Why Software Piracy is Good for Microsoft
jcphil writes "Salon has an article that explains why Microsoft has toned down its anti-piracy actions in China and other developing markets. The answer is simple: due to the network effect, the more users you have, the greater your strength in the marketplace. And it doesn't matter if their Windows is pirated or not. So, in effect, software piracy in countries like China helps Microsoft to compete with Linux." Meanwhile, the RIAA doesn't feel the same logic applies to record sales in the U.S., and has started an ad campaign to convince the public that sharing music hurts artists.
I won't put linux on my machine! Pinky Swear!
Note: I'll just put FreeBSD on instead.
/^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
"They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade."
1.) Get user's addicted to our software
2.) ????
3.) Profit!!!
Because when you download music, you're taking bread from Britney's mouth! She can barely afford to LIVE! Please, think of the starving artists before you download that next MP3.
Come on, does the RIAA really expect me to take a PSA from Britney Spears or bling blingin' Nelly when it comes to theft of music? Are they trying to make us feel bad for these people who get paid truckloads of money and have no talent? Maybe they should show me a non-RIAA artist who lives out of their car and plays dumpy clubs instead.
NOTE TO RIAA: GET A CLUE.
A wrinkle laden aging speed metal rocker, wrapped in shredded leather pants; he's drinking from a bottle in a paper bag; sad music is playing.
The voice over says "When you pirate music, you steal money out of artists pockets. Now, how is this poor man going to afford his presidential suite, hookers, and 3 day liquor and heroin binges?"
Then a black screen with white text comes up:
"Help the Fella, Don't Gnutella."
Or, to sum it up, Microsoft won't bother alienating their market until they've got a market to alienate. ;-)
Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".
from the article: A print campaign, featuring such performers as Eminem, Madonna, Missy Elliott, Elton John and Luciano Pavarotti
...*sigh*... yes, I'm a tool."
Pavarotti is quoted to have said "Downloading music is wrong, because it's virtual. You're not getting the real thing. You're using technology to circumvent actually paying for it; you're taking the easy way out... Lip-synching a concert however, is perfectly okay; there's nothing wrong with that, the audience can't tell anyway,
Elton John on the matter: "Um, I really really need you're money since I'm WAY in debt, no, I didn't get screwed by my label, at least I don't think so, I was kinda high all the time."
"Elton, you spent $40,000 a month on flowers."
"They were pretty..."
disclaimer: don't know if it was exactly $40k, but it was some insane amount like that.
c-hack.com |
In other words, if you don't like the price of Bruce Springsteen, you're not going to switch to Broos Sprigstein who might be cheaper.
Don't knock us Broos fans until you've heard his early stuff.
OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
With any luck, the anti-music-piracy commericals will be as much a scream as those "Today I killed a judge (because I bought drugs)" drug-terrorism ones:
GMD
watch this
Too true. Stop the insanity.
Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone
Al Qaeda has ninjas!
I download just as much of her music as I purchase...None
Brittney honey -- it is not music sharing that is causing a drop in your record sales...Hell just ask Tiffany & Paulla Abdual (sp?) -- they went through the same tough times, and could not even blame the big bad music sharing thugs. And to M&M -- What would it be 15.5 million instead of 15.3 million units moved if there was no music shareing? (Somewhere Vannila Ice is dreaming of being so popular that millions would download his music for free...)
(+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.