Archos Jukebox Multimedia Reviewed
An anonymous reader points to Richard Menta's review of the Archos Jukebox Multimedia (mentioned in this earlier Slashdot posting). Here's a snippet from the review: "Right now my wife and I are watching an old episode of a TV show no longer broadcast in our area or available tape. How are we watching it? We are playing it off of a 9oz. MP3 player -- where I have digitally stored the episode -- hooked up to the small TV in our room and inconspicuously placed on top."
A fleet of rabid attack lawyers has been dispatched to the area regarding an alleged copyright infrigement. No comment on whether prosecutors will seek the death penalty.
Sounds great, but what kind of resolution are we talking about here? I wouldn't want to see fuzzy, pixellated video writ large on my TV screen, whether it comes from my VCR or a tiny MP3 player
Right now my wife and I are watching an old episode of a TV show no longer broadcast in our area or available tape. How are we watching it? We are playing it off of a 9oz. MP3 player -- where I have digitally stored the episode -- hooked up to the small TV in our room and inconspicuously placed on top.
Hey, tell us about the time you robbed a liquour store too. "Because, shucks, that brand of booze wasn't available in my area, so, gee, I decided to STEAL SOME."
Take your copyrite infringmeent tools elsewhere, pirate. Good thing oyu didn't say what show it was or the feds'll be no-knocking your ass in no time flat!
I know what you're saying, as you nervously look down at your shoes and sweat: but officer, we watched the commercials, and it was such an old show....
DOESN'T MATTER! You're in possession of a device that can fAST FORWARD over commercials! Even if you never push the fast forwrd button, it means you're a criminal, just like the DC sniper, who's taken EIGHT INNOCENT LIVES already!
WHEN WILL YOU THEIVES LEARN?
How the hell would the Supreme courts decision regarding taping TV shows not apply to digital recorders? Does the MPAA expect there to be Supreme Court case for every format that comes out? There Supreme court would spend 1/2 its time dealing with formats: (S-VHS, DAT, MPG, Quicktime, etc.) IANAL, but I would imagine the previous decision covers the act of recording a show for later personal use and is not related to what format or media it is recorded on.
Right now my wife and I are watching an old episode of a TV show no longer broadcast in our area or available tape. How are we watching it?
What does your wife think of you submitting a story to Slashdot while allegedly wating TV with her?
"No, honey I do not love that computer more than you." Please, please don't ask about the laptop ...
Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
To dream a little further, integrate an iPod and Palm OS, add a build in projector, make it float in the tub and usable in the shower (pr0n?).
Umm. Unless you have a really nice TV, it's only displaying 352x240 NTSC or 352x288 PAL. The quality is the same as a VHS tape---if there's "pixelization", the reviewer probably means the blocking artifacts that DivX has at too-low bitrates.
--grendel drago
Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca