How Many Cowpower is That?
Zlorfik writes: " Accoring to a a Des Moines Register story, a new facility in Iowa can generate enough renewable energy from 700 cows to power 1,000 100-watt bulbs." This sounds like a good reason to switch to a slightly more efficient lighting system.
This has been done for years in third-world countries for a long time. Particularily in India. It's nice to see industrialized countries following suit. Especially since we don't have an endless supply of gas (pun intended).
This is very neat. A good way to get rid of all that cow pollution. But when they say they reduce the methane production, aren't they just converting it to CO2(this assumes i am right to this they are burning it in the generator). Also, why stop with only cow manure? There are 6 billion people on this planet, which must translate into a goodly amountof methane. And cows produce methane directly, too. Don't forget that.
Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
I think the power supply would be continuous, barring any brownouts or other power interruptions. It would be pretty inefficient if they had to wait for more manure every time they wanted more power. As for why the light bulbs, that's probably since for most people, it's easier to picture 1000 100-watt light bulbs than actually figure out what 100kW is useful for.
"Brownouts." Heh. Heh.
But aren't cows more expensive to burn than coal or oil?
--
Evan (no references in this message)
"$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
Or you can use one mouse to power an asynchronous microprocessor.
We never found the need to use any bigger animals.
Mouse powered Chips, Open source Processors and Lego
This sound like The Matrix... for cows ;)
In an unsuccessful attempt to find the real story link, I searched the Des Moines Register for "cow power". I ended up with over 50 hits. Not many news sites can say that!
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
Oddly, despite all the interest I've seen in composting toilets in various back-to-the-land magazines I cannot recall seeing one which is designed to produce methane as a byproduct. Maybe there is some liability issue, such as somebody would be certain to run a leaky gas-line indoors and poison themselves without the ethyl mercaptan additive to give the gas a strong warning smell.
Landfills also produce quite a bit of methane, which is burned off in most places. There are some projects going to convert this free fuel to useful energy; I don't have a URL handy but I've read a somewhat tedious PDF of a white paper about the power potential of a certain landfill (King county, WA I think) and how cost-effectively it could be harnessed. Food for thought.
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
It's not economically feasible to run a french-fry operation for the waste-oil fuel, but since you're throwing away the spent fryer oil anyway it is cost-effective to burn it in an engine. The same thing with cow flop.
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
What *IS* the deal with geeks and cows? They're not exactly intelligent, graceful creatures, and they're not even that nice looking. I mean, compare a cow to, say, a nice white horse.
(moo.)
Bogs, piles of manure, improperly aerated compost piles generate methane. It is a byproduct of anaerobic bacteria. Since it is a more potent greenhouse gas it would be in our interests to aerate bogs, manure piles, and compost piles. Global warming will speed up the biological activity in said bogs, etc.