Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Receives Linux Mandrake 9.0

An anonymous reader writes "Today the Xbox Linux Project announced that Xbox Linux Mandrake 9 has been released. This is the first complete Linux distribution for the Microsoft Xbox gaming console. A 350 MB installation CD of Xbox Linux Mandrake 9 is available for download free of charge from the Xbox Linux website."

28 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Woooweee! by ebbomega · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can use WINE on my Xbox....

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  2. README / legal by jukal · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heh, they handle the legal issues in a very "pro" way:

    Xbox is either a trademark or a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Mandrake might be some kind of trademark of MandrakeSoft. Linux definitely is a trademark of Linus Torvalds. GNU is cool, but I don't think it's a trademark.

    1. Re:README / legal by jukal · · Score: 3, Informative
      This chapter from Linux Mark Institute might give you a hunch.:

      After considerable expense, and a gift of considerable legal resources and time by the law firm of Davis & Schroeder in Monterey, California in recovering the U.S. registered trademarks for Linux, Linus and his advisors concluded that the only way to protect the mark was to actively pursue the registration of it in a number of countries around the world and to maintain the U.S. mark in his name. To do so has required that we aggressively prosecute people who tried to register the name for their exclusive use in the U.S. and other countries, which we have successfully done in five countries. Should you become aware of other people claiming the exclusive use of the mark in other countries, please contact us at the address below.

      So you could say it is a protected trademark in most countries. If someone else tries to trademark it, they will protect it aggressively.

  3. Stupidity by e8johan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If M$ was so determined to build a console and prevent people from running *nix and other fun stuff on it, *why* did they choose a (nearly) standard PC hardware platform. Please provide a more custom solution next time to give the hackers a real challenge ;-)

    1. Re:Stupidity by e8johan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Judging from how much resistance M$ has put up against the modding of XBoxes (required to run XBox Linux currently), I don't think that they are trying to let the hacker community to do it for them.

      In that case it would be easier to make the PS2 run XBox games, as it has a known HW (and an official Linux distro available). The biggest problem is that the XBox runs an x86 and the PS2 an MIPS CPU. This means that you have to some translation magic (either emulation or recompilation) in order to run stuff for one machine on the other.

      One of the advantages of having Linux for both systems, and open source games is that you can recompile them for either system. Also propetary games can take advantage of this by having the same environment on both systems, just re-compile, make a CD (or DVD) with a small Linux kernel + drivers and the game for each platform. All they have to distribute is the Linux source. This removes the need for paying M$ for an expensive, restictively licensed, SDK.

    2. Re:Stupidity by warmcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its not clear actually that MS have put up ANY resistance to the modding of Xboxes, other than changing the hardware recently to be incompatible with existing mods.

      Certainly no one on the Xbox Linux team has heard a peep out of them, and of the three instances of MS apparently weighing in (a modchip company decided not to make their chip, Xbox Mame, and recently Lik-Sang going almost imperceptibly quiet), only the Xbox Mame one is certain to have come from MS. That apparently took the form of some communication objecting to binaries produced by a pirated XDK, which were then taken down. The other two instances may well have nothing to do with MS on closer inspection.

      I think they are very concerned about negative PR snowballing, alienating the consumer and tainting the MS 'brand' as being arrogant, monopolist and exploitative. Truth will out!

    3. Re:Stupidity by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not stupid, that's brilliant marketing. The fact that you can run Linux on it will now be a reason to buy an X-box, so MS now earns money with Linux, and it didn't cost them anything! Bill never ceases to amaze me.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Stupidity by N3WBI3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      How about shutting down Lik Sang for selling mod chips for the xboc

      --
  4. New Sourceforge Project by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first one to get CP/M running on the XBox will gain true kudos.

    10 PRINT "Microsoft really wouldnt like this"
    20 GO TO 10
    RUN

    1. Re:New Sourceforge Project by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Funny

      by youngerpants on Tuesday October 08, @06:01PM (Score:1, Offtopic) (#4408767)
      (User #255314 Info) [ Neutral ]
      The first one to get CP/M running on the XBox will gain true kudos.

      10 PRINT "Microsoft really wouldnt like this"
      20 GO TO 10
      RUN

      Ah... Teen moderators... Don'chya lovem "What's CPM got to do with this?". (Hint read some IT history books kids.)

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  5. Why? by miffo.swe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if its nice and fun that they have made it possible why would i want to run linux on X-box? All they really do is helping MS finetuning their DRM system before it gets to he PC. It will be a cold day in hell before i buy an Xbox.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Why? by DJProtoss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? Because you can have a small, quiet, nicely put together server box for around £140 + modchip costs (which if you are handy with a solder, are quite small).

      --
      "Success is based on knowing how far to go in going too far"
    2. Re:Why? by JavaTHut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This has probably already been asked many times already, but, didn't Sony release a Playstation Linux kit? Why arn't we supporting their efforts and buying that instead of pouring so much effort into a mircro~1 solution?

      ~Ravi

    3. Re:Why? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All they really do is helping MS finetuning their DRM system before it gets to he PC.

      Very true. However, they are also demonstrating legitimate uses of mod-chips, legitimate uses of hacking proprietry hardware, and legitimate reasons for cracking hardware protection. Best of all, they are doing so in a manner which can easily be recognised by the general public (of which judges are a subset) - "Cracking hardware is good: look, you get to run this mainstream, competitive, and popular OS distribution.

      A couple years ago, you'd have taken a modchip to court and the judge would say, "well yes, this is just for playing illegal games isn't it", but now you can take the same modchip along and the judge will see "yeah, that can be used to load the office-suite my son uses". Big difference.

  6. Re:I don't want to buy MS products/. by jez_f · · Score: 4, Insightful
    However they can use those figures to get more games to the platform, and more sales
    True. Unless a significant number of Xboxes are chipped, in which case publishers become more wairy of using xbox. Hence less titles, less sales and bigger loss. Personaly I think that Xbox linux is a nice idea but it has taken the limelight from PS2 Linux which is provided and endorsed by sony. It is nice that Sony are happy to let you play with their hardware. OK so you have to shell out for a HDD but it is a hell of a lot cheeper than a PS2 dev kit.
  7. If only... by TheVidiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is anyone working on bringing Xbox emulation to the PC? Wouldn't that make more sense?

  8. There is method in the M$ madness by ites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Why choose a (nearly) standard PC platform"?
    Microsoft are long-distance players.
    They are designing a Microsoft PC platform.
    Let's call it 'Fritz 1'.
    They would really like this to become the next standard.
    And by trying this out in the XBox arena they are proofing the concept.
    Whatever weaknesses get thrown up now will be closed in the next release.
    After three releases, the design will be unbreakable.
    After that, it's a minor matter to convince Dell and HP to base their PCs on this design.
    And Windows XP 2003 will not run on anything else.
    If the XBox does not scare you, perhaps you should consider a future where all PCs are designed by Redmond.
    It would be smarter for people to leave the XBox alone and not contribute to M$'s strategy by hacking it.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:There is method in the M$ madness by mr3038 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the XBox does not scare you, perhaps you should consider a future where all PCs are designed by Redmond.

      PCs will be PCs in the future too. It might be that you cannot run Windows on a PC anymore in the future. I really don't understand the difference between this new Microsoft XBox and normal x86 PC if they really decided to offer Windows for XBox only. XBox, even in its current form, has all the processor power the casual office worker needs and if companies can get their boxes for less than 250 euros then they should go for it. But some workers doing 3D stuff and simulations do need more processing power than that XBox can offer. So MS needs to offer multiple versions of this new XBox because companies are not going to pay for features they aren't using--at least I hope so. If this new XBox does have replaceable Xcpu, Xmemory, Xmotherboard and Xpci cards then how it's different from a reqular PC? It's not like we have a single identical bus between first x86 PC and todays PC either and we still consider those as the same architecture.

      The only thing to fear is that general use PCs could have really high price tag because all the normal people buy the XBox New Technology (pun intended) instead.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  9. I shouldn't ask but... by thogard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would happen if someone was to approach MS as a game developer and officaly port this so its got all the real stuff and so MS can sell it at K-mart or wherever. I know its wrong on so many levels but it would get around the mod chip issue and be legal (assuming the licenses allow it)

  10. This is an empty victory by ites · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Running Linux on the XBox helps no-one except Microsoft.
    Microsoft are counting on this kind of project to test the XBox security.
    And when all the weaknesses have been fixed we will find ourselves with a new closed PC platform.
    Leave this thing alone, boycott it, let it rot.
    It is an empty victory to help M$ improve this product.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:This is an empty victory by flamingdog · · Score: 5, Funny

      really now, do you believe what you're saying? I mean look at Windows for example. Keep that in your mind and repeat to yourself what you're saying. "when all the weaknesses have been fixed" is not on the MS project calender anywhere, my boy.

      --

      ---------------------------
  11. Re:Can you still play games? by ultrafunkula · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ah, after a bit of research in the FAQs, I've found the answer to my question:

    Will I still be able to play games once Linux is on my hard disk?
    That depends on the solution you choose. If you run Linux through the XBE bootloader on an Xbox with a modchip, there's a dual-boot solution.
    There are also "Live CD's" that make it possible possible to run Linux from a CD without having your hard disk modified at all.
    If you use the replacement ROM method, you would have to install both ROMs in parallel to be still able to run games.

  12. Re:Why not? by Quixote · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why not? Buy ten of them, then smash them to bits. Every one you buy takes money directly out of Bill-n-Steve's pockets and away from their DRM project. Just don't buy any games

    sigh... this comes up every time there's a discussion on the X-box. Your logic would make sense if there was an infinite supply of X-boxes. The fact is, the number of X-boxes being manufactured is limited (and finite, as are all things in this Universe except, possibly, human stupidity). If you buy an X-box, it moves off the shelf and the manufacturer gets $300 ($100 from MS, and $200 from you). If you don't buy it, it sits on the shelf and the manufacturer is out $300. An X-box sitting on the shelf for 1 year will end up costing the manufacturer an additional (say) $50 in interest and other costs, maybe much more.

    If you really want to hurt MS (and I am not saying that one should; I'm just answering this hypothetically), then the best way to do it is to (a) not buy X-box at all, (b) convince others to not buy either, and (c) (this might be illegal) buy an X-box and return it after opening it.

  13. Re:I don't want to buy MS products/. by 13Echo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly.

    Judging by the cost of the X-Box and the cost of these off-the-shelf parts when purchased in bulk, why must anyone assume that they are losing anything? Many of the parts are quite OLD. That includes the hard drive, RAM, CPU, and now even the GPU. It is foolish for anyone to assume that they are losing any money at all. Microsoft gets these parts at dirt-cheap prices, and they have Flextronics build the devices in their slave-labor shops in Mexico.

    Taking a loss... Sure.

  14. real powerful by g4dget · · Score: 3
    [Xbox] consists of very powerful IBM-PC-based hardware

    Yeah, 64M, a 733MHz PIII, some slightly outdated nVidia chip, and an 8G hard disk. Real "powerful". See that baby "fly". For the same price, you can get a real PC.

  15. Re:Why? (your answer) by gosand · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Even if its nice and fun that they have made it possible why would i want to run linux on X-box? All they really do is helping MS finetuning their DRM system before it gets to he PC. It will be a cold day in hell before i buy an Xbox.

    I agree, I wouldn't buy one either. But think about this: before Linux (I'll assume GNU/Linux, since it is now a distro) was ported to the Xbox, there was no reason to have a mod chip other than to play pirated games. Now people are hacking it (in the truest sense of the word) and are finding other fun uses for THE HARDWARE THAT THEY BOUGHT. I emphasize that because Microsoft just shut down a company that sold mod chips. They have no right to do this. Once you buy hardware, you own it. Now they might be able to convince a judge that the only reason to have a mod chip is to play pirated games, therefore robbing Microsoft of their money. But with the porting of Linux, it proves that there are non-illegal reasons to want to buy a mod chip.

    Not that I think that it will stop Microsoft from bullying people, but it is a start. If you couldn't run the Linux kernel on the Xbox, there would be no other reason to buy a mod chip.

    Besides, I think it is cool that people have the skills to do this kind of thing. It is interesting, and proves the power of the "little guy".

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  16. Re:The Point You Are Missing Is by Quikah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Each Xbox bought also goes to the pool of "Xbox sold" which MS uses to market to game developers to code for the Xbox which creates more Xbox games which MS uses to market to the consumer to buy an Xbox.

    --
    Q.
  17. DRM Practice by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Protecting the XBox is good practice for building an 'unbreakable' home PC.

    MS had to build a PC becasue they need to have a reference point. A software DRM solution would be problematic because of the wide range of hardware it was likely to end up running on. They have a need to get this reference system into the wild and see how people would attempt to break into it. Already they have reaped dividends by having their first attempt cracked.

    They can do this without any great risk to their reputation as secure system builders because, after all, it's *only* a games console.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter