Slashdot Mirror


Vint Cerf Talks About The "Interplanetary Internet"

Uncle Humph1 writes "There's an interesting article at NewsForge by Robin (Roblimo)Miller about Vint Cerf giving a presentation to NOVALUG about the Interplanetary Internet and having lunch with them afterward. An interesting read. One of the quotables by Vint with regard to security reads 'We're building in security from end to end,' he says, 'because we don't need headlines saying, '15-year-old takes over Mars.'" Here is some more information about the interplanetary Internet.

20 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. sigh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    so now i can truly say they'll have broadband on mars before i get it.

  2. Already done? by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, accoring to this one documentary I saw, TCP/IP is already in use on at least one other planet.

    1. Re:Already done? by paulcammish · · Score: 2, Funny
      What?

      Surely it was Appletalk or something, which is why everyone seemed to be using Macs...

      Otherwise everyone would have netstumbled their wifi network and slashdotted them out of the sky :)

  3. Interplanetary Internet means.... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interplanetary Internet means intergalactic porn. The triple breasted whore of eroticon six will have her poor web server slashdoted.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  4. Sheesh! by MxTxL · · Score: 4, Funny

    C:\>ping www.marsrover.co.mars

    Pinging marsrover.co.mars [68.179.57.159] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=12100ms TTL=4300
    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=12000ms TTL=4300
    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=11000ms TTL=4300
    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=12000ms TTL=4300

    Ping statistics for 68.179.57.159:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11000ms, Maximum = 12100ms, Average = 11700ms


    Won't be playing UT with these guys anytime soon... :)

    1. Re:Sheesh! by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

      The scary part of that is that I've had worse pings than that on terrestrial servers on my 56k.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Sheesh! by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to make a similar remark about my highspeed loading pages on earth is bad enough, without having to wait about 14 minutes for my request to be responded to.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Sheesh! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Your sig is false.

  5. News: RIAA invades Alpha Centuri over filesharing. by legomad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait till the RIAA goes inter-galactic.

  6. *sob* Willis gets fired. by jukal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can just /. all the approaching asteroids.

  7. Built-in security by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think the lag time to third world countries is bad? Try third world PLANETS.

    Whenever I play quake against guys from Mars, its always the same: they just stand there, and I frag 'em. They must have a latency of several minutes, at least! Other planets are even worse. I once waited all night just to download a 1k faq on Plutonian mining operations, and I can't even COUNT how many connections I've lost completely with servers on Jupiter.

    Who could hack those anyway? Of course, it would take forever. Plus, as we all know (having seen Independence Day), servers in space run MacOS (otherwise how would the guy have easily uploaded a virus with his iMAC), which is a bit difficult to hack anyway.

    I don't think they have anything to worry about. Except Uranus. I hear they're using unpatched IIS servers there.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Built-in security by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
      Except Uranus. I hear they're using unpatched IIS servers there
      I know I'll get modded down for this, but I can't resist...

      ...are you saying there's holes in Uranus?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  8. ET by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    ET Ping Home. ET Ping Home.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  9. Will the Interplanetary Net support . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . the MIME types suggested in RFC1437?

    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1437.html

  10. FTL Communications by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTL Travel is probably never going to be a reality - meaning all those green alien women will just have to pine away for Captain K's hot man love.

    However, FTL Communications are probably possible, so we can hope that our overweight, velour wearing descendents might at least talk dirty with some green alien women.

    Of course, based on today's internet, those green alien women would probably be fat, balding green alien men and green alien FBI agents on green alien sting missions against the sexually deviant human race.

    Unfortunately, this proposed FTL method requires you to ship the quantum-coupled-er...thingies from place to place FIRST, which means we'd have to exchange ambassadors with the green aliens FIRST... meaning Captain K is back in the shag house, big time.

    And then, the quantum communications might be a bit, well, odd, as you might recieve cryptic messages like this:

    Reply from 68.179.57.159: qubits = 256 95% confidence -11fs<time<-4fs, measured from point of transmission, 95% confidence -14fs<time<-6fs, measured from point of reception.

    Which is a reply to the following command:

    Pinging hotbabes.co.vulcan [68.179.57.159] with 256 qubits of data.

    Which you had not yet actually run. Anyone want to suggest changes to TCP/IP that would allow you to handle when acks arrived before the message they acknowledge has been sent? Just asking.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:FTL Communications by cperciva · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyone want to suggest changes to TCP/IP that would allow you to handle when acks arrived before the message they acknowledge has been sent? Just asking.

      Sure: If you receive an ACK to a packet you haven't sent, put it into a buffer. Each time you're about to send a packet, check to see if you've already received an ACK for it. If you have, adjust the window as apppropriate and don't send the packet.

    2. Re:FTL Communications by Dreamweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you have, adjust the window as appropriate and don't send the packet

      Naughty, naughty. Still need to send the packet or you generate a causality loop. You already received the response for the packet you're about to send, you see. If you don't send it, then what was the response to?

      It's bad enough having inexperienced coders leaving memory leaks and infinite loops lying around; now we'll have reality leaks and causal loops to watch out for, too. "Woops, I forgot a semicolon and now French people speak German..."

      --


      "If a man hasn't discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live" -- MLK, Jr.
    3. Re:FTL Communications by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, it looks like it would be easier to change the physics of the universe than to get people to leave IPv4.


      Damnit, I spilled pop all over my screen...

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  11. The Poor Pigeons! by tarsi210 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess the birds will need tiny spacesuits and rocket packs to make it back and forth.

    Incoming interstellar hen!

  12. Re:News: RIAA invades Alpha Centuri over fileshari by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    the tighter they grip - the more interplanetary internet warez sites will slip through their fingers.