Slashdot Mirror


Linux on Xbox One Step Closer?

RpiMatty1 writes: "Apparently the Linux Kernel has been booted on the Xbox. No mention of it on the Xbox-Linux Home page yet. Here is another posting of the same messages at Xboxhacker.net." I wonder if the recent security code change rules this particular development out for Xboxes purchased in the near future.

13 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Any practical reasons? by electricmonk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've heard all the rhetoric before about how porting the Linux kernel to esoteric platforms just for the hell of it is fun, and hey, if that's what makes you happy, you should do it.

    But are there any practical uses for an Xbox running Linux? Haven't you defeated the primary purpose of the Xbox: playing games?

    I've heard people say that they could use it as a cheap webserver for a massive farm of servers, but this doesn't make much sense when you realize that you can build a better machine for just a little more money and a *lot* less effort. I've also heard people say that it could be used as a part of a rendering farm, but these machines have only a lowly (crippled) celeron processor in them and their graphics hardware isn't meant to do non-realtime rendering.

    So what's the deal here?

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    1. Re:Any practical reasons? by aminorex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it is a good reason, when I can develop
      for Linux but I can't develop for Win32.

      But MAME is just one example. The range of Linux
      applications unavailable on the XBox is vast.
      I bought 4 XBoxes so far, 2 for routers, one
      for a sniffer/recorder, and a last one just in case
      I ever make a PBX for my home. I think I might
      go get a couple more before MS does something
      draconian with the encryption system, just in
      case. At .2k/pop, they are practically
      disposable.

      And *that* is the point: It's subsidized hardware.
      You've been paying taxes to Microsoft for
      10 years now. I think it's about time you
      got some good old-fashioned welfare for all
      those $$. Suck it up:)

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:Any practical reasons? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, MAME will run on junk hardware; this is a bad reason. I can spend $50 on basically spare parts and get a rig with video out, a midrange P2 or P3 and it'll run linux and MAME just fine.

      This is actually the case with pretty much anything you'd want to use the Xbox for. 3D apps? Forget it, NVidia's never gonna post drivers for that chip. By the time the linux community has developed good drivers for it, the entire thing will be outdated anyway. The XBox is really not that great a deal anymore, for the $199 you spend on it, all you get is a small hard drive, a 700 mhz P3 and a tricked out graphics card that is useless unless you have the drivers. Yeah it sounds like a good idea but once you really think about it, you can drop $100 and get a hardware-comparable rig from commodity parts. Plus you'll have hardware on an open standard where you can rig up things like controllers, VFD/LED displays, etc.

  2. Re:Not to say unworthy to the developers, but: by Locutus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, every purchase of the Xbox sends Microsofts money to the hardware vendors. Sony and Nintendo see this and dropped their prices (still making $$ on the hardware) so MS would lose more. The hardware in the Xbox is expensive as game consoles go and a bunch of that money is going to Nvidia.

    So, Microsoft loses money on each sale of the hardware and it's been estimated that you'd have to purchase something like 10 or 15 game titles for them to break even.

    Now you see why this is "interesting"? It's a hit against Bill Gates' wallet and there's a pretty cool graphics system onboard. All in a box that SCREAMS FOR THE X-WINDOW SYSTEM. ;)

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  3. Microsoft losing money on the sale of every Xbox.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you really wanted to make them lose money you would never buy the xbox at all, you really aren't making them lose money by buying the system, you're really making them lose less money, you're helping them pay back some of the money that has gone into building the box. If no one ever bought an xbox microsoft would lose millions on the development and production costs.

  4. Microsoft loses money myth by diakka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen people quote this "fact" all over slashdot. But has there been any hard facts? How do we know this isn't some kind of astroturf campaign to make anti-ms types think it's ok to purchase an xbox? I'd love to see someone who really knows about hardware manufacturing to do a cost rundown fo the xbox, giving conservative and liberal estimates of how much they think it costs MS to maufacture and why.

    --
    -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
  5. Re:You could actually play LINUX GAMES on it... by electricmonk · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Uh, right. Like everyone is going to go out and install Linux on their brand new Xboxes because maybe if they do, some interesting games might pop up sometime in the future. Or they could just buy one, leave it as it is, and play a ton of great games now.

    Can you say "pie in the sky"?

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
  6. Re:Microsoft losing money on the sale of every Xbo by yasth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You forgot:

    You don't buy and XBox but someone else does: -100+ Royalties = profit

    In other words so long as MS doesn't end up with excess Xboxes buying one does more damage, because then they have to make more. The best solution would be a massive coordianated campaign to buy thousands of Xboxes in a short period then stop. Thus causing MS to overestimate demand and get stuck with unsold inventory. However as a practical mater one can assume that MS will predict demand at this point in the cycle with some accuracy, so buying an Xbox now does the most damage as MS will take a hit, and the Xbox would have been sold anyways.

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
  7. Practicing for Palladium by smartin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people here are saying Why bother wasting your time porting Linux to the Xbox, you can create a better cheaping Linux platform using, blah, blah, blah... But the Xbox is really a trial run for Palladium, i.e. an M$ only hardware platform designed to only run software authorized by the Bill himself. This is where we are heading folks, so any R&D done now will be valuble when the real thing comes along.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Practicing for Palladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      R&D for whom? Wouldn't this just give Microsoft more information about how to stop future platforms from being hacked?
      -ac

  8. Re:Microsoft losing money on the sale of every Xbo by handsomepete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, so let's say you are able to garner enough support to go on a massive 'Let's screw Microsoft!' binge and purchase as much as 20,000 Xboxes.

    $4,000,000 - $6,000,000 = -$2,000,000

    Two problems I see. And, while I'm not trying to be an ass, it'll certainly seem like it.
    1.) Microsoft isn't the only one that'll see these sales figures. Game companies will too. They'll see a rise in demand and want to produce more titles for it (some exclusive, no doubt) therefore making Xbox more enticing to gamers. The increased production as a result of your buying spree might actually be able to be sold and you may unintentionally help Microsoft's plight in the gaming market.
    2.) $2,000,000 isn't a lot of money to Microsoft. They probably don't even care that it's gone. But $2,000,000 in donations to open source projects would be a great thing. I realize that's not something that everyone is interested in, but if even half the people donated half that money to something more worthwhile than maliciously screwing Microsoft, you'd be doing a lot more net good than apparent net harm to Microsoft.

    Just a thought. Could be wrong.

  9. Simple Economics? by Kirby-meister · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A lot of people don't seem to get this point -

    Buying Xboxes allows Microsoft to recoup some of its operating losses.

    Imagine it costs $210 to make an Xbox these days. So Microsoft loses about $10 per Xbox.

    "Great!," you say, "we can just buy 100,000 Xboxes and put MS down $1 million!"

    It's a brilliant idea, because 100,000 Xboxes will cost you around $20,000,000 (minus applicable sales taxes). Microsoft paid $21,000,000 to make them, so this way MS loses $1 million and we've screwed Microsoft, right?

    Well, imagine if you hadn't bought those 100,000 Xboxes. Then, not only would it have cost Microsoft $21,000,000 to produce them, but there is an added bonus that they don't make back $20,000,000; this sets them at a loss of $21 million, a much higher expense than just a measely $1 mil.

  10. Re:OK by allanc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) (reasonably) small machine with TV-out running Linux is good for a lot of neat AV type applications. It's powerful enough to be useful, and designed to look like Consumer Electronics Gear instead of like a computer, so won't look ugly in your TV cabinet (well, I personally think that the X-Box is ugly as sin, but that's just me). In addition, putting Linux on it opens it up to the whole world of Linux console emulators, so you could make your X-Box emulate an 8 bit nintendo or an Atari or a whole host of arcade games with MAME.

    2) Last I heard, Microsoft was losing money on every X-Box sold. Their plan was to make it up through getting a piece of the action for every game sold. So if you hate Microsoft, buying an X-Box but not buying any MS-approved games takes money directly out of their pockets.

    3) Pure hack value. Remember that Unix was originally designed so they could play a silly little game on a spare DEC minicomputer. Geeks doing weird things with weird hardware often leads to great results.

    (Fun Fact: I found your post 'cause I was metamoderating it. It was given an "interesting" moderation, I metamoderated it "fair" and then came here to vehemently disagree with you. Ironic, really, but that's exactly how it really should work.)

    --AC