MS Exec: 'Our products just aren't engineered for security'
Various Microsoft news tidbits contributed by numerous readers: Phoebus0 notes that Microsoft's Vice-President in charge of Windows development states flat out that Microsoft products aren't engineered for security, absolutely guaranteeing he'll have tomorrow's Ditherati quote. Many readers submitted this Knowledge Base article stating that Microsoft is mystified by a wave of successful hacks on assorted versions of Windows (there's also a news report on this). Microsoft has another security bulletin out on the digital certificate spoofing bug that has caused them so many problems recently.
95 isn't supported ( ok, I can understand that )
e nts/WUCritical/q328145/default.asp
H /25386/WINME/EN-US/328145USAM.EXE
OK you are right here. There isn't a ptach for 95
98 isn't supported ( getting a little too close for my comfort )
Microsoft Windows 98:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows98/downloads/cont
ME isn't supported ( didn't that just come out 2 years ago? )
Windows Me:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/WINME/PATC
And the bulletin does say win2k patch will be released soon. I suppose reading the bulletin would take all the fun out of bashing MicroSoft for bullying us into upgrading right?
Actually, from what I gather MS's R&D engineers are some of the best engineers around. The actual production engineers are good as well, but nowhere near their R&D counterparts.
Yeah, they get their UI from Apple, and buy up/copy any other promising piece of software or technology.
PSS := "Poor Server Software"?
-- Terry