Slashdot Mirror


Worldwide WarDrive Aftermath

wardriver writes "The event took place on August 31st 2002, people from around the world took part in the effort to document and make known wireless access points as a group. Some people go WarDriving everyday, so this was just like an normal day for many who attended any of the world wide events as documented on the results page. Hardware ranged from laptops, to car mounted computer systems, to handhelds all equipped with GPS devices to accurately map the spots. Cars were marked with )(WarDriver stickers and people were sporting their wardriving is not a crime t-shirts. All in all the event went well and with enough pressure and requests to chris it may happen again." And in a related story, Dr_Marvin_Monroe writes "Wardrivers be warned---- A Practical Approach to Identifying and Tracking Unauthorized 802.11 Cards and Access Points includes information on locating rogue access points and intruders."

13 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Typically North American attitude by RebelTycoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    World Series (2 teams from Canada, rest from States).

    WarDriving... Cities from only the western part of North America...

    Don't call it "World" if its just North America, and especially don't if its just a region of North America.

  2. "wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "wardriving is not a crime t-shirts...


    You got to admit that people aren't doing themselves any favours by choosing a real positive expression like "wardriving"....


    I can see this must win real friends when you are explaining to companies what you are doing outside their offices. Especially in countries where vigilante groups /gangsters like cruising round in their autos. Great PR, guys :-)


    (Yeah yeah I know the origin of the term but I still think it sucks.. maybe try cruising round New York on 11th September and explain to a cop that you're war driving...)

  3. Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While white hat hacking can be argued to be ethical (like Adrian Lamo type people), I don't see how wardriving does _not_ lead to unethical practices. It may be interesting how many people have open networks, but really what "good" does war driving accomplish? Do war drivers stop at the house and tell the people "Hey, you're network is open, and this is how you fix it"? What "good" comes out of knowing where wireless service is available?

    I understand that some people invite others onto their network. This is very generous (but in my opinion insane because YOU are responsible for what comes out of YOUR router), but shouldn't these people advertise that their network is open instead of people driving around trying to discover these access points? I think the concept of wardriving is interesting, but the practical ethical results of wardriving efforts seem very very few. Maybe there is some application I am missing. Feel free to enlighten me

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wi-Fi piggy-backing is kind of analogous to riding freight trains.

      A rail line needs to protect themselves against being held responsible for the hobo population, so they hire screws to kick the bums off the trains. Likewise, most people are advised to encrypt their Wi-Fi signal for the same reason. However, beyond that, most people don't view either type of trespass as a particularly serious crime. Odds are, the user of this WarDrive data is just some warez kid who is using your broadband to swap DivX files or something. Someday they will turn 18, and the fear of a permanent criminal record will disuade them from continuing. (At least that's what happened with all the hacker kids I grew up with.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by mrobinso · · Score: 0, Insightful

      > I don't see how wardriving does _not_ lead
      > to unethical practices

      Wardriving is theft, plain and simple.
      Perps should be jailed, plain and simple.

      --
      -- Karma whore? You betcha. --
  4. That's funny by Night+Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Wardriving is not a crime..."


    Unless you think of THEFT OF SERVICE!

    Sometimes I have to wonder about the real-world intelligence of these people. Sure, they probably are really bright when it comes to technology, but evolution should have taken care of the guys wearing these t-shirts long ago.

  5. Useless ? by CresentCityRon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem to me that if someone wanted you on their system they would register on one of the various websites for free wireless access.

    If they didn't want you then you're becoming a bother. I guess you could tell them that they were open and be helpful. I don't see anything of that angle though.

    So its just "Lets see who screwed up their technology. Tee Hee." Nothing useful here.

  6. Not a crime by Strog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Port scanning also is not a crime(for now at least) but a lot of crimes are started with it. I don't blame people for getting a little paranoid.

    It's like a guy swinging a baseball bat all over the place. Sure it's not illegal but he could start clobbering people whether on purpose or not. I'd probably tell him to stop swinging too.

    My brother-in-law lives in California and has had all kinds of trouble since this event. Conicidence?? You start stealing service and disrupting other people's service and you just crossed the line.

    The people that are just scanning and mapping could be considered accesories to the crime when other people use their info to "steal bandwidth".

  7. Re:War...Driving by Wiseazz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Legal or not, there is certainly an ethical question here... not so with skateboarding. Don't sniff around other folks' networks, regardless of your intentions. No good will come of it.

    --
    My sig sucks.
  8. Time for a little honesty by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, Slashdotters. Time to fess up and be honest Wardriving, though harmless in and of itself, is shady business. It's the electronic equivalent of casing a store or residence in order to rob it later. I realize the vast majority of wardrivers do nothing with the info they find, and right now it's more of a fad than anything (especially for kids that fantasize about being Mad Haxorz with Big Skillz, or whatever they hell they're calling it this week), but deep down, face it. You KNOW you're up to no good. The very essence of Wardriving is LOOKING FOR VULNERABILITIES. Only two kinds of people really give a damn about this kind of information. Serious security researchers, and net scum looking to break into networks. Now, like everyone else, I'm getting damn tired of seeing my liberties slip away in new laws and regulations. But if there was half an ounce of honesty here, we'd all admit to each other that by doing stupid shit like Wardriving, we're begging the government and public to be alarmed and put further restrictions on what we do. So to you people that deface webpages, spread virii, and wardrive looking networks to break into, why don't you do us a favor and go fuck yourselves. You are why the word "hacker" evokes fear and loathing.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  9. who f-ing cares?!? by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Why have an event ... indeed! What is the goal here? Awareness? Big deal! In the grand scheme of things, are unsecure wireless networks going to mean anything real to humankind? Is this Wardriving 'event' going to draw attention to a subject that will make someone think twice about something that might save the lives of themselves and/or others?

    To put this in perspective, consider that for years cellphones were 100% open to eavesdropping. In one case this vulnerability was exploited to expose a scandalous affair Prince Charles was having. Did people take notice and say, "Damn. I better get some encryption going on!" No.

    Even if every wireless AP owner knew people might be accessing their networks surrepititiously, would they really care enough to do something about it? Probably not.
  10. Re:Idiot Administrators by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Insightful

    hillct wrote:

    > It boggles the mind that so many administrators
    > unintentionally leave their wireless networks open
    > and available

    It doesn't boggle anything when you get off you geeky high horse and realize that most people buying and installing wireless network equipment are not "administrators" of any sort. They are ordinary people who don't know a thing about network security, but just need a net to work. The only thing that boggles the mind is that you would rationalize preying upon their ignorance.

    The manufacturers hold one key to solving this. If they would make the configuration of these networks secure by default, and give people easy to understand instructions for enabling security: "Yes, I want to make my network safe from invading hordes of young hoodlums.", it would help.

    "Godzilla and Jaguar: Punch! Punch! Punch! Hit! Hit! Hit!
    We die if they stop fighting for us."
    Jet Jaguar Song, "Godzilla vs. Megalon"

  11. Re:War...Driving by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    g0bshiTe wrote:

    > Last I heard it was not a crime to putt around
    > anyones neighborhood, whether you lived there or
    > not. So what, if you just happen to have a laptop
    > and a wireless network device. I haven`t heard of
    > anyone bieng arrested for posessing network gear.
    > Unless it was stolen! Is a cop really gonna bust
    > you for wardriving? I think not.

    If you "putt around" the neighborhood of a single woman, living alone, especially at night, she will most likely be giving her local police department a call about a "suspicious vehicle" which appears to be canvasing the neighborhood. And when you explain to Mr. Policeman that you are "scanning for access points", you are going to be seeing some bars from the inside very shortly.

    And if Mr. Policeman sees your WarDriving Tshirt, no doubt he will think you are part of a gang.

    > It`ll be the old skateboarding thing, where your
    > told that even though it is public property, and
    > you technically can be there that what your
    > doing is potentially damaging and/or disruptive.
    > Who cares!

    My guess is the rest of the general public who don't want to be damaged or disrupted. Well, except for the bigger skateboarding dude that runs into you and puts you in the hospital. Chances are, he won't care.

    To be a responsible member of a civilized society, you have to think (and care) about the impact of your actions on others.

    "What do you think Mothra would do?" - Moll, "Mosura" 1996