Slashdot Mirror


Crusher Crushed from Nemesis

Ant sent in a link to Wil Wheaton's weblog where he writes a surprisingly heartfelt piece on being cut from ST:Nemesis. Its a strangely bittersweet little entry that really speaks volumes, especially considering Wil's fairly public disagreements with Rick Berman. Apparently Wil's bit was cut along with 48 whole minutes of the flick- its just the nature of filmaking. But I guess if nothing else, they've got tons of stuff for the DVD now!

36 of 451 comments (clear)

  1. Wait for it by sben · · Score: 3, Funny

    Snarky comments about Wheaton and/or Crusher in 3... 2... 1...

  2. If I cloned myself, I could say "I'm with stupid" by Milk+and+Cookies · · Score: 2, Funny

    Er, pardon my ignorance, but who is Wil Wheaton?

  3. 1st cut was 3 hours? by Boone^ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, that's a long movie. It takes the GodFather to pull that off. Granted I'm a Trek fanboy, so I'd have enjoyed the 3 hours, but I don't think my wife would have.

    BTW, I saw the trailer before K-19, and it looks pretty good. It appears they've made a return to some good quality action!

    1. Re:1st cut was 3 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Have you seen the first movie, Star Trek: The Motionless Picture?

      That's a long movie.

  4. Wishful thinking... by CMiYC · · Score: 4, Funny

    they've got tons of stuff for the DVD now!

    Yeah because if Paramount has shown anything, it just loves to pack extras into their Star Trek DVDs.

    1. Re:Wishful thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, like the NEW star trek II dvd... it has what, an extra 30 seconds of footage?

      Now, if the Star Trek V dvd had 30 minutes LESS footage, that would be good.

    2. Re:Wishful thinking... by Megane · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just as long as the wheel ruts on the God Planet are clearly visible. I noticed those things when I was watching it in the theatre. "What does God need with a 4x4?"

      You can't seem them on the widescreen LD because there isn't enough resolution, but I could clearly see them on a pan & scan TV broadcast.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  5. Re:Who cares... by Hamstaus · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're the kind of person to make an angry distinction between "Trekkies" and "Trekkers", I'm honestly surprised you don't have a Wesley Crusher action figure.

    --
    I moderate "-1, Fool"
  6. Take it out on Barney, Will! by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny
    The EFF is holding a fundraiser in San Francisco on August 22nd at which Will Wheaton will take on the Purple Menace:

    "The night features world-class electronic music artists and a special treat: celebrity boxing with Wil Wheaton and Barney! Wil Wheaton, of Star Trek: The Next Generation and Stand By Me fame, will take on Barney in a celebrity boxing matchup for the history books. Watch and see if Wil with his backing from EFF can protect free speech and parody on the Internet and defeat Barney and his team of corporate lawyers."

    http://www.eff.org/cafe/2002/

    Give that vomitous terrycloth reptile hell, Will!

    Stefan Jones

  7. Re:Who cares... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wesley was probably THE most annoying SF character ever.

    No way. I've got two words for you, buddy. Well, actually it's one word, but it's so annoying that you actually have to say it twice:

    Jar
    Dang. I could only bring myself to type it once, and my fingers are already blistering, like I dipped them in acid or something.
  8. Shut up Wesley! by Dr_LHA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop talking on your mobile phone while you're driving through residential neighbourhoods!

    1. Re:Shut up Wesley! by extrasolar · · Score: 5, Funny

      That was the first thing I was thinking as I read the article.

      The people on the street are lucky Wesley took the news as good as he did :)

    2. Re:Shut up Wesley! by extrasolar · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Talking on a hands-free speakerphone while driving is no more risky than talking to somebody in the passenger seat..."

      I'll buy that. If the passenger is a nineteen-year old bombshell with huge DD cup breasts and a short miniskirt who is touching herself all the time.

      Not distracting at all.

    3. Re:Shut up Wesley! by FFFish · · Score: 3, Funny

      The light turns green and I sit there for a moment, reflecting on the conversation.

      [snip]

      The dog-walking couple smile and wave to me.

      The light changes.


      Doesn't this man live the life of danger. Sitting through a full cycle? Suicide!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  9. New Crusherism by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quote from the article:

    Of course, I tend to not put a whole lot of stock in what I read online...if I did I'd be overwhelmed with the sheer amount of hot teen bitches who want to get naked for me right now, and I'd be rolling in Nigerian money.

    Exactly, Will. Most bigshot, part-in-Star-Trek-gettin' movie stars already have those problems.

    --
    ...
  10. He's *30*?!? by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny
    [Checks birth certificate, counts on fingers]

    Oh fuck, I feel old. This is all I needed after finding my first grey hair last week.

    Overall, I suppose anything that makes the end film better is a Good Thing. Still, it sucks that it had to happen -- I can't imagine the weirdness of putting, what, 7 years of my life in as a particular character and then having my last chance to play him yanked out.

    At least Wil seems very grounded about it. Unless, of course, he just omitted some drinking-drug-and-wife-beatin' binge he went on after the end of the blog.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:He's *30*?!? by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny
      You raise a good point. Wheadon is quoting himself in the story, so it's the reaction that he remembers having.

      If Rick Berman had a blog (yea, right), who knows what his version of the story would be...

      So, when I gave him the bad news, he just went ballistic. "What!?" he shouted into the phone, "don't you know who the fuck I am? I'm Wesley Fucking Crusher, the only reason anybody watched your lame-ass fucking show! I will destroy you, Berman, along with everyone and everything you have ever loved! That's right, I'm on my way over right now to go all "Wolf 359" on your ass! I'm bigger than Star Trek! I'm bigger than all you pricks! You will rue the day when... Oh, wait... I gotta go. I think I just ran over some lady who was out walking her kid."
      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  11. Re:Beaten by Fark Once Again by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know this is some crazy shit, but usually people's personal sites are really hard to beat for up to the minute news about that person. Just a thought..

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  12. Patterns by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Funny
    Star Trek I: hot bald chick
    Star Trek II: ugly space skanks (what happened to those hot chicks from "Space Seed"?)
    Star Trek III: better looking Savek
    Star Trek IV: cute but annoying whale-lovin' chick
    Star Trek V: sexy muscular Klingon chick
    Star Trek VI: boring, regal chick in charge of conference
    Star Trek VII: Whoopi Goldberg, ugh
    Star Trek VIII: creepy-looking overconfident Borg chick
    Star Trek IX: beautiful mature quail who says one too many "live life to its fullist"-style quotes.

    I dunno, I'm not seeing much of a pattern here....

    GMD
  13. Re:What a fine role model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get a grip. I see plenty of people driving with children right there in the car with them, not muzzled or anything.

  14. MOD PARENT UP, PLEASE by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    If he'd crashed in to one of those trees and died, I bet that 48 minutes would have been reinserted. It's about time talking on phones when driving was made illegal.

    Not only would his footage have been restored (although the entire 48 minutes wasn't about him), the movie would have been dedicated to him as well. And we'd have to sit and listen to the other cast members praise/remember him on talk shows.

    I second your call for making driving while phoning illegal. You need to make a cell-phone call? Pull off to the side of the road and talk. When you're ready to dedicate your attention to driving, come back and join the rest of us on the roads!

    GMD

  15. Re:Beaten by Fark Once Again by F34nor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah he would have been in Star Trek X if he had been using OSX

  16. Re:Who cares... by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny
    There's a word for people who make an angry distinction between "Trekkies" and "Trekkers":

    Trekkies.

    Nobody else cares.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  17. Re:Letter-writing campaign by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 5, Funny
    I grew up with ST:TNG -- this is part of my long-lost childhood they're cutting goddamnit.

    Ahhh, you kids don't know nuthin! How do you young whippersnappers think us old folks who grew up with ST:TOS felt, huh? Waitin' ten gol-dang years from the time the series was cancelled to the release of the first movie. And what did we get? ST:TMP. A pastel-colored bridge! Everyone wearing dental assistant's uniforms! Kirk with an obvious girdle holding his gut in and an alien hairpiece of some kind! Now that's pain! BUT WE WERE THANKFUL FOR IT!!!

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  18. Re:"I'm feel happy and proud" by Yosemite_Mark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eye think the spell checker wood have accepted that line

  19. Citation? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    talking, putting on makeup, reaching around to take care of a baby/kids, getting dressed, drinking a soda/coffee and eating food have been statistically proven to be many *many* times more dangerous than simply talking on a cellphone.

    Please provide a URL link to the statistic that shows that more accidents are caused by people getting dressed while driving than from people using cell phones while driving. I'd be interested in seeing it.

    Now, accidents being caused because some hot chick is getting undressed while driving I can understand... :)

    GMD

  20. Nerds vs Geeks by extrasolar · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you were a true geek, you wouldn't have to ask who Will Wheaten is. You would Just Know.

    But, fool, you are only a nerd. The truly productive members of our technological society who runs his GCC and puts strange Paul Graham quotes in his slashdot signiture. Yet you ask who Will Wheaten is.

    Posting here on Slashdot is only a sign of True Geekiness. But I must ask you, do you have a Geek Code? If you are over 16, do still own any action figures? models?

    Do you watch cartoons?

    These too are only signs of True Geekiness. But your True Nerd may kill the Geek within. You may spend the rest of your miserable life learning about the workings of the Universe, building vast technological systems, and watching reruns of Gilligan's Island.

    But one day you become old and gray, and you suddenly discover what you believe to be the answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything; and you bring forth this information to the Council of True Geekdom. And they laugh. And Geeks throughout the world learn of your pitiful endeaver and they, too, laugh.

    To reconcile, you will be forced to stand on your knees and beg: "Thou art geekier than I."

    And then, for the first time, you may learn what we already Just Know.

    There is no Spoon.

    1. Re:Nerds vs Geeks by Mournblade · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you were a true geek, you wouldn't have to ask who Will Wheaten is. You would Just Know.

      If you were a true geek (or if you'd followed the link or even just read the posting), you'd know that his name is spelled "Wil Wheaton", not "Will Wheaten". dumbass.

  21. Re:Who cares... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jar^2 (or (Jar)(Jar)) expands to Jar Jar

    Or, if you assume ^ is a binary XOR operation then Jar^2 evaluates to Jah

  22. Re:Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back Style Revenge by JayAndSilentBob · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will, youse just give me and silent bob your phone number, address, bank numbers and some time with your fine-ass wife and we'll beat the shit out of anyone you want. Snoogans.

    --


    Love,
    Jay and Silent Bob
  23. Re:Letter-writing campaign by kubrick · · Score: 4, Funny

    And we had to walk seven parsecs to school and back! In the freezing vacuum of space! Uphill BOTH ways!

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  24. Re:I am a trekkie. (trekker, whatever) by hitzroth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is cock-boy hyphenated?

    I don't know. Is anal-retentive?

    --
    In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
    --VonNeumann
  25. Re:not what I would have liked to see by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What are you going to do? Program a holographic doctor?" An obvious poke at those who watched voyager. It's stuff like that which makes Star Trek interesting.


    I groaned when I heard that line, the lameness filter was off the scale.

    Ignoring the big huge plothole of "so this engineer dude knocks up holograms complete with personality and ship wide movement capability in his spare time while in then takes the federation another what, FIVE HUNDRED YEARS to get to the same point???"

    Yaaah, err, suuuure. Bleh. Fucking lame man, continuity is one thing, and I don't give too much of a damn about it, but a 5-freakin-hundred year continuity fuck up? That is to large for even my grammer poor self not to bitch over!

  26. Re:Are acronyms (or Star Trek) your life? by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Things like TWOK don't- where that acronym might make sense on a fansite, it means nothing to most of the people here.

    I just thought it was some porn I haven't seen yet.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  27. Out-doing Adric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, I think you all just out-did Adric. Now we need some more dinosaurs and an earth-bound freighter.

  28. Re:Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In short: Being an idiotic expert in the semantics of something no one cares about, makes you look like a jackass.

    And then for him to say "makes you look like a jackass" - we're jackoffs, not jackasses.

    Sincerely,
    Trekki^H^H^Treker