Slashdot Mirror


Hard Drives Evaluated for Noise, Heat and Performance

Sander Sassen writes "Ever wondered what harddisks offer the best combination of performance and low noise? Hardware Analysis evaluates all recent 5400 and 7200-rpm harddisks and focuses on noise, heat production and overall performance. Their results show that 7200-rpm spindle speed is no guarantee for high-performance and that low-noise and high-performance is not an impossible combination with some harddisks."

11 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. What I've known all along- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seagate's Barracuda IV drives are great! Exceptionally quiet (the CPU cooling fan generates more noise) and I've not run across a single failure in ~100 sold.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:What I've known all along- by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative
      My 80Gig is in a removable caddy and during heavy defragging it will reach 137 degrees F. </quote

      What you need to do RIGHT NOW is cut away most of the plastic from the bottom of the caddy, and not use the caddy's top. It'll run cooler, just from not being almost completely enclosed in plastic (those little slots they put in are so useless, and plastic is an insulator).

      Also, the top of the caddy tends to block the breather hole, voiding your warranty.

      Oh, and maybe move to a system that doesn't need defragging to improve performance (shameless plug for non-Windows OS of choice)

  2. When it Slashdotted, here is the conclusion by ites · · Score: 5, Informative
    As evident from our benchmarks and the noise and heat production measurements the 80GB, Western Digital 800JB with 8MB cache and the 120GB, IBM 120GXP offer the best combination of performance, noise and heat levels. The IBM has our preference as it has the largest capacity and thus offers the best price/performance ratio.

    If you're looking for a good 7200-rpm harddisk then look no further than the Western Digital WD800BB, with 2MB cache, just a tad bit slower than the WD800JB which features 8MB of cache. The surprising newcomer is the Samsung SP8004H that scores well on all fronts and certainly deserves your attention too.

    Equally surprising was the performance of Western Digital's 400AB and 800AB, both 5400-rpm harddisks showed exceptional performance on par with all but the fastest 7200-rpm harddisks. If you're looking for an affordable, high-performance and yet silent 5400-rpm harddisk either of these will fit your needs exactly.

    If you're however looking for a harddisk that offers an impressive combination of performance and low noise then look no further than Seagate's ST380021A Barracuda IV, it really is an engineering marvel that combines the best of both worlds. No match for the IBM or Western Digital but a fair trade-off between performance and noise level.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:When it Slashdotted, here is the conclusion by Sokie · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you're however looking for a harddisk that offers an impressive combination of performance and low noise then look no further than Seagate's ST380021A Barracuda IV, it really is an engineering marvel that combines the best of both worlds. No match for the IBM or Western Digital but a fair trade-off between performance and noise level.

      I too have been very impressed by the Barracuda IV's, they are put near silent and come in nice round 20GB increments. I've built probably a dozen systems with various sizes of this drive in them and have yet to see one go flaky.

      As a white-box maker, performance isn't foremost in my selection criteria, reliability is and these Seagates are about the only drive I've used that I haven't had some sort of issue with. As an added bonus, they are usually $10-$15 cheaper than a Maxtor or WD of the same capacity and RPM.

      Just my experience...ymmv....

      -Sokie
      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
  3. Hmm by Sludge · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a timely article, what with hard drive warranties having just been bumped from three years to one in a few of the leading brands (including Maxtor). Word is the WD w/ 8 meg cache still has 3 years.

  4. Re:Western Digital?? by UncleOzzy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Amen to that. You'll notice that they give high marks to the WD800BB (7200RPM, 80GB, 2MB cache). I bought this drive last March, and it served me well: fast and reasonably quiet. However, in July, it died. Corrupted boot sector, various bad sectors, etc.

    Unfortunately, this was not a one-off manufacturing error. A friend purchased the same drive about a month later, and his died the same crash-and-burn death as mine about two weeks later. Sounds like these drives just suck. I'm using the replacement they sent me, but only until I can get the scratch together to replace it with a Seagate.

    Caveat emptor on these suckers.

  5. I suppose more people should know about.. by spinkham · · Score: 5, Informative

    storagereview.com
    Huge database of very indepth reviews on hard drives. Scsi, ide, 5400-15000rpm.. Basically everything, with noise, temperature, and a few different benchmarks for different usage conditions.
    Definatly the best resource I've found for hard drive tests. I always consult this site before a hard drive purchase.

    --
    Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
  6. Re:Why no RAM -- IDE Devices? by ptudor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Platypus Technology does make something similar. They have both internal PCI and external enclosures to just hold sticks of ram; some models have stadard hard drives for times of power loss. Unfortunately under linux it requires a kernel module (and at the time I was using them, if I upgraded the kernel the company had to compile a new module to match). They fly though, they're sooo fast. Really nice for my mail queues.

  7. Re:I have only one thing to say... by Sivar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Storagereview.com has had noise and heat statistics for years.

    Actually, it is a better reference than this quoted article because you can tell SR.com to compare all the drives you are interested in purchasing and get good* benchmarks, heat/noise, and can sort by specific benchmark.
    Go to the website, click "database" (near the top) and choose your criteria. In ten seconds you can find out the noise/heat/speed of every drive SR has ever reviewed, with a rather nice labelled bar graph for clarity.
    You can also visit the forums and get advice from some of the most knowledgeable people in the IT industry, and get information that is difficult to come by anywhere else--for example, that Samsung makes the most reliable (albeit close to the slowest) IDE hard drive. SR was also the first to discover that Seagate planned to reduce their warranty and that there are terrible SCSI performance bugs in Windows XP, among others.
    A very good resource, and it's been slashdotted without the server being brought to its knees. (It runs Linux/Apache/PHP)

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  8. Buyer Beware by eclectro · · Score: 3, Informative

    The most quiet drives, the seagate Barracuda IV atas have a problem in Raid configurations. When used in a Raid configuration, the performance is less than a single drive by itself. Raid is not officially supported by this drive. More here.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  9. Mirror by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since things seem to be getting bogged down on Hardware Analysis's end, here are two mirrors:

    1. Earlham College

    2. UW-Madison

    These are in PDF format, which I converted from the printable HTML provided on the website. It is missing one eye-candy picture of a hard-drive's interior.