Slashdot Mirror


Mule Gives Birth

!splut writes "Thumbing it's nose as science, a Moroccan mule has given birth. Mules, hybrids between horse and donkey, are normally infertile, due to differences between the number and structure of horse and donkey chromosomes. Nevertheless, for reasons not well understood, fertile mules do occur, infrequently, with some 60 documented live births since 1527."

123 comments

  1. Learn to spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thumbing it's nose as science...

    Thumbing its nose at science

    i claim this fp in the name of George Nayef Kayatta, R.M. (renaissance man)!

    1. Re:Learn to spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I know some people are annoyed at these observations... but they ARE correct and noticeable. Yet, I will bet that these changes will not be made to the article. I know articles can be altered after being posted, but this change will not be implemented anyway.

      Seems like it wouldn't be terrible to make these kinds of changes if they are pointed out, but whatever.

    2. Re:Learn to spell by Gorfydyd · · Score: 1

      I really think that you could stop worrying about typos. The web is international and not everyone has a perfect command of the English language, However, I do know how you feel...bad spelling and syntax are utterly infuriating at the best of times.

  2. A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

    Thumbing it's nose as science...

    Sheesh, the things they're calling "science" these days!

    --
    I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    1. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Copperhead · · Score: 2
      This paragraph touches on the "science" aspect of the issue.

      "A horse has 64 chromosomes and a donkey has 62, so a mule is left with 63, an uneven number which cannot divide into chromosome pairs. This should make a mule unable to reproduce."

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    2. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      I understand that.
      But how does this make thumbing one's nose a science?

      sheesh...

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    3. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Accelerated+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah! And what's the deal with this mule having a thumb? Where'd she get that from?

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
    4. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Copperhead · · Score: 2
      Depends... if you consider "science" being "collected observations used to make predictions", then it dosen't, since there have been verified instances of this occuring.

      Really, what it's doing is thumbing it's nose as science teachers; those people who told us that mules are sterile and heating solids always expand.

      I understand your point.

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    5. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, my point was to make a freakin' joke!

      I find the science fascinating. Likewise, people's inability to use the English language.

      In this case my knowledge of the language is better than my knowledge of the science, so I left the intelligent scientific observations to people such as yourself.

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    6. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Copperhead · · Score: 1
      I'm an idiot. I just now saw the "AS". Pardon me whilst I retreat to my cave.

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    7. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me try to explain the joke...

      StuffYourReligion was making fun of the writer's original and poorly conceived words by interpreting them as literally as possible. Hence the commentary: When did thumbing one's nose become a type of science?

      Consider these two problems with the phrase "Thumbing it's nose as science...":

      1. The 's' is a trifle far away from the 't' on the keyboard for the original writer to have merely made a typo. Apparently, !splut's recollection of cliched phrases is corrupted.

      2. There is an unintelligible apostrophe thrown in to make the writing even less comprehensible. Expanding the contraction, anyone can quickly see that "Thumbing it is nose..." is a nonsensible construction of words.

      The correct phrase should have been, "Thumbing ITS nose AT science" - no apostrophe, and no confusion between 'as' and 'at'.

    8. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure say "sheesh" a lot. Geez.

    9. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by !splut · · Score: 2

      I find the science fascinating. Likewise, people's inability to use the English language.

      This was more a case of my inability to proofread my own typing.

      I seem to have a typo every time I get a story accepted. You'd think I'd learn...

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    10. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      Heh, I don't have a problem with story submitters making the occasional (or, in your case, consistent? :P) typo, but I wish the "editors" would catch them. IAC, I found yours amusing, and I thank you for the laugh.

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    11. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      Just because something is unlikely doesn't mean it is impossible, and science does not claim otherwise. Thumbing its nose at science? That's stupid!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    12. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      Please uncover your sense of humor, mister. ...and while you're at it, try to discover a sense of the subtle.

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    13. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      ...and please excuse my assumption regarding "mister"

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    14. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by Gamasta · · Score: 0

      "A horse has 64 chromosomes and a donkey has 62, so a mule is left with 63, an uneven number which cannot divide into chromosome pairs. This should make a mule unable to reproduce."

      That is very correct. Now I wonder if scientists test every insect if they aren't able to reproduce with other insects of different species (and generate fertile children).

      My point is, there are millions of different species of insects, but often they just differ by some dots in some part of the body, but are already described as a different specie. What about the definition for different species used above and in the above thread?

      ---
      Shuma Gorath will come: after the rain.

      --
      reason defies logic
    15. Re:A fertile mule does not mean a fertile mind. by mandolin · · Score: 2
      I seem to have a typo every time I get a story accepted. You'd think I'd learn...

      On the contrary, maybe that's the secret, Taco's all like "wow this was the first submitter today who can spell" :)

  3. just like watermelons! by penguin_punk · · Score: 1

    We always joke about how they make seedless watermelons - and this article made me think of it.

    (and no, I don't care what everything2 says - sexually-deviant horses and fertile watermelons do NOT make seedless ones.)

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
    1. Re:just like watermelons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that the horse is deviant, it's that the humans controlling such are.

      Considerable effort is expended in convincing (or just plain restraining one of..) the animals that this is indeed what they ought to be doing.

      Take a look at groups.google.com at rec.equestrian and search for "mules" or "making mules."

      Of course, the one time the horse and donkey will 'get along' by themselves is when you do not want them too. And there is the rule of how equine society works - the female gets what she wants, even when you'd expect there was not a way.

  4. the failure of Science by tps12 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As far as I can tell, Science has no explanation to offer for this strange--dare I say miraculous?--event. It strikes me as no small coincidence that where we see Science fail is in the prediction of when and under what conditions the Creation of Life takes place. Maybe someone is trying to tell us something...

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:the failure of Science by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny
      It strikes me as no small coincidence that where we see Science fail is in the prediction of when and under what conditions the Creation of Life takes place.

      Well, the conditions of where life is created is scientifically known as 'bonking' or 'squelching' or 'doing the dirty' and it is fully expected that a similar route was followed here, although research involving staring at pictures of mixtures of animals is no doubt ongoing, but is having problems obtaining funding.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:the failure of Science by LMCBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice troll, but the existence of natural phenomena that are not understood in no way represents a "failure" of science. It would *only* be a failure if science was a system of belief that purported to explain everything about the Universe (like, say, religion). It is not such a system.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:the failure of Science by theCat · · Score: 1

      Explanation: I doubt the mule is "fertile". In a random mutation the extra chromosome was dropped in one egg (it has to be the egg of course or else this is no miracle birth), such that the female mule could pass an egg which would look vaguely as if it came from a donkey. Then it doesn't matter if the mule is mounted by a horse or a donkey; either works, thought the latter produces yet another mule (albeit with some really whacked genetics.)

      What doesn't work, most of the time, is a chromosomal deletion. Those are generally fatal, most of the time even before a fetus develops. So what is rare is not fertilization or even implantation, but birth. Still, I would expect that the foal would be tweeked in some way, not likely at all to thrive.

      If horse breeders kill "fertile" mules (those that give a birth) it probably is not because they will be run out of business if mules become a new species (rather they should be thrilled; can you imagine how hard it is to get horses to mate with donkeys?!?) They are killing these animals because of fear that the birth is the result of sorcery, and that their business will suffer or they themselves might be accused of witchcraft. Two-headed sheep? Hens that crow? Mules giving birth? Toss a rope over a tree limb and go looking for a witch. (You can take the word of a practicing warlock.)

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    4. Re:the failure of Science by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      Who's this person called Science? I know some people who call them scientists and they have all sorts of different opinions about things. But I've never met this person called 'Science'.

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    5. Re:the failure of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as "Horizontal Refreshments" or "Ridin' a Dutch Gal" (props to Ken Burns)

  5. Fertile mules destroyed by crow · · Score: 1

    I've heard that fertile mules are generally destoyed. The breeders don't want to sell them and put themselves out of business.

    Or perhaps that's just a legend?

    1. Re:Fertile mules destroyed by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      > Or perhaps that's just a legend?

      An urban legend, with emphasis on the urban.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Fertile mules destroyed by Gorfydyd · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to destroy a fertile mule? Chances are that its offspring would be infertile anyway, and therefore there would be no risk of putting onesself out of business. Given also that there have only been around 60 live births from female mules since the 16th century, I hardly think that the sale of one such mule would do much to the hypothetical mule breeding industry...Which brings me to another point; if you really want a mule rather than a horse or donkey, all you have to do is cross the two. I seriously doubt that there are too many specialised mule breeders out there anyway. Plus, given that you would have to breed a mule with a horse or donkey anyway - male mules are also infertile due to an uneven number of chromosomes -a fertile mule would really be no threat, as there would be no telling what the offspring would be like. Which is better? A donkey+mule or horse+mule. Breeders would, I am sure, be more likely to continue to produce mules by crossing horses and donkeys rather than breeding form an animal which is a scientific anomaly anyway.

  6. The reason for sterility... by DLWormwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...given in the article has to do with if the hybrid creature has an even number of chromosomes. I was under the impression that sterility of offspring was one of the determinations of speciation used by biologists. (And one of the frequent "disproofs" of evolution by creationists.) If a hybrid offspring had an even number of chromosomes, could it be fertile?

    Are there known hybrids/half-breeds can have normal fertility, as opposed to requiring a "miracle" to occur? This is a sincere question, even though I know full well the trolls that are going to be attracted to this post.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    1. Re:The reason for sterility... by spacy · · Score: 1

      There are some birds that make fertile hybrids all the time - I think the finches do this a lot. But they are probably closely related species anyway. For what its worth.

    2. Re:The reason for sterility... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      That definition of a species is problematic because there ARE many exceptions. For example, finches in the galapagos come in many different distinct species identified by their distinctive beaks and the foods they are adapted to eat. However the species can and do interbreed often and share the same habitat. The offspring are fertile, however they are not terribly successfull since their beaks are not specialized enough to open any nuts at all, so the species remain distinct. Also that definintion of a species does not account for organisms that reproduce asexually - for instance bacteria exist in species even though they reproduce by simply cloning themselves. Really all you can say about a species is that it is and remains a more or less genetically distinct pool of dna, evolving without genes being introduced into the species gene pool.

      --
      Jeremy
  7. Offspring fertile? by crow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what is really interesting is whether the offspring are fertile. If so, then we can start breeding mules from mules, and we have a new species.

    And where does the infertility in mules normally lie? Is it a male thing or a female thing? Or both?

    1. Re:Offspring fertile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And next thing you know we can combine people with mountain gorillas for added strength. We'll be God-like in 300-500 years tops!

    2. Re:Offspring fertile? by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      If so, then we can start breeding mules from mules, and we have a new species.

      How do you know that these fertile mules are not able to breed with horses and/ or donkeys? If they could, it would rather be an example of our 'species' definition breaking apart.

      Tor

    3. Re:Offspring fertile? by geoswan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So what is really interesting is whether the offspring are fertile. If so, then we can start breeding mules from mules, and we have a new species.

      And where does the infertility in mules normally lie? Is it a male thing or a female thing? Or both?

      I looked into this when we discussed cloning Mammoths, or harvesting frozen Siberian Mammoth sperm a few months ago.

      It was my impression that the very rare offspring of a mule mare and a horse sire, or a mule mare and a donkey sire, are the same species as the father. The mule has a mixture of donkey and horse chromosomes. Sperm and ovum are haploid cells -- they have one chromosome, not a pair. That is how sexual reproduction works. It was my impression that most ovum will have a mixture of horse and donkey chromosomes. But very occasionally, by chance, an ovum will have entirely horse chromosomes or donkey chromosomes.

      Male mules are almost always gelded, to curb their agressiveness.

      Hobbyists cross donkeys with zebras. They call the offspring "golden zebras". Hobbyists cross lions and tigers. These crosses are, apparently, a bit nuts. Lions are, of course, social. And tigers are, of course, solitary. The hybrid is drawn both ways.

      The Moroccan foal looks a bit like a baby donkey and a bit like a baby mule - but not exactly like either.

      The site I found about crossing cats talked about the differences between lion tiger crosses where the lion was the mother and when the tiger was the mother. When the tiger was the mother the hybrid is larger than a tiger. The maternal influence on the foal's embryonic environment has an influence on how the genotype is expressed.

      Another anecdote. You can tell whether a mule's mother was a horse or a donkey by putting it in a corral that contained both donkeys and horses. The mule will go hang out with the kind of animals it was raised with.

    4. Re:Offspring fertile? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Hobbyists cross donkeys with zebras. They call the offspring "golden zebras". Hobbyists cross lions and tigers. These crosses are, apparently, a bit nuts.

      Okay. That's it. That's the last time anybody on Slashdot ever gets away with saying "Building a watercooled PC rig out of Kraft Dinner and installing cold cathode lights in their hard drives? Those silly PC hobbyists have too much time on their hands!" :)

    5. Re:Offspring fertile? by mxmissile · · Score: 1
      If they could, it would rather be an example of our 'species' definition breaking apart.

      its called evolution

    6. Re:Offspring fertile? by !splut · · Score: 4, Informative

      So what is really interesting is whether the offspring are fertile. If so, then we can start breeding mules from mules, and we have a new species.

      And where does the infertility in mules normally lie? Is it a male thing or a female thing? Or both?

      The infertility arises from the fact that normally, during meiosis (the production of sex cells), like chromosomes in the diploid compliment of chromosomes (one chromosome from each parent) pair up, separate, and produce haploid daughter cells. Mules are in the awkward position of having 31 chromosomes from the donkey parent and 32 from the horse parent, giving them an odd number of chromosomes total, even though they are in a diploid state.

      On the one hand this gives the mule "hybrid vigour" - it exhibits many of the desirable characteristics of each parent. On the other hand, this odd number of chromosomes poses problems for meiosis - the normal meiotic process just doesn't produce viable sex cells. (So, in answer to your question, the infertility is a male and female thing.)

      The fact that the foal was born at all suggests that the mother, the father, the foal, or some combination has some manner of chromosomal aberration - an extra chromosome from one parent, or something along those lines - resulting ultimately in a viable diploid zygote.

      Chromosomal aberrations often result in infertility to begin with... but lets pretend that the foal is fertile, and is able to breed with horses, donkeys, or future siblings. It's offspring will not exhibit the hybrid vigour that is observed in the mule, because the offspring will not have the characteristic compliment of horse and donkey chromosomes. And since that vigour is the reason why people breed mules in the first place, a new breed of fertile mule would not be that useful.

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
  8. Geek Gets Signficant Other! by Numeric · · Score: 1

    I guess that will be next headline.

    --
    -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
  9. wonders of nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this is even more amazing than the wonders that lurks beneath the indigo waves of the oceans that cover 80% of our planet.

    We talk of finding life on other planets, which orbit around other stars. And we talk about environmental issues and geological events with such certainty, such God-given insight. Or is it indeed God-given? Have we not perhaps eaten instead of the Fruit of Knowledge? Did we doom ourselves long ago to the curse of insight? It is not for me to say, nor for any man. But we have no choice: we, as a species, are driven to seek information, knowledge, science.

  10. Dont look at me!! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I didnt even know her nime months ago.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  11. Not again by Boglin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Second Foundation barely saved the Seldon plan from the Mule the last time. This kid could ruin everything!

    1. Re:Not again by Knacklappen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wonder if a certain robot is behind all this...

      BTW: If mules are infertile, where do they come from? Do we have to deal with a bunch of sex-fixated donkeys out there, trying to mate with horses whenever they can? On the other hand: most mules are used in rough terrain, like moutains. If I were a horse, I'd probably agree to this as well, rather then living in total celibate. Hell, even as a human... NO! This thought goes to far... =:*)

      --


      Excellence: Moderate (mostly affected by comments on your karma)
  12. The dad.... by p4ul13 · · Score: 0
    The article never mentions (I guess its unknown right now) what the father was. Was it a horse, donkey or mule?

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
    1. Re:The dad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it a horse, donkey or mule? Don't forget "other"...

    2. Re:The dad.... by spacy · · Score: 1

      Mules are by definition the product of a male donkey and a female horse. You can make the opposite cross (pony stallion + female donkey) but then its called a "jennet".

    3. Re:The dad.... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Mules are by definition the product of a male donkey and a female horse. You can make the opposite cross (pony stallion + female donkey) but then its called a "jennet".

      Close.

      With horses, the male is a stallion, the female is the mare. With donkeys, also known as the ass, the female is the jennet or jenny.

      The hybrid of a stallion and a jenny is a "hinny".

    4. Re:The dad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With donkeys, also known as the ass, the female is the jennet or jenny.

      I knew my friend Jenny was an ass. Now there's proof!

  13. Bat baby by Vodak · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    "hybrids between horse and donkey, are normally infertile, due to differences between the number and structure of horse and donkey chromosomes"

    Oh boy, more proof that the bat baby exists

  14. Liger/Tigon by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A quick google search on Liger and Fertile tells me that male hybrids are rarely fertile. Another page states, "No fertile male ligers have yet been found and it is assuemd all are sterile." Though reading a bit more, there may be some fertile males, or males that are fertile for a brief period.

  15. downs syndrome by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    I am no biologist, but isn't downs syndrome caused by the "freak" addition of an extra chromosome? If this is the case couldn't something like this happen with great rarity in mules resulting in a 64-chromosome mule, which would be capable of breading?

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:downs syndrome by capnjack41 · · Score: 2, Funny
      64-chromosome mule, which would be capable of breading

      I like breaded mule, especially the chicken-fried I had at Outback. Oh, you mean breeding!

      Sorry, corny joke. Had to do it. So sorry. :)

  16. Fertility by ktulus+cry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One possible explantion for this rare occurance, one that I can see, anyway - Horses have 64 chromosomes in their normal diploid state, with haploid gametes having 32. Donkeys have 62 chromosomes in normal diploid state, with haploid gametes having 31. This gives a mule 63 chromosomes. If one gamete had experienced non-disjunction during meiosis (that is, one pair of homologues did not split correctly, giving one daughter cell 2 copies of a chromosome, and one none), a mule could have 62 or 64 chromosomes (depending on which gamete it received). This is not a very rare occurance, Down Syndrome or Kleinfelter's Syndromes in humans (trisomy 21 and XXY respectively). While most cases of non-disjunction produce abnormal offspring, in humans, for example, an XXX female is completely normal, except for a usually smaller stature. A case like this, where the offspring IS normal, is relatively rare, and a similar situation could be occuring in these fertile mules.

  17. Time for experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be this mule has special features that allow it to succesfully breed with all other species.

  18. Speciation by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The truth is that speciation is not very well understood. In many ways 'species' is a convenient abstraction - we humans like to put horses and donkeys into two discrete buckets and not think much about anything in between. In reality there is no law of nature that says that all living entities must belong to exactly one of our convenient buckets.

    The 'infertile children' definition works pretty well, but it is not perfect. Another problematic example is that of a species of birds that live in different territories around the globe. The birds can mate with other birds in their own or in adjacent territories. In other words, the birds in the first territory can mate with those in the second territory, and those in the second with those in the third, and so on all the way around the globe - and finally the birds of the last territory can again mate with those in the first. However, it turns out that the birds cannot mate with birds several territories away. Our convenient species definition breaks apart.

    Tor

  19. Should this make me feel better... by bay43270 · · Score: 1

    about my former school's mascot?

  20. Creationism and Short Sightedness by roachmotel3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, let's get one thing straight. I am a christian, and I believe many things that folks here on slashdot would likely have me strung up for.

    The point here, however, is that when folks that have an agenda immediately jump on something that MIGHT be remotely related, they tend to make themselves look like the donkeys in this story when they are proven wrong.

    Slightly longer version -- Science is still growing and changing every day. I doubt that there are many (if any) scientists out there that say that science has all the answers today, or that science ever will. Kinda like the old expression -- "The more you know, the more you realize you don't know".

    If you want to push a creationist agenda, don't jump like an idiot. Wait, think, and have logical and intelligent conversations. There are plenty of paradoxes and uncertainties in christianity too, let's not forget that the point is that humans are imperfect and fallable.

    What you're saying amounts to people that used to bash Christopher Columbus for believing the world is round. "Oh look, another ship dropped off the face of the earth, never to return. You idiot. God designed the world to be flat, it's obvious! Maybe he's trying to tell you something by never having ships return." That, or something like "You're not supposed to fly, if so, God would have given you wings."

    Again, I am a Christian, but I believe that as humans we are pretty darn smart, and can figure out most things. Don't sell science short just because it doesn't have the answer you want TODAY.

    1. Re:Creationism and Short Sightedness by roachmotel3 · · Score: 1

      Man, I just realized that I blew my ability to moderate this discussion because I felt a strong need to set this guy straight. Crap.

    2. Re:Creationism and Short Sightedness by valdis · · Score: 2

      OK.. Blowing *my* chance to mod to set things straight..

      "What you're saying amounts to people that used to bash Christopher Columbus for believing the world is round".

      Actually, Queen Isabella knew *damned* well that (a) the world was round (b) the circumference was around 25,000 miles (c) that going east it was some 7,000 miles and (d) ships of the day didn't have the capacity to carry supplies for a trip of 18,000 miles the OTHER way. Chris Columbus thought the circumferences was 12,000 miles, and thought a ship could carry supplies for a 5,000 mile trip.

      So Isabella finally shut him up by sending him off with 3 leaky ships crewed by prison scum, figuring if they never came back she'd not be sorry. And sure enough, 5,000 miles later Chris was running out of food when he found unexpected land. Fool that he was, he went to his deathbead truly convinced he *had* made it to the Orient.

      Call Isabella the first of the high-risk venture capital financiers... :)

    3. Re:Creationism and Short Sightedness by roachmotel3 · · Score: 1

      The point here really isn't the Christopher Columbus/Isabella story. The point is that some folks choose to believe that the world as it is today is how it has always been, and how it always will be.

      When someone chooses to sell themselves short like that and believe that they are capable of comprehending everything in the world with a small belief system where everything magically fits in, I have a problem.

      Like before, I will state that I am a religious person -- I go to church on Sundays, I sing, I make donations. But I do not accept that just because people can't comprehend how things happened that God must have done it in a wink.

      Hate to break it to most religious folks, but God is a good bit smarter than you, and if it's really easy to figure out, chances are you have the wrong answer.

    4. Re:Creationism and Short Sightedness by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1, Troll

      what does it mean, "i am a christian?" the problem is that a lot of people say "i'm a christian," and it means a lot of things. it means they supported the crusades. it means they supported the inquisition. it means they denied rights to irish catholics before irish independence. it means they killed american indians. it means acted as colonial powers. it means they stood silent while children were physically or sexually abused.

      or does it mean none of those?

      in my lifetime i've heard christians say fags must die - in boston a guy had a four foot high placard on his car proclaiming that gays will burn in hell. i've heard christians berating single mothers - and i saw the hurt look in the eyes of my single mother. i've seen them hover over poorly performing college students hoping to convince them to drop out and join their church. i've seen them try to stop stem cell research. i've seen them try to stop a 13 year old rape victim from getting an abortion. i've seen them shout abuse at women going to an abortion clinic. i've heard them explain that white people were created and blacks evolved.

      very few christians supported all of those things, but a lot of christians supported some of them.

      so.

      which christian are you?

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    5. Re:Creationism and Short Sightedness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an assholish thing to say.

      Newsflash, mister: Christians aren't particularly evil. There are bastards in every religion. There are atheist bastards, too.

      Niven's 16th law: There is no cause so right that one cannot find a fool following it.

    6. Re:Creationism and Short Sightedness by roachmotel3 · · Score: 1

      You can make it complex, or you can keep it simple.

      I stole this, but it speaks to me.
      http://www.voiceofgospel.org/beliefs.html

  21. donkey by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    I don't think they know who the dad is, but they said the little one looks a lot like a donkey...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:donkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so the father must be Larry Ellison.

    2. Re:donkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I have mod points, I never see anything this funny.

  22. Infertility explanation by Optical+Voodoo+Man · · Score: 2, Funny
    According to the British Mule Society,

    "The donkey has 62 chromosomes (31 pairs), the horse 64 (32 pairs) and the mule and hinny each have 63 chromosomes - of which many pairs are unevenly matched. It is not just the number of chromosomes which is different in donkeys and horses, but their structure: they have developed slightly differently over evolutionary time....The donkey and horse chromosomes are almost completely unable to pair up."

    It's amazing that mules turn out as well as they do. If carrying heavy packs all day and being beaten daily by a bowlegged man with whiskey breath is your idea of turning out well.

  23. A Mule giving birth by kcavness · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that's some half-assed science.

    --
    "We must cultivate our garden." -- Voltaire
    1. Re:A Mule giving birth by Boronx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ROFL. Mod up parent please.

    2. Re:A Mule giving birth by Trogre · · Score: 1

      But I'm sure it was using it's whole ass.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:A Mule giving birth by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      Christ, now I have coffee up my nose. I'll be sneezing for the rest of the day!

  24. yawn by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    i'm not surprised.
    it's happened before with some decent results.
    though i haven't checked it on wine...

    i think we need to encourage this sort of thing, get back to the roots, you know?

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  25. Mod parent up by penguin_punk · · Score: 1

    If I didn't blow my chance on the quick watermelon remark, you'd have at least one 'Insightful' right now. Good statement.

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
  26. "Thumbing it is nose as science"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, Yoda's posting on /.

    m.

  27. No explanation != failure of Science != a miracle by geoswan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me tell you about another miracle.

    My parents met in Venezuala, working for shell oil, in the late 1940s. Shell had a company store where the North American employees could buy stuff you couldn't normally get in Venezuala. They had North American bungaloes for the North American employees. They had a little school with a North American teacher (my mom) for their children.

    Like other North Americans my parents had a local cleaning lady. Unlike some of the other North Americans my parents learned Spanish.

    My mom told how she taught Dahlia, how to prepare potatoes North American style. Including baking them. You peirce the skin so the steam can escape. I know most people do this by poking them with a fork. But in my family we cut a small X in the skin.

    My mom's spanish wasn't yet sufficient to explain why you cut an X however.

    A couple of days later there was an explosion in the kitchen. Dahlia is standing over the oven door, covered with exploded baked potatoe.

    She was hysterical, and very apologetic. She told my mother that she realized she must have been very religious. But, she was in a hurry, and just this once, she thought that God would forgive her if she blessed the potatoes by putting the sign of the cross in them after they were baked, not before.

    Dahlia couldn't explain this explosion, except to think it was a miracle. God punished her for not blessing the potatoe with a cross.

    So, was it really a miracle? Of course not. Does an inability to explain a phenomenon mean that it is the reuslt of supernatural intervention? Of course not. Not with exploding potatoes, or with unexplained births.

  28. Re:Idtiot moderator. Fuckwit. by penguin_punk · · Score: 1

    You uslesse waste of carbon.

    Geek alert.

    Oh - wait. This is slashdot. Nevermind, please continue.

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
  29. M.U.L.E. gives birth? by ip_vjl · · Score: 2

    A fertile M.U.L.E. - we could have used one of those on planet Irata. ... wonder if I can genetically engineer them to be born already outfitted for Smithore?

    1. Re:M.U.L.E. gives birth? by KORfan · · Score: 1

      Smithore is for the servant class. Those of us who mine Crystite will retire to live in palatial estates.

  30. TROLL ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Above comment is a pseudoscience troll.

    1. Re:TROLL ALERT by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      it is called a hypothesis, he did not state anything as fact...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    2. Re:TROLL ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. You fucken noob!

  31. Re:Idtiot moderator. Fuckwit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have no fucking sense of humor?

    For some of us, it's developed some more since the 6th grade. Your joke was lame. If you can't stand criticism of your pathetic attempts at humor, then why are you posting on a moderated forum?

  32. Re:Fertility and XXX females by GuidoZ · · Score: 0
    Hmm, all of the XXX females I've seen are always lying down and moaning.

    And some of the are far from normal.

  33. Re:No explanation != failure of Science != a mirac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funniest thing I read in a while. Thanks!

  34. Re:The reason for sterility == odd chromosomes? by geoswan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The reason for sterility given in the article has to do with if the hybrid creature has an even number of chromosomes.

    The beeb and the British Mule org may have said mules are infertile because they have an odd number of chromosomes. But I am skeptical.

    Here is an excerpt from a page about the Przewalski Horse

    Some authorities feel strongly that the Przewalski horse is the ancestor of all modern breeds. Others point out that it is a different species from the domesticated horse, having 66 chromosomes as compared to the 64 of the domestic horse. They further point out that while crosses between the Przewalski and domestic horses result in a fertile hybrid, the offspring has 65 chromosomes. Subsequent crosses result in 64 chromosomes and bear little resemblance to the Przewalski. The Foundation for the preservation and protection of the Przewalski's Horse, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, report that only a few Przewalski horses are tamable, in proportions similar to a Zebra.

    So, even if this site is mistaken to say that the 65 chromosome hybrid is fertile, what if you crossed a 62 chromosome Ass with a 66 chromosome Przewalski's Horse? That hybrid would have 64 chromosomes. Would that make it fertile?

  35. Re:Fertility and XXX females by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang, you beat me to it!

  36. Holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That last line you threw in was fucking hilarious! Damn, that caught me off-guard.

  37. Second Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Second Foundation isn't going to like this.

  38. A shot in the dark as to why it happened ... by tdelaney · · Score: 2

    Normally a mule has 63 chromosomes according to the article (presumably 62 paired donkey/horse and one paired horse/horse).

    However, this mule suffers a form of "mule Down's syndrome" - she only has 62 pairs. The father is a donkey. There is a match in the number of chromosomes.

    So, what is considered a genetic disability in humans could possibly be considered a genetic advantage in mules.

    Note: no science whatsoever backs this theory as far as I know ... but then again, there wasn't much in the article either.

    1. Re:A shot in the dark as to why it happened ... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      However, this mule suffers a form of "mule Down's syndrome" - she only has 62 pairs. The father is a donkey. There is a match in the number of chromosomes.

      Could you post your source for this info for the rest of us to read?

    2. Re:A shot in the dark as to why it happened ... by tdelaney · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately not ... haven't found a way yet to replicate my brain onto the net ;)

      You may note the title "A shot in the dark ..." and the last sentence ... especially the theory bit.

      It's just a wild guess. Perhaps I should have put the last sentence first.

  39. Przewalski;s Horse and the three species of zebras by geoswan · · Score: 2
    Przewalski's Horse is pretty interesting. Something like 150 of these equids survive. All in zoos. There are people dedicated to trying to re-introduce them to the wild.

    There are three different species of Zebra, including the Quagga , which genetic analysis shows to be a subspecies of the Plains zebra.

  40. Didn't these guys watch Jurassic Park? by One+Louder · · Score: 1

    Ooh! Ahh! That's how it always starts. Then later there's running and screaming...

    Nature will find a way.

  41. Re:No explanation != failure of Science != a mirac by Dahan · · Score: 2
    ... covered with exploded baked potatoe.

    ... not blessing the potatoe with a cross.

    Great story, Mr. Vice President!

  42. Re:No explanation != failure of Science != a mirac by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    great story, nuf said

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  43. Anyone mated mules? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever mated mules? can you get male mules? what about a mule and a donkey, anybody care to explain the different combos?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Anyone mated mules? by geoswan · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes, mules come in both male and female. Male mules are almost always gelded, prior to puberty. There is no advantage to keeping them intact. And, if they are not gelded they get very aggressive.

      Horse mother, donkey sire - offspring is a mule. Donkey mother, horse sire - offspring is a hinny. Genetically indistinguishable from a mule. I presume the two different names predate modern genetics.

      Mules are stronger, and more intelligent than horses.

      Like mules, a hybrid of a zebra and a horse, or a zebra and a donkey, is infertile. Or a hybrid between any of the three species of zebra.

      Fans of breeding exotic hybrids have dreamed up all kinds of "cute" names for the different crosses. Seems annoying to me.

      Breeding exotic hybrids of endangered species seems very irresponsible to me. But there are people who do it. It seems to me that breeding a Liger or Tigon means you are wasting the reproductive potential of the parents. The Quagga is a recently extinct subspecies of Plains Zebra. There is a project to find Plains Zebras with the most Quagga like characteristics, and breed them, to try to restore them.

      This seems like a bad idea to me too. It seems to me that it makes more sense to husband the remaing genetic heritage of the Plains Zebra.

      The sixth surviving equid is the very rare Przewalskis' Horse. Extinct in the wild. 150 survive in zoos. Originally found in Mongolia. It is not too late to try to preserve this animal's genetic heritage.

  44. Re:No explanation != failure of Science != a mirac by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    But what if this were a Virgin Mule Birth? Should the faithful chant Hail Mares?

  45. Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio. Horror/Sci-Fi author Stephen King was found dead in his Maine home. There weren't any further details. Even if you never read any of his books, there's no denying his impact on popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  46. Re:No explanation != failure of Science != a mirac by yelligsc · · Score: 1

    Execellent post.

    Scott.

  47. Possible reason it doesn't happen? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    Could it be possible that that mules don't reproduce very often due to the fact that no one tries to reproduce them due to the fact that its "common knowledge" that mules can't reproduce?

    1. Re:Possible reason it doesn't happen? by RedCard · · Score: 1

      Could be, but keep in mind that because it's 'common knowledge' that mules can't reproduce, they are often kept in pens with horses/donkeys of the opposite sex.
      Farmers don't have to watch where they put an infertile animal, so they'll often just stick it in the pen with the most room available.
      If sex happens - hey, no problem. It's infertile, so no offspring.

  48. so how many chromosomes does this one have by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    A horse has 64 chromosomes and a donkey has 62, so a mule is left with 63, an uneven number which cannot divide into chromosome pairs. This should make a mule unable to reproduce.

    So how many does this baby mule have? Did it manage to end up with an odd number, or did it end up with an even number due to one of its mule parents having the mule equivilent of downs syndrome?

  49. Fertile Mule ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ASS !!!!!

  50. I have no problem with criticism. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    YOu thought my joke wasnt funny, fine, thank you for posting your opinion. However, my complaint is not that someone thinks im not funny, my complaint is that the mod it down as a troll, off topic or any other such crap, which keeps anyone else from seeing it. If they dont think its funny, fine. Leave it the fuck alone. DOnt mod it down.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  51. Hey... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Nobody said the mother mule was a virgin...
    Creation of Life... gee whiz!!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  52. Re:Przewalski;s Horse and the three species of zeb by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

    Przewalski's Horse [okstate.edu] is pretty interesting. Something like 150 of these equids survive. All in zoos.

    Just to be clear, that count is for North America only -- at least, according to the referenced Web document.

  53. Hybrids: fertile and sterile by gacp · · Score: 1

    Are there known hybrids/half-breeds can have normal fertility, as opposed to requiring a "miracle" to occur?

    Short answer: YES. There are very many recorded cases of animals and plants of different species hybridizing and the descendants being fertile. Depends on the species involved, some hybrids are sterile, some are not. They often are. But that hybrids are sterile is a myth.

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    1. Re:Hybrids: fertile and sterile by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Are there known hybrids/half-breeds can have normal fertility, as opposed to requiring a "miracle" to occur?

      Here is an example . Most of the most widely used cereals are hybrids that breed true. However, from memory, I think that the number of chromosomes of triticale and similar hybrids is the sum of the number of chromosomes in the parent stock, not the average.

      If the name triticale rings a bell it may be because Captain Kirk had to make an emergency delivery of QuadroTriticale in an old Star Trek episode.

  54. What's better? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    (a) freak birth by a mule

    or

    (b) sex with a mare

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  55. Re:The reason for sterility == odd chromosomes? by nucrash · · Score: 1

    I can't help but reinforce what was said earlier about depending on various species. All species are to have an even set of chromosomes, but you can't count on playboy bunny taking it from Black Beauty and expect to get a centaur. Nor can you expect a ass with 62 chromosomes and a Przewalski horse with 66 chromosomes to produce the offspring. If the Hybrid was possible, and had 64 chromosomes, the odds are that two of the chromosomes would have not have pairs. Pairing of the chromosomes being the most important part of genetic structure.

    --
    Place something witty here
  56. I felt like putting a bullet between the eyes of by ashkar · · Score: 1

    ...every panda that wouldn't screw to save its species.

  57. Re:The reason for sterility == odd chromosomes? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    I am not suggesting that the hybrid of an Ass with 62 chromosomes and a Przewalski's Horse with 66 would breed true just because it would have 64 chromosomes. I was just giving an example of a possible cross where the infertility would not be due to having an odd number of chromosomes.

    Pairing of the chromosomes being the most important part of genetic structure.

    Is it? Can you explain this to me?

    First, let me restate this, so I am sure we mean the same thing. You are saying that paired chromosomes are necessary for an animal to breed true with its peers, is this correct? You are not saying that having paired chromosomes are necessary for an offspring to be born, because mules obviously don't fulfill this condition.

    So, how did the proto-equid, that was the ancestor of both Asses and the Horse split into two species with different numbers of chromosomes?

    So, what about Down's syndrome individuals, who have an extra copy of chromosome 21? They don't fulfill your requirement for an even number of chromosomes. Yet I don't believe they are sterile.

    Like MS-Windows programs, our chromosomes contain a lot of code bloat.

    I heard a lecture about this, when I was in high school. So this info may be incorrect, and I would welcome correction. That lecture included slides of individuals born with chromosome abnormalities. Our chromosomes vary in size. And they are numbered in order of size. The lecturer showed some individuals with an abnormality on a larger chromosome. She said that these individuals were more profoundly affected and had more health problems and more profound cognitive challenges than Down's Syndrome individuals. She said that abnormalities on the larger chromosomes result in problemso profound that the children are spontaneously aborted before they come to term.

    Then there are chromosome abnormality of the X and Y. Turner's syndrome women lack a sex chromosome. They have a single X and no Y. They are of normal intelligence. But they never go through puberty, so they can't have children. There are people who have XXY and XYY. I don't believe they are sterile either. Another slashdotter said something about XXX women - women with three X chromosomes.

    Since that lecture I have heard that some Down's symdrome individuals have only a fraction of the extra 21, and that there are less profoundly affected than individuals with a full extra chromosome 21.

    Genes slip around. They slip from chromosome to chromosome. I saw a science documentary about how genes were slipping from the Y to the X. I am not a molecular biologist, but I imagine that 61 of the 62 chromomosomes of Horses and Asses correspond, and that sometime after they split into different species one of the chromosomes split in two. If this was the case, there would be genes for the same traits in the chromosomes from both parents, even though they had them on different chromosomes.

    There was an article in Scientific American, on mule fertility about 45 years ago. It advanced a theory about Mule fertility, that Mules produce gametes, eggs and sperm, but that almost all of them contain a mixture of Ass and Horse chromosomes. And those would be no good. But occasionally a gamete is produced that has all the gametes from a single parent. IIRC the theory was that that gamete could be fertilized and brought to term. That offspring would be pure Horse or pure Ass. "One in million" is the estimate of how often a mule brings an offspring to term. Check my math. If this theory is correct

    Here is something I don't understand. That documentary said that some of the genes on the Y are duplicated dozens of times. So, why does the mere single extra copy of genes in chromosome 21 cause the profound manifestations of Down's? Does each gene contain the molecular equivalent of an instruction pointer, or a map of bad sectors?

  58. Re:The reason for sterility == odd chromosomes? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    I must have been half asleep when I posted this, there is stuff missing.

    There was an article in Scientific American, on mule fertility about 45 years ago. It advanced a theory about Mule fertility, that Mules produce gametes, eggs and sperm, but that almost all of them contain a mixture of Ass and Horse chromosomes. And those would be no good. But occasionally a gamete is produced that has all the chromosomes from a single parent. IIRC the theory was that this gamete could be fertilized and brought to term. That offspring would be pure Horse or pure Ass. "One in million" is the estimate of how often a mule brings an offspring to term. Check my math. If this theory is correct then the chance is more like one in 2^61.
  59. Re:Hybrids: fertile and sterile and m×2×n by gacp · · Score: 1

    >However, from memory, I think that the number of chromosomes of triticale and similar hybrids is the sum of the number of chromosomes in the parent stock, not the average.

    Yes, it's called hybrids stabilized by polyploidy. Common in plants. The new number is (obviously) even, so there in no problem during segregation of chromosome pairs (this is what screws up gametes of some hybrids).

    But this is not alwasy neccesary; many related species have the same chromosome number, so there is no problem to begin with.

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''