Vanishing Mobile Phone Masts
babycakes writes "The BBC has an article about the concealment of mobile phone antennae in the UK, where the masts have been disguised as clock face hands, chimneys and so on. The company behind them, The Undetectables (flash site) aim to 'eradicate this architectural acne' - pics available."
my thoughts exactly.. Quick search on google comes across this page with *ooooh* pretty pictures.
They use them in residential areas and national parks. If I find a link, I'll post it.
I found one that is similar here
Live web cams
There are many options and it is great NOT to see these ugly antennas everywhere.
Here is some examples, fake tress, a fake window, or a cross on a church tower.
my sig
I'm not sure it's little files - in the headers, there's this line:
:/
meta http-equiv="refresh" content=";URL="
Mozilla, at least, seems to treat that as a zero second refresh to the same location. As fast as it loads it, it reloads it.
Ibelca
__
Sig: Marine Stock Photos
It's nice to know that here in the UK we have the good sense to hide the antennas in something inconspicuous.
Depends on the antenna design. You may get unwanted stray lobes of radiation if they've installed it improperly though. I'd rather put my faith in the inverse-square law.
The Kirkwood United Methodist Church in Missouri had to take their rather massive steeple down due to rot. The church was unable to commit the resources for a replacement. AT&T had a replacement built and installed in exchange for antenna rights.
I'd link a picture, but the web site also rotted away. Trust me, the steeple was an integral architectural element and the building looked silly without it.
And for those worried about emissions, no need. AT&T phones barely work in the building. I suppose the antennas don't radiate down very well. Of course we are probably cooking the Christian Scientists and the Catholics next door...
Being somewhat of a wireless tech, there is a place we call the 'touch down radius'. It is possible to be right under a tower and not get reception due to not being in the Frenel Zone. I will admit though that I do not know the specs on the antenna they use or what downtilt angle, or anything else along those lines.
I agree, that is one ghastly site. There is no good reason to use Flash in this case. Did you notice in the BBC article how they included screenshots of a browser window showing the pictures, because they couldn't link to the pictures properly? I'm sure Berners-Lee is rolling in his grave, but since he's not dead he's rolling in his desk chair.
If you object to this website, let them know:
mail@undetectables.com
+44 (0)117 9290400