Slashdot Mirror


Upcoming Cyberwars

Jamyang writes "In the run-up to the first anniversary of September 11, Taiwan's President has accused China of threatening Taipei with "terrorist" tactics in a speech that will fuel Beijing's current fury: "Communist China has accelerated development of 'unrestricted warfare' similar to terrorist methods," he said. Reuters man in Taipei reckon he's referring to "Unrestricted Warfare" [PDF] by leading PLA strategists - Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui - who famously argued that China should focus on "asymmetric engagement" in the 21st century. In fact, many related secret documents have leaked out of China lately. Taiwan's Defense Ministry is taking the threat of infowar very seriously, as can be seen in their 2002 Defense Whitepaper. If the U.S. gets tied up in a ground war in the Middle East, China's going to be real tempted ...."

3 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. With that last question I ask another by cscx · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why is it that non-Americans hate the US so much, yet it is always the United States cleaning up everyone else's spilled milk, as so to speak?

  2. You're a child molestor by geek · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Anyways, the one redeeming quality were the girls. I paid 100 yuan (about $12 US) for a great fuck, with a 16 year old who seemed quite new and "unblemished" if you get my drift. Boy, was she tight, made all the right noises, sucked and fucked all night long and let me cum all over her. Much better than even the vaunted Thai whores, and worlds apart from anything in Las Vegas or in Europe. Best bargain I have EVER found in my life!"

    ----------------

    You say all this like you're proud. It's disgusting that 1) you would use a prostitute and 2) an under age one who's been through enough in her life and doesn't need you degrading her more.

    You should be shot.

  3. Re:I find it funny and scary.... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Troll

    what if GW is right? Don't argue that there is no proof...blaha blah blah. Hypothetically, what if he is, and Saddam could nuke people

    What if he does have nukes - or chemical weapons? or supports "Terrorists"? These things are ALL DONE BY THE USA!

    Having Nuclear Arms is UNIVERSALLY BAD - there is no "exception" from this idea, the USA is not somehow magicall trusted to only do good, and they have proven to not be trustworthy in the past.

    What people inside the US (generally) fail to recognize is that it is a complete contradiction for you to be dictating ANYTHING to ANYONE in this regard. It is one thing for the product of the 9/11 event to begin an American-Lead World-Peace initiative (through a body such as the UN) or something, but this is not what has happened.

    Instead, after the invasion of Afghanistan, you are now looking to broaden a War, of your creation, to ANOTHER nation - all the while trying to 'justify' and make 'reasonable' the act.

    No war is acceptable - ever. It is one thing to defend yourself from attack (the purpose of every military) and another to ATTACK another nation - what you are proposing.

    The world does not welcome Americans invading foreign nations... any more than Iraq->Kuwait, Germany->Poland, USSR->Afghanistan etc etc etc.

    You cannot invade using "we need a regime change" as the reason, its fucking ridiculous -- and not alittle big scary.