Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Make Wireless Networking Hardware

traskjd writes "Microsoft are looking to increase their strength in the hardware market with wireless and conventional networking hardware according to this story on cnet. Microsoft has always been slow at moving into the hardware market... could they be testing the waters for making things like switches and routers in the future? Lets hope not..." There's also a Reuters article. There was a story last year that mentioned Microsoft was working on Win-WiFi - 802.11b hardware that exported some of the processing to the CPU in much the same manner as a winmodem, and thus was cheaper to produce. These stories don't mention anything about that, so probably these are conventional 802.11b devices.

11 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Will? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Will Microsoft make this equipment or just slap a logo on somebody else's?

    I do like my Microsoft keyboard, it's great when it sits in my lap.

    1. Re:Will? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      or just slap a logo on somebody else's

      Probably. You'd be amazed at how many of the big hardware companies outsource the manufacturing of hardware and then stick their own badge on it. Often you can see the exact same device with diffent brand names, but that usually only happens with the smaller companies.

      Even if they don't do that, it will be off-the-shell components that make it. I don't see MS building a PCB and IC fabrication facility, or designing the PCB track layout.

      So in essence, this article is about MS striking a contract to rebadge someone elses products. You do get their support and reseller infrastructure from that (for better or worse). The stuff should be pretty good quality, putting aside all the MS bashing, these companies do live and die based on reputations, so it should be decent.

      I wonder if it will ship with an insecure default config? That would be a turnup for MS, if they get that aspect right for once!

  2. Re:I don't know about you guys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's because they just buy or license existing hardware from quality manufacturers, at least in the case of mice and keyboards.

  3. Re:... well maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You're probably thinking of the Winmodems of old. They used to have badly programmed drivers which caused problems. Most of all, computers used to be many times slower than they are today. With a modern computer, a Winmodem can run as well as a normal modem, and without sacrificing ping times and system speed. I should know, I've got one, and it works fine.

  4. I can't wait by Sp4c3+C4d3t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't trust anything wireless. Not even a wireless mouse. Sorry, I just like having cords... it makes me feel more secure. Microsoft + wireless is NOT a good idea. However, it might be a great way to show Joe Sixpack that MS products are not secure, when he gets hacked by the script kiddie across the street.

    --
    Happy New Year, it's 1984!
  5. Re:Welcome to our Monopoly by krugdm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not to be a troll or anything, but how different is this from Apple and AirPort?

    M$ just wants to see if they can get a piece of the WI-FI pie

    I'd only be concerned if they decide to come up with their own flavor of 802.11 that only works with the latest version of the OS and forces you to upgrade to be able to keep using it.

  6. This should have been expected by MouseR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given Palladium, one should expect MS to start making networking hardware.

    by producing hardware that refuses entry from any non-certified applications and hardware, they further secure their world (aka, pockets) within the constraints of their Palladium (money-making) scheme.

  7. Re:A new meaning for BSOD by GiorgioG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can anyone who is competent in Windows 2000/XP administration/setup honestly remember the last time they got a core dump? If I get one it's usually because of a shoddy (beta) video driver.

    Come on, find something valid to make fun of.

  8. Re:A new meaning for BSOD by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes...I get one about 1 a week. Random BSOD that don't seem to follow any particular pattern. I notice it slightly more occasionally when running WinMX then other applications, but not often enough to conclude it's the application. And I'm running your typical system, not 75 fibre channel drives like the other guy is.

    2K and 98SE never seemed to have any problems with the same setup.

  9. Yet another wireless authentication standard ! by sjhwilkes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MS have gone on record as saying they want to secure home wireless networks, their solution for this is going to be PEAP, yet another variation on EAP (Extensible Authentication Protocol).

    This is a PIA, already we have the certificate based EAP-TLS (supported in XP & CE4.0), EAP-MD5, the Cisco LEAP (supported everywhere but only with a Cisco client card), 802.1x - now a standard but not supported in it's vanilla format anywhere much yet, etc.

    Guess what the cross platform support will be for PEAP ?

    I'm just glad Linksys and Dlink exist, because it's going to be difficult for MS to displace them in the market, and dominate with a non-standard product.

    These may also have a variation on uPnP, but I don't see how that will fit in with the security focus.
    Palladuim is miles off, look for that in the updated Christmas '03 product range.

  10. Re:MS Hardware? by gosand · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What is up with all the negative articles on MS Hardware? Take a look at your mouse! Have you ever used an MS Joystick? Sure, lots of you have complaints with MS's OS's. Some of you hate the whole "Major Corportation" thing. But, damnit, MS MAKES GOOD HARDWARE! I've used MS Mice, and MS Sidewinders for YEARS and they still work GREAT!

    Sorry, keyboards, mice, and joysticks don't control your data. Bottom line is I don't trust Microsoft - for very good reasons. They have continuously proved they are untrustworthy, before/during/after being found guilty of illegal monopolistic practices by the Department of Justice. I don't trust them - not because I am some zealot - but because they have proven over and over again that I have no reason to trust them.

    Yes, I use one of their mice, because
    a. it is a good product
    b. it doesn't have anything to do with security

    Microsoft sucks at security, they even admit that their products aren't engineered for security. Sure, that was in reference to their Operating Systems, but do you think they will suddenly see the light when it comes to hardware? Microsoft is crafty, they wouldn't be getting into networking hardware at this stage of the game just for the sake of doing it. There is a reason, and they are trying to weasel their way in to gain control. Period.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.