Slashdot Mirror


Another iPod Competitor

rael9real writes "NOMAD has intoduced a new player. It has USB 2 and FireWire (finally), and supports WMA and MP3. It has a 20GB drive like the high-end iPod, and supposedly holds more music because it supports WMA (though why someone would want to use WMA is beyond me). It *is* cheaper than the iPod, though. Looks like a definite competitor. Maybe it'll drive iPod pricing down." Update: 10/14 21:21 GMT by T : Note that the listed specs for the player mention only "USB," not USB 2.

26 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Maybe I'm blind... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    per Creative, it is $299+s/h after a rebate.

    The price info is pretty well buried. Had to "find a retailer" to get it.

    guac-foo

  2. Re:20 GB hard drive? by DCram · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the add:
    "Use your Zen to transfer files from your home computer to work or school by using the Zen as a portable hard drive."

    And the price is the same as the IPod after "rebate" read 8 months to get your money.

    --
    If I were only smart enough to accomplish the things I dream about.. Or maybe too dumb to care.
  3. It's not exclusive. was Re:Another thing... by millia · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not exclusive. they have an official windows version now. not to mention all the unofficial unix clients.

    --
    stored on computers from birth to the grave
  4. Re:Gotta say it... by sweetooth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go read the specifications, it's not listed. Only mp3 and wma are listed.
    specs

  5. Nomads used to be hackable by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a first generation Nomad Jukebox. There are several newsgroups & websites devoted to hacking these, so I'm assuming that the newer ones will be hackable also.

    I love my Nomad, with the exception of it's size (Portable CD player size), slow transfer (USB only) and battery life (About 2 hours), but this new player seems to fix all of those. As soon as it has been out a while and prices drop, I would definately love to have one of these.

  6. Re:Another thing... by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anotherng that will hold the iPod is it's exclisive Macintosh support.

    There's an iPod version made specifically for Windows--three of them actually. With a FAT32 file system, Musicmatch 7.1 for access, and even a 6-pin-to-4-pin adapter for the firewire cable.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/02q4/021003/ind ex.html

  7. A bit about the Zen by fremen · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been lurking in various Creative boards, largely because I just bought the Nomad Jukebox 3. Anyway, the general belief is that the Zen is a somewhat stripped down Nomad Jukebox 3. When you think about it, this makes sense.

    The Jukebox 3 is a hard drive based MP3 player, just like the iPod. That said, they occupy slightly different niches. The iPod is small and very portable. The Jukebox 3 is bigger, but it has much more battery space, recording capabilities, a wired remote, more disk for the price, etc. There are two different markets here, and Creative wants a piece of the iPod's pie. The Zen appears to be a Jukebox 3 without the extra battery space, without the recording features (expect through its external wired remote), without the docking station port, etc. It's smaller, more portable, and easier to carry than the Jukebox 3. It also does less than the Jukebox 3.

    Truthfully, it's a wonderful time to be thinking about an MP3 player (especially hd based). Every possible configuration is out there. On the cheap side, you have Archos with it's video player. Creative has a richly featured (and fairly inexpensive) Jukebox and a less featured, more portable Zen. Apple has a very portable and light iPod that's also more expensive. There's a toy for every price range and feature set!

  8. Numbers head-to-head vs. 20 GB iPod by wherley · · Score: 5, Informative

    iPod specs here

    Jukebox Zen
    specs here

    Height: iPod =101.6 mm vs. Zen=112.6

    Width: iPod =60.96 mm vs. Zen=75.9

    Depth: iPod =21.34 mm vs. Zen=24.5

    Weight: iPod =7.2 oz vs. Zen=9.5 oz

    Display: iPod=160x128 pix vs. Zen=132x64 pix

    Output Power: iPod=60mW vs. Zen=100mW

    Playing Time: iPod=10hours vs. Zen=12hours

  9. Re:Shock absorbtion? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, its essentially a slimline harddrive. I have no idea what the buffer is on it, so heavy shaking's going to make it skip and possibly damage the platter and/or head.

    They've got 512MB solid-state USB memory keys (think: DiskOnKey) that you can play audio/video from on your PC. I imagine it won't be too long before they've got a decent 1GB+ storage chip that someone could put into a portable audio device like this. I'd hope it would be cheaper too.

    I've got an el-cheapo JaMP3 simply because it cost me $20. The 64MB MMC disk cost me another $80, so I've got a whopping 80MB of MP3 storage. Sure, I can shrink the bitrates down using DietMP3 and the quality's going to suck, but I'm not about to shell out $300 for an MP3 player..

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  10. Re:This is great and all but what about the softwa by sweetooth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've used Play Center 3 a good bit because it came with my Sound Blaster Audigy, and I can't stand it. Version 3 is better than the older versions, but it's still clunky and over complicated. That's just my opinion of course and others may have had better experiences. Having used both Play Center 3 and iTunes though, I would say that iTunes is much better than Play Center. iTunes just has a ton of thought put into makeing the user interaction with the software as simple as possible.

  11. You're obviously an uninformed zealot by Brigadoon · · Score: 5, Informative

    slogg vorbis is shit. Stop whining about your fucking audio codec that no one will ever fucking suport because no one wants it. MP3 is the standard and ogg will fade away into nothing.

    Firstly, how can a codec that's gaining momentum "fade into nothing"? It's not mainstream now, but neither were computers, UNIX, digital audio, etc.

    Second, more and more companies are picking up OGG Vorbis support. Why is that? Well, let's see. It's a completely FREE codec that is continually getting better. It's supported by an organization that's dedicated to creating free multimedia codecs for use in open, free, and commercial use -- all without charging a cent. Most importantly, however, OGG Vorbis IS superior to WMA and MP3. If you think otherwise, try looking into some of the various listening tests. Or check out Vorbis' Listen page. If you're such a blind zealot that you won't actually test various codecs, you have no right to praise or flame any codec for any reason.

    Grow up and leave the technology details to people who know what they're doing and talking about.

  12. Re:lot's o room there by mustangdavis · · Score: 3, Informative


    Although your music tastes may be very limited, many people like a VERY wide variety of music ... which usually varies depending on their mood. Although I agree that 20 gig may be a bit excessive, it isn't out of the range of possibility. I'm not a MP3 nut myself, but I do have over 5 gig of MP3s burned onto CD, so I could easily see people putting 10 - 15 gig of music on this device ... especially if they are like me and enjoy listening to live music performances.

    Besides, a portable hard drive, as you propose, would require making the enclosure for the device larger ... thus making it suck more than iPod even more in that category!! I know that "they" say "size matters", but in this case, smaller is better! (size is a GREAT marketing tool)

    Also, the batteries may run out using today's batteries, but in a year or so ... their might be a new standard for batteries that make it possible to listen to all 20 gig twice ...

    Have faith in technology ...

    And besides, isn't it better to have extra space rather than not having enough space? This way, 99.5% of the people will not complain about not being able to carry their entire MP3 collection with them every where they go!!! (another good marketing tool)

  13. Re:Gotta say it... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't appear so, but if you look at the bottom of their spec sheet page:

    ** Operating System/Firmware support & update will be available via www.NOMADWorld.com
    (http://www.nomadworld.com/pro ducts/Jukebox_Zen/sp ecs.asp)

    It looks at though it could possibly be added if demand was great enough. This is just speculation though.

  14. Re:WMA isn't *terrible* by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 3, Informative

    For portable devices, it almost makes sense - except, of course, for the lack of linux support.

    There's plenty of (unofficial) Linux support for WMA. Both MPlayer and avifile support most WMA formats. Plus, Crossover provides a plugin for WMA8 that works just fine (granted it costs $25, but it's the best quality/buck ratio in the business).

    DZM

  15. Re:Shock absorbtion? by BWJones · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder how shock absorbent this guy is

    I can't speak about the Nomad, but the I have taken the iPod jogging, mountain biking, bicycle commuting etc... and have never had a skip. Essentially the iPod has a huge RAM buffer (can't remember how big, but something like 32 or 64 MB). The hard drive spins up briefly and loads music into RAM before spinning down again. This saves battery life, limits the damage to the hard drive, and keeps music from skipping. I looked at a number of MP3 players before deciding on the iPod and I must say I am truly happy with the iPod. The other bonus is that I can take the iPod and almost half of our collection of music with me with the 20GB model after synching it to our home stereo system (iTunes powered). Thats about 13 days of music folks and you can have road trip mixes, exercise mixes etc.... that can easily be updated before walking out of the house.

    See scientia et macintosh for more iPod commentary.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  16. features by asv108 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have the 1st gen 5GB ipod and would be glad to replace it with this player if:
    • It doesn't require a ridiculous amount of drivers in order to work. Anything I've bought from creative recently has had the most bloated drivers I've ever seen. The default install of the Audigy installs 100 megs of crap but the worst part is you can't download the new drivers without having the fscking CD!!
    • Is there any reason why this cannot have OGG support? Instead if just trying to mimic the competition why not try to differentiate yourself with additional features? No a crappy FM tuner is not going to cut it..
    • Will this work with other software or will I be locked in to using playcenter?
    • How is creative as far as returns and warranty? When my ipod died after 8-months of use, I got a brand new one 3 days later and apple even sent me a box to ship out the old one.
  17. Wrong by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Informative

    And the price is the same as the IPod after "rebate" read 8 months to get your money.

    The 20GB iPod is $499.

    The Jukebox Zen 20GB player is $349 before the rebate, and $299 after.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  18. Trolling or sleeping? by drew_kime · · Score: 5, Informative
    Vorbis decoding is much more resource-intensive than WMA or MP3. It actually requires a chip with a floating point unit.
    From here:
    "Tremor" integer-only codec now under BSD license
    Did you really not know this? This has been out for over a month.
    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:Trolling or sleeping? by JesseL · · Score: 3, Informative

      A PIC16F877 doesn't have the power to decode OGG or MP3. They use a hardware decoder in the SliMP3 to do the actual decoding, the pic just handles the networking and display.

      Also, I wouldn't exactly call a 20MHz 8-bit microcontroller "fancy".

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  19. You forgot the most important thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ogg sounds better than MP3, yes, but: OGG will continue to improve, while MP3, for all intents and purposes, is effectively DEAD.

    Yes, DEAD. The "standard" MP3 is not going to improve. Any attempt to improve it will be NON-standard. MP3Pro isn't MP3. Any 'official' enhancements to MP3 will be like MP3Pro--for profit. The MP3 "game" is up; Fraunhoffer and their ilk won't let the next goose that lays a golden egg get away.

    Ogg on the other hand is free to change and evolve on it's own, patent free. Our idiot "MP3 is standard and ogg sucks" troll, obviously, didn't consider this. Nor did he consider the fact that major game companies are now using Ogg Vorbis for music formats (NWN, UT2k3, Serious Sam, etc), and NOT MP3.

    Also newsworthy: There is alpha-level Ogg Vorbis support for the PhatNoise/Kenwood Music Keg -now-, downloadable from the PhatNoise web site. Looks like the Music Keg is the first one to market with Ogg! (at least for car players, anyway...)

  20. NOT a 1.8 in. drive! by s.o.terica · · Score: 4, Informative

    The iPod uses a 1.8 in. hard disk; the Creative uses a standard 2.5 in. notebook
    hard disk -- therefore the Creative player is about twice as big as the iPod.
    Not only is this not novel (Archos has been using 2.5 in. notebook
    drives in similarly-sized MP3 players for a while), it's also not a competitor
    in my book.

  21. Creative supports DRM by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's not forget that the company that makes this, Creative Labs, hopped on the DRM bandwagon.

    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
  22. Features & Why OGG is not better supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    People are complaining about features? The Nomad does have features over and above the iPod. Most notably recording. Many people in the live & location recording circles are exploring the Nomads as a replacement for DAT and Mini Disc recording. Creative engineers have been quite active with end users on some of the message boards I frequent with refining the firmware of the Nomad III to enable bit accurate recording and data transfer, so they will listen to a relatively small customer base to improve their product. That said I think I remember reading an article that discussed why so few portable devices support OGG and other codecs. It basically comes down to CPU power. Most of the embedded chips do not have enough processing power to support OGG decoding. Any device this small makes a tradeoff between battery and processing power. Finally 10-12 hours of nonstop music is a lot, maybe I can't listen to EVERY song on a player in that time, but do you always know what songs you listen to before you leave the house? I don't, so it's nice to have a large selection to choose from. And the ability to recharge from a USB port or an AC adapter sounds pretty nice to me. Competition in this market will drive innovation and lower prices. The iPod and Nomad are both prime examples of that, so let's hope for our sake the battle continues.

    1. Re:Features & Why OGG is not better supported by sl3xd · · Score: 3, Informative

      It basically comes down to CPU power. Most of the embedded chips do not have enough processing power to support OGG decoding.

      This is quite false. In fact, many of the required decoding operations (IDCT being the primary one) are so close to identical it hardly matters. Moreover, decoding of Vorbis is nearly as efficient as MP3 decoding (give it the same kind of optimization time MP3 has had, and we can revisit the statement.) Since WMA is closed, I haven't seen any good papers on WMA decoder efficiency, but I think there's little reason to think it behaves much different to MP3 or Vorbis.

      And there's one key point that makes the CPU power argument fall flat on its face: Encoding into either MP3 or WMA, requires massive (at least to an embedded system) resources; espescially when compared to the amount of processing power needed to decode the same piece. The difference is several orders of magnitude.

      If the thing can record and encode to MP3, (espescially in real-time), Vorbis decoding is a no-brainer. Espescially with a fully-integerized decoder freely available.

      Frankly, I think the thing should have the following decoders (in order of 'significance')

      MP3 -- The de facto standard.
      AAC -- The 'new' MPEG standard (MPEG4), which not only encompasses MPEG4, but also RealAudio8+

      WMA -- Pandering to Microsoft hasn't been bad for Creative in the past, and since there are millions who just use WMA because it's built-in to Windows, it makes sense to support it.

      Vorbis -- The hacker favorite, but also lacks the licencing fees required for MP3, AAC, or WMA.
      MP3Pro -- Less popular than Vorbis, but it has the blessing of Thompson and Frauhaufer.

      Ideally, it should be able to have decoder 'plugins' that you download, and are stored on the disk with the music (ie. not in firmware).

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  23. Alternative to MP3 players... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've actually just recently gotten hooked on MiniDiscs. Yes, I know, the DRM sucks, but it's easy enough to get around (besides, I usually rip straight from CD anyway so it's not a big deal.) The NetMDs are way cool, the MDLP4 format can hold about 4 full length CDs on one MD (albeit at a reduced bitrate, but with the headphones most people use with light portables, you'd never be able to tell the difference.) The thing is impossible to skip, the battery life is insane (60+ hrs on a single AA,) plus it's small and the media's cheap.

    I really do wish Sony would get over the stupid DRM bullshit though, as that's really the only major flaw the NetMDs have. Well, that and lack of cross-platform drivers, but that seems to be a problem for a lot of portables. You can pick them up at Best Buy for around $150, but I'm sure with some online searching you could find them for a bit less. The discs are about a buck a pop, but when compared to flash media or a cratered hard drive, it's a steal.

    Yeah, I know, a lot of people are going to bitch about how the format is closed and very much proprietary, but personally I don't care so long as it works. If you're just looking for a solid portable, take a look at the NetMDs. Yeah, 10 gigs of MP3s on a hard drive player sounds nice, but I'm not sure I wanna plunk down that kind of cash on something with as many sensitive, breakable parts as are in a hard drive. Aw well, any other MD fans out there?

  24. Nice objectivity... by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a lot more specs then that on those page: recording capablity:
    zen: yes, ipod no

    radio
    zen: yes, ipod no

    S/N ratio:
    zen: 98db, ipod: dosn't say

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.