Slashdot Mirror
Students Show Off Super-Efficient Solar Homes
mmol_6453 writes "An article at voanews.com describes the 'first-ever solar decathalon,' where the students show off effecient solar-powered homes." As a former Airstream resident, tiny efficient homes have a special place in my heart. Anyone in the D.C. area who can get out there and take pictures, links to photos would be much appreciated in comments.
Correct me If I am wrong... but... we are producing 1kW with our pretend $3000 array on our house. Now, lets say you get that peak power for 8 hours a day. 8 hours *7 days * 4 weeks we get 224kilowatt-hours each month. * your rate... .1103... we get $24.70 as your monthly return... without factoring any of the other benefits (clean energy, power outages not as large a problem, etc...). It will take about 10 years for the array to pay for itself. However, as I mentioned before, this is about alot more than just saving money. You are pretty lucky, in my area rates average 16 cents per kWh, making monthy savings about $35.
Throwing about hyperbole does not help
.01 = .031 KWh/m2/day
.031 = 343 x 10^6 Kwh/day
Doing a quick calculation and using the sq mileage for San Diego County of 4281 sq miles and the nominal energy density of solar at that latitude of 3.1 KWh/m^s/day and a 1% conversion factor gives:
3.1 KWh/m^2/day *
4281 Sq Miles * 2.58 x 10^6 Sq Meters/ Sq Miles = 11 x 10^9
11 x 10^9 x
Or 343,000 Megawatts-Hours for a small California county.
Not that I am proposing to cover an entire county with PV panels but if you are going to "tell it like it is" then do.
BTW, can we bury the Nuclear afterproducts in your backyard?
> but at least I will tell it like it is
Or at least how right-wing kooks want you to believe it is.
You're overlooking two things. First, solar thermal. Most of our power demands are for thermal applications, which are cheap and easy to do with solar. Photovoltaics get all the press because they're "sexy", even though they don't collect much power.
Second, demand. It's very, very easy to lower demand without changing lifestyle, because we currently waste enormous amounts of energy. California demonstrated that during the last manufactured energy crisis. Basically, if *any* effort is made to lower energy use, demand drops dramatically. In particular, it's easier, cheaper, and affects our lifestyle less to lower demand, rather than pouring more money into centralized power generation so we can turn around and waste it again.
PV cells are clean? It sure would be nice if everyone could ignore the costs of manufacture. Just because it generates energy from sunlight you are already getting doesn't make it clean.
I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
- Rob
WebMaster:
BinFeeds
XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but