Open Source Studies
e8johan writes "Avaya Labs Research has presented a paper studying the open source process in the cases of Apache and Mozilla. They reach a number of interesting conclusions, the ones I find most interesting are: * Open source projects tend to have a core team of 10-15 coders, producing almost all code. The next layer is a set of developers submitting new features and bugfixes. The next layer is a set of advanced users submitting bug reports. * Open source projects tend to have a lower bug-rate than commercial projects. * Open source projects are generally quicker to respond to user requests. The article also discusses the differences between projects that have always been open source (such as Apache) and projects having a proprietary history (such as Mozilla)."
... and here is my bug sumission. It's spelled COMMERCIAL, not commersial I guess this submission was proprietary.
Open Source projects tend to have less men with whips walking around your cubical.
"We are slaves."
One Leader
One inner circle of designers
10-15 core group of coders
Dozens of bugfixers, feature submitters
Thousands (and then some) of users
Several Slashdot articles
Hundreds of Insightful, Informative, Interesting posts
A preponderance of troll, offtopic or subjectively funny posts
Priceless
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
And to be fair, with some products, that's a good thing.
Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.