Slashdot Mirror


AMD Opteron to support Palladium

Jim Norton writes "This article is just a reminder that AMD is just as guilty as Intel in supporting TCPA / Palladium. AMD has announced that Opteron will be compatible with the Palladium Initiative and that AMD is part of the 'Trusted Computing Alliance'."

8 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    john otto is a fag!

  2. Not Guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    "just as guilty"? Fuck off you politically correct cocksucker. While denying that Palladium has any merit whatsoever might get you karma and get your story posted on slashdot, it's just not the truth.

    There are more factors at work in AMDs decision to support this than a simple desire to crush freedom-loving geeks. As if they care...

  3. Re:Well I guess we can't win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Exactly which "rights" are you losing here? The "right" to steal music?

  4. But we're coerced into upgrading for other reasons by trauma · · Score: 0, Troll
    Quoth the poster:

    As long as people are running windows 98 on non-DRM hardware this will never fly past the drawing board. People will not upgrade thier computers to view content and if they are forced to that content will never catch on.

    People will be forced to consider upgrading not to view DRM-protected (or not) content, but due to Microsoft's refusal to support operating systems such as Win98 which still allow the user at least the illusion of being in control of his own computer. I'm not talking about "tech support" when I say support, I'm talking about:

    - not certifying drivers any more for Win9x. I just bought an ATI Radeon 9700 and I am only able to use it on my Win98 machine because someone at ATI had the good sense to make drivers for WinME (which is still "certifiable", I leave it as an exercise for the class to find the irony in that term) that work fine on Win95/98 machines depite not being certified for those OSs. And made sure the word got out. I'm sure all you linux folks out there are rolling your eyes at complaints by a Windows user that drivers are getting hard to come by, but I wouldn't be using this OS if I didn't want nearly universal hardware support. And it's going to go away if I don't jump on XP, or whatever is coming next.

    - not offering DirectX upgrades for Win9x. This will break more and more games in the next couple of years, since the new generation of gaming video cards work their magic through the expanded features of the new DirectX APIs (as well as existing OpenGL functions and proprietery extensions, but plenty of game developers ignore GL in favor of developing to the masses). And face it, since office productivity apps have run as fast as they need to for years now, gaming drives the upgrade market more than anything else.

    Ultimately these and other similar factors will force users into hard decisions, balancing the pros and cons of driver support for newer hardware/playing the latest games vs. being Microsoft's bitch. And having chosen the path that leads to bitchdom, they will accept the burden of DRM crap. Or they won't accept it, but it will be too late.
  5. Re:Needs to be said.... by potnoodle · · Score: 0, Troll

    Remember MAC people, to take out the vibrating iDildo before leaving your home or writing to someone!

    The future of the MacOS : o

  6. NO IT WON'T ... /. PROMOTES FUD, NEWS AT 11.00!!! by JoeGee · · Score: 2, Troll

    Doesn't anyone at /. bother to check sources, or even look for more current versions of articles anymore?

    Breathe in. Breathe out. Repeat. Read this updated article: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5489.

    This is rumormongering at its finest. Tune in to /. tomorrow when we learn that an alien being masquerading as Elvis Presley (employed by Microsoft) is the true force behind the Linux kernel. The domain name elvix.com has already been registered by Microsoft.

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  7. Re:If you RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Government + Corporations versus Consumers, Saddam is just a distraction

    Well, that's a little bit over the top, don't you think? While government and corporations working together against consumers is HIGHLY undesirable, it's not like they are GASSING us. Or working on weapons of mass destruction that they WILL USE (either directly, or by proxy through your friendly neighborhood Al Qaeda or other crazy Islamic faction). Or machine-gunning their own family. And they haven't been waging a secret war that results in American and Israeli deaths like Saddam has. Remember, Timothy McVeigh was found with a list of Iraqi individuals' phone numbers in his pocket. Yeah, that's something every American keeps in their pocket. Sure.

    It's only a matter of time before the average nitwit wakes up and realizes that Saddam is not some guy "over there" who the Evil Bushes just like to prop up as some sort of distraction. The man is a crazy, cold-blooded killer, and his ties to OK City bombing will eventually out, whether the Powers That Be (tm) want it or not.

  8. Re:If you RTFA... by samdu · · Score: 0, Troll

    I agree with everything you said except the Saddam thing. There's no comparison between our ability to watch DVDs on our computers and a madman that has used chemical and biological weapons on his own citizenship. Believe what you want, but Saddam Hussein is a VERY dangerous individual. And if you want to keep it in the media realm, I'm sure he's not all that supportive of freedom to watch what you want when you want either.