Slashdot Mirror


Jabber Makes It Good

el bastardo writes "According to this ZDNet article, IBM is building a new IM network for the Washington, DC area government agencies using Jabber as the base protocol."

89 comments

  1. Good idea by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a good idea. It seems to be like a huge cell phone network that won't have line overload problems during emergencies.

    Finally, an open source project used for good.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Good idea by AussiePenguin · · Score: 1

      GPRS?

      --

      Jeremy
      Melbourne, Australia
      Jabber Australia

  2. Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The name "jabber" comes from the Japanese phrase, "jabu jabu" which means, "splashing water sound" and is commonly used during the amoral act of sexual copulation (for purposes other than procreation which is a necessary and unfortunate evil to carry on our species). Basically a male would say, "kuwaete! osouji! jabu jabu" to a Japanese female after spilling his seed all over the unfortunate girl's face, instructing her to "take it in her mouth", give it the "honourable cleaning", and "make splashing sounds".

    The developers of the Jabber messaging tool obviously have taken basic Japanese 101, and decided to sneak this offensive term right past the noses of honest, hardworking, god fearing Christian Americans.

    If you use this tool, you are engaging in an act of blasphemy. Please support a boycott of IBM until the Jabber product is renamed or taken off the market.

    Thank you for your support, and God Bless.

    1. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be modded up for being funny!

    2. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long live Satanic SEX!!!

    3. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by randmairs · · Score: 1

      Did you burn your dictionary because you thought it was satanic? Or did you merely eat it?

      If not, I would suggegest that you blow the dust off of it and realize the word jabber comes from the Middle English word jaberen meaning imitative (?).

      There are reasons why I try not to tell people I'm a Christian. I think it has to do with association with witch and book burners.

      Do unto others as you would have done unto yourself
      -- read !!!!

    4. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > when does any Japanese person over the age of 12 use "jabu jabu" in conversation?

      You're kidding, right? You obviously haven't been learning Japanese very long if you believe that (words based on sounds or actions, called giseigo and gitaigo in Japanese, or onomatopoeias or mimetics in English, are COMMON in everyday conversation.)

      Trust me. Next time a cute young Japanese girl is sucking your schlong, say, "jabu jabu!" and see what happens. ;-)

    5. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, it's "ke-ki GA daisuki", not "wo". If you're going to use Japanese, please use it properly. Thanks.

    6. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by triptolemeus · · Score: 1

      If god didn't want us to have sex, he wouldn't have made it so nice.

      Even if you're right, although I personally think that the word comes from some ancient English. Even if you're right, using a tool with a bad name would not be considered blasphemy. There is still the differnce between the tool and the name.

      One could of course argue that you cannot use freebsd or apple computers because of the logos. If you do that you will miss out a lot (and everyone knows that despite of the propper logo, M$ is the evil).

      Considering jabber a devil tool, tells probably more about the user's use of the tool than it tells about the tool.

      --
      The site where: "I'm right, as long as you ignore the things that prove me wrong", became a valid method of debate.
    7. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All right... have the trolls been studying Japanese, or is it the other way around? :-)

    8. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, Christians! They make the best targets for a good Bukkake shoot.

    9. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there. I think it was a joke.

    10. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      organized religion = root of all evil....
      christianity = most evil of all

    11. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by kdart · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI:

      Jabber Jab"ber, v. i. imp. & p. p. Jabbered; p. pr. & vb.
      n. Jabbering. Cf. Gibber, Gabble.
      To talk rapidly, indistinctly, or unintelligibly; to utter
      gibberish or nonsense; to chatter. --Swift.

      --

      --
      The early bird catches the worm. The worm that sleeps late lives to see another day.
    12. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by cgaylord · · Score: 1

      Would that it were so... sigh ... unfortunately, I don't think so. All I can hope is that this pseudo-christian is only assuming this persona for shock value on /. ... sadder than fiction.

    13. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by cgaylord · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anonymous coward = most ignorant of all

    14. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by markc · · Score: 1

      That was funny! Was I the only one to get the joke?

      (jeez, maybe that should scare me... )

    15. Re:Jabber is an offense against christians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh, yes. The common misconception that Christians are forbidden from having sex unless it is to procreate. How funny this myth perpetuates.

      Catholics (my religion of choice), do not believe this. We believe that true beauty comes from perfect love that a woman and man share together in a monogamous relationship (yes, after a commitment has been made thru wedding vows.... how old fashioned, I know). My wife and I share many nights of passion without the sole intent of having children.

      Silly, silly slashdot folks... Find your faith, whatever it may be, and follow it. You'll be happier and feel less animosity towards others who happen to be happy in their own faith. Believe me.

  3. Jabber on Cell-phones? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How would they do that? PDAs I can understand, especially if they run Linux, but cellphones? Or is this just some kind of SMSJabber Gateway. If memory servers me right. Jabber is easy to plug into other systems with server Gateways.

    Also, note the cost, $20m is peanuts for a Govt project. I guess they will try to use existing infrastructure where possible.

    1. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by Robotron2084 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Although I couldn't find the older SMS transport, there seems to be another one being made here at http://sourceforge.net/projects/jabbersms

      Jabber gateways(transports) work very well. And if it doesn't exist you can write your own in Perl, Python, C , Java and many others using existing libraries to handle network and xml functions. $20 million buys you a hell of a lot of Jabbering!

    2. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by AussiePenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe IBM are going to make a Jabber enabled phone?

      --

      Jeremy
      Melbourne, Australia
      Jabber Australia

    3. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen Jabber used on pagers-- RIM Blackberry pagers. Apparently its not very hard to implement.

    4. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
      Thinking some more, some new mobiles phones have at least a bit of a Java VM in them (that is the telephone embedded variety). That would probably do it.

      I don't think that $20m would go far if there was dedicated hardware being developed. I gues the whole point is the use of IM to lever of exiting technology where possible. For example, the purchase of servers but the use of exitsing standard PCs as front ends.

    5. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by X-ViRGE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, France TeleCom and SwissCom both provide Jabber-enabled cell phones. It may be using an SMS gateway of some kind, but it doesn't have to. Jabber clients don't have to be using linux...

    6. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
      Is this via I-mode or something? Jabber normally needs an always on IP connection.

      You are right that Jabber doesn't need Linux, but it needs a programmable cellphone, usually Java (phone embbedded edition). Is this running under the Java VM or what?

    7. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by rusty0101 · · Score: 2

      One thing to take into consideration is that just because the server in question is Jabber, does not mean that all of the users need to be running jabber clients.

      If the Central Dispatchers are using Jabber clients, and have accounts on the various consumer accounts such as YM, MSN-IM, AIM, etc, and the phone that an officer is carrying has a client for one of these (my own cell phone is capable of either msn or Yahoo Messenger) the officer can be in communication with the Central Dispatchers, who can relay messages to other systems if needed.

      This does require the use of transports that may not always work, (Yahoo and AOL are both having fun trying to kick cross platform users off their networks.)

      Web enabled phones could also use ICQ, or other potential clients, including web enabled IRC gateways.

      Jabberd also runs on a variety of OS platforms as well, including NT, Solaris, BSD, as well as Linux. I would be surprised if no-one has taken te BSD source and confirmed that it will run under MacOS X as well. So just abou any platforms that are coming out of service, or are not being fully utilized can have a jabberd server running, interoperating with other jabberd servers.

      Of course other people have different ideas and opinions. We can't all be me.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    8. Re:Jabber on Cell-phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is shitload of phones with J2ME. Combine this with GPRS, or your local persistent mobile connection system, and here you go, you have PMIS.

  4. Open Stuff by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It seems that numerous industries and goverments are now going with open source/standards/free stuff (what was that thing in Peru? -???).

    Excellent Stuff.

  5. Jabber Server by pajor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its good to see an open standard promoted by the government. I'm half suprised MS didn't push for an MSN contract to help push their .NET intiative.

    I'm also glad IBM is smart enough to roll out their own servers rather than use that godawful jabberd that jabber.org provides. I hope they release their jabber server as free software, as the lack of a fs/os production quality jabber server has hurt deployment.

    --
    Gnuyen
    1. Re:Jabber Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried their damndest.

      In fact, I was at several of those meetings with MS.
      And I have NEVER seen such a torent of lies and threats before in my life.

    2. Re:Jabber Server by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm half suprised MS didn't push for an MSN contract to help push their .NET intiative.

      They would have difficulty with that. MSN was designed to be a large scale consumer service and nothing else. Check out its architecture if you don't believe me. It's not at all extendable, and the whole thing relies on central servers - you couldn't even just sell a server-in-a-box.

      I'm also glad IBM is smart enough to roll out their own servers rather than use that godawful jabberd that jabber.org provides. I hope they release their jabber server as free software, as the lack of a fs/os production quality jabber server has hurt deployment.

      I don't really know what you're referring to here. I admin a popular jabber server, and it works great. If you need corporate level scalability, the Jabber Commercial Server is especially designed for you.

    3. Re:Jabber Server by tzanger · · Score: 2

      I'd love to know where to get a hold of a copy of the IRC transport or even a version of aim-t or yahoo-t which works with jabberd-1.4.2. The sf-like site for jabber apps is as dead as a doornail as far as offering files or getting at CVS. :-(

    4. Re:Jabber Server by Mansing · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://msn-transport.jabberstudio.org
      http://aim- transport.jabberstudio.org
      http://yahoo-transport -2.jabberstudio.org

    5. Re:Jabber Server by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      I'm also glad IBM is smart enough to roll out their own servers rather than use that godawful jabberd that jabber.org provides.

      Yeah, but I'd be glad to see you helping to make the jabberd server less godawful, as some people I know doing it right now. They certainly need your invaluable expertise and will to perfection.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  6. Makes Sense by radoni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ability to log messages is really keen. Accountability is important in a business setting; I witness Jabber developers' use of conference logs almost daily. The adoption of jabber in a messaging infrastructure by government makes sense.

    tired as i write this.

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  7. Location based by smallfries · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    This sounds like quite a cool application, linking together the IM networks doesn't really give them more than a radio, but pluging it into their databases could be interesting. Especially if the edge devices know whereabouts they are; message for backup to the closest 10 units, run stolen car checks automatically (hook up a front end that pulls plates out of a video feed), or even, when you spot one message a uniform car in the direction that the cars going. It would be quite cool for managing evacuations as well, real time stats about people getting out could organise escape routes to avoid congestion amongst other things..

    So when can I get a scanner for the car that checks there aren't any speed checks coming up...

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  8. More at the CapWin Site by reallocate · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's more on the CapWin Site.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  9. Re:Anyway : Which is the Best Linux Distros ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The adjective is 'communist', moron.

  10. Jabber.com technology? by pointwood · · Score: 2

    Since they link to jabber.com in the story - will they be using their technology?

    I'm on that impressed by the jabber.com clients though. JIM (their client) hasn't been updated for "ages" it seems and it's not because it's bug free...
    They have a webclient too...which only works with IE5-IE6 and Netscape 4.x! I'm NOT impressed!

    1. Re:Jabber.com technology? by X-ViRGE · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, when they say "The instant message application will come from Jabber..." they most likely mean Jabber, Inc., so I would imagine they are using that commercial server. That doesn't mean they have to use their clients, though.

    2. Re:Jabber.com technology? by karm13 · · Score: 1

      if you are not impressed by JIM, why not pic one of the many others?
      you could write your own -- it's not that out of reach, the protocol is easy to understand, and The Jabber Programmers Guide is actually a good read.

      --

      --
      making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
  11. Probably sick of AIM ads. by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government is probably sick of having to use AIM (or MSN, or Yahoo) like everyone else.

    But seriously, the DOD is fond of using SGML to process documents, and there's even a govt. website pressing for the adoption of XML standards as a way to facilitate communication between agencies. This would be a good thing.

    Jabber clients, as an XML transport mechanism, would definitely facilitate this... For instance, right now the US EPA provides a database program called CAMEO which provides emergency response data for over 6080 different hazardous chemicals. Imagine, not a beowulf cluster, but a US EPA On-scene coordinator who wants data on "Methyl-ethyl-meatloaf", a chemical not included in the program. "Beep beep beep", she sends a query (containing the CAS Number for the chemical) via the Jabber IM client. Then about ten seconds later, she receives a response data information sheet on the chemical from the National Response Center. Her specially-designed US EPA Jabber Client takes the data and (a) loads it into her CAMEO program and/or (b) processes it with XSLT and dumps it into her browser for printing.

    I do chemical emergency planning for a living and I'm always seeking to improve the ability to deliver appropriate information on request. One method is "give 'em everything we have and let 'em find it". That leads to (a) a file cabinet full of files on each fire truck or (b) a cd wallet and a computer guru on each shift.

    An other alternative is fax them what they need on request (ugh!). A Jabber IM solution would be a powerful way to deliver structured content to the responder on request.

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:Probably sick of AIM ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't really thought deeply through your suggestions, but I think there's another protocol out there that could help you a great deal. It's called HTTP. I'm at a loss trying to see what the advantages of using an IM client to request information are. Care to flesh it out a little more?

  12. Re:And you can have one too! by happystink · · Score: 1, Troll

    Wow, an ad troll,sad.

    --

    sig:
    See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  13. But the relevant question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is IBM using IBM GXP hard drives to run the IM system it is building?

    Two different links.

  14. What? No Sametime? by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    I'm really surprised IBM didn't push that gawd awful Sametime garbage.

  15. IBM isn't new to Jabber by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check http://sash.alphaworks.ibm.com/download/sashjab/

    Don't be tricked by it needs IE, it needs MS XML stuff. The Sash thing is in its full a real interesting stuff... I remember I installed Sashjab, with all those cool tricks just made with WEB technologies, thing used LESS than ICQ of that time...

    So, IBM isn't new for Jabber.

    BTW, in this evil corparate games Internet, I know its a dream but, how a cool thing if all IM relied on a protocol like Jabber...

  16. Not sure about this by 5lash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally, i think this sets a bit of a bad precedent for the future of the world. I'm worried that one day the only thing we'll use for communication is IM/Txt msgs. This is bad because Text has a number of disadvantages over speech:

    1) It's near impossible to convey emotions in txt. The popularity of the internet has meant people use emoticons more and more, but even these cannot compare to a single facial expression.

    2)Not many people can type as fast as they can talk. This doesnt really matter to us now, but speed is important for the Fire Service or any other Life Saving Service.

    I think thats pretty much the way i feel, tell me if i'm wrong!

    1. Re:Not sure about this by karm13 · · Score: 1

      france telecom has invested $7mio in jabber.com.
      press release talks about mobile and voice communications.

      --

      --
      making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
    2. Re:Not sure about this by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's near impossible to convey emotions in txt.

      You're right. Before the invention of emoticons, humans were unable to express sarcasm, sorrow, pain, or joy verbally. Just think how great Shakespeare could've been had he known about smileys:

      "To be, or not to be. That is the question. :~("

      Oh, wait. You were serious?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Not sure about this by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      Just think how great Shakespeare could've been had he known about smileys:

      Oh, please. Shakespeare is supposed to be performed.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
  17. Re:What? No Sametime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sametime isn't that bad, my company uses it and it's alot more lightweight than any of the other non-corporate bloatware crap out there like icq and aim.

  18. SameTime anyone? by SGHarms · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how IBM's push of this is going to affect their sametime Intsant Messenger for Lotus Notes.

    I won't argue that Jabber clients, by virtue of being OSS and infinitely customizable, offer a greater feature set than the SameTime client (the java version of which barely runs on *IX).

    My question is, is this IBM conceding that SameTime sucks (likely) and that they are looking for their Open Source embracing design theory to force the demise of SameTime as an IM client?

    (That said, I think that ST may be the best enterprise collaboration untility still -- a thouand VNC streams just don't cut it -- unless someone knows something better?).

    1. Re:SameTime anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article quotes
      "They did not want to be hooked into any proprietary system,"

      Taht pretty much rules SameTime out. Since IBM has an interest in Jabber, they could push that instead.

    2. Re:SameTime anyone? by SGHarms · · Score: 1

      Good point -- it's odd that IBM sees it more profitable in the long term to cannibalize lotus.

  19. Jabber!? by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But I have to use fucking Sametime Connect inside the company! The bastards! Having to use Lotus software is the biggest downside to working at IBM. They have to justify that 6 billion dollar investment in Lotus, you see? And despite the fact that IBM is all gung-ho about Linux, we'll never see Linux ports of that software. I suspect it's not that they don't want to as much as no one really knows enough about the code base to even make the attempt. Or to be able to document their file formats. Lotus is this decade's Token Ring.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Jabber!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're brave! I feel the same way, but I'm too chicken shit to say it using my real slashdot id.

    2. Re:Jabber!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For someone that works in IBM you seem to be lacking in knowledge of your own products.

      Sametime wasn't made by Lotus it was bought by Lotus from another company.

    3. Re:Jabber!? by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Domino runs on Linux, and runs well.

      I can't say if there are Linux clients of Notes though, but the server not only exists, but excels.

      -9mm-

    4. Re:Jabber!? by vanguard · · Score: 2

      Cisco uses that crap too. I guess it works but it lacks the polish that *every* other IM client provides. For example, no smiley faces, when I disconnect from the network I get two alert boxes that I have to click "Ok" on, it doesn't seem to start minimized in my windows tray, etc. I don't know why Cisco bought it.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    5. Re:Jabber!? by ijablokov · · Score: 1

      Uh, let's keep certain comments within the family, OK? You have a problem with it use internal channels to route it to the appropriate contact who can help with your issues. If you have never tried providing feedback, please do so, it'll alleviate your concerns.

  20. Typical message exchange by jimbolaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    there's a riot downtown. :(
    stores are being looted! :O
    all units respond now! >:(
    officers have arrived. situation under control. :)

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  21. It's really not fair. by Anaplexian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...when you use IBM's proprietary technology, they charge you money. But when they use Jabber, it's free for them.
    Not fair, I think.
    In my view since IBM charges for it's work, IBM should also pay for the great work the Jabber folks have done. A donation to the Jabber people would be easy for IBM, and a VERY cool thing for the Jabfolks.

    1. Re:It's really not fair. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ibm does already sponsor jabber... http://www.jabber.org/sponsorship.html

    2. Re:It's really not fair. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, if the people at Jabber dont want other companies to make money from their code, they should NOT release it as open source.

  22. From a Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW,
    fax = fucks (as in 'fack you' - our native idiots tend to misspell the word in graffiti) in Japanese so don't you Christians send those anymore until you come up w/ a new word!
    I'm not kidding. We Japanese have to end up saying "Kore wo fucks shite kudasai" to mean 'please fax this' because of the similarity of 'facks' (sic) to 'fax'. This is when we are speaking among ourselves. Then we have to switch to 'fax' when speaking with Americans, and when in mixed company we cringe as there is no way out.
    So, if you are worried about what something means in Japanese you would want to change 'fax' first. 'Jabu jabu' means gulp down, and also a kids cartoon character. Why doesn't this guy tell the Japanese jabu jabu character creators they're using a dirty word?
    Jeeze, it's jabber and not jabu jabu. From 'javer'. duh.
    As we say in Japanese, 'baka yaro' (frikin'idiot).

    1. Re:From a Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's in the FAQ, Mr. Japanese poster. ;-)

      (To the non-Japanese-speaking morons: FAQ is also pronounced "fuck"). ;-)

  23. Re:What? No Sametime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, just ask any IBM employee who uses linux and is forced to run a jabberd server on their box with the sametime transport so that they can converse with others. IBM may be pushing jabber on that specific project, but internally it's all sametime all the time.

  24. Re:Pity the fool! by quinto2000 · · Score: 1

    Well, Gaim sucks at IRC. I use it for some of the other protocols though. Mostly it's good at Aim, and good enough for the other protocols that I can talk to people who use them in a pinch.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post
  25. Pin in a haystack by Tyreth · · Score: 1

    It's harder to get someone to switch their favourite IM than it is to get them to switch OS.

    At least with an OS we can build compatibility with their favourite applications/protocals, but getting them to switch protocals means that they lose all their friends.

    And for some absurd reason people continue using ICQ and MSN messenger in general rather than get a multi-protocal IM application. I don't understand this, it's so much easier having them all in one.

    I guess to get people to switch we'll have to wait for AOL and MSN to start new 'services' and 'features' that continue to irritate their 'customers' until the point where they look for alternatives - just like MS is doing with it's license fees at the moment.

  26. Jabberstudio by 21mhz · · Score: 2, Informative

    The sf-like site for jabber apps is as dead as a doornail as far as offering files or getting at CVS.

    Jabberstudio is far from it. Subscribe to their CVS commits notification list and see for yourself.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  27. Re:What? No Sametime? by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    Please tell me more about a sametime transport for jabberd, I've been looking for such an animal for a while. URL?

  28. Re:Pity the fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gaim doesn't do file transfer, thus it isn't a real client.

  29. Ds: Patalogic lack of sense of humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh

  30. Why should it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    >gaim doesn't do file transfer, thus it isn't a real client

    I know you're trolling here, but I want to address this point. So what if gaim doesn't do file transfer? It's an instant messaging client, not an FTP program! That AIM and ICQ support point-to-point file transfers is convenient, but it's really just more unnecessary bloat.

    The official AIM client includes some sort of extensible plugin API, presumably so that you can roll your own AIM plugins (though I have yet to find an SDK). One of the stock plugins is the ability to start a Quake 2 deathmatch via the AIM client; a neat toy perhaps, but it has nothing to do with instant messaging. Do you think that ICQ is not a "real client" because it doesn't feature Quake 2 support? Trillian supports IRC to some extent; does that mean that AIM isn't a "real client" because it can't do IRC?

    Applications should be designed to perform specific tasks and perform them well. I don't need an IM client built into my web browser, I don't need an FTP server built into my IM program, and I don't need my SSH client to be able to arrange Quake 2 deathmatches. The idea of consolidating every possible feature under a single umbrella is precisely why I quit using Netscape some time ago... In order to get the browser, they also wanted you to install Collabra, and Composer, and all sorts of other things I neither wanted nor needed.

    If I want to transfer files, I'll type 'ftp' instead of 'gaim.' Why is that so hard?

    1. Re:Why should it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I want to transfer files, I'll type 'ftp' instead of 'gaim.' Why is that so hard?

      Because your friend has to be running an FTP server, you have to know his IP address, it has to pass through whatever firewall you're behind at the moment (and whatever firewall he's behind), you have to have an account on your friend's machine that allows uploading; if downloading, your friend has to copy the file into the transfer directory...

  31. Look around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is internal software at IBM to connect jabber to sametime. You just have to find it.

  32. HTTP is good but... by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IM allows a human at both ends to communicate. For instance:

    Fire Chief: I need a MSDS for "Methyl-ethyl-meatloaf", I have a partial CAS Number: It starts with 456.

    NRC Dispatcher: Chief, is it a drum or a cylinder?

    Fire Chief: It's a cylinder.

    NRC Dispatcher: The MSDS is being sent now...

    Granted, this can be done over the phone as well as a IM client, but HTTP requires the user to navigate to the record. In some cases, the user doesn't know where to find the information (too much information available, not enough expertise in chemicals or searching). The NRC, Chemtrek, or state agencies staff call centers with experts that can handle requests from responders. Responders regularly communicate with them to verify their data and obtain additional information.

    The benefit of using IM would be to communicate with an off-site expert (like a phone) and let an off-site expert to push the requested data to the user (like a fax). But unlike a fax, the data can be further processed: transformed to a standard format familiar to the emergency responders, or used in a chemical release modeling program to calculate a threat zone.

    Frankly, the ideal situation would be if you could send data along side a regular telephone call. That's one niche I haven't seen explored.

    --
    My father is a blogger.