Slashdot Mirror


Today's Solar Flare

An anonymous reader writes "X1-class solar flare today (13:30 Universal Time). Still the SOHO spacecraft offers some of the all-time greatest snapshots anywhere on the web. The flare's residual activity would be shown white and at around 9 o'clock position here. There are 3 major categories, each 10 times stronger than the next: X-class flares are big; they are major events that can trigger planet-wide radio blackouts and long-lasting radiation storms. M-class flares are medium-sized; they generally cause brief radio blackouts that affect Earth's polar regions. C-class flares are small with few noticeable consequences here on Earth. If it were headed towards Earth, arrival is usually 48-72 hrs later (this is not coming this way). Future Mars astronauts should take a lead umbrella because one radiation day on Mars is like living at 70,000 feet on Earth." Nature is pretty.

28 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Of course it happens today! by joshua404 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It -always- rains on holiday weekends!

  2. All electronic devices? by G0SP0DAR · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that what Intel said caused Pentium 4's to underperform? Must have been.

    --


    Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.
  3. That explains everything by Schlemphfer · · Score: 4, Funny

    An X1 class solar flare, huh? No wonder I've gotten so many popup ads of provocatively dressed women staring longingly into webcams today.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:That explains everything by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      No wonder I've gotten so many popup ads of provocatively dressed women staring longingly into webcams today.

      No, it is just you're lack of flair.

  4. Not unusual by matman · · Score: 5, Informative

    X class flares happen quite often, especially around the peak of the solar cycle (which we are currently moving away from). Often, they are not earth directed and do not cause anything so nice as aurora (even if they do cause blackouts on some frequencies). Keep an eye on spaceweather.com and notice how often these things occur. The flare referenced in the article was probably the one that occured on Friday from sunspot 95 and did not appear to be earth directed (it occured while SS95 was just comming into vision). I'm surprised that this flare got on the front page, since there have been larger ones recently (I can't recall exactly when - obviously, its effects were small enough).

  5. Re:Um, info please by jetlag11235 · · Score: 2, Informative

    See http://www.eaaa.net/ut_conversion.htm for translation in the US. Those mathematically inclined should be able to use the table and common sense to translate to any time zone. So 13:30 UT = 09:30 EDT.

  6. Re:WOW , size only, not distance... by saskboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/images/Sun_and_ea rth.jpg Just a heads up to anyone, that the size may be to scale, but not the earth's distance from the sun. I still would like to see a to-scale model of the solar system. I guess a to-scal model of the galaxy, would be a "leetle deeficult" to make ;-)

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  7. Odd by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    Strange how all the "plasma" looks somehow connected together.

    It does not look like a solar flare, but rather like Mr. Sun sneezed and blew his tupee off.

    1. Re:Odd by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Frankly, that flare looks slightly demonic to me... but seeing as it's not headed our way, I suppose it's just a nifty looking explosion. *)

      Well, it is not alone in that department. My favorite is still the "middle finger nebula" near Eta Coroni (sp?). I want to buy a poster of that, but my wife won't let me put it up.

  8. Re:WOW , size only, not distance... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* that the size may be to scale, but not the earth's distance from the sun. *)

    I should certainly hope that the Earth is not anywhere near that close. 2/3 of the daytime sky would be pure sun. However, before our Sun goes nova, it will swell up so that about 2/3 of the sky will be sun according to current theories. (Not that any humans would live through the process to watch, barring special environ suits/houses.)

    Some museums and campuses have scale models of the solar system including distances. In the cheezier ones, the sun is represented as a painted circle instead of a physical sphere. But even with painted stuff, you can still get a better feel for the scale. The problem is that the outer planets are often way off campus. You have to go hiking around to find them. Some students get pissed when they go hiking for miles only find a little B-B for pluto. (Now that I think about it, maybe it *was* a B-B that some kid shot into the wooden marker. Nobody would know the difference.)

  9. M-class overloaded by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    M-class flares are medium-sized

    That could make for some confusion in the Trek world:

    "You idiot human! I said find and land on an M-class *planet*, not an M-class flare! [sizzle sizzle]"

  10. Holy 802.11b wireless BatMan! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2

    Man is the wife going to give me shit when my wireless connection between be office and the apartment goes out.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  11. Not the 'Mars Radiation' virus again! by Howzer · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This one sure gets about! Don't worry though, from the very article actually linked in the story above, the "problem" is immediately debunked:

    Fortunately, astronauts can find the protection they need indoors (from solar storms) ; shelter walls made of lightweight materials provide adequate shielding.

    For those needing more on this, go find what you need here or, for something a little more cautious and "NASA" here.

    Now only if we can get people to stop running about waving their arms and shouting "The Radiation! The Radiation!" we might get something productive done... Heh! No chance of that I guess, might as well join them...

    *waves hands over head, runs about, starts screaming "The Radiation!" and giggling*

  12. Hmm... by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 2

    SOHO Spacecraft eh? Where can I accquire one of these for my small office/home office?

    --

    My other sig is funny!
  13. Small red dots in space? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I am curious what all those red star-like dots are.

    I doubt they are stars or distant X-ray sources, because those are usually overwhelmed by the Sun's local radiation. In other words, they often have to turn *down* the sensativity when looking at the Sun (strong filters), but you normally have to turn *up* the sensativity to look at stars or take long exposures. I don't know what wavelength that image is in. It does not look like X-ray nor visible light. I guess infrared or ultraviolet.

    Those "star spots" are signal noise I guess, not really actual objects.

  14. Nature is Pretty, DIY by Leeji · · Score: 2

    You can actually see sunspots (it'll look kinda like this, but in grayscale) any time you want by projecting the sun onto paper. Binoculars work well, a telescope works even better.

    Aim your binoculars at the sun, without looking into them. If you look into them, you'll only see the steam rise from your eyes as they cook. Put a piece of white paper about 2m away from your binoculars. Cover a lense so only 1 circle shows on the paper. Finally, focus your binoculars to make the remaining circle as crisp as possible. This is easiest when you mount your binoculars on a tripod, but still works by hand.

    If you look closely, you'll see the sunspots.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
    1. Re:Nature is Pretty, DIY by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Aim your binoculars at the sun, without looking into them. If you look into them, you'll only see the steam rise from your eyes as they cook.

      Mmmmm. Chinese food!

      Put a piece of white paper about 2m away from your binoculars. Cover a lense so only 1 circle shows on the paper. Finally, focus your binoculars to make the remaining circle as crisp as possible.

      Doesn't that burn the area around the eye-peice. True, it is not a perfect focus at that point, but perhaps hot enough to damage your binocs. The image may sometimes land on the edge of the lense and cook the glue holding it in place, or the grease and dust on the surface of the lens, making it foggy or hard to clean.

      I don't know. It sounds a little risky on the equipment if you ask me.

    2. Re:Nature is Pretty, DIY by mamba-mamba · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It seems to me that it probably could damage your binocs (exactly as you say). On the other hand, I used my binocs in the same fashion to view a solar eclipse, even when it was only about 20% eclipsed, and they still work fine. FWIW they are expensive 7x50 marine binoculars. They are gas-tight and filled with nitrogen.

      I guess, since binocs transmit 9x% of the light, the power absorption is very low, once you get them adjusted so that the image is going through them. (But as you say, while you are adjusting, the image may briefly get projected on the edges somewhere, which can't be good.)

      If you are worried about it, you could use something opaque like heavy paper to reduce the aperture of the objective. Or obtain some neutral density filters.

      Another way to observe the sun is with a pinhole camera, although that is a bit more involved.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  15. FALSE ALARM! No X class flares today! (yet) by tiohero · · Score: 3, Informative
    Nothing listed on www.spaceweather.com indicates an X class flare at 13:00 utc today nor do any of the other usual websites.

    This is the information from SEC (NOAA): Only a few C class events are listed:
    0221 UTC C2.8
    0955 UTC C8.8
    0930 UTC C6.7

    You can easily see all the recent events from this plot of solar X-ray flux: (updated in real-time)

    There was a minor X class flare last friday (as you can see from the plot!). This is what the poster may be refereing to:
    8/30/02 1329 UTC X1.5 Sunspot 95
    It was a limb event and isn't headed our way. The plot shows there were no X-ray flares today!

    X class flares are fairly common (once every 2-3 weeks these days...) Usually they are near the limb or backside events and don't effect us other than a little radio interference. We might see an earth directed one from region 95 in the next few days. (But don't count on it!) If there is an X-ray event indicated by www.spaceweather.com, then check this alert page at Solar Terestrial Dispatch. These impact predictions are often very accurate! (Only updated if there is a strong earth directed event!)

  16. Possible Extinction event? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The comparison shot got me thinking. Suppose there was a flare, say 100 times larger then one of the common X class ones. Would the radiation be enough to whipe out life on earth?

    Anyone have any idea. I suppose there really isn't much point in worrying about it though :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Possible Extinction event? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Well if it were possible, then we wouldn't be here. :-)

      After billions and billions of years we would of been hit by one by now and wiped out.

      There have been at least 3 killer asteriods that have done mass devistation in earth's life time including a recently discovered one that probably wiped out all lifeforms except bacteria about 3 1/2 billion years ago. There are no fossils before the event because whole mountians with the fossilized rock were crushed into sand by 2 mile high waves, which travelled twice the speed of sound, and travelled over and over again untill the energy was dissapated. Even moutains higher then a few miles high(unlikely back then)were to exist, the waves and their speed would easily blow them away into dust. The one after that was about 750 million years ago which wiped out %90 of the earth's lifeforms caused again by giant waves that engulfed most of earth and a mini ice age that followed. Then you all know about the one 65 million years ago which killed the dinosaurs. All the recent asteriods however have been getting smaller and smaller. I do not know if we have just been lucky or if the bigger ones have been getting smacked into smaller ones in space. Also their have been hundreds of tiny asteriods that were powerfull enough to wipe out whole city's and change climate world wide. THey happen every couple thousand years. I wonder how big the tisuami's from those are if they hit the ocean. Yes, asteriods are a threat and we need to take them seriously unlike solar flares.

  17. Insightful Quote of the Year by Garridan · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Nature is pretty" -- CmdrTaco

  18. Old photo by macemoneta · · Score: 2

    According to the directory listing, that photo is from March 15,1999. I know it takes a while until submitted articles are posted, but this seems a little excessive.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  19. Re:Odd (OT) by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    When I was looking for that "skull" image on Google, I had "Chandra" (the X-ray telescope) and "skull" in the search terms. Here is the summary of one of the matches:

    "Chicago Tribune | Chandra Levy found dead ... the skeletal remains of missing intern Chandra Levy. On a remote hill of a heavily
    wooded park, a man walking his dog early Wednesday discovered a skull, human ... "

    The oddest coincidences you find using search words on the web. Let's make a cult out of it. Even El Ron didn't use coincidences to their full advantage.

  20. Realtime movies of last 48 hours by Cally · · Score: 3, Informative
    The best pics for my money are at:

    http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/mpe g/

    In particular this:

    http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/curre nt _c2.mpg

    is a reasonably small (3Mb) mpeg of the last 48 hours... the flare is right at the end of the sequence. Notice that although it appears on the right limb of the sun first, it's also pretty symetrical - indictating that the thing's coming straight for us.

    Incidentally, if you've ever fancies getting your name on a comet, there are people who sit in front of those pages pressing ^r constantly in order to be the first to identify a new sungrazer. No, there's no software sitting processing the images in realtime for comet-like objects, and they (or rather, their ion tails) show up nicely.
    Enjoy!

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  21. Dumb Question by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    What does "CCD Bakeout" mean? Does it mean NASA is suffering the /. effect, or does it mean a flare physically cooked the CCD elements, or something simpler, related to maintenance?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Dumb Question by hubie · · Score: 2

      It is maintenance related. A nice explanation can be found here.

    2. Re:Dumb Question by jelle · · Score: 2

      Pfew. I was worried for a second there.

      The SOHO pictures are just beatiful, especially the movies.

      I'm not an astronomer, but I think this big one is visible on the "LASCO C2" just around the '11:00' timestamp on Sept 1.

      Too bad the EIT movies are not current. I guess it was almighty Murphy who choose this week-end for the flare...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.