Lofgren's Anti-DRM Bill
blastedtokyo writes "House representative Zoe Lofgren introduced the Digital Choice and Freedom Act. Perhaps the most interesting section is the part that invalidates 'non-negotiable shrink wrap licenses' (EULAs) that limit rights. On top of this, it states that both digital and analog media need to be subject to fair use rules for backing up. The full text of the bill is also available." News.com.com.com.com and Infoworld have stories as well, which both note that there is no chance of these bills being passed this year.
I'm not a US citizen (I'm from the forgotten US state, Australia :0), so I'm not sure how the whole lawmaking process works - but doesn't this law say the exact opposite of quite a few laws either previously passed or currently being debated? What happens in this case - do the laws nullify each other? Do they both apply and it gets left up to the courts to decide which has priority?
Perhaps we need some kind of legislation lottery, where the first law that gets drawn out of a barrel is passed, and the rest aren't...I can just imagine a group of senators, fingers crossed, chanting "come in DMCA!"
===
You know that guy who stole your girlfriend away from you in the summer of '95? He's going to die.
this new law will protect ./'s right to copy old articles from the day before?
What needs to happen is some small (1 person?) company neds to release a great product, but include a few... unusual... conditions in it's EULA. (Like, say, each user must send the programmer $100 a month for the rest of their lives, etc.) Then, take all their users to court. Either the court wil uphold the EULA, and the programmer gets rich (woo-hoo!), or the court declares EULAs invalid (take that MS!!)
It's a win-win situation, really.