Intel Must Pay $150M for Patent Infringement
An anonymous reader writes "ExtremeTech is reporting that a U.S. district court has ruled that Intel's Itanium infringes Intergraph's intellectual property to the tune of $150 million in damages. The judge also cleared the way for Intergraph to request an injunction blocking sales of Itaniums and Itanium 2's."
...must be throwing a party right about now.
What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
Could I run out and patent the idea of 128 bit parallel chip?
Application for patent: method by which an individual may suggest/ask feedback regarding (un)patentable ideas in an Internet-based group discussion forum.
Somehow, I'm guessing there's probably some prior art here....
moto411.com
Cheque made payable to Intergraph for $149.99999...
I had this great idea, and thought of Patenting it, but in the interests of open source and free software, decided to publish it for free use. As far as I know, there is no prior art. :-)
VCR Clock SettingA reliable sign of the absence of technical knowledge is to see the flashing 12:00 of a VCR. It seems that manufacturers can't get their act together, to create a UI that the average Joe (or Joanne) can use to set the time in the VCR (or Microwave oven.)
My idea is to add a single button, replacing all those time setting menus. On this button, and also on a large sheet of card in several languages, would be written the words "Press the Time button at 12 noon." Of course, technicians can also be trained to do this for those who have trouble following instructions.
Share and Enjoy!
[Note to moderators: +1 Funny. It's humor.]Paul Gillingwater
MBA, CISSP, CISM
Because it's worth a lot, at least $150M, that's why.
unfinished: (adj.)
Too bad this patent doesn't keep people from reinventing it.
!#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
... AMD announces the acquisition of Intergraph for $400M. :-)
That is all.