Slashdot Mirror


Robot To Explore Mysterious Pyramid Passage

a_timid_mouse writes "The National Geographic Society, using the same kind of robot used to search for survivors in the ruins of the World Trade Center, is trying to solve a mystery that lies deep in the bowels of the 4,500-year-old Great Pyramid of Giza. Up a tiny square tunnel is a stone hatch with copper handles that was discovered in 1872. No one knows the purpose of the shaft, and no one knows what lies behind the hatch. Enter the Pyramid Rover."

67 comments

  1. simple, man by T.Hobbes · · Score: 2

    It's a 4000-year-old weed stash

    1. Re:simple, man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that you mean, "You put your weed in there."

    2. Re:simple, man by peterpi · · Score: 1

      That must be some quality shit to inspire you to build a fucking pyramid!

  2. Just like Al Capone's vault by adso · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's just hope that Geraldo Rivera doesn't decide to cover it live, which will guarantee that nothing interesting is down there.

  3. Bevare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the robot wakes the mummy, gets cursed, and comes out of the pyramid with XP embedded in it's firmware...

  4. Robot to insert fiberoptic camera to find... by stienman · · Score: 3, Funny

    The robot will find the first occurance of the smiley face, if only to show up the smuggness of the person who retreived the vax backups.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Robot to insert fiberoptic camera to find... by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

      You mean like this ??

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  5. Extraordinary? by 1WingedAngel · · Score: 1

    From the article :
    "It has to be an extraordinary engineering feat to go up a 40-degree, 200-foot shaft"

    Almost as extraordinary as a 4000+ year old civilization creating such a passage.

    1. Re:Extraordinary? by photon317 · · Score: 2


      DUH

      The pyramids were created by an alien civilization as a star gate. They're returning in 2038 to enslave us.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:Extraordinary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They're returning in 2038 to enslave us.

      Good, then we won't have to worry about all the UNIX systems that will run out of space for the date, right?

    3. Re:Extraordinary? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

      Well, the passage is easy. You cut it as you're building the pyramid. It's nowhere near as imponderable as the pyramid itself.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:Extraordinary? by rgmoore · · Score: 1
      It's nowhere near as imponderable as the pyramid itself.

      The pyramid itself isn't even that imponderable. It is, after all, just a really big stack of rocks. Getting all of the stone blocks and moving them into position was a tremendous amount of work, but it's not some inconceivable feat. It just requires a huge amount of labor- which the records suggest the Egyptians had access to. The pyramids represent a tremendous organizational accomplishment- getting all of those workers in one place and paying and feeding them all was incredible- but are not the unbelievable engineering challenge that they're made out to be.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    5. Re:Extraordinary? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      I agree. I only had in mind that the exact method is a matter of speculation to a certain degree; there are a number of equally plausible theories on the details of how the construction ramps might have been arranged, the blocks transported to the site, etc. I didn't mean to invoke the weirdo theories.

      The best proof that the pyramids aren't the product of some strange advanced alien or Atlanean technology is that they are in fact pyramids. Genuinely advanced tech can construct buildings of that size using many other designs. The primitive tech of the ancient world limited them to the basic rockpile shape; they simply didn't have building materials that could support anything else. This is the real reason for the ubiquitousness of the pyramid, from the Maya back through the ziggurats of Mesopotamia, not that they were based on any mystical prototype.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    6. Re:Extraordinary? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      The best proof that the pyramids aren't the product of some strange advanced alien or Atlanean technology is that they are in fact pyramids. Genuinely advanced tech can construct buildings of that size using many other designs.

      Another reason to build a pyramid shape is that it is likely to last longer.
      (Most pyramids were built as tombs, and were meant to last forever.)
      If you look at non-pyramidal above-ground ancient buildings, they have all suffered damage from the elements, mostly to their roofs.
      After all, stone lasts a long time, but it's not the best material to use for a lintel or beam.
      In contrast, most of the damage suffered by pyramids was due to vandalism (at least, in Egypt; the meso-American pyramids were also damaged by the encroaching jungle, but still fared better than other above-ground buildings (except maybe the plazas, but those aren't really buildings)).

      Are there materials available today that last as long as stone in a desert or desert-like environment?
      I don't know of any.
      (Perhaps some forms of concrete.)
      If I were designing a structure today that I wanted to survive for as long as possible with a minimum of maintenance in a desert-like environment, I'd make it out of stone, and make it pyramid-shaped.
      (Disclaimer: IANAA (I am not an architect).)

      Not that I believe in any of that "Chariots of the Gods" mumbo-jumbo.
      I just don't think that you can use the material and architectural design of the pyramids as an argument against it.
      A far more compelling argument is that no remnants of more "modern-style" architecture exist from that time, nor do any depictions of such architecture exist in the various wall decorations, sculpture, etc., from that period.

      To get back on topic, how do they know that there's anything at all behind the "hatch"?
      Maybe its not a hatch at all.
      It could be something just set in the wall, and the handles could have been used for tying ropes to for some reason.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    7. Re:Extraordinary? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      Another reason to build a pyramid shape is that it is likely to last longer.

      That doesn't mean that a pyramid will last a long time if it's not built out of the right materials. There are numerous pyramids between Giza and Saqqara, but not all of them are still pyramid shaped. Towards the end of the Old Kindom, pyramids became decidedly low-buget affairs, constructed out of unbaked mud brick with limestone casings. Once the casing stones were removed for building material by later generations, the things just started to erode away. The pyramids of Giza also had their casings removed -- only the Second Pyramid preserves a few courses near the top -- but since their cores are stone they endured anyway.

      In any event, I doubt longevity was a consideration, at least as far as the shape was concerned. The oldest pyramid was just a century or so older than the Great Pyramid, so they really had no data to go on in that regard. There were plenty of other monuments in Egypt at least as old as the Stepped Pyramid at the time, many older, and probably in just as good a condition.

      It's not just that there are no other buildings of the ancient world comparable in height to the Pyramids that have survived; it's that there are no buildings in the ancient world comparable in height at all, not even in ruined condition. Every monument of significant height in the ancient world is roughly pyramid shaped, even when they weren't "houses of eternity", like ziggurats or Mesoamerican pyramids. That strongly suggests they knew of no other way to build something that tall except by shaping it like a pile of rocks. (I said "size" in my earlier post when "height" would have been better. That's a hazard for me when posting to /. from work; I generally don't have the time to phrase it as clearly as possible. I'm a sloppy writer by habit, and I make lots of mistakes in first drafts.)

      You're right: it's perfectly possible that there will be nothing behind this stone. But it's more fun to speculate about there being something rather than nothing. We'll know in a few days either way.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    8. Re:Extraordinary? by Skoshi · · Score: 1

      Not only was that the only was for the ancient Egyptians to build something that big/tall, it was also symbolic for religious reasons. Their legend of the creation of the world states that once there was only water (Nu). Eventually a hill emerged from Nu and then the first sunrise rose over it. Another states that the sun god Atum (the original sun god, before Ra became popular) willed himself into being, surrounded by Nu. Since he had no where to stand, he created a hill and then the other gods. Of course, there are several other creation myths that tie into these, such as the one where Khnum (a ram headed god) created humans on his potter's wheel, but soon grew tired of the process as people asked for more and more children, so he put a potter's wheel in the belly of each woman on earth to create new children. But I seem to have wandered slightly off topic. ( If you care to learn more about various myths and gods/goddesses of Ancient Egypt there's a good, simple introductory page run by artist Richard Deurer at http://members.aol.com/egyptart/index.html )

      --
      "What are apples? Left, right, socialist...I don't know."
    9. Re:Extraordinary? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      You're right, but the Egyptians didn't need to build pyramids to express the symbolism of the primeval mound. They already had such a symbol: the mastaba, which was the burial monument of choice for those who could afford it prior to the 3rd Dynasty and which continued to be used afterwards by anyone wealthy enough who wasn't a king. The first pyramid, the Stepped Pyramid, is nothing more than the form of six mastabas one build atop another: a mastaba of monumental proportions.

      The architectural history of this structure has been fairly well established. It was begun as a standard mastaba, which was extended in two or three stages. Then, having apparently reached the limit of how grandiose a mastaba could be, three more mastabas were stacked on top of it, forming a 4-stepped pyramid. As Djoser was not yet dead, it was then expanded once again into the six-stepped form it still retains. It seems to me that the original mastaba was expanded until it was as grandiose as that particular form could have achieved with the building materials available -- it's built from stone cut into small, brick-sized blocks -- and that the piling up of successive mastabas may have been the only form that occurred to the architect to make it even more grandiose.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    10. Re:Extraordinary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah , well I bet you cant even build this today , you fucking engineer wanna be. dipshit

    11. Re:Extraordinary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've studyied the pyramids - it is quite an amazing feat of engineering. The precision they fit the rocks with, and the precision the entire pyramids have is amazing for the tools they had to work with.

  6. Already tried? by munner · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this already tried a few years ago? I remember seeing something nearly exactly like this.

    They sent a (very similar) robot up the passage, got to the door, but somehow got stuck. IIRC, the robot couldn't get over some sort of obstacle, but could still see the door at the end. They ended with a problem: how did two iron spikes end up locking the door, so far inside such a small tunnel.

    What's different and new this time around?

    1. Re:Already tried? by BigBir3d · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1 - about 10 years ago

      2 - copper, not iron

      3 - handles (loop), not spikes

      4 - fibre optic camera is small enough to fit in/through the cracks, maybe reach the other side?

      5 - there is another sensor for seeing 'thru' the stone that is blocking the pathway, range is 3 ft thru concrete, maybe 2 or 3 times that through stone of the pyramid structure.

      6 - the stone is of the nice variety only found in the chambers of the interior of the pyramid

      Unanswered questions lead to more investigation.

    2. Re:Already tried? by legerde · · Score: 5, Informative

      Heres the deal..

      The shafts themselves were discover in 1840 or something..

      The thing you saw was Rudolph Gattenbrink about 1992?
      He was commissioned to add ventilation fans to the shafts that actuall reach the outside surface. The tourists created too much humidity inside the pyramid and were causing damage.

      Of the 4 shafts, only two make it out.

      Now, Rudolph sent his robot up the other 2 shafts to see if they reach the surface. One of them bent in such a strange way, they couldnt get past one of the bends. One of them ended at this mysterious door that had polished stone leading up to it... (Polished stone was reserved for important areas of the pyramid.) The door also had some metal like handles. (Wasnt this stone age construction?)

      His discovery of that door is what you saw on television.

      So the question has been for 10 years, Whats behind the freaking door!

      Rudolph has offerred many times to go back to the pyramid with his robot. But due to political issues, Egypt doesnt want him to work on that site. They dont like how he documented and revealed his first find.. Egyptology is more politics than science... Alot of people think that Rudolph is being robbed of credit. I noticed the CNN article mis-credits the discovery of the door.... Poor Rudolph and these pyramid games.

      Sooooo... The Egyptian authorities have allowed National Geographic to build its own robot. Thats what this is. They are going to try and determine whats behind the damn door.. Im sure they have already looked. In fact many believe there is a room behind the door that can be reached through a different passage that hasnt been revealed to the public. There have been reports of secret drilling in the pyramid in 1998? time frame. (They closed the pyramid to allow "renovations!" hahah!)

      There have been rumours that an underground system of passages connect the pyramids with each other.. There have been rumours that a black dog/man (anubis?) statue is behind the door. There have been rumours and rumours and rumours. I guess this presentation on monday will actually probably only create more rumours. If its empty, did they remove stuff befhore hand. If there is something there, who knows what will happen.

    3. Re:Already tried? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2

      So the question has been for 10 years, Whats behind the freaking door!

      Another question is: If the shaft is so darn narrow we need a state-of-the-art robot to explore it, how did they build the freakin door in the first place?

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    4. Re:Already tried? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple -- It's an example of floor-up engineering.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Already tried? by Edgy+Loner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably the easy way.
      Remember the pyramids are built up out of seperate blocks. They probably cust the shafts out out of the blocks as they were being laid. Cut the bottom part of the shaft out of one block, cut the upper part out of another block, then set it on top of the lower block, continue until the shaft reaches it's destination. As for the door, well you just set in place at the top of the shaft, then build up the pyramid around it.
      For everything there is is usually a hard a way and a n easy to do it. The trick is finding the easy way.

    6. Re:Already tried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easy way. They made slaves do it!

      For example:

      Master: "Cut a shaft through those rocks!"
      Slave: "yes maaaster."

    7. Re:Already tried? by legerde · · Score: 1

      Ohh... Art Bell has a guy on tonight "Christopher Dunn" Who predicts whats going to be behind the door..

      His prediction is at:
      http://www.gizapower.com/articles/door.html

      Everyone has a theory... Can't wait till tonight..

    8. Re:Already tried? by glyph42 · · Score: 1

      Do a little research, and you'll find you're not too far off. They cut the shaft out of the bottom of the upper blocks. Rudolf made some great measurements, and even has CAD files for your enjoyment: www.cheops.org

      --
      Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
  7. organic solution by Lepruhkawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if training an animal to go into such claustrophobic places would be cheaper and easier (disregarding any PETA complaints).

    --
    Jesus saves....And takes 1/2 damage.
    1. Re:organic solution by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Actually it would probably be the best solution. Train a lab maze rat to climp up a similar shaft in a lab, and strap leightweight scientific equipment on his back.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:organic solution by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Or a ferret. When I was a kid I remember reading how they had a ferret trained to run through the tube for a very long linear accelerator. The ferret trailed a messenger cord they used to yank through cleaning machinery.

      They considered building a robot to do it, but the ferret was cheaper, and the scientists grew very fond of it, eventually deciding it needed a mate.

    3. Re:organic solution by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2

      Remember those rats on /. a while ago? perhaps those. we could stear them up the shaft with a camera.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  8. this was tried by austad · · Score: 3, Funny

    This was tried several years ago. The robot they used did not have a fiber optic camera, and was unable to see past the door, however, it did have a laser on it, and they shined the laser through the cracks in the sides of the door and were unable to see the dot, so there is some evidence that there is a large room behind the door.

    The new robot has a fiber optic camera, and some kind of device which will allow it to see through up to 3 feet of rock.

    One thing that kind of pisses me off about the whole egyptology thing, is that the egyptian government is pretty strict on who they let come and do work like this over there. If they don't agree with some of your views on the history of the pyramids, good luck getting a permit to do anything there. The history of the pyramids is very sketchy, and how the traditional egyptologists think their theories are 100% correct is very arrogant.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:this was tried by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      How about this deal: When your country builds massive stone pyramids then you can decide what foreign scientists you let in.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:this was tried by austad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The government of Egypt did not build the pyramids, they just happen to lie within an area that Egypt currently controls. The pyramids were there well before the current government.

      It's the same thing for other interesting unique things of the past. I wouldn't expect any government to object to scientists or historians doing non-intrusive research at sites like Stonehenge, the Lighthouse at Alexandria, volcanoes in Hawaii, or any other place or object which has significant historical or scientific value.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    3. Re:this was tried by legerde · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand what you're saying...

      Do you think these pyramids represent Egypts History, or civilizations history?

      I realize they are located inside the border of the current government recognized as "Egypt".

      But, I think these monuments represent something that is important to humanity, and personaly, I dont trust any governments (American or Egyptian).

      So the politics play on, and I keep wondering about the conspiracy theories.

    4. Re:this was tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, let's re-phrase . . . when your government is given pyramids by British colonialists, then you can open your fucking pie hole.

      Seriously, though, as a fellow american I have to implore you to curb your instincts and STFU. If we are going to laugh and jeer at the UN eurotrash that wants to regulate how much gasoline we can buy or coal we can burn, or haul our soldiers up in front of a tribunal everytime Green Peace gets twitchy about a few brown people dying, then we have to be consistent and recognize other country's rights. Or are you on their side ?

    5. Re:this was tried by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      The history of the pyramids is very sketchy, and how the traditional egyptologists think their theories are 100% correct is very arrogant.


      On that note, does anyone have any information about this ?

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    6. Re:this was tried by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
      The current Egyptian government has less relationship to the pyramid builders than the US government has to the mound builders (or Her Majesty of England has to her own mound builders...). The current government is comprised of Arab usurpers of Arab usurpers of Arab slaves of Arab usurpers of the Copts, who are themselves the descendants and usurpers of the Egyptians proper.

      The Arabs never built a pyramid. Nor did they ever build up a great corpus of learning. But, clever as they are, they've taken credit for the last half-millenium. That proves nothing regarding the truth of the matter.

  9. Going to be on TV! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to the web site, it's going to be on TV 9/16, 8pm (eastern/pacific) on Fox. Pretty cool...

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Going to be on TV! by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thankfully it's a National Geographic production. If it was a Fox thing, it would have been called: "Temptation Door: Sex Secrets of the Mummies" or something stupid like that.

  10. They'll finally find . . . by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

    . . . all of those socks that everyone's been losing in the dryer. The aliens have been stealing them for years!

  11. Tonight On Battlebots by DeLabarre · · Score: 2, Funny

    ImhotepBot crushes the puny Pyramid Rover.

    --

    In the Star Trek evil Mirror Universe, virtuoso cellist Yo-Yo Ma is gangsta hiphop star DJ Yo Ma-Ma.

    1. Re:Tonight On Battlebots by ELCarlsson · · Score: 1

      That won't happen anymore, Comedy Central cancels Battlebots

  12. Where's Thinkgeek when you need them? by mbourgon · · Score: 2

    Custom robot, shmustom robot. They just need one of these:

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/fun-stuff/5776.sh tm l
    (Mini Rover)

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  13. If they were in US by ACNeal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If they were in the US, we would be the assholes, and would be insulted, and chastised until we let anyone in. If we didn't, we would be called ignorant, arrogant, classless, knuckle scraping rubes that don't deserve to breathe, and how dare we try to foist our control on world history. Somehow this would also make us imperialistic, I am sure.

    But since it isn't in the US, I guess the Egyptian government is well within their rights to control something that was built before the current incarnation of Egypt was even thought of.

    You see, if you aren't American, you can't make a mistake. I just realized this, and boy do I feel bad about being American.

    I am sorry that everyone speaks English.

    I am sorry that France and other countries have to make laws to keep their language alive. This is obviously as a result of some covert American plot to pollute the world with our language. The French saw fit to give over control of everything to the Germans upon the asking, but somehow we have sullied their language, how dare we.

    I am sorry that we came over to Europe in the early 20th century, and again in the 40's. I know we should have just left Stalin kill another 20 million Christians, and Hitler kill another 6 million Jews. We were insensitive, and imperialistic.

    I am sorry that we tried to force capitalism on the North Koreans in order to protect our oil interests. Same with all the Vietnamese. These people wanted, and have thrived under the communism they recieved. We were rude, brutish, and totally out of line in both of these actions.

    I am sorry that we stopped a thug and a thief from stealing millions of dollars worth of property, and a chance to control a significant portion of the worlds oil supply. This was selfish, and imperialistic. I am sorry that we allowed our women service people to remain uncovered, offending all the right thinking people we just saved, because our women have the same rights as the men.

    I am sorry that we stopped a racist, religious zealot from trying to cleanse his country of other races. They clearly didn't belong there, since an arbitrary border said they didn't belong in the same place they had for severl centuries. I am sorry that we stopped his troops from systematically raping all the females of these other races as their troops moved from town to town. Clearly these people deserved to be raped and killed and we were insensitive and arrogant to impose our ideas on that eastern european community.

    And most recently I am sorry that we feel the need to try to dictate how another country can defend its borders. We have no reason to believe a man that has already gased citizens of his own country to test chemical weapons would release a weapon of mass destruction on the world. How dare we get that attitude.

    Yeah, we are just a bunch of arrogant, classless hillbillies over here that don't have the common sense to commit suicide because we are so beneath the rest of the world.

    I am sorry that the rest of the world has to deal with us Americans. If only we had never been organized as a country.

    1. Re:If they were in US by Cplus · · Score: 1

      I know you intend to be sarcastic, but...a lot of what you are saying is how the rest of the world views Americans. Especially the part about the arrogance...

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  14. Previous attempts... by ENOENT · · Score: 3, Funny

    A previous attempt to penetrate the mysterious
    shaft ended in disappointment when it was discover
    that Lara Croft's cross-section was too large to
    permit her entry into the shaft.

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    1. Re:Previous attempts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure I'd like to get my large cross-section into Lara Croft's shaft..

    2. Re:Previous attempts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be the other way around?

  15. Best site for info on this... by legerde · · Score: 3, Informative

    The BEST place to get info about the shafts and the history is:

    http://www.cheops.org/

    It is a site constructed by Rudolph Gattenbrink and contains all of his findings in a very public way... AutoCAD drawings of how each block was cut to form the shaft, etc...

    Zahi Hawass (The director of the Giza site) loves to take credit for anything and everything.. I true ego-maniac... I would love to see Rudolph Gattenbrink get the credit he deserves...

    There is a petition located at:

    http://www.dailygrail.com/petition/

  16. Upuaut by T-Punkt · · Score: 2

    > The thing you saw was Rudolph Gattenbrink about 1992?

    The 'thing' certainly was Upuaut (the name of the robot) and here's the official website of Gantenbrink and his robot.

  17. They never let... by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    ...poor Rudolph, join in any brain gear games?

  18. NOT "stone-age". by Ashurbanipal · · Score: 1
    One of them ended at this mysterious door that had polished stone leading up to it... (Polished stone was reserved for important areas of the pyramid.) The door also had some metal like handles. (Wasnt this stone age construction?)
    Bronze age. Not that those terms are as meaningful as you might think!
    1. Re:NOT "stone-age". by j_w_d · · Score: 2

      Bronze age. Not that those terms are as meaningful as you might think!

      Especially when the last agricultural use of flint that I know of was on Cyprus where threshing sled blades of flint were being made up into the 1950s. The tractor powered thresher finally crowded out animal traction threshing sledges, within our, well my, lifetime.

      --
      ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  19. It's part of the plumbing! by Ashurbanipal · · Score: 2

    Everybody knows that the Great Pyramid was a water pump, right?

    Kunkel expounds his astonishing theories.

    Give this guy some money, please, so we can either be amazed or have a jolly good laugh at his expense.

    1. Re:It's part of the plumbing! by gujo-odori · · Score: 1
      Give this guy some money, please, so we can either be amazed or have a jolly good laugh at his expense.

      I've already had a jolly good laugh at his expense. I don't knot if he actually wrote the text of the web site, but if he did, I expect he will be taken away in a straitjacket anytime now.

      The hackneyed writing, the non-stop overuse of repetition to repeat himself, I reiterate, the nonstop overuse of repetition to repeat himself, the hyperole of it all!!!!!!!, the abisthmul spealing, the poor: punctuation, the of out order logical insertion of sentences all serve to indicate that the person who wrote the text for the web site is not only no scholar, s/he has no concept whatsoever of either scholarship or the written English language. If this is the best Kunkel can do for disciples, I cannot imagine anyone taking him seriously.

      If the foregoing alone is not enough, at every point where a new "fact" is brought up that the reader might question, we are simply told that it is explained in the book. Of course, we are also given a link to buy the book. There is a commercial for the book on nearly every page, and several have two. Clearly, the purpose of this site is not to further scholarship or to edumacate anyone, but just to sell the book.

      Based on what I have read at their web site - which I'm sure was also constructed with the assistance of locks, big check valves, and a pyramid-shaped pump - I find the theory totally implausible. No serious scholar, whether professional or amateur, would tolerate such a badly written site. By the Pharoah's Pump Foundation's own description of its work, this sounds like the biggest crackpot theory since Chariots of the Gods.

  20. What they'll find by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    Possibly Khufu's mummy. It's not in the sarcophagus in the King's Chamber and probably never was, but if the Great Pyramid was really built as his tomb it's got to have been there somewhere. It then becomes an engineering puzzle as to how they got the mummy in there. Maybe there's a larger hidden passage we haven't located yet, or maybe he died before the pyramid was completed and it was built around the burial chamber.

    Or maybe it's the control room to the alien launch facility....

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  21. dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a troll, not a karma-whore. Now quit it, you're messing up my neat little world-view.

  22. fnar, fnar by thomas+adams · · Score: 1

    shafts, passages, probes
    you guys have really got to get a thesaurus
    or i gotta get a better sense of humour.

  23. Re:not 1872! 1993 by 17028 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if those seals will be gone when the show starts, or if they will have super-glued them together...

    You don't seriously think they haven't looked already, do you?

  24. Purpose of the shafts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pharroh was placed behind the door on the south shaft, the queen at the south. After a hundred years a given amount of sand would flow out of a timing chamber, setting off a rube-goldberg contraption that would open the doors suspending the king and queen within their shafts.

    another door would slide open, revealing a shaft rising to the east at a 45 degree angle out of the pyramid. To the west, another door opened and a 20 ton block was sent sliding down it's shaft.

    The intended result was for the pharroh and queen to meet in the queens chamber and "mate" when they collided. Soon after the joining, the 20 ton block would sweep them up the eastern shaft, where they would emerge to fly for a short while across the desert.

    However, looters tampered with the mechanism which resulted in the queen, looters, and block flying out of the pyramid, while the pharroh remaind trapped behind his door. There is rumor that there might be another 20 ton block positioned behind the pharroh as well. The national geopgraphic team should exercise great caution unless they wish to suffer the fate of those looting the queens chamber thousands of years earlier.

  25. Dredge, redundancy, TLC by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the same thing TLC's been showing every other week for the last four years now ? The one where they hit a spot where the stones have shifted and the step-up is too high for the poorly-designed truck to climb. I would have thought that a spider-like bot would have been better for this, since it would be able to walk across gaps n'stuff.

    I mean, egyptian architecture is neat and all, but I don't think they had the tools and knowledge to properly build these things to 1/16th-of-an-inch precision.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  26. Site used to be much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've already had a jolly good laugh at his expense.

    Well, mirth is good. But as for the web site - the old version was remarkably better. I have no idea why they changed it to the current sad incarnation.

    Many typographical, technical and stylistic errors have been introduced, as you noted, and also the pump animation applet has disappeared - it was actually kind of cool, I thought. And now there is all sorts of raving on the misunderstood genius of Tesla, Kunkel, and Schauberger that is pretty much guaranteed to turn off most (thinking) people.

    Sad to see a kooky but cool site turn into just a another kook site.
  27. It's over, and... by sstamps · · Score: 1

    Item 1: The Sarcophagus

    My prediction was that they would find, gasp, human remains.

    They opened the sealed Sarcophagus, and guess what they found? The bones of a human being. Still, a significant find, compared to the next item.

    Item 2: The Blocked Shaft

    My prediction was, uh, more shaft, debris, or a wall.

    They drilled a hole through the "door" (it was less than 4 inches thick) and poked a camera/light source through the hole. What did they find? A short space, and then, a wall (contrary to Dr. Hawass' statement that it was "another door!").

    Where're the alien artifacts? The treasure? The buried long-lost knowledge of the lost civilization?

    While it was interesting, it would have been 1000% better if the mummy would've sucked the juices out of the co-hosts and just let Dr. Hawass narrate the show; even if he is a putz, he's vastly more interesting and entertaining than they could ever hope to be. I mean, come on, this is National Geographic we are talking about here, not RealTV.

    All in all, I give it a 5/10, if only to see Dr. Hawass getting heart palpitations from running full tilt from the Great Pyramid to the Pyramid City Administrator's tomb and back again to keep on Fox's "Live" schedule.

    --
    -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
  28. Hype or Tripe? by dolo666 · · Score: 1

    Hype or Tripe?

    Is it just me or was that National Geographic live broadcast about the pyramid chamber discovery a total waste of time and money? It's nice to have a show about the pyramids and the information contained within the show was fantastic, but they promoted it as being a great discovery show to try and lure a larger audience. They discovered pretty much nothing (for TV standards (skeleton & more passage)).

    At one point I exclaimed to my wife that Osama Bin Laden was going to jump out at the end of the secret passage, but no such luck. The punch line is that at the end of the show, there was just another door, and they still hailed it as a great discovery.

    The robot was COOL so I guess it wasn't a total waste of my time... but talk about lame endings.