Slashdot Mirror


Seeking a Simple Programmer's Calculator?

jbum asks: "One day I'm going to lose my trusty mid-80s calculator, so help me find a new one that doesn't suck! I've been using the same calculator since the mid 80s. It's a Casio CM-100 'Computer Math Calc,' and if you lookup the name on Usenet/Goggle News or even here on Slashdot, you'll find a small number of lucky (but older) programmers singing its praises. Sadly, it hasn't been manufactured in years. Here's a picture. Has anyone found a calculator that is currently being manufactured which is remotely appropriate for programmers rather than scientists/engineers?"

"The CM-100 was solar powered, it was cheap at the time - maybe 20 bucks, and most importantly, it's simple. It does what I want (mostly hex/bin/oct/dec conversions and the occasional shift or rotate) it doesn't do what I don't want (scientific calculations and trig). It makes good assumptions about operator precedence - it does the right thing if you type 1+2*3, but you can also use parens if you choose. It doesn't try to be clever with the display (such as displaying the input in a tiny font on a different line) or pack in a whole lot of extra functionality I don't need.

Every calculator I have bought since the early 90s has been much, much worse, primarily because they are trying to be too general purpose. They pack too much functionality in, they have sucky interfaces, they add the hex conversion as an afterthought and make me use a shift key to get to it. They don't put A,B,C,D,E,F on separate buttons as they should be and so on.

Last month on a business-trip I had my briefcase stolen. It contained my passport and some other important documents. But I went crazy thinking that I had lost my calculator. When I returned from the trip, I found I had absent-mindedly left it buried on my desk and was hugely relieved. The passport is replaceable, but the calculator may not be. If I had lost the calculator, I probably would have been prepared to pay $400 to replace it, but probably wouldn't have been able to find one. According to e-Bay, no one has ever sold one there.

Nonetheless, the time will come when I will lose my trusty little calculator for good. Then I'll have to replace it. Plus, I'd like another calculator to keep at home."

47 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. bc by tachyonflow · · Score: 2, Informative
    I find the 'bc' program to be pretty handy. It will do arithmetic, binary/hex/decimal base calculations, etc. (For those who like reverse polish notation, maybe 'dc' would work better.)

    example doing a base conversion:

    $ bc
    bc 1.05
    Copyright 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1997, 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
    For details type `warranty'.
    obase=16
    ibase=2
    10101010
    AA
  2. Palm OS by ResHippie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have an older Handspring Visor, the advanced version of the built in calculator seems like it would do what you want it to. Under the "Logic" setting you can do all sorts of base conversions, as well as Logical Right and Left shifts.

    Granted getting a Palm just for use as a calculator is a bit much, but I figure most geeks have one anyway.

    --

    Those who don't know me, probably shouldn't trust me. Those that do know me, DEFINITELY shouldn't trust me.

    1. Re:Palm OS by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

      Well, I'd be fully prepared to sell him my Visor Deluxe for $350.

      --
      ...
  3. Software by DeadSea · · Score: 2
    I don't know any physical calulators. I prefer a good software calculator that allows copy and paste.

    I couldn't find one that did everything I wanted (mostly hex and binary in a sane fashion) so I wrote one. Its written in JavaScript, so it runs in your web browser (I always have mine open anyway). It has a bookmarklet so you can open it in a window that is sized nicely. It makes my life a lot easier.

    1. Re:Software by DeadSea · · Score: 2

      Internet Explorer has severe problems with it right now. Use Mozilla. (It used to work in IE, I hadn't tested it for a while though.)

    2. Re:Software by DeadSea · · Score: 2
      I fixed it so it works with IE. If you are interested:
      1. Internet Explorer does not support [^] to mean any character at all in regular expressions, it gives a parse error. I had to replace that with (?:[a]|[^a]). (Note I don't want to use . as that does not include new lines.)
      2. Internet explorer does not support spaces in the name of a window. I had been appending the date the the name of the window for the popup to give a new window each time (I want multiple calculators). Since a date contains spaces, it failed. I had to take the spaces out of the date.
      Microsoft: fix these bugs! Since you (Microsoft) don't have a public bug database like Bugzilla, I'm reporting them here.
  4. Windows Calculator by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    I will probably be modded "-1, Troll" for this, but here goes...

    I set my Windows Calculator to "Scientific" mode and then I can easily do calculations in hex or binary, easy to convert between bases, etc. Probably doesn't do everything you want, but it's useful for me when I'm figuring out subnets and such.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  5. CFX-9850G by brejc8 · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    The CFX-9850G is one I use all te time. The batteries last for years even thoug they are rechargeable. It has a nice BASIC like programming language, a serial port for communicating with a pc or other calcs. And there are millions of programs available on the intraweb to try out.

  6. He said KISS by rw2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let me, since the first handful of posters seem to have forgotten, reiterate that the person asking the question wanted something simple! Not an app on a desktop that he can't fit in a briefcase, not a graphing calculator but an available calculator that is just like the one he has.

    Yes, I like my TI-89, but that's not what this dude is asking for!

    1. Re:He said KISS by Webmoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just went to Casio's website. They've got a couple that will do computer math, but they also do a lot more. Not that you need more, but at least they aren't a big, honking graphing calc that you can't fit in your shirt pocket, and they aren't clunky software that you gotta lug a laptop around to use.

      A specialized calc may be hard to come by, especially from the big boys (Sharp, TI, Casio).

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    2. Re:He said KISS by jbum · · Score: 2

      Simple and Handheld are the keywords here...

      Compared to the CM-100, the new casios are incredibly awful for my purposes. Lots of shifts needed to do hex conversions, and no dedicated A-F keys. They were clearly designed by a different person who wasn't actually planning on using the thing.

      Computer-emulated calculators suck. I like having something I can hold in my hand with buttons.

      The palm-pilot emulators are okay (and may be my best choice) but still not as tactile nor as simple as I would like.

      - jbum

    3. Re:He said KISS by theCoder · · Score: 2

      Perhaps he should look at the TI-36X. I got the solar powered model since I didn't want to worry about batteries. It certainly isn't as simple as the given one, but it seems to do almost everything it does (except shifting). While the A-F buttons aren't dedicated to that most of the time, they are when it's in Hex mode. It also has a 10 digit display (most calcs only have 8). I've actually bought two, since I lost the first one. Personally, it's the calculator I reach for whenever I need to do any quick calculations (or base conversion stuff). I suppose the only requirement it doesn't adequately fit is only doing what the poster's current one does (but is that really such a problem for us computer geeks?)

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    4. Re:He said KISS by david.given · · Score: 2
      Compared to the CM-100, the new casios are incredibly awful for my purposes. Lots of shifts needed to do hex conversions, and no dedicated A-F keys. They were clearly designed by a different person who wasn't actually planning on using the thing.

      Damn straight. Nearly all of them require you to type in an expression and evaluate it, which makes using them a complete pain.

      I have a FX451M. I love it. It's ancient and falling to pieces; the battery went long ago, and the solar panel isn't sufficient to trigger the reset circuitry, so every time I need to use it I have to get it out of base 14.5 or whatever the confused circuitry has decided to put it in this time, and the hinge is going so that the buttons on the right half of it only work if I press a certain place on the case.

      So I want to replace it. I had a look at Casio's current selection. Every single one uses expression evaluation, which makes 'em useless for my purpose. I don't want a pocket computer. I want a calculator.

      My FX451 is small, simple, flexible, powerful, and I know it so well that I can think with it. It's got the four bases I commonly use, it's got all the logical operations I commonly use, it's a scientific calculator, it does unit conversions (saving me from remembering how many bloody millimetres there are in an inch this year), it's got a decent set of scientific constants, and everything is two keypresses away. (The FX451 is wallet-shaped, with lots of extra buttons on the right half of the wallet, so it doesn't use the shift key much.) It's so well designed you don't need a manual to work it, and I'd like to see you try that on a modern calculator.

      Since I can't replace it, I've been seriously considering reboxing it in another case with, like, real keyswitches. I'd lose the portability but keep the feature set.

      So where are the real calculators? Why is it that all you can get are these idiotic semi-programmable user interface nightmares? There has to be a demand for simple, powerful calculators, so why isn't anybody meeting it?

  7. Market forces reduce variety by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing that a combination of market forces and technology are forcing the calculator manufacturers to make fewer products that do more.

    Rather than selling 10,000 each of ten different product lines, they can sell a million each of three different product lines. It doesn't make economic sense to make specialized products for niche markets when for the same cost you can make a single, generalized product that does everything for everybody.

    At the same time, it would be awfully nice to get a VCR with just five buttons: Play, Record, FF, RW, and Stop. Dump the clock, dump the timer, dump the prgramming. (Maybe they should just include a piece of black tape for the blinking display?) But, alas, such a thing is a figment of history.

    KISS.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Market forces reduce variety by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Funny, you want a VCR that can't program off the air while you're away, and I want an audio recorder that can (tune to a radio station and record at a pre-set time). I guess we're both looking for a niche market item, but at least you can do what you want with any old VCR, while I have to cobble up what I want with a radio, a tape recorder, some patch cords, and a timer.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Market forces reduce variety by Webmoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...while I have to cobble up what I want with a radio, a tape recorder, some patch cords, and a timer."

      Um... I hope you're not planning on bringing this on an airplane anytime soon.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    3. Re:Market forces reduce variety by Webmoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I'd like an eject button, too :)"

      OK, I'll concede. That might be useful. But if all you watch is "I Love Lucy" reruns, who needs it?

      My point was that technology has made it possible to design a gadget that does too many things, and make that gadget cheaper than its weight in salt.

      When was the last time you saw a phone that would let you dial a number? I mean just dial a number, without redial, memory, flash, hold, speakerphone, caller ID, flashing lights or any of that peripheral junk? When was the last time you actually heard a telephone RING? With an actual brass bell that went "ding-a-ling-a-ling?"

      I think that as technology progresses, people will yearn to have a few simple things: coffee makers that require you to turn them on when you want to make coffee, ovens that you have to crank a knob to turn it on (I still haven't figured out the stupid electronic panel on mine, and I'm a computer tech!), a thermostat on the wall you can turn (literally, turn) up when you're too cold and down when you're too warm.

      A story on today's Slashdot discusses the art of human interaction on the telephone (dump the "Press 7 if you have a rotary phone"...). The gist of it is that companies are discovering that people don't want to deal with a computer for simple problems. This stems from the desire of humans wanting to have control over their environment. Electronic gizmos and gadgets are slowly wresting this direct control. We become nervous, worrying, wondering whether or not the timer will actually turn on the VCR to record Friends while we're out with our friends.

      Conspiracists could theorize that technology is slowly weaning us away from having tight, tactile control over our environment, with the eventuality of some entity creeping in the back door and taking over without us even noticing. Yes, that's right, the EPA will set your thermostat, the MPAA will run your VCR, Starbucks will brew your coffee, and Martha Stewart will bake your cakes.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    4. Re:Market forces reduce variety by topham · · Score: 2

      I hit RECORD on my remote when a read-only tape is in the VCR, it ejects it.

      For some reason it doesn't swap it with the other movie I rented though...

    5. Re:Market forces reduce variety by jbum · · Score: 2

      Excellent points all. I think we're starting to see a backlash against the 80s-90s impulse to put everything on a computer screen.

      A good example are the tactile knobs used in music studios using hard-disk based recording techniques.

      Our brains are wired for doing things with our hands, and using a mouse to turn a knob (or push a button) just doesn't cut it.

    6. Re:Market forces reduce variety by singularity · · Score: 2

      I actually had a Sony mini-system that was capable of this. Glancing through some reviews of current Sony mini-systems, they are mostly still capable of this. Look for "Record Timer" as a feature. A Google search for (sony mini system "record timer") brought several hits.

      I was actually shopping for answering machines, speaking of KISS. I am techologically well aware, but when it comes to things like answering machines, I want as little as possible.

      I see no need for answering machines to have ten buttons. My last one had three buttons (Play, Fast Forward/Memo, and Outgoing). Pressing Play played the messages. Pressing Outgoing played the outgoing message, and holding down the Outgoing button allowed you to record one.

      What else do you need?

      I go into the store, since my three button answering machine finally broke after six years of service, and I find machines with ten buttons. What added functionality do I want on an answering machine that requires that many buttons?

      I finally ended up buying a combination cordless phone and answering machine despite my hesitations about ever buying combination machines (if one part breaks, you have lost basically the entire unit). TV/VCR combinations are a great example of this.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    7. Re:Market forces reduce variety by toast0 · · Score: 2

      Hah... my answering machine has two buttons... play which plays (and stops playing) messages people left, and outgoing which does the same stuff as yours. no memo feature though, but one less button to break :)

    8. Re:Market forces reduce variety by david.given · · Score: 2
      My microwave has two dials: amount of heating, and a timer. Oh, yes, and a door release.

      A friend of mine has a microwave with twenty to thirty buttons, including a full keypad, with a dozen different cooking modes, memory facility, loads of preprogrammed settings, and an LCD display to let you know what you've done. It's so complicated it actually has a special mode where it will run through the program without producing any microwaves, just so you can check your programming. Oh, yes, and it has a door release.

      When my microwave dies, I'm going to replace it with as identical a model as I can find...

    9. Re:Market forces reduce variety by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Dude, I can't listen to video tapes on my Walkman!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  8. red stapler by DevilM · · Score: 2, Funny

    All I can think of is the red stapler from Office Space.

  9. Hey! Is there even an up-to-date... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2
    ...calculator for scientists and engineers? HP used to be the closest thing. But they've stopped doing calculators and all they have are almost decade year old models with a slightly faster CPU. Texas have some half decent calculators but their intended customers are students, not real scientists or engineers, so they lack some important, but heavy duty functionality, that the HPs have. The power available on PDAs today is incredible and yet nobody has seen fit to produce a decent calculator for them either.


    And before people start directing me at toy calculators here is some of what I expect of a calculator in 2002:

    • Real algebra. Not the lame half-attempt in the HP machines.
    • Full matrix arithmetic. This includes SVD, QR and LU decomposition.
    • Decent mathematics functionality including elliptic functions and Bessel functions.
    • Ability to add new datatypes including things like quaternions.
    • A rechargeable battery and a decent CPU
    --
    -- SIGFPE
    1. Re:Hey! Is there even an up-to-date... by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I've wondered about the same thing for the last ten years. The best idea I have is they figured very small computers were getting so good that you'd just run things like Mathematica on them, so high-end calculators would become obsolete.

      Also, way back when, HP was so far ahead of the game (in its niche), they may have felt they could sit back for a while and just enjoy the profits.

    2. Re:Hey! Is there even an up-to-date... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      I think the high-end TI calculators use a version of REDUCE. But it's been stripped down to support the sort of material students get in courses - not the stuff people need in the real world. Years ago I used Mathematica on workstations with 20 MHz CPUs and a couple of MB of RAM. Any Pocket PC could blow those machines away - and yet we see no good packages for pocket devices. You'd think there'd be a need wouldn't you?

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    3. Re:Hey! Is there even an up-to-date... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Any Pocket PC could blow those machines away - and yet we see no good packages for pocket devices. You'd think there'd be a need wouldn't you?

      Actually, no. Think about the resolution of a PDA screen. To get anywhere near the functionality of a decent science, engineering or finance calculator would require drilling down through several layers of menus to get to the functions. Even if the software was smart enough to move the most-often used features to the top, that's more annoying than anything - people get used to the layouts of their calcs, and don't want to actually have to hunt for a button, and do want to be able to borrow a similar one from time to time with an identical keypad.

      The computational power is the easy part. The UI is almost impossible on a current-generation PDA.

  10. TI graphing calculators by Electrum · · Score: 2

    While TI graphing calculators don't have the hex buttons where you want them, they are very programmable. The TI-86 is reasonably priced and very programmable. You could write yourself a simple conversion app with remapped buttons in TI-BASIC, or go all out and integrate it into the TI-OS using an assembly language program. There are many sites with resources to help you and assembly language mailing lists to get help on. You can do so many cool things with these calculators. Remapping the keys and writing a simple conversion app would be simple.

    1. Re:TI graphing calculators by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Actually, remapping the keys for use in the normal calculator modes is not a very simple thing to do on the TI calcs. You'd have to register an interrupt handler, and I think the only free memory the calc won't shuffle around is the memory used for the graphics screen. So, while you had the buttons remapped, you couldn't graph.

      Note: I am sure that is correct for the TI-82 and 85. I don't know if the Asm handlers for the TI-83 or 86 have better facilities for interrupt handlers or not. I'm willing to bet they do not.

      ~GoRK

    2. Re:TI graphing calculators by Electrum · · Score: 2

      Actually, remapping the keys for use in the normal calculator modes is not a very simple thing to do on the TI calcs. You'd have to register an interrupt handler, and I think the only free memory the calc won't shuffle around is the memory used for the graphics screen. So, while you had the buttons remapped, you couldn't graph.

      Right, the 82 and 85 did not have assembly support built in, so interrupt handlers are more trouble. Though quite possible. One of the shells with interrupt support comes with a demo that leaves a grayscale background while in the TI-OS.

      However, I was talking about the TI-86, which does have assembly support and has a lot of built in hooks (such as the [sqrt] programs). I did a lot of programming in assembly for that calculator and if you look on ticalc.org, you will find a lot of demos that show you how to do things like that in the TI-OS. A good one to look at is Kirk Meyer's April Fools program. It completely rearranges the keyboard. A good joke to play on someone :)

      The hooks for the 86 let you do a lot of stuff. You can remap the keyboard, modify system menus, modify the parser, change output, hook into the grapher, run programs at startup, etc. Pretty much anything you want to do is possible if you're willing to do some digging in the ROM. The hardest part is keeping the TI-OS from crashing when you modify things that you shouldn't.

      If you're interested, take a look at this set of hook demos by Clem Vasseur. It's a good example of what can be done and if you actually want to write a hook, then most of the hard work is done for you:

      http://david.acz.org/hooks.zip

      The TI-83 line has built in assembly support, but it is not as good as the 86's, and those calculators suck anyway, so do not consider buying them. The 86 is the best calc overall, especially if you want to have fun programming. The 89 and 92 are ok, have more RAM and a faster CPU (68k instead of z80), but aren't as "clean". The 86 lets you do cool grayscale and has a lot of free RAM to play with. The 83 line can't really do grayscale, don't have much RAM and the screen is smaller (96x64 vs 128x64). The 86 is a fun device to progam.

  11. Re:Is this the new Slashdot? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
    I have two 8" floppy drives, but naturally I need to keep one to read my 8" floppies so I can only let you have one. How much is it worth to you?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  12. hp-6s by tongue · · Score: 2

    the hp 6s seems to fit your bill... solar powered, not overpowered, does fractions, bit ops, base conversions, parens, etc... according to hp its only $10, and not as bulky as the graphic calculators we're all familiar with.

    1. Re:hp-6s by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      I don't see dedicated A-F keys. I think that is a biggie.

      -Peter

  13. Build one? by photon317 · · Score: 2


    Considering the simplicity of the desired operations, how hard would be to build one around a super-simple microcontroller yourself? I bet a PIC could do it just fine (or even a PIC packaged up as a Basic Stamp for even easier programming). You just need a driver chip for the keypad rows/columns that will interface as input to the controller, and a very simple LCD display.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:Build one? by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Because there are no Chinese knockoffs that fit his needs anymore, because he's such a minority market to the manufacturers.

      --
      11*43+456^2
  14. Palm Pilot by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Informative
    There are alot of great apps for the palm pilot for programming conversions

    http://palmgear.com/software/showsoftware.cfm? sid=69996520020904223550&prodID=41610

    thats my favorite, but there are plenty of others. If you dont like any of them, write one of your own. Numerical Methods is a good topic for programmers to understand. Would prolly take you a week or so to write and would be a good excercise.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  15. $400 to replace? by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    If I had lost the calculator, I probably would have been prepared to pay $400 to replace it

    For $400 I'll sell you my graphics calculator and put some gaffer tape over the buttons you don't want to use.

    (Moderators: yes its offtopic, get a sence of humour)

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  16. For $400 ... by Paul+Lamere · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll sell you this one:

    Picture of my CM-100

    works great.

  17. Casio Scientific Calculator watch by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 2
    One of the other cool things Casio made in the 80's which you can't get anymore was the Casio CFX-20 Scientific Calculator Watch. My Dad had one and loved it to death. It had the standard chronograph, alarm, and stopwatch features. It also had a ten digit scientific calculator with metric conversions, all in a face that is one inch square.

    I would spend the hundres of dollars it would take to acquire a used one in good condition, but I doubt my Dad could read the display anymore. Vive la 80's!

  18. There is only one by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    By far the best programmer's calculator ever made (that I've seen, anyway) was the HP 16C. Not made anymore, but EBay usually has a few you can pick up.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  19. My TI-36X sidearm by yerricde · · Score: 2

    TI-34 ... discontinued

    I swear by my TI-36x calculator. When in hexadecimal mode, it changes the trig keys into A-F keys.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  20. Perl! by AT · · Score: 2

    I usually end up using perl for a calculator. Simple statements like "printf("%x", 0x43 + 0x3e)" usually get the job done.

    Why? Well, I don't always carry a calculator with me, but I always have a computer handy when I'm programming. And perl uses mostly C/C++/Java like syntax -- 0x for hex constants, printf output formatting. Not only do I not have to relearn a new syntax, but I can actually cut and paste expressions straight from code, too.

    Sure, its a little verbose, but I also run it in an emacs shell buffer, so I can cut and paste easily from one line to the next.

  21. Re:A high quality software calculator by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
    I would second that. I have Calc98 on my IPAQ and it works fine. It does do shift in programmer mode. It also has a timer/time calculator mode as well as finance and statistics modes. It also has matrix support. It isn't Open Source but it is freeware. The only thing that it isn't is programmable. Sometimes, it is useful to have a programmable programmer's calc, but usually it isn't a problem.

    The only killer with using a PDA as a calculator is the appalling battery-life, This seems to have done a dive since the days of the Psion. I also have an HP 16C running off three button cells that lasts a couple of years (even with intensive use).

  22. Re:Another good old calculator by John+Miles · · Score: 2

    except maybe the random number generator (I can live with any mental bias when making up a number).

    Not me. I wouldn't be able to order a pizza without my EC-4017's RAN# key.

    0.000-0.199: Pizza Hut
    0.200-0.399: Papa John's
    0.400-0.599: Domino's
    0.600-0.799: Pagliacci
    0.800-0.999: Pizza Time

    Fifteen years or so ago, I gave my father this very EC-4017 for Christmas. He died in '98, but it was only last month that I discovered the calculator, brand new and untouched in its original box from Radio Shack, in a neglected bureau drawer at home. The OEM lithium battery hadn't even leaked.

    One of the most annoying things about Dad was his steadfast refusal to actually use anything you gave him as a present. At this point, though, having reached the same conclusion that all calculators today suck complete and total ass, I'm very grateful for that little character quirk of his. Like the original poster, I'd probably have paid a couple hundred bucks for this calculator on eBay... if one could be found there, which it can't.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  23. Re:Another good old calculator by John+Miles · · Score: 2

    Yeah, in our case, the competition always centered around whose calculator could do 69! the fastest. (69 being the largest number whose factorial is less than the calculator's numeric limit of 10^100).

    I don't remember who won, but the slowest calculator took several seconds to run the benchmark. Needless to say the cheerleaders were not impressed.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  24. Re:No to HP48 by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    Mr Z> I say this as an owner of an HP48SX and HP48GX, and a former owner of a Casio w/ dedicated A-F buttons: The HP sucks at the tasks the poster asked about. Not only do you have to hit alpha-lock to get the A-F on the HP (every time you enter a hex number), but you also have to remember to provide the correct prefix. Further, "integers" won't mix at all with "regular numbers" without going through that annoying "B->R" and "R->B" crap.

    Yeah, I noticed the same prob. Just write a custom CST and a few programs, and you're all set.