Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Wales

phich65 writes "People could soon be sending e-mail from the hillsides, roadsides and rooftops of the south Wales valleys with the expansion of Europe's densest wireless internet network. See this BBC story for details."

123 comments

  1. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bitch

    1. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap! I just installed OpenSSL on my penis, and now I find out there's a big security hole! I'm in danger of contracting THE HERPES.

  2. Doesn't Alan Cox live in Wales? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Is that why? Is this the start of World Domination, spreading like contagion from Wales to the rest of the world?

    1. Re:Doesn't Alan Cox live in Wales? by Subcarrier · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that why?

      Indubitably. Rumour has it that Alan has a 802.11b base station hidden in his beard.

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    2. Re:Doesn't Alan Cox live in Wales? by Sits · · Score: 1

      Yes he does (in Swansea to be a bit more precise). The nice thing about Swansea is that NTL started their cable modem trials there and thus affordable broadband has been available for about a year and a bit there. Since I went to University there and shared a house which had a cable modem I can report that it works well. Now I've moved back home and I'm waiting on the dial up modem I only wish broadband were available in Yatton :(

  3. First thing that came to mind... by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 1

    At first I thought "Wow, now we'll have a wireless mesh even when we're out to sea?" I thought it crazy, but there's so much crazy stuff on here lately that I figured it must be true! (No I'm not kidding or trolling) Anyway, sounds cool.

    1. Re:First thing that came to mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if they could figure out how to bring wireless to the coal mines ...

  4. Looks like by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2

    They went up a hill, and came down a WiFi tower.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Looks like by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      They went up a hill, and came down a WiFi tower.

      Too cute for your own damn good.

  5. interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds great, except for the fact that it's in Wales.

  6. So... by goldfndr · · Score: 1

    If someone died because they were connected and didn't pay attention to their surroundings, would they get a D'Arwain award?

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a herd of sheep are gonna trample you for not looking.

  7. free wireless internet by cavegrub · · Score: 1

    ...the initiative already gives free high-speed internet access to users in a 10sqkm catchment area in the city using five roof-mounted antennae.

    Free broadband? Free wireless broadband? This could be put to great use, especially for dense urban areas. Its too bad that so many ISPs in North America are fighting wardriving, whilst overseas it seems to be a non-issue.

    1. Re:free wireless internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American is the capitalist arena of the world, so naturally its big businesses will try to turn everything into a matter of money.

    2. Re:free wireless internet by YDdraig · · Score: 1

      Almost enough to tempt me further up the valley. Here's hoping it's successful enough to expand.

  8. In the US? by PRickard · · Score: 2

    Call me back when the US telecom companies manage to expand their cellular/PCS service to my area. Pathetic that we can't even have universal wireless telephone service here while the UK is putting wireless Internet into its own rural areas. I wonder how many years its been since every square inch of Europe got cellular service coverage...

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

    1. Re:In the US? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      It is also pathetic how people can't relize there is a difference between europes geography and demographic, and the US's geography and demographic.

      There are many places in the US that are larger then England that have coverage.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:In the US? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Size matters. Everything there is closer together, so the cities aren't exactly to remote from the "country". If you live in west texas or montana, I doubt you'll see it anytime soon. Its just too much space to cover to justify the cost of deployment.

    3. Re:In the US? by owenb · · Score: 1

      Never been to the north of Scotland, have you?

    4. Re:In the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Size matters.

      Do they still teach geography in high school? Do kids today even get to look at a map.
      http://www.conceptdraw.com/img/Worldmap.gif

      On this one for example see that lil purple thing. Thats all of whats considered Europe. See that big yellow thing on the left. Thats actually north & south america. But I think you can figure out which part is the United States of America.

    5. Re:In the US? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2

      Yes, however all of those places do not have the same geographic structures. Getting Britain all wired is a fear. Getting Iowa wired is expected.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  9. Why not in the US? by justzisguy · · Score: 1

    So when can we expect free WiFi to roll out to the cities in the US? They're trying to shut down free access here in the name of security. Terrorists could use this anonymous access to plot nasty things against Americans.

  10. One question... by GearheadX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How are they going to handle the sudden influx of users when this opens fully? I'm afraid my command of how wireless operates is a bit shakey.. but isn't a general rule of thumb more users = less available bandwidth/stability?

    1. Re:One question... by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, there's 3 people in Wales, of which two live in LlanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllLlantysilio gogogoch

      Just kidding, I've been to this lovely town and all I'm saying is that there's not _that_ many people living in Wales.

    2. Re:One question... by dafydd · · Score: 1

      Wales has about 5 million people, but most of them live in the South, near the M4 corridor. (The M4 being the motorway from London, past Cardiff, into Carmarthenshire.) In size, Wales is about 20,000 sq km (10,000 sq m). A growing minority of the Welsh speak Welsh.

      WRT Llanfairpwll (as it is abbreviated), although the name /does/ have a meaning in Welsh, it was, IIRC made up in the 19th century to encourage tourism. And from what I've heard, the name is the most interesting thing about the town by a fair margin.

    3. Re:One question... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Like the name board at the railway station. It's about as long as one of the bloody carriages.

    4. Re:One question... by Vermithrax · · Score: 1

      Bugger I must be the other one. The Welsh assembly have also introduced a scheme where a selection of coastal towns are getting broadband with the installation subsidised. I have the Unfortunate problem that I live inland. actual coverage in wales looks like this. UK report if you then click on the welsh map a couple of times you'll see what it's really like. Just go ahead and klick on the map of Wales. (fortunately At work I'm sitting on the end of a 34 Mb link but that does make home access really crawl.

    5. Re:One question... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes, but I worked out, with a contention ratio of 50:1, providing 576kb/s to each user, each channel can handle 286 users; it's surprisingly high really. (Assuming you get a reasonably realistic 3.3Mb/s throughput on each channel, YMMV of course).

      And you can have 3 channels, and/or multiple transmitters on the same channels (widely spaced using directional antennas) those tricks would multiply up the capacity further.

      By ADSL standards the capacity is huge.

      Of course each wireless node can probably only handle about 15 nodes on it, depending on the equipment you plug in, but then you network the nodes together.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, about 3 million actually. Around half of this population is in the South-East.

  11. wwwwow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wowwie .. COWS will MOOOOO in happiness!

  12. One answer by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Same way they handle more cell phone users. More switches and code multiplication.

  13. Sad day ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Sad day ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blahblahblah...it would be nice if there was some intelligent trolls around, instead of brainless shits like this that post the same stupid fucking thing over and over...fuck you all.

  14. That's Great, Except by cscx · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It still doesn't solve the age-old problem of still needing a throat full of phlegm to pronounce the name of any town/city in Wales.

    1. Re:That's Great, Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newport, Cardiff, Swansea, Wrexham. Try pronouncing them, it is easier than you think.

    2. Re:That's Great, Except by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      Unless you type the names. Voice-Over-IP is still in its infancy.
      Typing Llantrisant, Aberystwyth, Clarach are all much simpler than coding PERL!

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    3. Re:That's Great, Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Wales in Welsh. Cymraeg. Sounds like what I call my old girlfriend.

    4. Re:That's Great, Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just shows that you're pronouncing it wrong. Saying ch, dd, ll etc is no harder than saying th, ph or sh in english.. it's just a case of learning it.

  15. Wales vs. Whales by Chairboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Personally, I think wireless whales would be more exciting....

  16. Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by Droz1313 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...when it comes to anything other than dialup access? Is it strictly a lack of competition or is there more to it? The best broadband I can get at my home is spotty cable access for $55.00 a month, so I'm almost to the point of looking at Sat. service for my internet access..it's either that or moving, and hate U-Haul.

    1. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by NineNine · · Score: 2

      It's demand. Nobody gives a shit about anything on the Net that needs high speed access, anymore. Hell, I know that I don't even need high speed, and I run a shitload of web sites.

    2. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's demand. Nobody gives a shit about anything on the Net that needs high speed access, anymore.

      Oops. Guess Yahoo! is about to suffer another boo-boo, then. Yahoo, SBC unveil high-speed Web service:

      Yahoo Inc. and [...] SBC Communications Inc. [...] unveiled a high-speed Internet service designed to convince more people that broadband is worth the extra money [...] Yahoo has developed a souped-up version of its popular Web page that will provide subscribers with a wide range of exclusive entertainment options and other applications unavailable anywhere else. "We have been programming to the lowest common denominator until now," said Jim Brock, a Yahoo senior vice president [...] "This is going to change the broadband landscape."

      That is, unless Yahoo! can pull the rabbit out of the hat and actually provide content worth the cost of broadband... no, check that, they're probably screwed. Perhaps corporations should push for wireless access instead buying into the "bigger is better" mentality that content-driven broadband embodies.

    3. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by Droz1313 · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is small sample bias, but I thought the same thing until my mother signed up for cable access in Iowa, she's an AOLer(I know...I know...but it's hard to give tech support from 300 miles away!) but now loves the service...if I had to offer my own hypothesis- I'd say most people are satisfied with dial up because they've never used anything but. She was fine with AOL until she finally got broadband at work, now I don't think she could go back. Would it be worth it for telcos to offer discounts to businesses/schools for broadband to spur subscribers to get the service at home in the same way Apple used to give hardware to schools?

    4. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Is the US really far behind? Do you have any links or data that compare prices and availability, as well as numbers of users of DSL, Cable, Wireless, ISDN, any other broadband connections in Europe and in the US?

    5. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      It truly isn't. This is 10 square miles in the middle of a country. Only 50% of the UK is in range of broadband, and only about 1 million homes or so actually have it. The percentages are probably even lower for Wales.

      Seriously, if you want to you could probably set up your own wireless network. It's not *that* difficult.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      You might find this conversation informative.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    7. Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always seen it the other way round: I was talking to people online who had cable in the US when anything faster than 33k was a distant dream in Europe, with the exception of Germany, where a lot of people have ISDN - that's 64k, but otherwise normal dial-up. Also, I gather there have been flatrates for a long time in the US even for modems, which are still impossible to get, at least in Germany. But it's true that nowadays, DSL is quite easy to get (and popular) in Germany and elsewhere in Europe, except Luxembourg, where I live - the state telecom's DSL is ridiculously expensive to set up and use, offers (at the basic rate) 256k down / 64k up, and has a 5 GB per month limit. Competition is emerging very slowly if at all. It's quite an achievement for me that I have 64k ISDN and unmetered access over the weekend.

      I think it's just that development seems to be rather erratic - DSL making a leap here, cable there, WiFi in another place.

  17. Nooooooo not more posts from joskyn in alt.2600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject says it all - imagine - wirless usenet flaming whilst sharing a pair of whellington boots with a furry loved one. this scares me

    1. Re:Nooooooo not more posts from joskyn in alt.2600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radge? Is that you?

  18. Let's try that in Welsh by cscx · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Rhyddha broadband? Rhyddha wireless broadband? Hon could bod ddod at 'n fawr arfer , 'n arbennig achos 'n bendew 'n drefol gwynebau. 'i hefyd 'n ddrwg a 'n gynifer ISPs i mewn Gogledd Amerig, Yr ydy yn cwffio wardriving whilst overseas hymddangosa at bod a non - ddeillia.

    If anyone wants to assist in pronouncing that other than "it sounds like you're trying to talk after stuffing an entire jelly donut into your mouth," be my guest. :)

    1. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by dafydd · · Score: 3, Informative
      Hmm. Either a translation program, or a word-for-word translation by way of a dictionary, methinks. Let's see what a speaker might come up with:


      Broadband am ddim? Broadband diwifrau am ddim? Gellir rhoi hwn i ddefnydd da, yn arbennig yn ardaloedd trefol ddwys. Mae'n drueni fod cymaint of ISPs yng Ngogledd America yn ymladd yn erbyn y wardriving, tra nid yw'n broblem dramor.


      It's interesting that the previous translation used the word "rhydd" (used above in the imperative form "rhyddha") for "free", since it means "free as in speech", as opposed to "for no cost" ("am ddim" - lit, "for nothing"). Yet another language that makes the distinction; pity there isn't a simple way around the ambiguity that exists in English.
    2. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by cscx · · Score: 2

      It's interesting that the previous translation used the word "rhydd" (used above in the imperative form "rhyddha") for "free", since it means "free as in speech", as opposed to "for no cost" ("am ddim" - lit, "for nothing").

      Oh, I used the GNU/Welsh translator! I hope that clears things up.

    3. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I couldn't read it. Welsh translators suck. There again, it could be in South Walian. Damn them for currupting the language! :)

      A Gog

    4. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by psamuels · · Score: 1

      Ignore this guy - what would someone named "dafydd" know about Celtic languages, anyway?

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    5. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by divec · · Score: 1
      It's interesting that the previous translation used the word "rhydd" for "free", since it means "free as in speech", as opposed to "for no cost" ("am ddim" - lit, "for nothing").

      Wel, efallai fyddai "broadband rhydd" yn iawn, achos chi'n gallu cysylltu gyda fe heb cytundeb - yn union fel mae rhaglenni GPL yn rhydd ac am ddim hefyd. Wrth gwrs, dylai dysgwyr fel fi ddim ceisio pregeth am ramadeg achos fydden ni'n anghywir, mae'n debyg.


      Synnwn i ddim os chi'n gallu dyfalu does dim pwnc go iawn gyda fi i wneud. Ond dwi'n methu gwrthwynebu cyfle fel hwn i siarad (wel oce teipio).


      Gyda llaw, ydy'r postiwr yn siarad sbwriel am y rhaglen cyfieithu, neu ydy hi'n bodoli'n wir?

      --

      perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    6. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by neur0maniak · · Score: 1

      Where did you get such a translator?

    7. Re:Let's try that in Welsh by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2

      Y Ddraig Goch ddyry gychwyn

  19. The whales? Really? by PotatoPhysics · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't even get DSL out here in the boonies but the Orcas are all runnin 802.11 on the World Whale Web.

    1. Re:The whales? Really? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
      Thats pretty much what I thought ... at first I was imagining whales with WAP's strapped to their backs, providing wireless internet access to scurvy sea sailors and pirates ... "Arrrrrr me webcamnow.com went out!! I guess its back to man-love for me...DAMN YOU WHALES!!! *gives promethian gesture*"

      Then I had the more sober thought that this was probably some kind of research project so they could know the temperature of a whales rectum 24/7 ...

      Then I realized we were talking about Wales and not whales and I could care less about this story :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:The whales? Really? by 5alligator · · Score: 1

      whales are *already* wireless

  20. Wireless Whales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story of fat chicks in spandex and their cell phones.

  21. finally! by Noodlenose · · Score: 4, Funny
    This can only mean one thing:

    Wales will be the proud location of the first portable web-server on a sheep. You could even design a sheep cam and check were your flock is heading or which bastard is shagging your herd!

    cool!

    1. Re:finally! by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      Oops, someone said sheep cam... http://www.sheepcam.com/. A cluster of sheep servers... thats a funny thought. Or even p2p sheep file servers. Could be good news for all us budding mp3 farmers ;)

  22. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see this is why people think Americans are insular and ignorant. Maybe we should limit news to things that effect you personally - then you wouldn't have to read all this unnecessary rubbish.

  23. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know much about UK before today. Looks like United Kingdom is the name of the country, their largest island is called "Great Britain", in turn Great Britain comprises the realms of England and Scotland, and the principality of Wales. So Wales is a chunk of land roughly 100 miles x 60 miles with people and stuff.

    cheap map and more info here

  24. Oh dear, those poor 3G companies... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    They really are doomed with a capital 3.

    BTW, if you work for a 3G venture, i'll go with the first network that gives me an IP address. I'll roll my own content, thanks.

    1. Re:Oh dear, those poor 3G companies... by chill · · Score: 2

      AllTel is rolling this out starting in November. Tampa, FL will be their first market. Target date for turn on is Nov. 1.

      They don't want to screw with things, just an IP address via 3G1X. I believe it will be 64-128 Kbps, but would have to double-check.

      They eventually plan to move it to all their coverage areas.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  25. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Malorian · · Score: 1
    Surely, that can't be sarcasm, can it? 'Cause if not you're going to have very low scoring games and tired players;)

    Some info: Wales is 8000 square miles, 160 miles long by 60 miles wide. If you want any more info go to: Wales Statistics

  26. Wireless Wales....? by seamustheshark · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem they have in Wales (and indeed, most of the UK outside the 'big' cities) is that the major Telecoms provider, British Telecom, who basically own all the local telephone exchanges, will not upgrade them for broadband until there is a certain "target level of demand" (i.e. until it will pay them hansomely to do so).

    Of course, the rub is, for rural exchanges (like where *I* live) they won't tell you what the target is.....

    Therefore, they can alter the 'majic' target at will, so that rural communities will almost certainly never get wired-broadband, hence the move to wireless networks - not only in Wales, but elsewhere in the UK, as it is seen as the only economic way to get better than a POTS dial-up (and don't even ask me about Satellite access in rural UK - uk£1,200 setup and uk£99/month? No thanks!!!)

    --
    -- Seamus
    1. Re:Wireless Wales....? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Informative

      The targets are well known. BT even publish information about how well your local exchange is doing.

      See http://www.adslguide.org.uk/availability/btprereg. asp?order=reg
      for the current 'league table'.

  27. P. Rickard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....you know, the only way you can have a url in your message/sig and have it not show the trailing is if you are a moderator. (update...now the sig is missing?...hmmmmm)

    Mr. Ricard (user #16563) is actually one of the locals....and that mail is clearly a flame/troll...anti-ms at it's best, I'd say, since the sig below is the message and the message above is superfluous.

  28. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative
    Close... Actually, England and Scotland are seperate countries. Scotland has a completely different legal and school system, susbstantially different financial system, although it shares the same money, and has a more-or-less seperate government. Wales has a degree of governmental independence (not quite so much as Scotland, but nearly so), and is considered a seperate country. These make up Great Britain.

    Then you add in Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and all the Channel Islands, and you've got the United Kingdom.

    Please don't mention Sealand or Rockall, they're just a pain in the arse.

  29. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Moridineas · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Close... Actually, England and Scotland are seperate countries.

    Odd...Neither the CIA Country Factbook nor the UN Stat. Division lists Scotland as a country.

  30. I'm so excited now! by henkieboy · · Score: 1

    People could soon be sending e-mail from the hillsides, roadsides and rooftops of the south Wales valleys

    People in Europe can send e-mail ( and even receive, yeah! ) from any hillside, roadside or rooftop they want using the GSM/GPRS network, there must be something more interesting that you can do what public Wi-Fi networks?

    1. Re:I'm so excited now! by windi · · Score: 1

      People in Europe can send e-mail ( and even receive, yeah! ) from any hillside, roadside or rooftop they want using the GSM/GPRS network, there must be something more interesting that you can do what public Wi-Fi networks?

      Well, yes, but GPRS isn't exactly cheap, so sending and receiving big e-mails can become quite expensive.
      And using the cellphone provides e-mail, yes, that's possible, but if you're stuck with T-Mobile D like me, you have to pay for the mails you receive.
      So yes, it's possible, but if you use it often, it'll cost you a lot of money

    2. Re:I'm so excited now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speed. WiFi ranges from 2 Mbps to 10 Mbps. GSM/GPRS isn't 1/10th that speed.

  31. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1, Redundant

    No they're not separate countries (much though the scottish would like it to be so) they're separate provinces. Scotland has its own parliament, but shares many of the laws with the rest of the island (basically they get UK law until they decide to override it, although they have no power to override certain laws such as military stuff).

    Wales is completely dependent on the mainland. Its 'Assembly' is just a talking shop with no real power.

    The separate provinces make up the single country of the UK, or 'Britain'.

  32. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    Well what do you expect? The CIA couldn't find their own arses with a labelled diagram. Stupid Americans.

  33. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    Nope, sorry. The legal system is completely seperate. It just happens that many laws are parallel to English law, and the UK parliament has a certain amount of say in Scottish law.

  34. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odd...Neither the CIA Country Factbook [cia.gov] nor the UN Stat. Division [un.org] lists Scotland as a country.

    Well Scotland does have the right to leave the UK - England doesn't as it was the scots who formed it. Surely that makes it pretty close to a country? Wales doesn't have this option as we were invaded by the English and treated as 2nd class citizens, punished for using our language, and generally made to feel inferior until very recently. I for one reckon we should cut off the water supply (from Wales) to the English midlands.

  35. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Shade,+The · · Score: 2

    Exactly, and even if they did have the same legal system, would that make them any less different countries? England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are part of the UK, but definitely separate countries.

  36. Re:Wales? c'mon. by plumby · · Score: 2


    Actually, as the full title is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are part of Great Britain, not just the UK. You're also missing a few, such as Gibraltar and Bermuda.
    </pedandry>

  37. There is one catch... by Kirruth · · Score: 1
    (From the BBC article) Broadband advocates and activists frustrated by the slow roll-out of wired options are looking to wi-fi to plug the gap, even though 802.11b suffers from reduced reliability in heavy rain.

    This might make things tricky. As they say in Wales, "If you can't see the hills, it's raining. And if you can see the hills...it's about to rain."

    --
    "Well, put a stake in my heart and drag me into sunlight."
    1. Re:There is one catch... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      My understanding from the people who have actually tried it is that the attenuation to the signal is pretty minor- it's about the same as you get with satellite TV in fact- the frequency is pretty close anyway (as far as that goes.) Even in torrential downpours you still get connectivity, maybe some reduction in rate.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:There is one catch... by mikeb · · Score: 2

      Eh? 802.11b close in frequency to satellite TV? Not in Wales it isn't. The satellite (DBS) channels used are in the Ku band (10-18Ghz) while 802.11b is on 2.4 GHz ISM band. Not even close, really.

      A pedant speaks! I think.

    3. Re:There is one catch... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and there's people that will argue that 2.450000 Ghz is a completely different frequency to 2.450001 Ghz. Well, it's different... completely different? It has similar transmission properties. But that's not the point, the frequency isn't that different from its absorption characteristics. We're talking about comparing absorption; the absorption from rain isn't that bad for WiFi; and if anything the absorption is worse at 10-18 ghz than 2.45 ghz.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:There is one catch... by neur0maniak · · Score: 1

      I dunno what you're on, my satelite transmission is remarkably clear, and the satelite dish is also slighlty misaligned.

    5. Re:There is one catch... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  38. Re:Wales? c'mon. by inetuid · · Score: 1

    Yawn. You can't really think anyone is interested in the actual statistics about Wales when the made up ones are funny can you?

  39. Cwl! by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they proceed Caerphilly they could lead the world, unless someone Welshes on the deal. Can you install a new Cardiff your PC doesn't have the Newport you need for the service? When you speak Welsh over VOIP is it clear, or just Mumbles?

  40. Oh no ! by Salsaman · · Score: 1
    How the hell did you find out about my wireless whales...oh I see, you were talking about Wales the country...

    Errr nothing, never mind, just carry on, nothing to see here :-)

  41. Re:Wales? c'mon. by balloonhead · · Score: 1
    They are separate countries, but they are effectively ruled by one government, and in total all the different {countries¦provinces} make up the UK.


    To the other poster who said they were separate provinces but the same country, I have no idea which is more correct - I don't know if there's a legal or official definition of a country but I imagine it's more a historical thing.


    In Scotland (where I am from) we have our own monarchy (which sort of bit the dust), our own parliament (a horrible, puppet organisation of scrounging bastards who use therir position to get perks and free lunches but have little real power), a border (as far as I'm concerned the most important thing to define a country!), and although we have similar money, it's not exactly the same. Pound notes are still legal tender here although they have long since stopped being used in England.


    I think to be honest the individual provinces' definitions are a metter of opinion, unless someone knows better...


    I wouldn't think the CIA or the UN stat division would bother separating them for their purposes anyway, so I don't think that helps.


    We do have our own football team though. They are the worst in the world.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  42. Don't you know this ? by Krapangor · · Score: 1

    Some people even say that he is the Princess of Wales (usual case of double life) and all this stuff with the tunnel in Paris was just because he wanted to have more time for incorperating kernel patches. Wasn't this "accident" even around time Alan Cox wanted to take over kernel maintaining from Linus ? And that's also the reason why this tunnel-picture which surfaced on the web won't be printed in any newspaper. It's said that he had forgotten this time to take his fake beard off.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  43. Re:i guess this means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are not the real Buttfucker2000.

  44. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repeat after me. The Welsh are not a race. The Welsh are not a race.


    Cutting off the water supply to the Midlands would have one effect. Even more unemployment in Wales.

  45. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They are not separate countries, since the only entity recognized under international law is the passport-issuing entity, in this case "The United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland".


    This is what is on a British person's passport whether they are born in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland or Wales, and this is what defines a country for all legal purposes.

  46. What about NORTH wales? by neur0maniak · · Score: 1

    It's all well and good about south wales, but what about the north? Have people completely forgotten about us, or sommat?

    1. Re:What about NORTH wales? by Alan+Cox · · Score: 2

      The south wales one was done by people getting off their backsides and doing stuff. I'm sure the same can be done in the North.

    2. Re:What about NORTH wales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People already have "got off their backside"
      e-fro.

      Even with wireless you still need a few broadband upstream connections and that's harder to find in North Wales not to mention more expensive.

  47. Re:Wales? c'mon. by neur0maniak · · Score: 1

    Why is it that so many ignorant fools, seem to preach without learning? Admittedly the welsh assembly is nothing more than prattling politicians, and what they discuss there gets carried to london, they ARE actual countries. The Act of Union (1536), made Wales part of the early UK, but it retained it's own country identity.

  48. Wireless whales? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

    When I first read the title I thought it said Wireless Whales. I thought all whales were wireless. I've never seen one swimming around the ocean while tethered to the nearest continent with fiber optic cable...

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  49. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, England and Scotland are seperate countries. [...] Then you add in Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and all the Channel Islands, and you've got the United Kingdom.

    Idiot. It cannot be called United Kingdom if England and Scotland are separate countries.

  50. From the cwms too by Kwantus · · Score: 1

    Couldn't resist. (Although cwms, IIRC, aren't exactly nice to radio.)

  51. pointless by thomas+adams · · Score: 1

    pray tell, who the hell got wi-fi out there?

    i expect burnings of wireless transitters as english cultural intrusion by welsh nationalists.
    it'll be like burning man crossed with the wicker man

  52. eurotrash socialists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what the eurotrash commies get for their socialist policies!

  53. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

    See thats why I also included the UN, becuase I knew some Euro would say something along these lines (ie, "stupid americans") ... what about your beloved infallible UN? The UN lists other areas such as American Samoa, Macao, and the Gaza strip. Why no Scotland?

  54. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

    The UN lists other areas such as American Samoa, Macao, and the Gaza strip. Why no Scotland? I really am curious what the difference is?

  55. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Wateshay · · Score: 2

    That's not really true. A province is just an administrative demarkation, for purposes of delegating the buerocracy. A country is a sovereign, or semi-sovereign state. If Scotland and Wales have sovereign rights (i.e. they have rights which Parliament in London can't override), then they are for all intents and purposes countries, albeit countries which have banded together to form a greater whole (which is also a country) for their own common good. I don't personally know the details of the UK's situation, though, so I may be wrong. I can guarantee, though, that our states aren't provinces, and it sounds like the UK's are pretty similar.

    --

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

  56. Re:Wales? c'mon. by Ataru · · Score: 0

    That's not correct. The full title is "The United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and Dependent Territories". The Isle of Wight, the Scilly Isles, Anglesey, the Hebrides, the Orkney Isles, and the Shetland Islands are part of the British Isles, and also part of Great Britain, and therefore part of the United Kingdom.
    The Isle of Man is part of the British Isles, but not part of the UK, it is a "Dependency of the Crown".
    The Channel Islands are not technically part of the archipelago that forms the British Isles, they are closer to France than they are to England, but they are also dependencies.
    The other dependencies (which are not part of the British Isles) are:
    Anguilla, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands, St Helena and Dependencies (Ascension, Tristan da Cunha), South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands.
    ^^^ I nicked that lot from a web site because I couldn't remember all of them, OK?

  57. Wireless wales by Bearcat21 · · Score: 1

    Finnally! Now all those poor fishes without internet acess will have somthing to do!

    --
    Bearcat....grr!!!
  58. The Colorado Connection by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    A couple of months ago I was visiting a client in Old Colorado City (a suburb of Colorado Springs) and he mentioned his next-door neighbor, a wireless ISP named Old Colorado City Communications ISP, was providing technical assistance in this project. Old Colorado City Communications is owned by Dave Hughes, who was a columnist for BoardWatch magazine back in the early 90's.

    Dave gave my client a nice color brochure talking about the wireless initiative, printed in both English and Welsh.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
    1. Re:The Colorado Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's of Welsh descent, and is helping Welsh projects with wireless.

  59. It's compensation for having a language that... by rs79 · · Score: 1

    ...sounds like Klingon.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  60. Re:Wales? c'mon. by plumby · · Score: 2
    The United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and Dependent Territories

    And which website was that from, then? Try something like the United Nations, or the CIA World factbook.. The name comes from the Act Of Union in 1801, when it was titled the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland". After partition, the name was changed to reflect the change to "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".

    Being part of the British Isles is irrelevant, as Eire is also part of the British Isles and no longer forms any part of Great Britain or the UK. The other dependancies that you mention are part of Great Britain (the names - British Indian Ocean Territory, etc) often give a suble clue to this. You seem to be mixing geographical (British Isles) with political (Great Britain). The latter includes all of the dependent territories that you mentioned.

    For instance Bermuda.
    "Bermuda is one of the fourteen (14) Overseas Territories of Britain." It's part of Britain, not just the UK.

  61. Re:Wales? c'mon. by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

    I know being part of the British Isles is not the same as being part of the UK(...), that's why I wrote what I did.
    The other dependencies are NOT part of Great Britain or Northern Ireland, they are dependent territories. Look it up. The word "of" in the sentence you quoted means "which are associated with", not "which are part of".