Slashdot Mirror


AOL and .mac IM Not Entirely Integrated

gsfprez writes "While chatting with some Apple employee friends (with .mac accounts and iChat), we were stumped why we couldn't see each other on AIM. It seems that AOL has decided to take the opportunity -- while integrating the .mac users 'into the fold' -- to modify their AIM protocols so that Open Source clients (like Fire and Trillian) can't see those with '@mac.com' IM accounts, and vise versa. Bottom line: you can't be seen by .mac IM users, and they can't see you, unless you get the crufty, single service AOL IM client. The only positive affirmation of this is from the Fire mailing list. 'Into the fold ... sorta' is more like it." Well, it's still early, this may merely be about bugs that need fixing, rather than intent to block .mac users. We'll see.

26 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. for the record.... by tongue · · Score: 2

    Trillian isn't open source. although it is possibly the best IM client out there.

    1. Re:for the record.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I know it's not really a fair comparison, but iChat is by far the best IM client. Nothing can touch it for sheer elegance and ease of use.

    2. Re:for the record.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Uh...Since when have YOU used iChat? Do you have some super-secret connexions within Apple to get you 10.2?

      Yes. It's the super-secret Developer Program. The one that includes super-secret developer seeds. The last one I got was 6C106, which I've been running full-time ever since I got it. The golden master was 6C115, so this build is pretty close to finished. There's some debugging code in iChat itself that probably got ifdef'd out in the release, but other than that, it's totally release quality.

      In fact, I'm using iChat right this second to converse with some co-workers in Australia. I love it.

    3. Re:for the record.... by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      i have also been using ichat. and it sucks. since it is aim only and most of my contacts use icq/msn i use fire. fire isn't all that great either, but I am not stuck using only aim, so...

    4. Re:for the record.... by singularity · · Score: 2

      Actually, I have been using Adium for Mac OS X and have to say that it is the best IM client out there. Clean OS X interface, and written entirely in Cocoa, which means you get the great features that come along with that.

      For anyone running OS X, I would suggest giving it a try.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  2. Older AIM didn't work either. by catwh0re · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I discovered that my friends were on iChat, I immediately downloaded AIM and registered, to my surprise the AIM download link that i was given pointed to a version that was not only out dated, but completely incompatible with .mac users. Selecting "upgrade" from the "My Aim" menu (and some time waiting for the download) i was presented with the ability to chat with my .mac friends.

  3. The correct URL for Fire by kearneyj · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:The correct URL for Fire by usr122122121 · · Score: 2

      Drat! Here they were trying to divert the effects of having a link posted on slashdot... and you just HAD TO post the real link! :-)

      --

      -braxton
    2. Re:The correct URL for Fire by gsfprez · · Score: 2

      how is that any different than the link to Fire in the article?

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    3. Re:The correct URL for Fire by pudge · · Score: 2

      You had it ".htm" instead of ".html", dumbass. ;-) I fixed it originally when I edited it, but then started over and forget to re-fix it. Then when I later saw the error, I fixed it again.

  4. Fire v. iChat by cappadocius · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This would seem to create a rather strange schism between OS X'x current reigning IM client, Fire.app, and Apple's new iChat offering.

    Undoubtedly, anyone who depends on running on two or more messenger systems will stick with Fire. Those who use only AIM will probably switch to Apple's offering. But if this is true, then within any circle of friends it has to be one or the other -- Fire (or your fave) or iChat.

    It would be a shame to see Fire die, but with the trend for Macheads to adopt Apple programs, that might very well be what happens.

    [Sigh] Back to running two messenging apps again. :(

    --

    omnia tua castra sunt nobis

    1. Re:Fire v. iChat by Erdinger · · Score: 5, Informative

      It isn't a matter of using iChat or not, it has to do with the .Mac address. You can use your AIM screen name in iChat and then there would be no problem.

      And yes, I am certain iChat allows you to use your AIM screen name.

    2. Re:Fire v. iChat by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And yes, I am certain iChat allows you to use your AIM screen name.

      Not that it's necessary, but I'll second that. I've been using my old-as-the-hills AIM screen name with iChat for some time now to chat both with other iChat users (even over Rendezvous over AirPort, which is really cool) or AIM users on both platforms. Since I had an AIM screen name all along, it seemed unnecessary to use my .Mac user name.

  5. Why you can't see .macs by sammy.lost-angel.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe (and I could be wrong) that the reason you don't see .mac people on these clients is because of the protocol they use (the old TOC one). Gaim uses oscar, and I believe you can see people just fine. It probably just hasn't trickled down through TOC, although AOL might choose just to ignore it.

    Anyone have any concrete information on this?

    1. Re:Why you can't see .macs by hoggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know that Apple specifically say in the help for iChat that AIM users may need to download a newer client in order to see and communicate with .Mac users.

      Certainly the old client I had (4.3) wouldn't even let you type in a .Mac screen name (didn't like the '@' or '.' characters), also iChat couldn't see me online with the old AIM client and couldn't send messages to me.

      Wouldn't surprise me if it's just a bug/version problem.

  6. Proteus by bootc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The other day I signed on to my AIM account using Proteus and a new contact was magically added to my buddies list: "PleaseUpgrade000". That sort of told me that I had to give up on Proteus.

    Just to add more to the discussion, I remember that even AIM had to be upgraded to work with or see Mac.com buddies, so it's just that the others haven't caught up yet.

  7. Re:They can be turned off. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    How? I looked around quite a bit. Saw nothing.

    Under the "View" menu, you can choose "Show as Text" or "Show as Balloons." Methinks you didn't look around quite as much as you say you did.

  8. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by bmetzler · · Score: 2, Funny
    Too bad AOL seems gung-ho about preventing these fine application from being put properly to use.

    You mean from stealing AOL's resources, right? If AOL wants to only let their clients, or licensed clients connect, then they should be able to do so. It's their resources after all. If Trillian wants to be compatible, they should step up to the plate and talk to AOL, just like Apple did. If AOL declines, well, this is a free country and you can do business with whoever you want.

    -Brent
  9. Distributed IM service by bmetzler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may finally allow AOL to license their servers to over companies and have their own @company.com clients that interoperate. Perhaps Microsoft needs to talk to AOL about licensing again. And Yahoo. and whoever else wants to offer a specialised IM client. I want my bmetzler@yahoo.com AIM ID. That'd be cool.

    -Brent

  10. Wait, wait.... by Valdrax · · Score: 2

    Do you have to keep a .mac account to use iChat? Oh, just great. Just when I thought I'd get an instant messaging client, I find out it costs $100 a year to use. Forget that.

    I think I'll stick with ignoring my email instead of moving to ignoring my instant messages.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Wait, wait.... by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      Oh, thank goodness. That's was the impression that I already had before this article started referring to iChat users as ".mac accounts."

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  11. Re:What about Adium?? by jlower · · Score: 2

    But Adium only does AIM, right? I want all four services running at once and Fire does a pretty nice job at that. If I want Yahoo Webcam or one of the special features the 'real' client provide, I log off that service in Fire and launch the authorized app. This happens very seldom - most of the time Fire is fine.

  12. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. by DeanT · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It has never crashed.
    Not strictly true. AT&T had a failure in 1990 due to a C programming bug.

    DeanT

  13. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by bmetzler · · Score: 2
    My info...they got it, either way.

    Nah, when they asked for your personal information, you probably lied and said, "Bill Gates, 1 Redmond Way".

    -Brent
  14. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by GutBomb · · Score: 2

    is your 3rd party client passing the ads that AIM displays? AOL has a good reason for not wanting users to use 3rd party clients!

    i mean it is a sucky reason, but a reason nonetheless.

  15. Storm, meet teacup. by carlfish · · Score: 2

    Originally, AIM users were all AOL accounts. Now, AIM users are either AOL accounts or .Mac accounts. The system had to be changed to cater for this. No conspiracies, no black helicopters, just the standard lag you'll get if you're using a reverse-engineered client instead of the official one.

    This isn't the death of Fire, or Trillian any more than all the other changes to Oscar were. The third-party clients will reverse-engineer the changed protocol within a week, Trillian users will download (yet another copy of) aim.dll, and we'll all be happy again. Meanwhile, the idea that AOL would force-upgrade all of its legitimate users just to annoy Trillian users for a week is pretty ludicrous.

    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.