Slashdot Mirror


A Printshop Equivalent for Unix?

mcorliss asks: "I'm trying to convince my wife to switch from Windows to Linux. However, one program she loves is Broderbund's PrintShop, which I haven't found a Linux equivalent of yet. Does anyone know of such a product, preferably one that's free and fairly easy to use?" For banner creation, there's Gozer and AAType, but they aren't the easiest of things to use. Unless you consider The GIMP, software for designing greeting cards (another PrintShop specialty) seems to not have appeared for Unix. So is there an all-around equivalent for PrintShop for Unix users? If not, can you get close to that same functionality using a specific set of Open Source software? If it turns out neither of the first two questions produce encouraging answers, would anyone be interested in starting an Open Source project to fill this niche?

59 comments

  1. Same thing.. by Perdo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My Aunt is a bigtime print shop poweruser. She gets updates in the mail. They send her reams and reams of disks. I swear she can do things with it that can't be done in Photoshop...

    The sad part is, she has actually shown a strong intrest in Linux.

    I tried to get Print shop running under wine but was stopped dead by what else, Linux's dismal printer support.

    You want to get mad, try loosing all your formatting in a program that essentially does nothing more than formatting.

    I think that is the key though. Print shop does little but formatting, with some stock pictures, formatting templates and a heavy dose of ease of use thrown in.

    Keep that in mind if you think of something that might work. Whatever replaces print shop, must replace print shop, not quark.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Same thing.. by Khopesh · · Score: 2

      one way around printing in windows apps on linux
      is to use Adobe Acrobat (writer) to
      "Print to PDF" in wine. then open up
      acroread or ghostview and print.

      this is all in theory, and adobe acrobat does cost money...

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    2. Re:Same thing.. by forsetti · · Score: 1

      Or, print to PS and use a ps2pdf converter.... then it is free!

      --
      10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
    3. Re:Same thing.. by BusterB · · Score: 2

      I've used the old print-to-file using the Applewriter 600 windows drivers with great success. The output that you get is postscript, which you can print just fine. If you want a PDF, use ps2pdf.

    4. Re:Same thing.. by reverius · · Score: 1

      Why convert to PDF, then open and print the PDF, when you could just print to PS, and then use "gv" to view and print the PS file? No conversion necessary.

  2. Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm trying to convince my wife to switch from Windows to Linux.

    Care to elaborate why ?

    1. Re:Um, why ? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Maybe he likes Linux more than Windows?
      Maybe they only have one computer.
      Why not?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Um, why ? by mcorliss · · Score: 1

      Certainly, first when she has a problem with her machine I have a much better chance of fixing it with Linux than Windows. Secondly, I want to use her machine as well as my own, and let's just say I'm not a Windows enthusiast. Third, using Gnome and Nautilus (although it's slow) gives a user-friendly desktop which in many ways resembles the Windows interface. Fourth, open office, abiword, and gnumeric are all good replacements of microsoft office.

      Really, the only problem I see with her using Linux is that there are a few applications which Linux doesn't have an equivalent of (or doesn't have a user-friendly equivalent of). I don't agree with some of the other posts, that maintain these aren't important applications for Linux. If Linux is ever going to become a mainstream OS then it's going to need to offer these applications (if you don't want them, then don't install them).

      So, I guess the bottom line of my rambling is, why shouldn't I try to convince my wife to switch from Windows to Linux?

    3. Re:Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Really, the only problem I see with her using Linux is that there are a few applications which Linux doesn't have an equivalent of ...
      That is a really, really BIG problem. Stick with Windows.
    4. Re:Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Maybe he likes Linux more than Windows?
      Bad reason to switch. Use the best tool for the job - Windows.
      • Maybe they only have one computer.
      So, put the operating system on that allows them the most functionality - Windows.
      • Why not?
      Because Linux won't be as useful for them as Windows will.

      Honestly people, it's not rocket science. This is a case where it is completely obvious that she should use Windows, as the software she is using is Windows-only!
    5. Re:Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      • Certainly, first when she has a problem with her machine I have a much better chance of fixing it with Linux than Windows.
      That's a very selfish reason. Perhaps you should learn to use Windows effectively for her benefit then.
      • Secondly, I want to use her machine as well as my own, and let's just say I'm not a Windows enthusiast.
      Another very selfish reason. If her computer runs Windows, and you want to use it, you should be considerate of her choice and just use it as she has it set up.
      • Third, using Gnome and Nautilus (although it's slow) gives a user-friendly desktop which in many ways resembles the Windows interface.
      But it is something she is not used to, and has no reason to change to. Let her use what she is comfortable with!
      • Fourth, open office, abiword, and gnumeric are all good replacements of microsoft office.
      But again, not what she is used to. And they are hardly 'good' replacements (consider how well Office integrates its components in comparison, for example.)
      • Really, the only problem I see with her using Linux is that there are a few applications which Linux doesn't have an equivalent of (or doesn't have a user-friendly equivalent of).
      Does that not strike you as an excellent reason for her to continue using Windows, quite apart from the most fundamental reason which is that she wants to?
      • I don't agree with some of the other posts, that maintain these aren't important applications for Linux. If Linux is ever going to become a mainstream OS then it's going to need to offer these applications (if you don't want them, then don't install them).
      Just a few hours ago there was a similar Ask Slashdot from a high school physics teacher asking how to get a Windows-only piece of software to run under Linux because he wanted to run Linux. Again, the most appropriate choice was Windows because it did what he wanted. The trouble with you Linux zealots is that your priorities get incredibly skewed so that Linux, not functionality and ease-of-use, becomes the most important. Please put things into perspective for the sake of your marriage!
      • So, I guess the bottom line of my rambling is, why shouldn't I try to convince my wife to switch from Windows to Linux?
      Because she doesn't want to, and your reasons for wanting her to do so are entirely selfish.
    6. Re:Um, why ? by mcorliss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well actually, she does a lot of other things. In fact, her two biggest applications are web browsing and office. For browsing she prefers mozilla to ie and for office she prefers open office to microsoft office (after a small adjustment period).

      Of course, you might ask why I don't just install these on windows. Well, mainly, because she has an old machine with a celeron processor, and both windows 98 and 2000 ran horribly on it. Her machine was crashing at least a couple of times a week. I have now installed Linux on it, and it runs beautifully. So, although she would like to get a replacement for this one application, overall she's happier with Linux than she was with Windows.

    7. Re:Um, why ? by mcorliss · · Score: 1

      I think the point you've been missing in all your posts is that Windows is a restrictive, slow, and unstable operating system. I will be the first to admit there are good reasons to use Windows. But those reasons aren't for me nor my wife (I hate to speak for her, but she's at work right now and doesn't have access to a computer). I posted to slashdot to see if anyone had an answer to my question (I found some good replies already) NOT to have someone tell me I should be using Windows. Don't you think I would have explored this option already. If you're looking for a debate on which is a better operating system Linux or Windows, then perhaps you should post your own question to "ask slashdot".

    8. Re:Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point you're missing is that in this case, Windows is the more appropriate operating system because this program you want to run has no Linux counterpart. I'm not a Windows zealot - indeed I use a variety of operating systems for the work I do, including Windows and Linux - it's just that in this case it's obvious that Windows is the better choice.

      In my experience, using the GUIs on Linux is much more slow and restrictive than using the one on Windows. And with NT4, Windows 2000 and XP I have never had any serious stability problems (that is, no more serious than Linux.)

    9. Re:Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is a restrictive,

      Yes.

      slow,

      Win2K is slower than a linux kernel, vterm, and a bash prompt. It's NOT slower than than a RedHat Gnome/KDE/Mozilla combination.

      and unstable operating system.

      I've never encountered stability problems with WinNT/2K/XP, and I've never even met anyone who has encountered stability problems with WinNT. Perhaps you're using Win95/98/ME? Those are totally and completely seperate operating systems, sharing no code or internal desing. It's a really amazing that the incredible engineers at Microsoft were able to make two totally unrelated operating systems run the same applications so well. I'm not kidding here, either.

      If you're looking for a debate on which is a better operating system Linux or Windows, then perhaps you should post your own question to "ask slashdot".

      You should try reading slashdot sometime. That's all we talk about here. If you don't want a mindless windows/linux bashing debate, even in the threads about electric robot lawn mowers, Wil Weaton, and the Great Pyramids of Egypt, then perhaps you should have picked "ask fark" or The Onion's "ask a wino clown" instead.

    10. Re:Um, why ? by mcorliss · · Score: 1

      The point you're missing is that I don't care at all about Windows. I asked a question about Linux/Unix. If there is no application for Linux then I'm fine with that, but save me your pointless and trite crusade for Windows. I just want to know if there is a solution for Linux.

    11. Re:Um, why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, welcome to Cmdr Taco's personal blog site, then. All we ever do here is bitch about Windows and Linux. Well, there is one exception:

      Perhaps you could find a PrintShop replacement that works on Mac OS X? Steve Jobs is an evil spawn of Cthulu, and printshop probably requires more than one mouse button, and Macs are hideously overpriced for what you get, and Printshop would have been a LOT easier to port to Be than to NeXT Step, and the Mac is the "gay" computer so married people can't use one. But, I just thought I would bring it up, so that you'd better understand what Cmdr Taco's personal blog site really is about.

      Actually, since I brought it up, I just thought that I would mention that Micheal is a jerk, and Jamie kills kittens when he looks at photos of Cowboy Neal while he masturbates. And Cmdr Taco is stoned all the time, and doesn't bother to read the site anymore. And a long time ago, this site was better, but all the nerds left, and it sucks now.

      Oh, and to make absolutely certain I cover everything that needs to be covered in a proper slashdot thread, I've posted a link to the source code for a Printshop replacement I wrote. I hope you like it!

    12. Re:Um, why ? by binford2k · · Score: 1

      and I've never even met anyone who has encountered stability problems with WinNT.

      Holy shit! You need to crawl out from under your rock and meet the real world.

    13. Re:Um, why ? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Well, now you've "met" me. The company I'm at at the moment has supplied me with a Dell desktop running NT wirh SP6al, and it blue-screens at least once every three days.

    14. Re:Um, why ? by BJH · · Score: 1

      It's a really amazing that the incredible engineers at Microsoft were able to make two totally unrelated operating systems run the same applications so well. I'm not kidding here, either.

      Me again... if you want to see amazing, look at the job that Apple did moving from m68k to PPC - an operating system that ran on two totally different architectures, but which let you use applications for either.
      Or NetBSD - the same kernel and userland ported to more than 30 different architectures.

      MS wasn't even able to keep to their original ideal of developing NT on Alpha, in order to remove any x86-isms.

  3. Well... by Arminius · · Score: 1

    She could always use a color FIGlet and output to a printer. ;-)

    --

    ------
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  4. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco-bashing was a bit harsh but loved the 'Trident driver' bit.

    1. Re:lol by SN74S181 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Isn't Trident 'deprecated' (aka- unsupported) in the modern XFree86? The S3 Trio64 certainly is.

      It's kinda one of those Microsoftian things, obsoleting hardware for convenience....

    2. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Trident 'deprecated' (aka- unsupported) in the modern XFree86? The S3 Trio64 certainly is.

      It's kinda one of those Microsoftian things, obsoleting hardware for convenience....

  5. whee by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    heh. i remember playing around with printshop 1 and 2 back on old apple II's back in 2nd and 3rd grade. fun stuff.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:whee by dmarcov · · Score: 1

      I completely rememeber PrintShop for the Apple ][. It was (for its time) an incredible bit of programming. It took your Okidata Microline dot-matrix printer (was there ever a quiet version of one of those?) and a ream of continus fold, tractor feed-able paper, and would make huge banners, computer with "fancy" computer graphics. I believe at that point the manual even suggested that you should then "color" in the lettering on the banner (for best appearance, of course).

      It also made greeting cards (provided you could handle the proper folding technique).

      I think that is what's missing nowadays. Not enough people making banners from their Okidata printers, with huge blocky graphics on them. It really was a neat idea once.

  6. Why Free? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PrintShop isn't free, but you use it. Why must a Linux program be free?

    This attitude explains why there are so few Linux versions of software.

  7. wine? by crazney · · Score: 0

    You could always try it in Wine [1] [2] [3]

    David

    --
    stuff
  8. Speech, not beer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True story.

  9. I've never used Printshop... by Dashslot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...so I don't know what it can do, but you could take a look at xwgui.

    This is an arrange the photos and print them out type of software, but it lets you do other things besides, and it has some assistents for specific tasks, that I presume you can add to.

    Unfortunately, it uses the XForms widget set, so it looks pretty ugly. Also I had to mess about with my fontpath to put my 75dpi before everything else in order to see some of the dialog boxes properly.

    I would love to see this app ported to qt or gtk, and a few other features added.

  10. Re:TEH FUTARE of SLASHDOT PISS FROST phirst poast by haplo21112 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Actually its Linus that Sucks as a developer, he handed him a big mess...its no surprise that Linus wanted out of 2.4 and on to 2.5 since beta was the only place he was gonna stableize the mess...

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  11. Unix is for serious computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unix is for serious computing. If you want to make your own greeting cards - Windows is the obvious choice.

  12. A good open source project by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Sound like a good project. The great thing about Linux is that if you want something you can write it yourself. You can do the same for windows but it is just not as much fun. If someone does this they could be a huge hit with the schools. Who knows maybe you could even sell it. Or at least sell the mannual.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:A good open source project by fUllstAr · · Score: 0

      lmao

      --
      THis is my signature bah: That's ridiculous, someone registered 'fullstar' so I had to choose 'fullstarplus'!!!
    2. Re:A good open source project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious! +1, Funny!

  13. A suggest by fUllstAr · · Score: 0

    Eh you, what a shame to ask her to change her favorite tool because Linux doesn't run it, eh. Why not trying to run it on Wine, if it runs, eh, cool! eh.

    --
    THis is my signature bah: That's ridiculous, someone registered 'fullstar' so I had to choose 'fullstarplus'!!!
  14. Linux vs Windows by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    ...the most appropriate choice was Windows...

    There's a certain argument that there's a long term benefit to using free software in terms of dollars and customizability.

    1. Re:Linux vs Windows by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      There's a certain argument that there's a long term benefit to using free software in terms of dollars and customizability.

      And freedom.

      That is a consideration, you know. Unless you want the industry to be owned by criminal corporations like MSFT. Using free - or at least, non-criminally produced - software is like buying stuff made in the USA by union workers instead of in China by prison laborers (on in the USA by prison laborers, for that matter); it may be more expensive in the short run, but in the long run you're buying the kind of world you want to live in.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  15. eh! A suggest! eh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not trying to run it on Wine, if it runs, eh, cool! eh.

    Because it's a program to print things and Linux sucks for printer support.

    Read some of the other comments above. They discuss this.

  16. Re:TEH FUTARE of SLASHDOT PISS FROST phirst poast by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Actually, I think there are minuses and pluses to Marcelo's work.

    It's not a lot of fun to be maintainer of a stable branch -- no glory, lots of bitching if anything breaks...and Marcelo is *young*, and could be doing other stuff.

    That said, he does release releases more slowly than Linus (which might be reasonable, given that people were complaining about Linus' lack of QA in the stable branch). I do wish that he would enforce fewer things going into -rc releases, though. There should be one or two -rc releases per version, and only bugfixes in an -rc.

    Also, he's had that one high-profile fuckup.

  17. Scribus? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    Have you looked at Scribus? I've never used it myself (having only recently decided to look at TeX/LaTeX for my own publishing needs), but it sure looks like it's aiming at the same target you want to hit.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  18. Why switch? by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm trying to convince my wife to switch from Windows to Linux. However, one program she loves is Broderbund's PrintShop, which I haven't found a Linux equivalent of yet

    One thing you need to ask yourself is why, if her Windows software does what she needs, do you want her to switch? Remember that what is the right solution for one person, such as yourself, may well not be right for someone else. Are you trying to convince her for an ideological reason of your own, to "convert" her? Because that just sounds like a recipe for strife, particularly since dual-booting is so easy these days.

    1. Re:Why switch? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
      One thing you need to ask yourself is why, if her Windows software does what she needs, do you want her to switch?

      Maybe he can't afford the endless upgrade path Windows leads a user on?

    2. Re:Why switch? by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 2

      ... or doens't want to submit to the onerous licensing that micro$oft included in the latest bug fixes.

      I find myself in the same situation: My wife uses Windows to
      1) Surf (including getting email via the web)
      B) Use Quatro Pro for budgets and stuff
      Third) Use Wordperfect for letters and other docs.
      There is no reason she couldn't do that stuff in openOffice on Linux, and we wouldn't have to give Micro$oft the right to inspect our hard drive and remove any files they think are suspicious.

      My biggest problem, though: my kid's games. They are in kindergarten and 1st grade, so they aren't quite ready for Doom yet (I don't think). I've looked around a little, and it seems that there are very few options for kids games outside of Windows (even for the Mac).

      So the kids will learn to duel-boot ;-)

      --


      -------------------------
      A person of moderate zeal
    3. Re:Why switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he can't afford the endless upgrade path Windows leads a user on?

      That's funny, I don't remember upgrading my Windows installation since 1999. Not planning on upgrading any time soon either. Guess what. All the latest software still works fine!

    4. Re:Why switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duel boot? Is that when Windows and Linux duke it out at high noon over who owns the partition table?

      Oh, dual boot. I getcha.

    5. Re:Why switch? by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 2

      yeah... I planned that. Pretty funny, huh?

      --


      -------------------------
      A person of moderate zeal
    6. Re:Why switch? by BJH · · Score: 1

      My 3-year-old son loves Frozen Bubble, although he's not particularly good at it yet.

  19. Can you spare $300? by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Informative
    VMWare costs $300, half that if you're a student. You can set it up so that whenever she launches VMWare, it automatically launches PrintShop. That way, she can use Linux for everything but PrintShop.

    The question is, is that worth $300 to you?

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Can you spare $300? by madstork2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recommend Netraverse win4lin for this type of application. It is about one third the cost (~$100 bucks.) I'm a web developer and I use it to test sites in several versions of IE, but it will run just about any software. see http://netraverse.com I am in no way affiliated with the company (other than being a happy customer)

  20. Off Topic, moderators ignore pls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice sig!

  21. the BIGGER problem... by Eneff · · Score: 1

    Even if it's libre (or even gratis!) people buy print shop for the clip art. The functionality is pretty simple, I'm sure any QT or GTK app developer could hack something together in a month. However, it'd be useless without spending the 30 dollars on clip art.

    Mind you, were I to do it, I'd probably print to ps and launch a program to print. Not to mention the burden of supporting perhaps one of the true "newbie-type" applications for Linux. "It won't print!"

    augh...

  22. Everything is there, but you need to search by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

    I use CUPS for overall printing control.

    I generate PDF or PostScript (or raw prn) files from a variety of applications. For a recent birth announcement card, I used Gimp and got very, very good results.

    No doubt you could use [La]TeX, too.

  23. lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word you're looking for is "losing", not "loosing". Get it right next time.

  24. Another Thing Linux Needs To Fix by reallocate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's another part of the dogma that keeps Linux off desktops. Software can be developed for any bloody platform, not just Linux. When someone says 'Oh boy! Linux gives me the freedom to develop any app I want!", they're just mouthing disingenuous propaganda.

    What potential Linux users hear is this: "If I want that program, I'll have to learn to program myself, or wait for some anonymous Linux developers to do it for me."

    So the choice becomes:

    1. Quit my day job and take a couple of years learning to be a competent developer;
    2. Wait for someone else to write what I want for Linux;
    3. Keep on using a commercial platform and shop around.

    Guess which option wins.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  25. Switching may be more costly for some users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because Linux works well for you doesn't mean it'll work well for your wife. This is the main point in an "open letter" piece I just wrote about Linux on the consumer desktop.

    See Croc O' Lyle - Open Letter to a Power User / Developer

    Here's an excerpt:
    "Okay, even if Linux with KDE or whatever were super easy to learn and use. Where would a soccer mom buy a preschooler edutainment for Linux? Could she install it and read the docs (don't get me started on man pages)? How about a tax package for my small business? Can I get it at Best Buy? Power users have different needs and understand how to locate Open Source needles in the haystack of the Internet - average folks want quick, easy and mainstream. It's not just the OS that has to be usable and suitable - OS's are just the start. It's the whole offering from the platform and all the related software vendors."

    When you factor in retraining/relearning costs as well as cost of locating, buying, and installing new software - switching OS's is a costly endevour no matter what you're switching to or from.

    Print Shop - a very user-friendly package - is just the tip of the iceberg. Linux needs thousands more Print Shop types of things before it'll be ready for mainstream adoption by non-power users.

    Croc