New MP3 License Terms Demand $0.75 Per Decoder

Götz writes "The licensing terms of Thomson and the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, who are the owners of the mp3 patents, have changed. Now not only mp3 encoders but also mp3 decoders require a license. This page lists the fees -- it's $0.75 per decoder. As a consequence, Red Hat has already removed all mp3 players from the Rawhide development version."

Comments

My check is in the mail !

[gosand]

I love the MP3 format, so my check is in the mail.

Well, not exactly a check, more like 75 pennies.

In an envelope

Postage due

(In college once I paid a $2 [total BS] parking ticket in change, in one of those "postage will be paid by addressee" envelopes.)

Lawsuit waiting to happen?

[TibbonZero]

Perhaps they are just getting their legal team cracking, and are just waiting for the right time to strike..
Odd, sueing someone over the IP of something that has caused more IP problems than anything else in history.

Like the (updated) saying goes

[A_Non_Moose]

Beware of greeks bearing .gifts.

The definition of irony...

[Anonymous Coward]

...scads of people who have no problem whatsoever pirating hundreds of gigabytes of $19 CD's throwing a tizzy fit over the notion that someone else might have to pay $0.75.

Re:Thank god for ogg!

[cheezus]

a mp3->ogg converter would still need to decode the mp3.

you want to cough up the $0.75?

Re:i wonder

[ImaLamer]

Winamp has already bought a license.

AOL did however get into trouble because they tried to use the fact they owned Nullsoft to get out of buying another, see the license wasn't transferable.

Re:There outta be a law...

[ameoba]

This is what happens when they lay off their patent lawyer and replace him with a crack dealer in the name of cutting expenses.

Xiph's reply

[patrikr]

The guys over at Xiph.org have posted a reply, in the form of a highly sarcastic open letter to Thompson. :)