Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Gaiman v. McFarlane Decision Handed Down

Posted by chrisd on from the no-word-on-if-he-must-give-up-the-baseball dept.

aronc writes "In a case of speedy justice a jury today ruled that Neil Gaiman was in the right on all 9 counts in the case he brought against Todd McFarlane. More details at ComiCon Pulse and ICv2. This case revolved around ownership stakes for Medieval Spawn, Angela, Cagliostro, and further contracts involving the rights to Miracle Man."

4 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. McFarlane's woes by Heynow21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think after this, being married to a Penthouse Pet, and his buying of that McGwire homerun ball for a few million dollars more than it was worth Todd McFarlane has officially qualified for an E! True Hollywood story.

  2. That's all fine but... by dhardman · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I think Journey's Steve Perry still owns the rights to Todd McFarlane's haircut.

  3. Eh? by Cinnibar+CP · · Score: 5, Funny

    (From Comicon Pulse Article)
    they found that McFarlane and Gaiman had entered into agreements in 1992 and 1997 and that McFarlane had breeched both agreements

    It's a rough world when you can't put pants on an agreement.

    Spellcheckers. Gotta love 'em, gotta hate 'em.

  4. Re:care less by unDiWahn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could care less who wins

    Ok... so you could care less -- which means you do care... so how much do you care? That's a very vague statement.

    Unless, of course, you meant you couldn't care less, meaning you don't care at all...