Slashdot Mirror


Macworld Expo May Return to Boston

Anonymous Being of Power writes "According to a New York Post Article, Macworld New York may be held once again in Boston due to rising costs and lower attendance."

63 comments

  1. A Mac user makes the switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    "I've tried everything to understand women. Their obsession with self-image, inability to make up their mind, always saying one thing while expecting another -- I just couldn't cut it."

    "My, er, relationships were always crashing -- I couldn't maintain a hard-on for more than a couple of minutes before it fizzled out on me."

    "Eventually I got fed up with women and decided to get a twink."

    "I couldn't understand how the female genitalia works. A penis is just so... intuitive. It works the way I work."

    "I've been in a loving relationship with my life partner Lance for six months now. I can't imagine ever switching back."

    Gay -- http://www.switch.gaymke.com/

    "My name is Rod Hardcastle, and I'm a certified Apple dealer."

  2. They'll be moving to Sioux falls soon by theolein · · Score: 1, Troll

    If Apple doesn't get something done about the processor performance/speed in the near future they may as well move their next expo to Sioux Falls for all the interest it's going to generate.

  3. and in related news... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...the yearly Summer Festival known as "Burning Man" will be held at Times Square, New York City. When asked why the festival was moving the organizers muttered sometime about "sausages are better there" and quickly changed the subject.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  4. Funny... by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

    I understood that the numbers since going to NYC had been rising...In fact, I'm sure that there were some web sites touting the fact that this years numbers had surpassed last years.

    Anyway, Boston is a horrible city for this, and relocating to there would only cement a second-rate image for Apple -- and I live there.

    1. Re:Funny... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Anyway, Boston is a horrible city for this, and relocating to there would only cement a second-rate image for Apple....

      Why, and how?

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    2. Re:Funny... by Lurkingrue · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, I won't get into personal preferences, but Boston is tiny, less active, relatively less accessible, and there's a much more limited market for hotel rooms. The locations available in Boston for such an expo are smaller, and less centrally located.

      The last Boston expo I attended had to be split between two locations that were both on the fringes of the city. The public transit system here is weak compared to NYC, the restaurants and the sites are also a far cry from what's available in Manhattan. NYC has world-wide cachet and recognition, as well as being the cultural and financial capital of the US... Boston is -- to put it kindly -- not.

      I'm a veteran of several MacWorld Expos (both Boston and NY) and I'm a Boston resident. Personally, I think it'd be a huge error to have the MWExpo in Boston again.

    3. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hes right about the hotel accomodations and whatnot. As a bostonian I agree with that much, but I completely disagree with the restraunts comment.

    4. Re:Funny... by mjpaci · · Score: 2

      Hey! If my (MA) tax dollars are paying for this new convention center, I want to at least attend a convention that I want to go to. The Seafood convention is just not my cup of tea.

      More hotels rooms are coming online as we speak. Boston's biggest problem is that it closes down at 1:00 AM and it's transit system closes right before that.

      Hell there's always "Cold Tea" in Chinatown at 4:30 AM.

      --Mike

    5. Re:Funny... by Altus · · Score: 1


      your nuts.

      first off... attendence is falling not only in people, but also in exhibitors. I was at MW NY a year ago and ADOBE wasnt there... WTF is that! they are much better off having this show in a city where exhibitors can actualy afford to go.

      Its mostly due to the teamsters union in NY, you cant do anything at the expo without paying teamsters a ton of money to watch you do it.

      as for the trouble with boston... less accessible... look, logan isnt great but its easier to get too and from than the NYC airports, hell there is a tunnel right to the convention center... with 2 new hotels right next to it.

      there are plenty of hotels in boston for this kind of thing.

      the only real problem is that if more exhibitors show up the show might have to be split across 2 halls, but frankly, thats an if. the expo has been a loosing propostion in NY. better to have more exhibitors than you can handle than not enough to make your expo center seem full.

      as for your overall complaints about boston (resturaunts, public transit and such) theya re realy unfonded. the Silver line will provide service from the trade center to the center of town, bostons transit system is far easier to handle than NYs since it doesnt have express and local trains and has less than 20 lines.

      boston is a fine city for this kind of thing, the only problem is the convention center which, given the way the expo has gone in NY, might not be such a big problem

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    6. Re:Funny... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Not anymore.

      at least not friday and saturday night thanks to the night owl buses that run along all of the subway routes untill very very late at night.

      I never use them myself, so I dont know much about them, but I have many friends that use them quite a bit.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    7. Re:Funny... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Philly...

      surely you jest

      I lived in philly for the last ten years... Septa is a joke and although cabs are available they are not sufficent.

      and what convention center would you hold it in exactly?

      Boston is in the process of building a new convention center (done in 2004). Its restaruants are world class and its hotels are certainly not more expensive than the ones in manhattan.

      sure, chicago would be a nice city for this, but it is relatively remote, sticking to an east cost city allows for easy trasport to the site for many people in this part of the country. as for having it in san fran... dont they already do that?

      Also, given that boston has offed them a free ride at the new convention center I realy dont think they are going to do better in NY.

      oh, and the big thing about the silver line is that it has dedicated lanes, and by the time the new convention center opens it will be fully completed.

      sure, the T closes, but if your staying in down town boston you realy dont have to worry about it. everything is a short walk or a short cab ride (there are plenty of cabs in boston, Ive never had trouble getting one)

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    8. Re:Funny... by weave · · Score: 2
      Boston's biggest problem is that it closes down at 1:00 AM and it's transit system closes right before that.

      Well that's bloody stupid. People like to drink, and transit provides a way to get home safely without having to drive home DUI. Now, I admit, riding the bus makes it a bit harder to pick up a babe and bring her home. "Yeah baby, we just have to stand out here on the corner and wait for the next 32 to come along...."

      Reminds me of a story...

    9. Re:Funny... by Altus · · Score: 1

      I said I lived in philly for ten years

      that is a lie

      I lived there for 2 years...

      I need to go home and sleep.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    10. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, chicago would be a nice city for this, but it is relatively remote, sticking to an east cost city allows for easy trasport to the site for many people in this part of the country. as for having it in san fran... dont they already do that?

      Can you emaplin to me how Chicago, which is the hub of Air and Rail transit in the US is remote? For that matter how any other city in the US is remote when most have international airports?????

    11. Re:Funny... by pudge · · Score: 2

      The hotels are a concern, but the fact that it was split between two sites is not. The next one won't be, that's the point.

      As to public transit, Boston's is far better than NYC's in my opinion. It's not as easy to get a cab, but far easier and less crowded to ride the subway, which goes almost everywhere, within a few blocks.

      As to the sites and restaurants in NYC, I think most of them suck, and I am certainly not alone. New York culture sucks. I could use a stronger word, but I am trying to be as polite as possible. The fact that it has "world-wide cachet" just means the world has no taste.

      And Boston is the #2 financial city in the country, not that it matters.

    12. Re:Funny... by pudge · · Score: 2

      business-wise, Boston is third-tier

      That make little sense. My only response is the quote from This Is Spinal Tap that you reminded me of.

      "The Boston gig's been cancelled... I wouldn't worry about it, though. It's not a big college town."

    13. Re:Funny... by Altus · · Score: 1

      well, it has to do with the way they set up these expos.

      Apple has chosen a 2 a year model (in the US) therefore, in order to allow the most people to attend the expo with minimal traveling, they have the two on the coasts, instead of somewhere in between.

      chigago is a great town for conventions, but it results in serious travel for most of the people on the east coast (includes most major population centers for that area). on the other hand, if you held only 1 convention a year for the whole country I think chicago would be THE place to hold it.

      lets face it... there arent any realy big markets near chicago, just chicago itself. NYC, philly, boston, DC they are all a reasonably long way from chicago. I just dont think it would fit well with the model they have chosen.

      thats just my thinking.

      there is one other major factor. look at the distances that companies have to travel to exhibit at the expo. boston has a huge number of apple developers (avid, media 100, bare bones... countless smaller developers... there are major local offices for macromedia and adobe as well )the north east is a stron location for apple, good Idea to keep your expo near that.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    14. Re:Funny... by NickV · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight (and I know some moderators here seem to be "ra ra Boston!" and will mod me down, but...)

      You're comparing the largest subway system in the western hemisphere to Boston's and honestly trying to make them seem on par?

      You're comparing a subway system that has, according to the census, a 60% FREQUENT ridership rate in the entire city (a city of 7.5 million) against Boston's (which is nowhere near the same magnitude.) You're comparing a ridership of about 250,000 a day (about 5K one-ways) (on the "real" train lines) against the 5th most used subway transportation system in the world?

      Then you complain about the "complexity of the system" where in Boston I need to go to a centralized hub to even transfer to any subway lines. Meanwhile, in NYC you can transfer readily and easily without any "centralized hub" needed. And wow, you're complaining about "confusing" express lines? I'm sorry if MORE options are a problem, sounds like the typical Bostonians complaint when they come to NYC. You say "has less than 20 lines" like having 20 lines is a bad thing (it's 28 btw). It's like, "well we only have one road versus 30 in town, isn't that great?" NO, it's not.

      Then again, you're also comparing a subway system that, at most, requires you to walk 5 blocks from ANY station in Manhattan against Boston's with it's monsterous walks to the T (or it's "silver line-because-we-really-want-to-call-it-a-subway" transfer lines.)

      Finally, the worse part of the "T" is that, you're comparing a subway system that's open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year... a system, that suffered the greatest foreign attack on America soil ever yet reopened in less than 1 hour after the second tower went down (and I mean Manhattan lines,) against a system that shuts down at night for "maintenance?"

      Even my friends from boston secretly admit to me there's no comparison. My question is, do you really honestly think this way regarding the subway, or are you one of those irrational "boston is great no matter what nyc sucks" type people?

    15. Re:Funny... by NickV · · Score: 1

      No no no silly. Chicago is the #2 financial city in the country. Where did you come up with that stat about boston? In terms of capital that goes through the city? In terms of how many prominent investment banks are in the area? In terms of what financial exchanges are located there? In terms of how many skyscrapers are in the city? In terms of raw numbers of people in the finance industry? oh no, probably just out of your ass.

      I love how Bostonians always compare their little metro system to the largest one in the western hemisphere. Guess why NYC's is more crowded? Because people ACTUALLY USE IT (it's the only transit system in America that over 50% of the residents use FREQUENTLY according to the census) You know what sucks about the T (aside from the fact that it closes, that half of it is not really a subway, that it has different fares for different stations), what sucks is getting from Quincy to BC requires you to go to a centralized hub to transfer over. None of that shit HAPPENS in NYC because it's system is not based on the hub concept (only system in the US to actually be that way.)

      NYC restaurants suck? Nobu, Tribeca Grille, Daniels', and the Union Square Cafe suck? Let me guess, you've been in an Olive Garden in Times Square and now you're an expert on the world wide culinary arts. Face it, the best restaurants in the world (also the pricest unfortunately) are in New York City.

      My God, are all Bostonians this delusional (2nd financial city in the country, HA HA HA HA HA)? The funny thing is, you sound so silly with your claims because they're not even debatable they're so far gone.

  5. beats the hell out of PC expo by feldsteins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God it sucks that the first 3 posts to this article are undeniable trolls. Slowly but surely the Macintosh platform is gaining ground in the nerdier circles including slashdot. I just wish it would happen a little quicker so we can actually discuss things rather than imply that Mac users are gay or that they will be out of business in 6 months if they don't go x86. Shut up already. I heard enough of that shit back in the early 90s.

    Now about the Expo...No matter where it ends up it'll beat the hell out of PC Expo which I've been to in Chicago for the last 2 years. I do hope other computer shows are better than that one. What a dog. I didn't see one excited person there. Not even the vendors seemed to be awake. Just a small building filled with small, cheesy, lame booths and a couple of hundred middle-aged tech managers shuffling aimlessly about.

    Now, Macworld is a different thing. Don't believe it? Try it. You can get in to the show floor for a song. Go see for yourself. And when you get back keep the Kool-Aid analogies to yourself already. Jeez.

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    1. Re:beats the hell out of PC expo by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      I've never been to a PC or Mac expo, but I was under the impression that the Mac Expo's cost big bucks. Doesn't help us students out too much!

    2. Re:beats the hell out of PC expo by feldsteins · · Score: 2

      Admittance to the show floor is cheap or free, as I recall. Well, I think it was under $50 and free admissions abounded, or something like that. It's the user and even more so the professional conference sessions that cost. And actually it wasn't that bad. I think I paid ~$500 for a weeks worth of professional conference sessions. I don't know if PC Expo had any conference sessions other that those that were basically sales pitches given by vendors. Not really sure, though.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    3. Re:beats the hell out of PC expo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course macworld is more fun then any PC show. No one company (except microsoft perhaps, but probably not) can completly change the entire PC world. The entire mac world as you know it can change in just one keynote. How can a PC show compete with that?

  6. I remember MacWorld Boston 1985... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lots of carrying cases. Lots of fonts. Not very much software.

    I got Stephen Chernicoff to sign my copy of "Macintosh Revealed."

    White Pine Software had an empty booth with a sign taped to the table announcing that they would soon have their first product, a VT-220 emulator for the Mac.

    Someone was demoing software that created a small amount of RAM cache for the floppy drive. If you had a whopping 512K of memory, that RAM cache actually could speed things up a bit.

    What else was there? Overvue, from Provue Development, I think... Filevision from Telos, which was really mindblowing at the time.

    I believe it was the 1986 MacWorld that had the huge inflated Macintosh outside promoting MacPublisher, a very early desktop publishing product.

    In the first few years, MacWorld was really great. You could belly up to a booth and really try out and learn about new software. The people exhibiting the software generally knew a lot about it and were often developers.

    Ah, well... MacWorld may come back to Boston, but it will never be like 1985.

    1. Re:I remember MacWorld Boston 1985... by King+Babar · · Score: 5, Funny
      Lots of carrying cases. Lots of fonts. Not very much software.

      Ah yes; that takes me back. :-) One other notable piece of software was Megamax C, and the amazing debugger whose name now escapes me...

      I got Stephen Chernicoff to sign my copy of "Macintosh Revealed."

      Me too! :-)

      Someone was demoing software that created a small amount of RAM cache for the floppy drive. If you had a whopping 512K of memory, that RAM cache actually could speed things up a bit.

      OK, so was MacBottom (hard-drive that fit under your Mac) at that first Expo?

      What else was there? Overvue, from Provue Development, I think... Filevision from Telos, which was really mindblowing at the time.

      I believe that RecordHolder may have had or shared a small booth.

      I believe it was the 1986 MacWorld that had the huge inflated Macintosh outside promoting MacPublisher, a very early desktop publishing product.

      I think 1986 was also the debut of Fontographer; Aldus PageMaker was out in 1985, but I'm not sure if it was out in time for the Expo.

      In the first few years, MacWorld was really great. You could belly up to a booth and really try out and learn about new software. The people exhibiting the software generally knew a lot about it and were often developers.

      In either 1985 or 1986, a weird British bearded guy was demo-ing this wild and nutty computer algebra system for the (not so large) masses. Guy's name was "Wolfram", like the element, and his software was called "Mathemagica" or something like that. :-)

      Also in 1986 I believe was the introduction of this wild and crazy product called "HyperCard", a product that was so important but so ahead of its time that many younger people i talk to these days can't believe there was anyting like this in the bad old days.

      But my favorite early MacWorld was 1987, since I basically had to sneak out from under my soon-to-be-inlaws in order to attend the thing...3 days before I got married in another state. I randomly ran into a Boston Globe reporter who made me part of her story in the paper on how...hyper-dedicated macophiles were in those days.

      Ah, well... MacWorld may come back to Boston, but it will never be like 1985.

      No, but neither you or I will ever be the same, either.

      --

      Babar

    2. Re:I remember MacWorld Boston 1985... by coastcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wasn't there in '85, but did suffer through the air-conditioning-free '87 version. Went as just a spectator, but got roped into manning the booth for our user group (Washington Apple Pi, one of the few classics still in existence). We were all the way on one end of the convention center, and the only properly functioning air conditioning was on the other end. Oy.

      Sat through a demo of Word Perfect for the Mac. Yes, in 1987. What year was that thing finally released? The demo was a disaster, so the rep smoothed things over a bit by handing out free painter's caps with the Word Perfect logo. My dad still mows the lawn while wearing that cap!

      The WAP booth was right next to Hayden Software, which was demoing MusicWorks. The same music loop played over and over and over again... drove me batty.

      I can't remember if Wingz was shown there, or if it debuted a bit later. You remember Wingz, don't you? Great tote bags, lots of enthusiasm, pure vaporware...

    3. Re:I remember MacWorld Boston 1985... by ProfKyne · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember MacWorld Boston 1992.

      I was only 14, and at the time I was very interested in graphic design -- I faked a company to get a free subscription to "New Media" magazine. (I remember reading Mondo 2000 around that time too.)

      With the interest in graphics software, I recall walking around the Boston Bayside Expo with my bag of hats and logo-emblazoned giveaways. I checked out Wacom's new wireless stylus & tablet with a pressure-sensitive tip for controlling airbrush paint flow, and a cool-looking game (that never quite emerged on my gaming horizon) called Blade, which was kind of a Shadow of the Beast clone.

      But the real highlight of the day was that I got Mike Saenz's autograph, he was the artist behind Shatter (first computerized comic, designed on a Mac no less) and, along with Joe Sparks, the creator of the pioneering MacroMind Director -based Spaceship Warlock.

      He also created Virtual Valerie, and that seemed pretty cool at the time....

      --
      "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
    4. Re:I remember MacWorld Boston 1985... by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember Wingz. It did eventually ship, I'm not sure when. In 1991 I worked for a company with several avid Wingz fans. I sorta liked the artwork in their ads, dreamlike stuff with people in suits and ties flapping their arms and flying over a landscape of 3D bar charts... I wonder whatever happened to Wingz? Remember when there was more than one spreadsheet? Remember when there were more than TWO?

    5. Re:I remember MacWorld Boston 1985... by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure HyperCard was 1987, not 1986. Bill Atkinson presented a session on it himself. A very worthy successor to Rolodex! One part I remember distinctly was that he personally promised that the file format would be open and documented. In due course, I saw a Tech Note entitled "Hypercard File Format," and was very disappointed to find it consisted of a single sentence saying "The Hypercard file format is not available."

      I don't think MacBottom could have been out in 1985. I think MacBottom was one of the first generation of SCSI external drives that materialized with the MacPlus in 1986. The first drives all had to work with the serial interface.

  7. Re: Why don't you just go to a REAL conference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...instead of making me write "should" in the subject line?

    (Just ignore the "should".)

  8. Posting faux pas by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

    I know its bad form to reply to your own posts, but I just looked it up, and the numbers have dropped over the last couple of years. Just correcting myself to save someone else the effort.

    1. Re:Posting faux pas by Gropo · · Score: 0

      given the economy, not a surprise. Keep in mind that the Boston area features a higher MacUser-to-PeeSeaUser ratio than any other region on the East Coast (hence the 3 GAPples within 30 miles of each other)

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  9. Re:Wow...MacWorld Expo by axehat · · Score: 0

    Oh man, not again. Hasn't this been cleared up several times? RISC architecture. Runs cooler, less mhz needed. Shorter pipelines. It's very simple, the reason the Apple processors have a slower mhz number is because of the RISC architecture. Your awesome r0x0r Pentium is basically an overclocked 486. This is the reason they have to be 2ghz with a gigantic fan on them to get better performance. Heard about the new AMD chip? Guess what, it's RISC. It's going to run cooler. My G4 doesnt have a huge fan on it. The performance is the same. The new AMD chips and the new Intel chips are just like the G4 and SPARC chips, 64bit, RISC, and lower mhz.

  10. MacWorld 2003 ain't going anywhere by Smack · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quote 1: "enticed by a free offer for Boston's brand-spanking new convention center"

    Quote 2: "free rent at its new convention center, expected to be completed in 2004"

    1. Re:MacWorld 2003 ain't going anywhere by Altus · · Score: 1

      given the lower attendence by individuals and companies, Mac world 2003 could be in boston in one of the older convention centers.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  11. It's a right-wing conspiracy! by leviramsey · · Score: 1

    They plan to get the Macintosh hippies and the GNU hippies in the same city at the same time! Don't do it!

  12. Expo attendance by BigBir3d · · Score: 1, Troll

    for this year might have been down to all the "rumors" flying around stating that there was no G5.

    "there was not much interesting at this year's expo" in NY, and that is a quote from an ex-Bungie employee.

    no new hardware of tecchnological note, lame new software and services (iTunes and .Mac) is all a recipe for a pretty boring expo.

    it is no different than this year's linux expo on NYC being smaller, and far less interesting, IMO, than 2 years before.

    just some more effects of the dotcom bubble bursting.

  13. Re:Wow...MacWorld Expo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This feature will be introduced when two button (or even gasp, three button) mice are available from Apple.

    Thanking you for your patience.

    Steve Jobs.

  14. Boston Vs NYC by rattler14 · · Score: 1

    Being that I'm a mac user that goes to college in Boston, I'm very happy. However, they would no longer have the ability to advertise apple as going to the big apple. Sure, its just gimmicky advertising, but it works.

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
    1. Re:Boston Vs NYC by repetty · · Score: 1

      Puleeeze...

      99% of the country couldn't possibly care less that MacWorld is in New York.

    2. Re:Boston Vs NYC by rattler14 · · Score: 1

      well, that's still 3 million people, which many times greater than the number of people going to the event, so, what's your point

      99% of country could possibly care less about a lot of things

      --
      my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  15. Mike Saenz by sydsavage · · Score: 1

    We are the mind, the tool, and the engine.
    We are Digital.
    We are the demigods of today and tomorrow.
    We are unafraid.
    We are the Dreadnoughts.
    Our coven is linked as chain mail forged in hell.
    Our secrets are guarded by invincible watchdogs...
    ...with eyes made of gold and sand.
    They are like the dogs of the dead pharoahs.
    We heed the ROM.
    We feed the RAM.
    We destroy those who oppose us.
    We strike without mercy...
    ...for we are digital.

    1. Re:Mike Saenz by sydsavage · · Score: 1

      After re-reading this, I'm not sure if it describes slashgeeks, as I thought when posting it, or Microsoft.

    2. Re: Mike Saenz by ProfKyne · · Score: 2

      LOL. It could go both ways.

      If I'm not mistaken, though, Digital Justice was written and drawn by Pepe Moreno, though I think I read somewhere that he was at least a distant friend of Mike Saenz. I think Digital Justice was marketed as "the first computerized graphic novel" (also done entirely with Mac computers).

      D.J. was definitely a step up from Shatter's 72 dpi graphics, but they each have an appealing style. There is definitely a similarity between Shatter's alien nation (at the Ravenwood tanks) and D.J.'s mutants, both representing subordinated cultural groups. The alien nation is more like a ghettoized minority community and the mutants represent the marginalized youth.

      --
      "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
    3. Re: Mike Saenz by sydsavage · · Score: 1

      Actually, that quote was from Iron Man Crash, by Mike Saenz, which is probably what you're thinking of, as it was marketed as "the first computerized graphic novel". And yes, it was done entirely with Macs.

    4. Re: Mike Saenz by ProfKyne · · Score: 1

      Actually, that quote was from Iron Man Crash, by Mike Saenz, which is probably what you're thinking of, as it was marketed as "the first computerized graphic novel". And yes, it was done entirely with Macs.

      How could I have forgotten that? Crash totally slipped my mind -- now that I look back on the quote, I can't see how I could have mistaken one for the other. You're right of course, sorry for being confused about that.

      Still, if you liked Crash, you might like Pepe Moreno's Digital Justice. I felt that Crash should have been a series rather than a standalone graphic novel, it just wraps up way too quickly. And while I like the art in Digital Justice, overall Saenz's style (Shatter, Crash, Spaceship Warlock) appeals to me more, even if all his main characters look like Tom Cruise somehow.

      --
      "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
  16. NY v. Boston by aparkermarshall · · Score: 1

    Since I read the original NY Post article, I have a hrd time seeing Macworld leave New York. A) the new Boston facility won't be open until 2004, so its not like it won't be Macworld 2003 or 2004 for that matter. B) New York officials have said they have no intention of losing Macworld, as has the Javits Center. C) This kind of scuttlebut is common in New York, as these people constantly want some sort of concession from the city. Even the New York Stock Exchange threatens to leave the city. D) Steve Jobs moved it to New York for a reason. If you notice, the move to New York was when Jobs returned as CEO of Apple. (I know IDG handles the affair, but it really is an Apple event, what Apple wants, it gets.) While I will avoid the whole Boston v. New York can of worms, I will say that if Macworld moves back to Boston, it will probably not help Apple reach a larger audience, just by their respective populations.

  17. Oversensitive Mac mods and the state of Apple by theolein · · Score: 1, Troll

    I just got two troll points further odwn for making a wise crack about Apple and the sorry state of it's processors. Note that I'm a mac user. I personally was in the market for a new Mac laptop but was left wondering about the price/performance as compared to PC's which are so venemously put down by Mac users. Apple makes a brilliant OS in OSX but it's hardware is expensive and slow compared to PC's (Go and try a modern PC with XP or Linux to see for yourself. Look at the price tag while you're at it.)

    I point out that Apple's iMac has stopped selling well and Macs are sitting in the stores in General at the moment. Apple doesn't acknowledge the fact that it is falling behind in performance and the macintosh fans are extremely reluctant to look at the facts in the face.

    It is *NOT* getting better either as far as I can see. Even if Apple does get a break and manage to conjure up 1.8 to 2.0GHz CPU's how is Apple going to tell all those people that have recently bought a Macintosh that not only do they get to pay $129 for the OSX update but they also have machines that are less than half as fast as the newer ones selling at the same price. Wouldn't you be irritated?

    1. Re:Oversensitive Mac mods and the state of Apple by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Dude. x86 laptops are so far inferior to Apple laptops that it's hardly a comparison. The laptops are cheaper feature for feature then PC laptops, the run at reasonable speeds for a portable, they have amazing battery life, they look cooler then almost everything else out there, and they come with builtin standard features that aren't available on ANY PC laptop, much less all at the same time. Show me an x86 laptop with gigabit. How about a wide screen? How about with 4.5 hours of battery life? All that, and slim? For $2500? The slim x86 laptops aren't as fast as the powerbooks, either. Unless you can't live without windows, what more do you need? Don't start with that one mouse button thing either. There are so many extra modfier keys on the keyboard that can be mapped to buttons on a mac then there are on a PC that it's not even worth discussing, and the keys act as buttons where additional buttons belong: ABOVE the track pad. I don't know about you, but I only have one thumb, and I can only use one button down there. I want the others where my fingers are.

      I prefer my powerbook to my vaio any day, and I can even fly across county with my powerbook on one battery.

  18. Re:Wow...MacWorld Expo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, I know the difference between RISC and CISC. I know MHz doesn't mean shit. I also know that the highest-end Apple machine is much less powerful than the highest-end PC(except in PS filters specifically written for the Altivec), and costs much more.

    --returnofthe_spork, forced to post anonymously because I have opinions unpopular with the "free-speech loving" crowd of Slashdot

  19. Mac Expo NY problem: Javits Center labor union by Sierran · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Javits center is infamous for its labor union price-jacking. While I'm not sure if this is still true, there were a rash of stories a few years back connecting the Mafia with said labor unions. This is a problem because Javits' rules state that you *cannot* use non-union labor to do *anything* during a show...as in, it's difficult to even move your own stuff around the bldg/floor. Thus, the hours charged to the show organizers are enormous, and the whole thing ends up costing a mint both for organizers and exhibiters. If they can get free space and cheap/free labor for the show in Boston, it might even lower the cost of attendance for users and companies alike. Remember that all of the no-shows at recent Expos have cited costs; this is one of the reasons they did so.

    I too live in Boston; I think it's an annoying town. However, it's immensely easier to get to and stay in than NY (easier=cheaper)...the airport is a 10 min subway trip from any downtown hotel, there's fun touristy stuff to do, the city's small enough to wander around on foot, and due to the high student population the town is used to large groups of rowdies showing up in bars.

    --
    A hero is someone who knows when to run away. I am a hero. -Trent the Uncatchable
  20. Offtopic by mcwetboy · · Score: 1

    And what does this have to do with the possible return of Macworld to Boston, exactly?

  21. My fondest memory of the old Boston expo by jht · · Score: 2

    I always used to weasel a block of tickets to the Ingram party at the Museum of Science every year back when I ran a Mac network for a living. Now that was the place to hold a party! Free booze, free food, live music, and all sorts of nerd attractions since the exhibits were open.

    I particularly remember the year that Casady & Greene (at least that's who I think released it) came out with a commercial version of the old Talking Moose, and had a fellow dressed up in a moose suit walking the floor of the show handing out demos.

    At the party that night, the moose showed up in costume, and was out on the dance floor when he toppled over from heat exhaustion. What a sight...

    It was kind of funny seeing a bunch of geeks carrying the moose off the floor.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  22. A Coupla Points by maggard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. MacWorld was a Boston event from the start. Every August it would roll into town as the biggest thing in that deadest month. But Boston's three convention centers (Hynes, Bayside, WTC-Boston) were small, and far apart, and MacWorld didn't like that (neither did DECWorld years ago but they rented ships to supplement services - that was style!)

    2. So MacWorld pulled out of Boston and went to NYC. This was a blow as not only was MacWorld a big thing in Boston but NYC is the perennial rival. The MacWorld move was one of the big kicks in getting Boston's new mega-convention center built.

    3. Now Boston's new mega-convention center is 1/2 way built and it's got a dozen shows booked. For the next decade! They're even talking about shutting down the one of the old convention centers to drive business to the new one (this is possible in Boston - reality has nothing to do with this it's patronage and appearance, the fellow in charge has the job for life anyway.)

    4. So getting MacWorld back would be a coup for Boston. Not only would it come back from the evil NYC but it would return to the new convention center to show that at last the facilities weren't too small, Boston could hold a biiig convention. Boston would likely be willing to cut all kinds of deal for that industry news as well as to quell the local critics.

    5. The MacWorld folks would likely be happy too. Javits is usuriously expensive and nasty nasty nasty to work with. I used to work trade shows years ago and nothing was worse then Javits. Extortion, unbelievably bad service, wrecked displays, fees and costs and hassles for everything

    6. Apple would likely be OK with going back to Boston. There's more educational and high-tech customers in Boston, more media and advertising in NYC, both cities have hard-to-crack finance & insurance. It's probably a six-of-one/half-dozen-of-the-other as far as Apple is concerned.

    7. The attendees would likely be as happy to go back to Boston. While it's still expensive it's a far sight cheaper then NYC. The couple-hundred miles further north also help too - Boston in August is less awful then NYC.

    8. Finally, this would be 2004. Aside from Boston's opening date arrangements have doubtless already started being made for NYC. The move from Boston po'd many of the folks involved with it's relatively short notice so I doubt that happening again in reverse - the lesson has likely been learned. I can see this being used as a bargaining tool with Javits and unless they really cut a schu-weet deal I bet Boston will scoop this. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if the interested parties on Boston find a way to pay MacWorld to come to Boston just to prove their point.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  23. Why *Boston*? Why not D.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Northern Virginia is the largest information technology sector in the US. That's right. Bigger than Silicon Valley. D.C. (and not Boston) is a primary internet hub. It's the center of the defense infrastructure. All the lobbyists are here. All the embassies are here. All the NGOs are here. Congress is here. All the governmental dollars are here. AOL IS HERE! Why the heck are they bothering with a backwater like Boston?

  24. WAAAAAY off on a tangent by Lurkingrue · · Score: 0, Troll

    I lived in Philly for two years, myself, and I stand by my initial assessment. Philly is a real city, and Boston combined with Cambridge still isn't remotely as large.

    Boston has not given IDG a free ride, at least not yet -- IDG was pushing for it, and looking for leverage in dealing with the Javitts people. There still isn't an offer on the table from Boston, and AFAIK it'll be 2006 before the center is completed anyway.

    The "Silver Line" is a bus, still rides on the roads, and is no more a subway than the Green Line is (less, actually). A bad joke, especially for those of us South Enders who are expected to use it.

    Finally, no one stays in downtown Boston, they stay in Back Bay/Copley, by the airport, or not in Boston at all...and I'd hate to have to walk from any of those places to downtown, the WTC in southie, N./S. End for restaurants or anywhere else in the July heat.

    Please, don't compare the pathetic cab system they have in Boston to that of NYC or Philly -- apart from a couple of train stations & Logan, you simply can't get a cab unless you're on Mass Ave or Boyleston.

    We'll just have to agree to disagree, but I think its clear that Boston is not the site for a world-class event that Apple needs. Tokyo, London, San Francisco, and...Boston? I think not.

  25. Apple's ulterior motives by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think Apple just wants to hear people try to pronounce Jaguar in a funny Boston accent.

  26. I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if they are really planning on boston. I just got my MacWorld for September 2002 (one with the new 17inch iMac on cover). On page 32 and 33, they list the two upcoming MacWorld Conferences:

    January 6-10, 2003 - The Moscone Center, San Fran, CA
    July 14-18, 2003 - Jacob K. Javits Center, NYC, NY

    I guess that is nearly a year in the future, but it might be a little difficult to change the location if they let it go a couple more months.