Slashdot Mirror


Hack Your Phone, Go to Jail

thodu writes: "This bill [Mobile Telephones (Re-Programming)] in the UK aims to make it illegal for anyone to change a GSM phone's IMEI number. Though the intention in this case is seemingly for the good (to track and prevent stolen phones from being used), the line between legitimate mods and illegal hacks is increasingly becoming blurred. What next - a bill to disallow modifying your PC ?"

21 of 525 comments (clear)

  1. Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you know of any, because I sure don't.

    Why shouldn't something that only serves theives (as far as I can see) be illegal?

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by Queuetue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why shouldn't something that only serves theives (as far as I can see) be illegal?
      Because it's already illegal to steal phone service. Removing freedoms without cause hurts everybody.

      Also, a silly counter-example - I'm a hacker, and in my basement lab, I've set up my own shielded, isolated cell network, just for kicks. And I want to have phone# 000-000-0001 (Those not in the US, please translate into your own localized version). Just because I *want* to. Or as a scientific experiment, a science fair project, or to learn more about the world around me. Why should that be illegal?

    2. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by sdjunky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If for every 1,000 hacks there is only 1 person doing it for scientific purposes then that one person has to pay the sacrifice for the greater good."

      So if 1000 people want to map the human genome to devise some kind of malicious bio warfare and 1 scientist wants to find the cure for cancer. Then the scientist needs to be treated as a criminal while the criminals will just go underground to do their work anyway.

      Sorry, but the logic doesn't seem sound in my opinion

    3. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by yatest5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, there is a legitimate reason. You bought the phone, you own it, so you can reprogramme it if you want to. You own the phone. You don't need any more reasons.


      Oh for FUCKS SAKE. Every time, the same old arguments.

      Look, 1 Mr. Geek may want to do this. In fact, no, they wouldn't, but one assy /. user who will argue against anything does.

      Being able to do this allows people to steal and use phones, thereby causing 1000's of crimes.

      What is more important, your 'right' to modify the phone, or to stop little punks mugging kids for their phones?

      Furthermore, the fact is, although it's 'illegal', if you just do it in your room, you are unlikely to be caught and prosecuted for it, as compared to, say, if you did it and tried to sell a mobile phone.

      So STFU about your damn rights being impinged on, jesus.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    4. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by AlgUSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is not like changing your Phone #, it is more like changing the VIN number of your car. Which is very illegal. Sure you own the car, but why would you want to change the VIN # except for illegal purposes.

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    5. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by yatest5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, there is a legitimate reason. You bought the phone, you own it, so you can reprogramme it if you want to. You own the phone. You don't need any more reasons.

      I own my car, can I scratch the VIN off it?

      I own my gas supply, can I leave it running until the street blows up?

      I own a radio scanner, can I use it to scan police frequencies?

      Society has rules, if you don't like them, fucking leave it!

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    6. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by colmore · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, you can scratch off the VIN and you can monitor police frequencies.

      Blowing up your neighborhood is obviously illegal because, well, you blow up your neighborhood. Recklessly endangering others is illegal for very good reasons, and has nothing to do with modifying a telephone that you own.

      I assume that the Iraq comment was a joke. But it's a good example. Just saying "society has rules" and not questioning those rules is a good way to end up in a nation where you can't criticize your leaders, religion, or society. I'm not the biggest patriot on my block, and I don't like the direction that America is heading in, but I'm sure glad that we're still (basically) free to live in (almost) any way that doesn't harm others.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    7. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by shimmin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You can scratch the VIN off your car, but if you do, you can't operate it on the public roadways. You own the car, you don't own the road.

      You can leave your gas running, but if something catches fire, you're liable for arson. You own your house, but you don't own the neighborhood, and you don't own the fire department.

      And in many jurisdictions, you can scan police frequencies. But you can't transmit on them. You don't own the airwaves.

    8. Re:Legitimate reasons for changing the IMEI? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      "you are still alowed to do that, There is no connection between IMEI and your phone number. IMEI is more like a MAC adress your phone number is pure software,(actualy bound to the sim#) So bad example."

      Yeah but at the level of the cell phone network hardware, the IMEI number (or in my case the ESN number) is what identifies the phone to the network.

      If your phone is stolen and you tell the mobile service provider, they tell the network to disable access to the phone with the ESN# (or IMEI#) shown on your account information. If you change this ESN/IMEI number, you can register this phone again with a new service provider on a new account and the network won't know the difference and won't be able to disable the phone's access.

      This is why changing the IMEI number is valuable to phone crooks.

  2. A good thing... by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I generally don't agree with restrictions on the use of hardware I buy, this is a special case. The law is intended to reduce the amount of phone-thefts in the UK (the phones are then reprogrammed and re-sold). There is currently a huge problem with phone theft over here which is driven by the fact it's so simple to give a stolen phone a new identity, so I don't think this legislation is over the top...

    1. Re:A good thing... by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's already illegal to steal. Think hard. Does this law actually do anything more to deter thieves, or only make things illegal for tinkerers? If the only place this law will be applicable is on stolen phones, and stealing them is already illegal, then this law ultimately serves no purpose that couldn't be served by enforcing stiffer penalties on thieves.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:A good thing... by FyRE666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This will do nothing to stop mugging

      Erm, I think it will have a VERY noticable effect on the blackmarket in reprogrammed phones. There are businesses that currently operate legitimately whose sole business is chaning the identity of [stolen] phones. The only reason anyone would wish to do this is to sell a stolen phone, there's no other purpose for it. Sure you might want to do this yourself, but why? It's not as though anything spectacular will happen!

      Maybe you think anyone should be able to file off vehicle identification serial numbers too, or wire up their house with all the earth wires and live wires reversed?

    3. Re:A good thing... by mpe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's already illegal to steal.

      It's already also illegal to traffic in stolen goods, misrepresent stolen goods as legitimate, defraud telephone companies, DOS legitimate mobile users.

      Does this law actually do anything more to deter thieves,

      The bill states that it is expected to have litte effect of policing, prosecutors and courts.

      this law ultimately serves no purpose that couldn't be served by enforcing stiffer penalties on thieves.

      It's apparent purpose is to present the impression of a government "doing something". With passing redundant laws being a prefered option to something like more police...

  3. already a law in US, sort of by ProfKyne · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't mean to troll here, but isn't this similar to laws against removing VIN (vehicle id numbers) and serial numbers from high-cost goods in the US?

    Of course, if this law extends to prohibit other modification of the phone that interferes with fair use, I suppose that's different....

    --
    "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
  4. Re:What's the legit use of this? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just to know they can.
    There are honest people who just like to tinker.

  5. Its a real problem, but a poor solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mobile phone theft is a real problem in the UK, and has caused violent crime to rise sharply over the past year. Understandably, politicians and police in the UK are concerned, and are trying their hardest to stop the problem.

    The UK telecoms operators have mobilised their SIM management systems to allow them to disable mobile phones according to the ID on the phone; previously only one or two of them did this.

    Now saying this; I don't see how this Bill will do anything to stop the situation. The phones are stolen already, and are in the hands of the criminals. No doubt they have a stack of them in a warehousr; anything else just isnt' profitable. Anyone who thinks the piddling little threat of extra jail time that this Bill adds will stop the bad guys from modifying the phones are out of their heads. Do they really believe that the criminals care what this Bill says?

    Its nothing but a quick headline grab, something for grining-Blair to point at and say "We're doing something about it, look!" and then allows him to get back to inventing rating schemes for various shitty public services, and cutting funding to the police forces.

    The real answer is simply to pay the police more, recruit more, and put them out on the streets where they can stop the phones being stolen in the first place. Like that'll ever happen.

  6. IMEI nubmer is essential to reduce GSM theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but I have no problems with this kind of law.
    When your mobile phone gets stolen, all mobile phone operators who are enforce IMEI-based disabling will disallow phone calls. (Not all of them do this...)
    This reduces the incentive to steal a mobile phone immensly.

    It can have some unpleasant consequences though: some years ago, a batch of Nokia mobile phones was stolen, all of them with the same IMEI number. Those phones eventually ended up in stores, where they were, legally, bought by consumers.
    Unavoidably, one of those phone got stolen and that IMEI number got blocked. As a result, thousands of people ended up with a disabled phone. Nokia refused to do anything about it, since they can be hold responsible for phone that were bought through 'grey' channels.

  7. Re:What's the legit use of this? by MartinG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would a person other than a thief want to change this?

    The approach of illegalising things that have a potential "bad" use just because nobody can come straight out with a "good" use will end in disaster.

    Defrauding telephone companies is already illegal. If some the telephone companies don't want this heppening then they should put it in their contracts. There is no need for new legislation.

    The only reason this is happening IMO is to tie in with the RIP bill amendments that the UK government have already tried to rush through (thankfully, the changed were met with sufficient resistance to delay for a while)
    The government wants to be able to track and record everyones movement by their mobile phone. And of course this ability will prevent all future terrorist attacks and rid the country of crime. Everyone will he happy and all will rejoice.

    --
    -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
  8. Re:/. people are paranoid by Skiboricus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love it how people avoid any REAL discussion of events and possibilites by simply calling someone PARANOID.

    10 years ago would you call someone paranoid if you were told that companies would market products that were implanted into your childrens skin so you could track them.

    10 years ago would brand a person paranoid if your were told congress was debating a bill to allow companies to hack private citizens.

    10 years ago would you call me paraniod if I told you people would be threatened with criminal penalities for reporting security bugs in software.

    Debate, don't just label people.

  9. Re:What's the legit use of this? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you chopped off the chasis number on a car you own, it doesn't hurt anyone but yourself.. Why should you go to jail for that?

  10. This would be better as "probable cause" by drew_kime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The law should say that simply doing this mod isn't illegal, but that it is sufficient grounds for a search warrant/wire tap/other investigative methods. After all, the IMEI was put in specifically to fight theft and cloning. It seems reasonable to assume that anyone changing it is probably going to do something illegal with it.

    --
    Nope, no sig