Slashdot Mirror


All We Want Is Whatever's On Your Machine

kubla2000 writes: "A breathless story about how the best defense against [fill in the blank: piracy, virii, hacking] is a good offense at CNet. What struck me most though is that in the midst of the rant from Timothy Mullen (no stranger to hacking the hack as this story from computerworld magazine shows, was a throw-away line justifying the RIAA and MPAA's appeal to Congress to make it legal to do this! It seems the bandwagons have started rolling. Who's next to jump on?"

24 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. why aren't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    watching fox's animation block from 7-9. with greg the bunny at 7:30?

    g to the oatse
    c to the izzex

  2. It's MegaMaid Sir.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    She's gone from suck to blow!

    You Suck!

  3. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    wtf??

  4. FIRST DILDO POST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Michael and Hemos, this double-headed one's for you. :o)

  5. first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    post

  6. not fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    yes! Not fp! Im such a coward!!!

  7. FlashFXP is a Trojan, prepare for your backdoor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    Not only does this closed source call-home program get huge amounts of attention making all of us wonder if "Charles DeWeese the information thief" is 1) selling your information to marketeers, 2) pretending he can increase profits by threatening, as reported in some cases, paying customers with BSA actions and lawsuits or 3) trojaning your system for other nefarious activities the nature of which you will never be aware because he provides neither source or debugging symbols, and the binary is stripped. One thing is for sure. Be it here on BetaNews, or on Slashdot, or on download.com.com, there is more than a few people calling into question why FlashFXP does what it does, and what is it doing. I would recommend the use of WinPCAP, WinDUMP, and ethereal, along with the free for personal use application firewall, Kerio Personal Firewall (software with nothing to hide, such as KPF, is often free for personal use, and others, like FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OpenSSL (a technology probably stolen by DeWeese and used illegally in FFXP) and Linux/GNU to name a few. With scary legislation in the US empowering copyright holders to DDOS your P2P networks, "root" your boxes in order to delete copyrighted content, and to make circumventing the mechanism by which an MP3 prevents the playing of an MP3 without a digital signature a felony, you can not trust software which calls home in an undocumented, undesirable way. This is the inroad by which these technology fascists will infect your computer with government sanctioned Trojaning devices. FlashFXP, when purchased legitimately, forces your to divulge HUGE amounts of information about yourself. You cant use cash and anonymously buy "shrink." Not only did I buy FFXP, but I excercised my right to fair use on more than one machine, the closed source binary was never run concurrently on more than one CPU at a time, yet my key got blacklisted. I have always been fond of OpenSource, but this and the EULAs for Windows Media Player, which also does various call home undocumented behavior, make not using OpenSource suicidal if you want a life where the government doesn't control and monitor your every keypress. Best of luck in the brave new world, if we continue to support fascists such as Charles DeWeese in his never-ending pursuit to force you to be tithed for non-Novel software which is built upon the stolen intellectual property of others, and prioritized. This is by no means a call for legislated digital communism, but it certainly calls into question the value of something that is not transferable, the seller has not liability of the actions of, the right to fair use is forfeit, and they law claims they copyright holder can root your computer in order to enforce copyright. Software like this I should be paid to use! Not pay for it! Be careful. He has stolen from the public domain technology to implement this secure technology, SSL, then he uses it to hide from you the true nature of his communications with home-base, as he calls home and Jon.Ashkrofts your information. I'm glad I use SmartFTP and NCFTP and run KPF as a start in the line of defense against a Orwellian cabal of software and I.P.

    Totalitarian fascist communist elitist fuckers we will not tolerate you!

  8. THE MOON: A redicilous libera lmyth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    HA HA you thought I was but I'm not because i"m in a diaper oh yeah I'm wearing Pampers 6 they're so great I think I'll masturbate haha lol j/k SPIKE me fuck you

  9. Incoherant headline by Stiletto · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    Time to burn some karma...

    Is it me, or is this story's headline totally incoherant? I re-read it twice and still only have a vague clue of what the links are going to be about. He couldn't even take some time to proofread or even close his parenthesis.

    1. Re:Incoherant headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You beat me to it.

    2. Re:Incoherant headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      how the hell is a whine about a headline +4 insightful?!

    3. Re:Incoherant headline by waspleg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      didn't you take any time to proofread your post?

      INCOHERENT

      this is slashdot not english class

    4. Re:Incoherant headline by Second_Derivative · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      : Time to burn some karma... ... because, of course, that line is what guarantees you more of it.

      Slashdot story is posted nongrammatically/misspelled, news at ten. One wonders what the moderators are doing these days if they see fit to mod stuff like this up.

  10. its viruses not virii by dcstimm · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    its viruses not virii, check dictionary.com...

    1. Re:its viruses not virii by teasea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's not its, it's it's.

    2. Re:its viruses not virii by kerincosford · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It's not its, its it's.

      If you're going to be a grammar Nazi, at least get it right.

    3. Re:its viruses not virii by glenebob · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's not it's not its, its it's, it's it's not its, it's it's.

      If you're going to be a grammer Nazi Nazi, at least get it right right.

      Oh God, I'm confusing myself myself. Easy to do, I know...

    4. Re:its viruses not virii by Fat+Casper · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      If you're going to be a grammer Nazi Nazi, at least get it right right.

      It's spelled grammar. At least get that right.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  11. OOOOhhhhhhhh. Nevermind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    We miss you Emily Litella!!!

    1. Re:OOOOhhhhhhhh. Nevermind. by bryston2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Gilda Radner

  12. Karma-dropping by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it me, or is every time a post begins by mentioning karma, the actual content is some uninspired drivel supposedly making insightful criticism of some perceived Slashdot sacred cow?

    What is it? Some reverse psycology tactic? Pre-positioning onself for the role of martyr? In any case, it screams "lack of conviction."

    State your argument and let it stand on its own merrits... or lack thereof.

    1. Re:Karma-dropping by screwballicus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Agreed. I'm inclined to just automatically moderate down any posts that pull that goofy over-dramatic martyrdom stunt. It's more tired than the "beowulf cluster of..." and goatse references at this point. And I cannot believe anyone is dumb enough to fall for it. But, seemingly, they do.

      By the way, I see you got moderated down. This is why you should most certainly have begun your post with 'time to get rid of some of that excess karma.' This would result in, by contrast, being moderated up by the trained-monkey-moderators we find here in their natural habitat.

    2. Re:Karma-dropping by lobsterGun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bah! shaddup and go meta-moderate. Here's a shortcut ya slacker.

    3. Re:Karma-dropping by mother_superius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you browse at low scores?

      Because, otherwise, all you'll see are the high-scored ones.