Patrick Volkerding Interviewed by The Age
boa13 writes "The Age, a major newspaper in Melbourne, Australia, has published an interview with Patrick Volkerding, The Man behind Slackware. Covered are the early history of Slackware, its business model, its current state, Patrick's plans for the future and his opinion about the commercialisation of Linux. "
I know who else likes man-behind!
Patrick likes oatmeal.
this is teh truth! teh truth!
There's a 2.4 kernel in the debian installer. Anything wrong with it?
Hi Fred, you and the Little Mermaid can go fuck yourselves. I told you to stay near the phone. I can't find those books--you have other books here--it must be in LaJolla. Call me back. I'm not gonna stay up all night for you. BUHBAYEE.
- Linus Torvalds
- Alan Cox
- Bruce Perens
- Patrick Volkerding
- Eric S. Raymond (everybody loves Raymond)
- David S. Miller
- Ingo Molnar
There are a lot of other cool Linux guys too. This list merely is the tip of an iceberg.Half of me was reluctant to write this letter, out of concern that Mr. Patrick Volkerding may be one of those people who say uppity things for the sole purpose of gaining attention. But given Mr. Volkerding's track record, I have concluded that when someone bends knee to his non-negotiable demands, Mr. Volkerding pushes and pushes for more, so I've decided to proceed. One of my objectives is to reinforce what is best in people. When all is said and done, he keeps saying that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. For some reason, Mr. Volkerding's lapdogs actually believe this nonsense. I hope I don't need to remind you that the only way that we can fight him, the only way we can beat him, is to establish clear, justifiable definitions of deconstructionism and demagogism, so that you can defend a decision to take action when his deputies assuage the hungers of his adherents with servings of fresh scapegoats, but it's still true, and we must do something about it.
Far too many people tolerate Mr. Volkerding's prevarications as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that ever since Mr. Volkerding decided to use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned, his consistent, unvarying line has been that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. He believes that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of beer-guzzling stereotypes. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Mr. Volkerding and his self-centered supporters. The tone of his whinges is so far removed from reality, I find myself questioning what color the sky must be in his world. What he is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly self-aggrandizing activity.
Mr. Volkerding's eccentricity is surpassed only by his vanity. And his vanity is surpassed only by his empty theorizing. (Remember his theory that if he kicks us in the teeth, we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick?) Mr. Volkerding is like a broken record, using the same tired cliches about family and education and safer streets, yet he has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that censorship could benefit us. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so."
One of his grunts once said, "Mr. Volkerding has a "special" perspective on hooliganism which carries with it a "special" right to pit people against each other." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that I should note that the main dissensus between me and Mr. Volkerding is that I contend that you should think of this letter as a clarion call for us to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. He, on the other hand, contends that he is merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. Mr. Volkerding is a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday.
Strange, isn't it, how what I call repressive spongers are always the first to adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined? Although some tyrannical, brain-damaged ne'er-do-wells concede that his wheelings and dealings are not only bad for the immortal soul, but for mortal men and women, they invariably deny that if he is victorious in his quest to open new avenues for the expression of hate, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.
If there is one thing I have learned, it is this: Mr. Volkerding's screeds are designed to rip off everyone and his brother. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. Before Mr. Volkerding spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that if he wanted to, he could waste hours and hours in fruitless conferences and meetings. He could "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. And he could reward mediocrity. We must not allow Mr. Volkerding to do any of these.
Let me mention again that I recently overheard a couple of illiterate dolts say that I'm too obdurate to introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on his vile hastily mounted campaigns. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Mr. Volkerding-induced era of slogans and propaganda. There is good reason to believe that he is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul.
Accordingly, I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Mr. Volkerding's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. I don't care what others say about Mr. Volkerding. He's still disagreeable, self-indulgent, and he intends to waste taxpayers' money. His perceptions are so crude that if allowed to go unanswered, their final cost would be incalculable. No matter how bad you think his smear tactics are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.
Perhaps Mr. Volkerding received his information (or rather, misinformation) from late-night television programs and "B" movies. Once one begins thinking about free speech, about malodorous, temperamental fruitcakes who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own craven beliefs, one realizes that this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of his crafty, puerile ballyhoos. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) Mr. Volkerding is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every insolent ideology finds expression in Patrick Volkerding. Something recently occurred to me that might occur to Mr. Volkerding, as well, if he would just turn down the volume of his voice for a moment: Mr. Volkerding should think about how his wisecracks lead ribald, jackbooted wackos to take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most stubborn, noxious bribe-seekers will never be in a position to condescend to. If Mr. Volkerding doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet.
Whenever there's an argument about his devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that it's quite a feat of hypocrisy for him to deny he wants to force me to wind up in a straitjacket and locked in a padded cell after so recently doing exactly that. That should settle the argument pretty quickly. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with rude airheads?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to place a high value on honor and self-respect. But the first step is to acknowledge that his method (or school, or ideology -- it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Mr. Volkerding-ism". It is a short-sighted and avowedly unpleasant philosophy that aims to assail all that is holy. Mr. Volkerding publicly disavows his ties to Marxism while secretly encouraging his spin doctors to replace love and understanding with sexism and opportunism. Not that I've come to expect any better from him. Let me close where I began: My cop-outs are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights.
Nice troll. A lack of profanity, proper spelling and punctuation. I rate it a 9/10.