, published it, wrote another large section, rewrote the second part, published that one, and so on.

    With this format you don't have the luxury of forgetting parts of it, only to rediscover them later on your first readthrough. Not doing so is subjecting many an unsuspecting reader on something they didn't know they were in for: a novel that's not a novel but wants to be a novel but will never actually be a novel.

    You have an idea; just the wrong way to go about it.

    Here's a suggestion: how about building a story with multiple blogs of fictional people? You can design sites with fictional towns and places (imagine, you can build your own fictional police force website, write your own police reports about incidents, etc) and then link them together with a condusive narrative. This would also work well with more than one writer, all of you with your own story, just interwoven with one another. But hey, it's just an idea.

    Good luck.

  78. Already Started by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

    I have already started something that you have spoken of on my website. It has been a very interesting experiment so far...

    Some things I've noticed are that creative bits of writing occur in bursts. That is, when one (usually new) person comes along and writes a whole bunch, everyone else builds on it and a good couple of pages are generated instantly.

    This leads to lots of deadspace, though, but maybe I just haven't gotten creative people.

  79. Fictional Blog by owillis · · Score: 1

    I have a fictional blog of my own, starring the one and only Britney Spears...

    --
    OliverWillis.Com
    An Operative with an Agenda
  80. I AGREE WITH THIS POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [I]chalk up one more point for pot-heads with
    webservers. in what remote, minute way is
    this original, or interesting, at All? Just
    because it has the word 'blog' in it?

    good christ, you people are Idiots[/I]

  81. Links and News - a sort of filter by crisco · · Score: 2
    some aren't a online diary, they are one person's filter of the net.

    for instance, I read dangerousmeta almost daily. I don't know all that much about garret's daily activities but I know he posts a decent assortment of news and tech links without too much commentary. I've been reading long enough to slightly understand his point of view, adding an extra understanding that I might otherwise miss or be annoyed by.

    The art is in the communication.

    --

    Bleh!

  82. Mod parent up, please by boa13 · · Score: 2

    To think that I would one day ask that. Thank you Sebastopol for asking a question I have never dared to ask. Thank you devon for this great link.

    I don't know if Rebecca Blood's essay was mentioned on Slashdot when it was published, but it is definitely worthy of being some "Stuff that matters."

    Damn, it almost makes me want to start a blog.

  83. more malleable than diaries by ph8ts2l · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure when this started, but I've been seeing weblogs for at least a couple of years. And many of them hardly deserve the miniscule bandwidth they require. Some weblogs, though, tend toward community discussion rather than one's personal life (case in point: the site you're looking at right now). Dunno about all the rest, but I only post stuff I'd actually want to share or maybe discuss with others. And if my six hits a day aren't the result I wanted, big deal, it's simply nice to have my very own bathroom wall on which to scribble.

  84. The Medium Isn't the Message by urish · · Score: 1

    I have yet to see anything interesting come out of 'narrative explorations' in the context of hypertext. Usually, when exploring narrative structures, one tends to forget that there's more to writing than structure, and it becomes tedious, boring, or both.

    Let's face it, a weblog is just a diary with a large circulation and some hypertext markups, nothing too novel (...and hyperlinks are not too useful as literary instruments in my opinion, but that's a whole other topic).

  85. Just don't name the character Igor. by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 2

    Ah.. flashbacks to the old BBS days...

    ---N

  86. Read the book "E" by Matt Baeumont by chris_martin · · Score: 1

    It's not a blog, but it is a novel written entirely by emails passing between the characters. It's very funny and a quick read. Once you get in to the book you don't even need to read the header of the email as you get to know the writting style and attitude of each person.
    It's a great book.

    E
    Matt Baeumont
    Plume Books, ISBN 0-452-28188-1

    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
  87. So what? by Liquid+Velcro · · Score: 1
    Sorry if weblogs aren't all open-source Linux-worshipping tracts that you guys seem to be looking for.

    Most "bloggers" don't even mind Microsoft, let alone abbreviating it with the dollar sign in a weak attempt to be "funny" and/or "witty". (hint- it's not!)

    The news item is a look at Internet culture and one of the ways it's evolving. As users of said Internet, you ought to be at least somewhat interested in that, as weblogs are very common these days.

    Get over it or quit whining, it just makes you guys sound like vindictive geeks.

    --
    - lV
  88. my blognovel by wisdomd · · Score: 1

    I have also been working on a similar project.
    HERE
    Enjoy.

  89. HHGTTG by roofingfelt · · Score: 1
    On the other hand, the radio show of HHGTTG seemed to be done in a manner that may not have had that much time to go back over it

    The just-out HHGTTG DVD has some things to say about this - it says Adams was short of time and writing week-to-week, but he did go over and over his writing, fine-tuning and tweaking it.

    Still shocked to realize there were only six episodes...

  90. Miss Frank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think someone called "Anne Frank" did something like this once, with some success