Slashdot Mirror


When to Buy Technology Goods?

inblosam asks: "I am about to make 'the switch', but the thought came to me that there may be a strategic time of year to purchase technology goods. Of course once you buy something it is nearly outdated already, but there must be some marketing cycle for lowering prices and releasing new toys. Anyone seen any patterns that may help? I do have one hypothesis: Companies push their products that have been on the market for 10-11 months during the holiday season (December), then afterwards drop the prices some and bump up the product with a new feature or size, etc. I believe this was the case for the iPod ($500 down to $300 ?), and even the Handspring Visor Edge was $300 when I bought it (November?) and then $169 three months later."

24 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. 18 month product cycle by oaklybonn · · Score: 4, Informative

    One thing to remember is that Apple tends to revamp a product category (consumer desktop/loptop, pro desktop/laptop) approx. every 18 months. This is by design. There are incremental upgrades during this time (larger iMac screen).

    Gee, did I get a first post?

  2. Wait until after Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    During the Christmas season, prices go up because retailers know people will pay.

    Go to Mac fan sites and find out when all the Mac shows are (obviously that's when the new stuff comes out).

    Sometimes new stuff comes out before Christmas for the first reason I listed. Photokina (the big camera show) starts next week I think. The new models announced will probably arrive on store shelves at the end of October (can't wait for a Canon G3 :).

  3. MacWorld by TellarHK · · Score: 5, Informative

    When you're looking at Apple purchases, try and keep the MacWorld schedules in mind. Usually MacWorld NY offers the 'big' updates and price shifts, but the other MacWorld events do too. It's a good idea to buy right after one, because prices aren't likely to change for a while.

    1. Re:MacWorld by guttentag · · Score: 5, Interesting
      When you're looking at Apple purchases, try and keep the MacWorld schedules in mind.
      This used to be the standard, but Apple seems to be getting away from the "wow them at MacWorld/Apple Expo" model. Hardly anything new is is introduced there by Apple these last few shows...
      1. The Apple Expo in Paris was held this week, but there was really nothing new there (in the past, Apple had used it as a supplemental stage to introduce new hardware in the fall between MacWorld NY and MacWorld SF -- and MacWorld Tokyo in the spring).
      2. This summer's MacWorld NY introduced... what? Jaguar? Nope, it wasn't even ready until a month later, we knew it was coming before MacWorld began.
      3. This last spring's MacWorld Tokyo gave us... (drumroll, please) a different size Apple LCD monitor? Woo-hoo...
      4. When did Apple intro the all-dual-processor tower lineup? In between New York and Paris.
      The updates come in between when Apple's ready to release them, which is really the way it should work.

      Maybe this is just the strategy for navigating the stormy economy and we'll see Apple re-adhere to the old schedule at some point. But for now, don't pin any bets on MacWorld... it's more for the third parties than Apple these days. The latest crop of TiBooks was also introduced between shows.

      I know a lot of people are talking about the mythical G5 ("It's going to be released at MacWorld SF in January"), but it's the same speculation before every show year after year. Don't believe any of it unless you happen to know that Motorola has finally gotten its rear in gear.

  4. Dont' be an early adopter by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 4, Informative

    For Apple products its always best to get wait for revision after a major product overhaul.
    Early adopters get burned. Outside of the obviously faster chips, graphics cards, etc, which just goes with the territory of buying computers, with Apple you get the industrial design quirks that haven't been worked out properly.
    In the original Titanium Powerbook the battery comes out if you twist the wrong way and the DVD drive can grind if the thing is at an angle at all.
    If you are going to "switch," always take the second or third product revision from Apple. You end up better in the long run.

  5. my general rule is by sstory · · Score: 5, Interesting

    my general rule is to buy tech at least 1 or 2 yrs after it hits the market. Since I'm a student, I don't have money for cutting-edge, but I get last-year's cutting edge for half price, the initial bugs have been worked out (somewhat), and I can avoid what's been massively rejected. It depends on a) how fast the turnover is for the particular tech B) how much disposable income you have c) intangible factors like status and style, and how important that is to you.

  6. The obvious - linewidth. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Informative

    For microprocessors and motherboards, prices are tied to the linewidth cycle.

    A couple of months after a new linewidth becomes available, you get a few marginally higher-speed samples at a huge price.

    Over the next six months, speed ramps up by a factor of 2 and prices drop on the older stuff. During this time any new chipsets introduced for the new hardware mature.

    6 months after a linewidth switch, buy from the low end of the new speed grade range. You'll get a good price, and won't be obsolete for a year or more (as opposed to the usual 6 months).

    There should be similar cycles for RAM (twice as fast, since they step lithography in cycles twice as fine), but in practice this isn't the case. Because margins are so thin, you get the occasional upset that drastically affects price (sometimes with help - the warehouse fire that quadrupled RAM prices a few years back only affected 3% of production capacity, according to rumour).

    Processors are driven by linewidth, and motherboards are driven by processors, but most other things are market driven and so not as easy to predict. Other posters seem to have a better handle on this than I do :).

    1. Re:The obvious - linewidth. by Mr+Z · · Score: 3, Informative

      Linewidth is essentially that "0.13 micron" number and similar that semiconductor manufacturers quote when they're quoting the process node that their device is manufactured on. It's a size gauge used to advertise how advanced the process is. Smaller is better.

      Semi mfgrs usually quote "L_effective", which is the "effective gate length of the smallest transistor". This is usually a bit smaller than "L_drawn" (the drawn gate length), and smaller than the line width. This page (down near the bottom) offers this blurb from a Motorola engineer:

      In the case of line widths there may however be some legitimacy to the different numbers they feed you. Each company uses a different definition for this parameter, and within the same Company they may bounce between definitions to suit their purposes. One definition is the drawn width of the minimum poly-silicon feature. Another definition is called Leff ('L' effective), the minimum length of the electrically isolated region under the CMOS transistor. The value in this second definition is modulated by the drawn width from the first definition. It, however, is also modulated by diffusion of ions implanted into the silicon substrate which often makes it 15% to 40% smaller then the drawn width. This definition is also highly dependent on the algorithm and the equipment used to calculate the Leff parameter.

      There is yet a third definition also commonly used for line-widths which is very similar to the first definition. This definition gives the average minimum width of the actual poly-silicon where it forms the gate of a transistor. Due to the polymerization of the masking resist during the poly-silicon etch and the magnitude of the exposure during the photo step, this value can be 10% greater or less than the drawn width.
      --Joe
    2. Re:The obvious - linewidth. by jafuser · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree. It seems like games don't quite keep up with the CPU's these days, and I doubt they will, especially now that most of the work has been offloaded to the 3d accelerators. See this graph as an example.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  7. Always a problem.. by sakusha · · Score: 4, Funny

    This reminds me of my old manager when I did computer sales, he was an old used car salesman and he would always say "it's ALWAYS a good time to buy a computer."
    But he was full of crap. A good example was my PowerMac 8100/110. It $4500 (even at edu discount), it took 60 days to deliver the machine due to delays caused by some idiotic porny easter egg they found in the OS CDs and they had to master new CDs for ALL their stock. 2 weeks after delivery, they dropped the price $300. Mere weeks later, the machine was discontinued and replaced by far cheaper, faster models.
    Another good example is my Powerbook G3/500, purchased 30 days before the G4/500 was released at the same price. But that one I don't regret, because I paid for the machine with the 30 days of work for one specific job.
    So what you could do is just ask ME, and whenever I buy, that's the WRONG time to buy. FYI, I just bought a new dual-1Ghz machine.

    1. Re:Always a problem.. by sydlexic · · Score: 5, Funny

      FYI, I just bought a new dual-1Ghz machine.

      sh*t, so did I. I'm screwed.

  8. From what i've seen from my supplyer.. 3-4 months by josquint · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I deal in the retail computer/technology world, mainly compaq, epson, HP, and Envision(AOC) monitors.

    Never fails, pretty much every 3 months compaq replaces their desktop line, and 3-4 months their laptop line(presarios and evos alike I believe... I work with both). Stocking them gets to be a bitch in a small market like ours... we order frequent small orders so not to get stuck with old models. So, if we hit it wrong, we're without computers for a week, because the old stock runs out, but the new stuff's still backordered.

    Never fails, EVERY back-to-school season we run waaay short, especially on laptops(so figure your cycle starting end of august).

    Epson and HP's printers keep a little more lifespan, usually 4-6 months, whenever the decide we need more faux-resolution increase, or a new type of ink/cartridge.

    Monitors... a year or better product cycle, at least for CRTs anyway... havent changed much beside the (case) color in a while either.

    I usually buy RIGHT at the end of product life.. get nice and cheap then.. but i hate it because the next product I see a week later is always sooo much cooler :)

  9. now by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is an answer to your specific question, but not to the more general one: now is a good time to buy a mac. The reason is that the long-awaited MacOS X 10.2 (Jaguar) has just come out, and the next big (non-free) release is probably a long way off. (If you're like me and bought an earlier version of MacOS X for $130, then 10.2 is another $130.)

    Getting at your more general question, the answer is also now. You're always guaranteed that if you wait it will be faster and cheaper. So what? Then you don't get the use of the machine until a long time from now.

  10. Buy when... by Gefiltefish · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Buy an electronics product when you need it, or when it would make a substantial improvement in your quality of life.

    Yes, prices usually drop somewhat after the winter holidays, but prices on most of today's consumer electronics will continue to go lower and lower as eqipment bought a few months ago becomes obselete because of the latest "advance." The solution: wait until you need something and buy it then. If you become obsessed with getting the best price on something and timing the market, you'll either never buy or drive yourself crazy.

  11. WTF are you talking about? by io333 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any self-respecting geek knows full well that whatever tech product you end up buying, no matter how well researched, no matter how "latest and greatest," will be instantaneously transformed into the lamest piece of outdated old fashioned stone knife and bearskin technology that even your grandfather wouldn't be caught dead using -- the *moment* you pay for it.

    1. Re:WTF are you talking about? by Digital+Believer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree--I'm reluctantly beginning to agree with the crowd that says "MHz don't matter for most of us." I used to think they were idiots--more power was always better. I bought a Dell Precision 420 dual-capable PIII-733 in September 2000 with Win2K and 256MB of RDRAM. I've since added the second processor, 512MB more RDRAM, and assorted minor toys. I'm still using a beautiful 19" Mitsubishi 900u monitor I bought in 1999. In twenty years, I've never before had a two-year old machine with so much life in it. I barely even drool over a dual-2.8GHz Xeon, even though it would almost triple the clock speed. Compare that to past two year upgrades:

      1995: Pentium 120
      1997: Pentium II 300
      2000: Pentium III 733

      I'm still throwing huge computing projects at this machine (complex maximum-likelihood statistical models with 100,000+ records), and nothing can choke up the combination of dual processors and plenty of RAM. This in spite of the fact that I had grave doubts about the Intel 840 platform and RDRAM given the public criticism at the time.

      The bottom line: buy the best machine you can now, and you may be happy to keep it a very long time.

      --
      We can reduce ideas to bits and people to genes, but "can" does not imply "should".
  12. A contrary opinion by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several people have written and said that you should buy systems 1-2 years after they're first released to maximize reliability.

    I've bought lots of Macs over the past 20 years, and since '95 or so I've seen a pattern develop. Here's my theory: buy the most expensive brand-new system you can afford at the instant you're ready to buy.

    My first Mac laptop-- a PowerBook 160-- cost me $3,000, and I used it every day for five years. It was my primary-- only!-- machine until I bought my iMac. I regret that purchase, but only a little bit. Both of my iMacs were great, reliable little machines, and I never had a complaint about either of them, but I often wished I had bought machines with more oomph.

    When the "speed holes" machines came out last month, I bought again. I found a friend who was willing to give me a few bucks for my iMac, and I plopped down $3,500 on a dual processor 1 GHz with a 17" studio display. It's fast, really fast, and it's got room to grow. I'll keep it for at least three years, I imagine.

    But I know, and I accept, that Apple will release faster and better machines eight months or a year from now. It won't be too long before my top-o-the-line machine looks a little pale by comparison to the newest machines shipping. But that's not the point. The point is to get the very best system you can when you're ready to buy, and then be happy with it for as long as it takes to justify the purchase in your mind.

    1. Re:A contrary opinion by Megane · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've got to agree with you. I got a "speed holes" Mac last month. My previous machines were a Pismo 500 laptop (bought at deep discount when they went EOL for the TiBook) and a six year old Power Tower Pro 225 which had received enough upgrades during its life that it now runs 10.2 and is about to replace one of my old Linux servers. The Pismo itself replaced a PB 145 that I had long ago stopped using because of the lack of built-in Ethernet.

      If you want a good deal at a low price, get an EOL machine just before a major (more than a speed bump) change. If you want a good deal at a high price, get a mid-range model a month or two after the same major upgrade.

      I was needing an upgrade really badly, and waited for the DDR because I wanted backside server bandwidth for leeching files around the house. Otherwise I would have waited another cycle to see if they would release G5 models. I'm suspecting that G5 would be a good reason why they wouldn't be able to boot MacOS 9.

      I wanted one in my hands right away, since I had just gotten the money. If I had waited another month, I'd be getting the free inDesign offer, but I don't really care about that.

      One thing to point out about Macs: unlike PCs, you can keep an old Mac running reasonably well for five or six years, if you choose the right model. My PowerTower Pro replaced a IIci, and they've both proven to be quite upgradeable. The only negative with my new speed holes Mac is that I'm stuck with the 166MHz FSB.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  13. My strategy by xee · · Score: 4, Informative

    I buy right after something big hits the market. I'd get a 2 GHz processor right after the 2.2s come out. A GeForce 3 right after the GF4 comes out. This gives you a good balance of near-cutting edge for a fair price. Your hardware stays up to date longer, and doesn't cost as much as the top of the line.

    --
    Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
  14. I've very sorry, inblosam by anotherone · · Score: 5, Funny
    Inblosam, I really hate to have to be the one to tell you this.

    But, since you asked...

    The entire technology industry monitors your activities. As soon as you purchase a product, we lower the price. Dramatically.

    Again, I'm very sorry.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  15. After working in a computer store... by shepd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I feel knowledgeable enough to say:

    Last month.

    No, I'm not being fecicious here, but I have seen, and experienced the best prices in July/August. Memory is cheap, and parts are cheap.

    My guess is because people and companies just aren't buying much during the summer.

    Whatever you do, avoid buying near Christmas. Even if you get a good deal, the extra strain on a dealer to work through Christmas will lower the quality of service, and possibly quality of parts you get.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  16. It depends by tmark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The question just cannot be answered. There is no single 'BEST' time to buy technology, no matter how quickly price drops off with time.

    Instead, when you 'should' buy a technology depends on the tradeoff between how badly you 'need' that technology and how badly you need to save money. For some people, waiting 1 week or even 1 day for the end of the next MacExpo might be too long to wait to buy the latest/greatest Mac.

    Do you HAVE to have the fastest computer out there because you're doing rendering or financial modelling or something really CPU intensive ? If your time is worth enough $, then maybe the time to buy the latest/fastest/greatest AMD/Intel chip or whatever is now. If, on the other hand, you're a hobbyist, then maybe you can make do with a slower CPU or the penultimate video card instead of the ultimate until prices drop.

  17. My Advice by dasunt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Check the product pricing curve. For example, look at CPU's. We all woo at the higher-ghz offerings from AMD and Intel. However, those CPUs tend to have the worst price/performance ration. For example (looking at http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.html?i=169 7&p=2), the Athlon XP 2200+ is $147. The XP 2100+ (only 66 mhz slower) is $117. The XP 2000+ (133 mhz slower then the 2200+) is only $92. Comparing the 2000+ (1.67Ghz) to the 2200+ (1.8Ghz), you are paying 60% more money for an 8% increase in speed. Wouldn't that extra $55 be a lot better if spent on memory or a faster HDD?

    A lot of hardware tends to be priced this way. You pay a premium for 'cutting edge'. You are paying more to be the first guinea pig to test their product. In a working environment, do you really want to do this?

    Speaking of which, know what you are buying. Don't buy junk, it will come back to bite you. Buy from quality manufacturers who have a history of supporting their products. For windows machines, go with companies that release stable drivers. Also, try to figure out where you need the speed. Do you need fast HDD access? Maybe a Gigabit network. Or is it raw computing power? Read the reviews of the hardware, and check usenet to see if anyone has had any problems.

    In short, do your homework, buy quality, and avoid the high-priced bleeding edge hardware.

    Just my $.02

  18. My take on MBD/Processors by RallyNick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tend to buy the latest neatest motherboard available and the cheapest processor it supports. Then a year or two later I'll buy the fastest processor supported by the same MBD and maybe some more memory. This way I get a system that's reasonably fast all the time and upgrades are much more affordable (never get to buy $300 CPUs).