Slashdot Mirror


Voyagers Legacy in Pictures

tanveer1979 writes "Space.com has an interesting photo feature from the voyager craft. For the uninformed voyager is the most distant man made object. For the first time we are recieving photos of distant parts of the solar system. Currently voyager is about 12 light hours away. Wonder how far is that? Well Sun is 8 light minutes away from Earth. In case you are wondering what is this all about, check out the current location of voyager. The voyager spacecraft are about to cross heliopause, which is the limit of the rule of the sun, after which inter steller winds take over, and for the first time scientists can get the feel of what lies outside the solar system."

39 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Photoshop? by rtnz · · Score: 2

    Is it just me or does this image look photoshop'd? Is that a real image taken by voyager??

    1. Re:Photoshop? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the comment field in the GIF file (can you write such long comments into the GIF file using Photoshop?):

      NASA's Voyager 2 took this photograph of Saturn on July 21, 1981,
      when the spacecraft was 33.9 million kÿilometers (21 million
      miles) from the planet. Two bright, presumably convective cloud
      patterns are visible in the mid-northern hemisphere and several
      dark spoke-like features can be seen in the broad B-ring (left of
      planet). The moons Rhea and dioneÿ appear as blue dots to the
      south and southeast of Saturn, respectively. Voyager 2 made its
      closest approach to Saturn on Aug. 25, 1981. The Voyager project
      is managed for NASA by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena,
      Calif. This image was converted directly from digital data to
      GIF format.


      (Unfortunately, the Slashdot "filter" doesn't allow me to post the whole comment.)

  2. Voyager makes me wonder by Krapangor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if all this "low-budget-space-exploration" the NASA does these days is the wrong direction.
    With the old expensive programs you got huge bills but you got huge results, too.
    The cheap stuff on the other hand tends to fail and doesn't has much scientific content.
    Space exploration is not about driving cute robots on mars - actual scientific results are wanted. No matter if the public "loves" them or not.
    Perhaps NASA is bound to degenerate to a pseudo-science space-entertaiment agency. If Disney sponsors one of their flights, then we will know it for sure.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:Voyager makes me wonder by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (* if all this "low-budget-space-exploration" the NASA does these days is the wrong direction.
      With the old expensive programs you got huge bills but you got huge results, too. *)

      I don't know about that. Would you rather have 3 missions to different places or one mission to the same place.

      Voyager 2 took a unique and limited opportunity of the fact that the outer planets were in the right position to use as a "slingshot" to the next target. I don't know how budget situations would have affected this.

      If a similar "alignment" opportunity comes along, but is not taken advantage of, then I can see a real complaint. But so far nothing like that has been "missed" that I know of.

      The closest similarity may be the tentative Pluto probe: if they don't launch soon, then Pluto's atmosphere will be frozen for another 200 years or so, losing any opportunity to study its non-frozen atmosphere close up for a long while. (Pluto has a highly elliptical orbit compared to most planets.)

      If they cancel the Pluto probe, then somebody should be summarily fired (even if a Senator did it). The ISS keeps sucking up the funds for it.

      Europa and Mars are not going anywhere soon, but Pluto's atmosphere is.

      I think they should send *two* probes in case one fails. Bleep happens. Even the Voyagers had intermittent problems, despite a "full" budget. Galellio (sp?) had a huge antenna problem which prevented most planned photography despite a full budget, and Mariner 8 totally failed.

      So far, the failure rate of the newer crop is not significantly more than the 70's probes. I think Countour's recent failure bumped up the newer number to stand out a bit, but it is still not that much worse.

    2. Re:Voyager makes me wonder by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Mariner 8's end was considered a "launch vehicle failure". I am not sure that counts because the probe itself did not cause the problem.

      Well, that is a grey area. The Contour probe appeared to also fail during a "boost phase". It just happened to be beyond the Earth's atmosphere when that booster fired. A booster is a booster, whether it is a big rocket or a little rocket that stays connected to the probe longer. You could make a dividing line between a booster that is permanently attatched and one that comes off after use, but that is still a somewhat arbitrary boundary IMO.

      But, thanks for the clarification regardless. I wonder if the finger-pointing process for Contour politics is going to face such definition issues also.

  3. Corrected link by MagPulse · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagegallery/

    It's not much, just 10 pictures. Click on "Voyager's Photo Legacy", then again for a Javascript pop-up gallery.

  4. More links by MagPulse · · Score: 4, Informative
    Voyager is coming up lately because it just had its 25th anniversary launch date on August 20. Here are some more links: And a few newspaper stories:
  5. Slightly offtopic but... Light Hour? Light minute? by tonywestonuk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Isn't stating distances in these units a bit 'oldie style.... Shoulden't we be always stating Light Years, where,

    27.4 milli-Light years = 1 Light day

    114 micro-Light Years = 1 Light Hour

    1.9 micro-Light Years = 1 Light Minute

    Mix and matching units isn't the way to go, for instance, how many times further is the Voyager from the sun than us?... (12 light hours compaired to 8 light mins, is more complecated than 15 uLightYear compaired to 1368uLightYear, where in the latter, it can be seen that it is approx 100 times further.)

  6. New photos from edge of Solar System? by danielsmc · · Score: 2, Informative
    For the first time we are recieving photos of distant parts of the solar system.
    Not Quite. Now most of Voyager's mission is focused on its other instruments, like its magnometer, rather than the camera. The area near the heliopause is kind of short on photographic targets! The pictures space.com has are all photos of planets that were taken decades ago.

    Daniel
  7. You're brain damaged as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The proper distance unit in the solar system is the "astronomical unit". Voyager 1 is currently 85.601 AU from Earth. That makes it, ahem, 85.601 times further than the sun because the distance of the Sun is 1 AU.

    1. Re:You're brain damaged as well by TheGreek · · Score: 2

      And that average *never* changes from year to year.

  8. Re:Slightly offtopic but... Light Hour? Light minu by nachoworld · · Score: 2

    Since a light year isn't an SI unit, I don't think it matters.

    Personally, I find 8 light minutes easier to conceptualize than 1368 micro-light years. We all think of minutes as very small compared to years. I'm pretty sure that all of us, being nerds that we are, have calculated how MANY minutes there are in a year. And most of us know that it takes light just minutes to reach the inner planets. But when I think of micro-light years I have nothing to reference. Can light reach Mercury in a micro-light year? Jupiter?

    It's just a matter of taste and custom. But since light-years aren't standardized, I don't see a problem with the norm.

    --

    ---
    I'm just an ordinary man with nothing to lose.
  9. Re:Slightly offtopic but... Light Hour? Light minu by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mix and matching units isn't the way to go, for instance, how many times further is the Voyager from the sun than us?... (12 light hours compaired to 8 light mins, is more complecated than 15 uLightYear compaired to 1368uLightYear, where in the latter, it can be seen that it is approx 100 times further.)

    Most people educated past grade 2 these days are taught that there are 60 minutes in an hour, and have no trouble working these sorts of figures out.

    The biggest reason *I* like to see light-hours/minutes/etc is that it's actually meaningful. 871 micro-Light Years is some arbitrary figure. 11 light minutes means that light (a really, really fast thing) takes 11 minutes to travel that distance. And if I want to communicate with a spacecraft that's 12 light hours out .. well, I won't be getting my response back until this time tomorrow. Things like that.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  10. Re:Slightly offtopic but... Light Hour? Light minu by Debillitatus · · Score: 2
    This is true... but you always run into this sort of trouble when you have a non-metric (or non-10-base) system. We would never have this problem with meters and millimeters and so forth.

    The clear solution to this problem is to use metric time. I'm sure that would never happen, but we could conceivably break each day into metric units. Each Mhour would be a tenth of a day (or 2 hrs., 24 min. of the old units). Then would could make an Mminute one hundreth of an hour (or 1 min., 26.4 sec. old units), and then an Msec would be one hundredth of that (.864 old seconds). So, everything would be the same up to an order of magnitude or so. As much sense as this makes, it ain't gonna happen. Hell, in the US, we're having trouble converting to other metric units, so this won't happen.

    On an even more off-topic note, this reminds me of something a long time ago. When I was in high-school, I was a waiter at this restaurant, and there was a timeclock which (as most do) actually recorded everything, not in hours and minutes, but decimal hours. For example, if you clocked in at 4:30pm, it would say 4.50pm. So, anyway, there was a couple of times that the dishwashers (who spoke only Spanish and no English) were asking me what the story was with the machine, since it always put "the wrong time".

    Now, I'm pretty comfortable with changing units, so it never bothered me, but it was hard to explain. Actually, I'm thinking that to explain about breaking an hour into anything other than 60 pieces, in English, say, to my mom, would be extremely hard. Now, I had to do it in Spanish, which I had sort of learned around the house and the neighborhood, and had never had any school on. Whew. I don't think I ever explained it to these dudes... the closest I came to making them happy was that I convinced them if the timeclock was crazed out, I wouldn't use it either.

    --

    Come on, give it up, that's

  11. One small error by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2
    The heliopause is not quite the end of the suns influence I think. There are is a comet like could that lays far beyond it that is barely held there by the suns gravity. If I remember correctly it is called oorts cloud and it will take voyager a bit more time to get there. 200 centuries or so.

    What I find most amazing is that the voyager is still going on a computer system that you could buy, in proccessing power terms, in kids toys but that the stability has yet to be equaled. Would love to have a look at that source code.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:One small error by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      The heliopause is the limit of the sun's contribution to particle flux. The sun spews out a constant flow of particles of various kinds, called the solar wind. As you go out, they naturally get more and more sparse.

      At the same time, there are a certain number of particles just flying around free in space, with a (very roughly) uniform density all over the universe.

      The heliopause marks the points where the density of solar particles has declined to that of the free-space particles. Inside it, most of the particles you see are from the sun; outside it, most of them come from elsewhere.

      The solar gravity does indeed reach farther. The Oort Cloud is made up of objects so far out that while they're basically orbiting the sun, they're also affected by the gravity of other stars in the "neighborhood". Once in a while this disturbs one of them enough that it falls into the inner solar system and we get a comet.

      rj

  12. New technology by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It makes me wonder what we could do with the even lower power and lower weight computer/sensor technologies we have available now. Looks like the Voyagers are going to last past 2020 but with even lower power one might marvel at how long newer devices could last. That is assuming, of course, that we can ever straighten out conversions between english and metric units.

  13. "About to" reach Heliopause? by guanxi · · Score: 2

    The voyager spacecraft are about to cross heliopause,

    Per project manager Ed Massey in the Yahoo article, it's a long way away:
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story &u=/nm/ 20020820/ts_nm/space_voyager_dc_2

    ... "We don't run out of electrical power until about 2020," he said. "There's every expectation that Voyager 1 will ... at least enter the heliopause. There may be a question as to whether it will exit out the other side before we run out of power."

    At 59, with only about four years with Voyager, Massey said he would be retired long before the probes hit the heliopause. ...


    1. Re:"About to" reach Heliopause? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* "We don't run out of electrical power until about 2020..." *)

      This implies they run off of "regular" batteries, which is not the case. They use nuclear power cells, which lasts a good while, but I believe chemical corrosion of some type in the cell reduces the harvest rate over time.

      (* [The voyager spacecraft are about to cross heliopause,]....Per project manager Ed Massey in the Yahoo article, it's a long way away: *)

      The bottom line is that nobody knows for sure where this heliopause thingy really is. There is no known direct way to tell from Earth. It is only an educated guess at this point. Voyager(s) is tredding where no (working) probe has gone before.

    2. Re:"About to" reach Heliopause? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      I didn't say those things

      I suppose I should have quoted my quotes a bit more explicitly. Sorry 'bout that.

  14. Neptune is cool by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the mid 80's I remember walking by the newstand, and suddenly seeing a picture of a big, blue/green spooky looking planet on the front page. Then right next to it was "Voyager Reaches Neptune!".

    I remember the space books before that simply showed grainy star-like blob photos of neptune (assuming no guessed illustration).

    Then low and behold, this big spooky ball with wispy clouds and a jupiter-like dark spot is revealed, and its a real place, waaaaaay out there at the cold edge of the solar system.

    It fit well the stereotype of a distant, strange, lonely, but beautiful planet.

    Thumbs up, Voy!

  15. I don't mean to be pessimistic... by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    but you do realize that someday Voyager is going to crash into a planet and obliterate an entire city of extraterrestrials.

    Years later we will cheer and gawk as NASA or the U.S. Air Force reports a fleet of unidentified space ships entering the atmosphere... until they pull out their laser blasters and photon torpedoes and come looking for revenge.

    1. Re:I don't mean to be pessimistic... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2

      Well think about how pissed the martians must be. We keep crashing things into their planet and the things never seem to work right, except for that rover thingie that left tiremarks on everything ... sheesh.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    2. Re:I don't mean to be pessimistic... by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 2

      Actually this sounds like a storyline of a particularly GOOD Space 1999 episode.

    3. Re:I don't mean to be pessimistic... by mshiltonj · · Score: 2

      but you do realize that someday Voyager is going to crash into a planet and obliterate an entire city of extraterrestrials.

      No, it's not. It's going to get damaged, then intercepted by a race of sentient machines. They will repair and upgrade voyager, using the best of their technology, then send it on its way. Voyager will continue on its mission -- collecting information -- before coming back to Earth to deliver the information to its creator.

      There's some extinct whales involved somewhere in the timeline, but I'm not sure how that fits in.

  16. Who cares about photos, check the video... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    Okay well anyone who's not familiar with what the voyager project is, or you just want a quick nostalgic recap.

    Here is a RM stream that has a nice little highschool science class feel to it, but is still very informative.

    But I don't get why we keep in contact with the Voyager satellites, everyone knows we'll just lose contact anyways ... (Ref: Star Trek: The Motion Picture)

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  17. Slashdotted.... by robpoe · · Score: 4, Funny
    We slashdotted NASA. OMG. I keep getting permission denied. Then a reload SLOWLY brings up the site.

    "ISS to Houston, come in please."

    "Houston, go ahead"

    "Will you fix the toilet up here? It's not flushing and theres shit all over the place."

    "ISS, we're trying, but 200,000 bloody people are trying to look @ pictures of Uranus right now. Will advise."

    --
    = Grow a brain...
  18. Re:Slightly offtopic but... Light Hour? Light minu by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.

    I have this sudden urge to go find a bathroom to first post in. ;-)

  19. More more links by Mumble · · Score: 2, Informative
    A few more Voyager links:
  20. Re:What about Pioneer 10/11 by lbonser · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, it's a matter of speed. Pioneer 10 was for a long time the furtherest man-made object, but Voyager 2 passed it about 10 years ago or so. The Pioneer's were launched with less powerful rockets and didn't use as much gravitational slingshot. Voyager 1 and 2 are simply faster.

  21. Moores law may not apply in space by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (* It makes me wonder what we could do with the even lower power and lower weight computer/sensor technologies we have available now. Looks like the Voyagers are going to last past 2020 but with even lower power one might marvel at how long newer devices could last. *)

    Too small of electronic parts cause problems near heavy radiation areas like Jupiter and other gas giant planets. Some of this can be helped with sheilding, but the sheilding increases the weight where it may be more effective to use fat electronics rather than fat shielding.

    One of the reasons that a planned Europa (Jup moon) probe was postponed is that the cost of radiation sheilding was more expensive than they thought. Older probes did not have as much worries about that because their electronics were larger. Now they have to weigh more tradeoffs because of the options and problems that minituration provides WRT heavy radiation.

    Plus, doesn't the power needed for radio transmission remain pretty much constant, especially in light of the fact that newer missions send more data than older ones?

    The efficiency of radio transmission has not followed Moore I don't believe. It is linear I think.

  22. Voyager to cross heliopause by Alsee · · Score: 2

    Soon to be heard in the Voyage control room?

    Ahhh, sir? I think there's something wrong. ::studies display::
    Yes? What is it?
    Well, as far as I can tell...
    Uhhh, I mean according to the numbers here... ummm...
    What happened? Spit it out already!
    Uh, yeah, well, according to my display here,
    uhhh... well... it says Voyager 1 bounced sir.
    What do you mean BOUNCED? Did a micrometor jiggle it or something?
    uhh, no, not exacly...
    Well? Then WHAT exactly ?
    Exactly? Ahh, well, as near as I can make out, it bounced off of the heliopause sir. It seems to be coming back this way now.
    Huh? But there's nothing out there, it's pretty much just a mathematical line where the force of the solar wind balances the force of interstellar gas, right?

    Uhhh, yeah, at least that's what all the scientists just sort of assumed, I guess.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. Re:Something to ponder... by IWAssassin · · Score: 2

    No, No Watch Star Trek The Motion Picture. It will find a bunch of super-intelligent aliens, get data on the entire universe, then fly back to earth as the center of some nebula looking for the creator and wanting to destroy all humans.

    Simple (:

  24. Re:Let's Go Right Now by greenrd · · Score: 2
    Todays society and econmy needs constant growth to survive. Without a growth of GDP, people will loose their jobs, poverty will increase etc etc.

    Indeed - quite a telling indictment of capitalism, no?

    It doesn't make rational sense that we should have to keep on growing the world economy beyond the capacity of the earth to bear it, just to feed everyone. It's only a system built on greed and selfishness that makes things this way.

  25. Re:Let's Go Right Now by mshiltonj · · Score: 2

    It doesn't make rational sense that we should have to keep on growing the world economy beyond the capacity of the earth to bear it, just to feed everyone. It's only a system built on greed and selfishness that makes things this way.

    No, Mr. Luddite. Individuals want to continually improve their own lives, and each generation wants the next generation to be better off than they were. I certainly want my kids to live better that I am.

    If you want to see stability (stagnation, no progress or improvement) look at the life of the average person in the year 500AD, then the life of the average person in the year 1500AD.

  26. What About the Manhole cover? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2
    I had heard that while voyager is the furthest spacecraft from earth, the furthest man made object was an unfortunate manhole cover used in a nuclear test pre-sputnik.

    Google brings up a pile of results like these

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    1. Re:What About the Manhole cover? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

      Doug William? is that you? It has to be.

  27. I concur; and *not* a troll by Sleepy · · Score: 2

    RobotWisdom declared:
    I wish that when Slashdotters linked file-formats beyond the basic HTML or txt, they'd at least add a little warning of some kind, eg link [nasa.gov] [pdf] so people can choose whether to mess with it. (In my case, it just starts downloading and I have to specifically cancel it.)

    Dude, I couldn't agree with you more. I don't know if the editors notice this thread, but if they do I replied for TWO reasons:

    one, to lobby for a PDF link warning

    TWO: alert the editors to MODERATOR ABUSE. Whoever moderated you as a "Troll" post clearly misused the system (if you are trolling, it's a subtle troll :-).

    Offtopic, but I find it odd that I *never* am selected to moderate. Either moderation is denied when you max your karma (bug!), or the trolls themselves have reverse engineered the system to the point where they get the lion's share of moderation. Not that I get a boost from moderating or anything... just speculating the system may be broken.

  28. Re:True, ... somewhat. by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

    true, but it wouldn't be like flinging a plate on it's lonesome through the atmosphere, it would have been surrounded by a mass of plasma for a long ways out.

    be interesting to see the effect that'd have.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'