Slashdot Mirror


The Aging Gamer

An anonymous reader writes "There is a short article at the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle about the surprising statistic that a large potion of computer gamers are over 35. This actually makes sense, since many of them began gaming in the 70's. A short and semi-interesting read."

12 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Sounds like me... by eaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now that I am over 35 (egad! Going to hit 28h soon!) I can actually afford the games. The ones I buy would have been a heck of a lot of allowance or lawns in my day. In fact, I think this age thing also has to do with the fact that games are much better than they used to be too - from a hardware and software point. When I first started out there wasn't much available for my $3500 Leading Edge...

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
    1. Re:Sounds like me... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is what Sony figured out, and why the Playstation was such a success. It was the first console to have a real plethora of adult oriented games. Well Sony discovered two things as a result of this:

      1) There are lots of adults that want to play games.
      2) Adults have more money.

      Kids have to take whatever their parents will give them, adults can spend what they wish within the limits of their means. Unsupprisingly, this means that adults spend more on games.

  3. why would anyone quit gaming? by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I played pong when it was bleeding edge technology, why wouldn't I be excited about the great advances in games over the last several years or be looking forward to some of the new games coming out in 2003? I am part of a generation of kids who have had every system between the Atari 2600 and the Xbox, I would think that our consumer dollars would be very strong in this market. I just don't understand this being a surprise to anyone.

    1. Re:why would anyone quit gaming? by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would anyone quit gaming?

      Because games get stale after a while, especially with most games pigeonholed into cliche-ridden genres: FPS, RTS, "character with attitude" platformer, racing, fighting, RPG. What eventually started bugging me is that most games are designed to take X hours to "beat." You buy the game, you plow through it, you see all the movies and all the levels and get the same experience out of it that everyone else does, and then you're done. So not only do you need a huge block of time to play, but you're just following a script. The cry for story-based games has made this much worse than it used to be.

      What I really want is to sit down for short bursts and play something unique. But instead it's like going to a video store that only rents movies like Collateral Damage and The Phantom Menace (ugh!), except that they're each 15 hours long.

  4. Voodoo Mathematics by greenhide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This actually makes sense, since many of them began gaming in the 70's.

    Right, this makes sense. If you are 35 and you are gaming, you must have been doing so your entire lifetime.

    How about this instead: Someone who is 35 now was in their mid teens when arcade games were really big in the mid eighties. They started playing the games non-stop. Most of them did not play on computers at home, they went out to an arcade.

    Fast forward ten to fifteen years. Home game consoles are so cheap and so powerful that they're better than going to the arcade. The same people who went to the arcade started buying the game consoles.

    Which brings us to today. Believe it or not folks, I actually know some people who are over 35 years old, and they might actually fool you into thinking they weren't wearing Depends. Most of them still like doing the things they did when they were in their late teens and early twenties, which includes gaming.

    Now, if the study had claimed that the average gaming age was 40 or 45, that would have been a little harder to swallow.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  5. Re:I would have to say... by altairmaine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > That is quite scary, considering that gaming is at an all time high right now...so, if in 20 years
    > 90+% of gamers are over 35, i wouldn't be shocked....

    Ummmm. That really doesn't make any sense. The birth rate isn't plummetting catastrophically. I teach high school - and I assure you that a large fraction of the 14-year-olds on down are quite hooked. They'll be 34 in 20 years, and I don't see any likely reason that gaming would stop gaining recruits. 10 or so to 35 is an awfully big fraction of the population, much more than 10% - even if they WERE underrepresented in the gaming group, they'd claim more than 10% of it. And I see such an underrepresentation as unlikely. A higher fraction of today's youth are gamers, for instance, than were gamers in the 70s.

  6. Re:Linux Games by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wrong. Being a bad parent would be not even knowing what your kid has been doing for the last two weeks. This guy knows. And if you force a kid to stop whatever they are doing for no good reason other than "because so elite said so" then they're just going to get pissed off at you and nothing's solved. Then the kid's going to be angry and forced to find something else fun to do before he was prepared to which sounds like a good path toward all sorts of problematic behavior.

    You sound like you don't have kids yourself and you're one of the armchair parents like the ones that run this country. You know the type, the ones that think that they should have complete control over the raising of every child in the country yet can't manage their own family.

  7. Re:I would have to say... by Raiford · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You don't even have to disagree. You can get a Flamebait, Troll for just suggesting that Windows does just one thing better than Linux

    Raiford -- Hacking Linux since 1993

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  8. Simple economics. by jinx90277 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It isn't any great mystery -- it's simple economics, plus demographics.

    Kids (say, up through early college) would like to play games, but don't have the disposable income.

    Younger adults (say, late college through late 20s) have disposable income, but they are spending their money on social pursuits, vacations, cars, gadgets, clothing, etc.

    But when they finally marry and start families, the center for entertainment switches to the home...and those $50 games are somewhat more affordable once you hold down a real job.

    --
    "she says i'm lousy conversation. as if that's supposed to help."
  9. Re:whew, I'm not the only one ... by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, agreed!

    I recently turned 31 myself, and last Xmas, I bought myself a PS2 and several games for it. Granted, I was always a bit selective about what I purchased/played. There seem to be quite a few "teenie-bopper" games out there that don't do anything for me.

    But how can you place an "age limit" on sports games, billiards games, flight simulators, well-done car racing sims, and any games with "mature" themes + good graphics, sound, and all around gameplay (like GTA3 for example)?

    As a matter of fact, one of the guys I worked with who was a few years older than me got hooked on PS2 after I kept telling him about the stuff available for it. (Initially, he wrote it off as kid stuff - but his interest was piqued when he heard about Gran Turismo 3 and the like.) I think he bought one "for his kid" as an excuse, and ended up playing it himself.

    In fact, I think one of society's big problems today is the number of folks who live in relative boredom and depression because of a self-inflicted lack of fun/hobbies. There's this prevelant sense that as you reach age 30 or so, you're "not supposed" to do lots of stuff anymore. (No more big car stereo upgrades.... no more video games.... yadda, yadda.) Screw that. I never want to grow old and be one of the "statistics" that sits around drinking beer in front of the TV, watching only football, baseball and/or hockey - goes to work, eats, and sleeps, and never really does anything else "for the fun of it".

  10. Computer games = generation gap? by Da+VinMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if, when we're all senior citizens and fragging away on each other with Quake XXXVI, and taunting each other with broadband audio and vidio feeds, if the kids will pass us by and scoff. Maybe they would says things like "What's wrong with those old farts?! Why do they play that crap when they could just talk to each other?"

    Perhaps there *is* hope for our species after all.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!