Slashdot Mirror


Retailers Won't Sell New Acclaim Game

DrEnter writes "According to this Yahoo article, Wal-Mart, Toys R Us, and Kay-Bee Toys are refusing to carry Acclaim's new video game 'BMX XXX'. Best Buy has stated it will sell a censored version of the game. Acclaim is billing it as the first major release game to feature full-action nudity, with prostitutes and pimps and main characters. A Wal-Mart spokesman stated "We're not going to carry any software with any vulgarity or nudity -- we're just not going to do it." I'm pretty sure Wal-Mart sells rated-R movies (including those arguably targeted at the same age group as this game is), so make your own judgement..."

70 of 680 comments (clear)

  1. In related news... by Dimensio · · Score: 4, Funny

    Acclaim has announced that the refusal of some retailers to carry the game would have no impact on sales, as no one has planned to buy the worthless piece of crap anyway.

    1. Re:In related news... by coene · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On some level I agree (the Tony Hawks and BMX games popularity is a little crazy -- and this takes is a step further), but on a complete different level... This game looks funny as hell.

      If you havent seen the trailer, http://www.fileshack.com/file.x?fid=1222.

      Seriously, the trailer makes it worth a rent at minimum... What red blooded male doesent like sports + nudity + pimps + hookers + weapons.. Especially in digital form!

      Hey, the world is in moral decay.. and its only gonna get worse. This is the biggest step forward since GTA3. I say enjoy the ride.

    2. Re:In related news... by Squareball · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah
      but it is ironic that they will usually carry games where you can KILL others but the minute you show some one naked it's vulger.

      So the message to the youth... making love is bad. Killing is good.

      so mindless.

    3. Re:In related news... by fliplap · · Score: 5, Informative

      Screw fileshack, they want you to WAIT for the download to start. They actually have queues, the wait time right now is at least 12 minutes. Why not get the trailer directly from the bmx xxx site. Its embedded in a page but here's the URL it pulls the mpg from:

      http://209.10.163.130/aux/bmxxxx/movies/mpg_01.m pg

    4. Re:In related news... by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Keep in mind that teenage pregnancy and the number of sexually active teenagers has actually steadily decreased over the last 50 years.

      In the meantime we have actually identified many diseases as STD's that used to be attributed to things like hygeine. Many experts beleive that the actual rate of STD contraction is way down.

      In the meantime the sexual demeanor of the nation has become steadily more liberal... Its a long process, but I think your right. There is a definite correlation between the two..

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    5. Re:In related news... by cenobita · · Score: 4, Interesting

      interestingly enough, each and every one of these retailers comes out as a hypocrite in this.

      just yesterday, i walked into wal-mart and bought a copy of GTA3 for PS2. no ID, no huge warning label, nothing. here we have a game that caused such a huge furor, with it's mass amounts of violence and criminal themes, not to mention hookers, pimps, and drugs..purchased from a company that has, time and again, supposedly "put their foot down" on this kind of thing.

      $10 bucks says that if this game gets popular, you can expect to see retailers who once claimed they would never tolerate that kind of thing, stocking it in droves to get a slice of the profit. this whole issue comes down to profitability and giving a good marketing face. if the game doesn't look like it's going to be a big seller, it's easy to say "we won't carry this!", because nobody gives a shit either way. turn the tables, though, and not carrying it means a large loss of potential profits.

      i can't think of a single retailer who would actually stand behind a claim of morality even at the risk of losing a lot of money.

      to finish this, though: i don't think the game looks all that entertaining, nor does the prospect of full nudity really appeal to me. if i want to look at naked women, i'll rent a frickin' porno..not a BMX game.

    6. Re:In related news... by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Funny

      but it is ironic that they will usually carry games where you can KILL others but the minute you show some one naked it's vulger.

      Not only that, but Wal-Mart is the only national chain I know of that continues to sell all sorts of guns and ammunition (mostly shotguns and rifles).

      BTW, it is NOT funny to go into Wal-Mart and tell them you need more .223 ammo, "because you ran out."

      Trust me!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  2. Some places sell it by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is all that Playboy and Penthouse software on the top shelf of the computer software section at Hastings...

  3. What ever happened to Leisure Suit Larry? by name_already_in_use · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That was vulgar and featured nudity and everybody loved it. No stores, as I recall, refused to sell that. Still I suppose the graphics have come a little since those days, perhaps it is the realism that shocks them.

    --


    Rake Free + Mac Poker: CardCrusade
    1. Re:What ever happened to Leisure Suit Larry? by no+soup+for+you · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Careful what you wish for... following is a list of Q and A from the Leisure Suit Larry I Quiz.

      Spoiler alert -- contains answers!!!

      "Tiptoe Through the Tulips" was recorded by c Tiny Tim
      "Where's the..." c beef?!
      A nehru jacket is b out of date
      Bourbon Street is in d New Orleans, Louisi
      Calvin Klein is c a clothing designer
      Captain Kangaroo's sidekick was d Mr. Greenjeans
      Charlie McArthy and d Edgar Bergen
      Does a pair of queens beat 3 deuces? a Yes, in Blackjack
      Herb Alpert and the ____ Brass? a Tijuana
      How many molecules are there in a glass of water? d as many as there ar [sic]
      I find computer games with adult content b acceptable
      If a physician were on an island with Bo Derek, he would thank God If Bo Derek were here, I'd ask her to d stop playing comput
      It's not nice to fool b mother nature
      Joe Dimaggio played b Baseball
      Lee Harvey killed c John F. Kennedy
      Mohammed Ali is c a professional boxe
      Peter Piper picked pickled c peppers
      Sergent Pepper was c the leader of the l
      The largest state is b Alaska
      The last name of Annette (on the Mickey Mouse Club) was c Funicello
      The most effective form of birth control is a abstinence
      The most likely place to find virgins is c St. Mary's Girl's S
      The most populous city in the US is c New York
      The result of Watergate was c Richard Nixon quit
      Utah is full of d none of the above
      When playing Monopoly you b must own 4 houses b
      Which is non-alcoholic c Perrier
      Which is not a car? d Toshiba
      Which is not a cheese? d Reisling
      Which is not a city in Mexico? c San Diego
      Which is not an American armed force? d the national league
      Which is not in Hawaii? c Fiji
      Who has not been US attourney general? b Sam Shepard
      Who is buried in Grants tomb? d Mrs. Grant
      Who was not a famous musician? d Tom Garvey
      Who was not a politician? c W.C. Fields
      Who was not an astronaut? a John Milton
      Who was the leader of Nazi Germany? d Adolf Hitler
      Who wrote "To be or not to be"? a Will. Shakespeare

      My compiments to google (as always) and Ken's cheats?

      --
      If you blog it...
    2. Re:What ever happened to Leisure Suit Larry? by Kraegar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ask the man himself, Al Lowe, creator of the series.

    3. Re:What ever happened to Leisure Suit Larry? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, I only played it because the game play was good.

      Right...and I only read Playboy for the articles.

      Wait...I'm 19, and I've never seen a Playboy. What's wrong with me?!

      (scrambles out the door)

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    4. Re:What ever happened to Leisure Suit Larry? by Timmeh · · Score: 4, Funny
      OH HELL NO. I can't believe they'd use a video game to force that anti-Oswald bullshit on us! EVERYONE knows it was the mafia in concert with cuban dictator Fidel Castro, Local 502 - Circus Clown Union, and the Jews, always the Jews....

      twajs....

  4. slashdot grammar by bo-eric · · Score: 5, Funny
    [...]with prostitutes and pimps and main characters


    Prostitutes and pimps - sure, but main characters? Won't somebody please think of the children?
    --

    -- Free speech is only free if your time is worth nothing.
  5. Traditional game content by Monkelectric · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "We're not going to carry any software with any vulgarity or nudity -- we're just not going to do it"

    The walmart spokesman cleared his throat and continued, "The staple of gaming content has always been VIOLENCE. Sure, we'll sell games where you can watch someone get their head cut off, THATS good clean fun."

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Traditional game content by Thalia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why are you surprised? The same ratings scheme applies on television. If it's just people getting shot, well then the kiddies can watch no problem. If it's nudity, that's a problem. If it's MALE nudity, then it belongs on the triple-X channel only. Americans are a puritan bunch... and the puritans did approve of killing people (remember, they burned witches for entertainment value)... just not of sex.

      Thalia

    2. Re:Traditional game content by SSJ2+Labsuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Americans are a puritan bunch... and the puritans did approve of killing people (remember, they burned witches for entertainment value)... just not of sex.

      That's not strictly true. The Puritans were a somwhat repressive bunch, like most of the religious colonists of their day, but they weren't quite as prudish as their name makes them sound. They strongly disapproved of sex outside of wedlock -- but once you were married, it was a different story. They believed a healthy sex life was an important component of a successful marriage, to the point where Puritan ministers actually acted as "sex councilors" if things weren't going well! Puritans actually thought that sex was a kind of duty -- if God didn't want you to do it, he certainly wouldn't have given you such a strong sex drive.

      Compared to the "puritanical" groups we have today, the Puritans themselves were pretty sexually liberated.

      As for the killing, well, I think you're pretty much on the nail with that one. But again, that was a widespread problem. For most of human history, life was pretty cheap. Killing for various purposes was a common occurance, despite the fact that every Sunday people told each other not to do it. It is only comparatively recently that the right to life has been well respected.

    3. Re:Traditional game content by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      and the puritans did approve of killing people (remember, they burned witches for entertainment value)... just not of sex.

      PUH-LEASE!

      How do you think they made little baby Puritans?

    4. Re:Traditional game content by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do you think they made little baby Puritans?

      Spores, IIRC.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    5. Re:Traditional game content by KnightStalker · · Score: 5, Funny

      My guess would be, clothed except for the important bits, and with averted eyes and lots of guilt and penance afterwards...

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    6. Re:Traditional game content by akruppa · · Score: 5, Funny

      >PUH-LEASE!

      >How do you think they made little baby Puritans?

      This I'd like to know as well. It might be the answer to all of our geek problems.

      Alex

      --
      Heisenberg may have been here
  6. What a joke by swagr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Books, comics, movies, tv shows, news and games with violence are everywhere.
    Violence is OK everyone.

    A naked person, though, will destroy the fabric of society as we know it. And s*x, I won't even dare say the word.

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    1. Re:What a joke by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually it's worse that you think.

      Think about it for a moment; there are only two words you need to mention, to show the bias in the media: "fucking" and "farting".

      You can have a fuck-specialist on the news, who's just written a book about how to fuck, who to fuck, how to feel after you fucked and who you should fuck next. You just don't call it fucking. Hell, look at day-time TV. You know that in that soap-opera you enjoy, all it really revolves around, is did he fuck her, has he fucked her, who else did he fuck, did she fuck someone else and what the fuck is going on.

      But - when was the last time you saw ANYONE even talk about farting? You've never had anyone on the Late Show who's just written a book about how to fart, who to fart at, how to feel after you farted and who you should fart at next.

      Farting is WORSE than fucking! Think about that for a while.

      (With apologies to George Carlin).

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:What a joke by cheese_wallet · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Farting is WORSE than fucking!"

      I'm going to have to agree with you there. I'd much rather fuck than fart.

    3. Re:What a joke by f97tosc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am from Sweden but I have been living in the US for a few years now. In Sweden, violence is censored to a much greater extent than in the US, but for nudity it is the other way around.

      I can see the reasoning behind the ciolence argument (although I am not sure to what extent I agree)

      watching lotsa violence -> violent behavior

      But for nudity...

      watching lotsa nudity -> ???

      Spontanious stripping? Unlikely.

      Will young men start raping girls if they see somebody naked? C'mon.

      Will there be more unprotected sex? No, lack of information has to my knowledge never stopped anyone that wanted to get at it.

      Could somebody with longer time in the US please explain. I really don't get it.

      Tor

    4. Re:What a joke by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Insightful huh?

      Last time I checked, I haven't heard about anyone writing a book about stamps appear on TV. By your logic, Stamp collecting must be far-far worse than sex or farting.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:What a joke by BeBoxer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I haven't seen the author on Letterman yet, but at least Amazon isn't afraid to carry it. The Gas We Pass: The Story of Farts And a childrens book at that! Somebody please think of the children!!! :-)

    6. Re:What a joke by goon+america · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Could somebody with longer time in the US please explain. I really don't get it.

      I've lived in the US my entire life, and I've never understood it. People here have somehow picked up the idea that naked bodies hurt children, but violence does not.

    7. Re:What a joke by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You know, I once cited a study commissioned by the Nixon administration which failed to find a link between pornography and sex crimes. I was much younger then; Now I find it extremely amusing. My english teacher probably thought it was brilliant for someone who chose to argue the devil's advocate point of view to choose something from that funding source.

      Anyway, I think it IS likely to cause spontaneous stripping. People are more readily programmed by television than you think. It puts you into an alpha state. (Boy is it hard to find reasonably reputable links about that!) As such, you are more suggestible (it is similar to the state achieved during hypnosis, though with somewhat different results here, we hope.)

      Now, am I saying that guys are going to run around raping people because they see more porn? No. In fact, some studies have shown just the opposite. If you don't make people feel guilty about sexual urges they're more likely to beat off and get all that tension out of their system. Then they can just beat women up instead of raping them, like good little Americans. Hey, it works for football stars.

      Will there be more unprotected sex? I'm sure there will be more sex, and a certain percentage of it is unprotected. So you could say yes, but probably not. Then again, if you make people horny enough they sometimes skip the protection and move right onto the beast with two backs phase of the evening.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:What a joke by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I live in the UK. On Sunday night Channel 4 showed A Clockwork Orange at last - first time on UK TV (other than cable). Very good movie.

      Plenty of violence and nudity and drugs and the old in out in out.

      What did my partner say at the end? "Was there any need for all those tits? Kubrick was a dirty old man wasn't he! No dicks though you notice!"

      No mention of the hefty doses of violence, sinister political activities, etc... just "why so many tits"

      Why do I mention this? Because I think the whole anti-nudity thing boils down to guys not wanting to see other guys dicks on the TV.

      The latest thing to stir up the tabloid is Tipping the Velvet, a BBC period costume drama with healthy doses of girl on girl lesbian action. Complaints to the BBC are all about how LITTLE action there was. Safe. No guys. Everyone wants to watch!

      Equality values are so live, especially in my neck of the woods, that any unequal representation is offensive - particularly if its seen to exploit the ladies. For many, the glimpse of boobs in Fifth Element is more offensive than 'that scene' in Reservoir Dogs. Simply because of the exploitation.

      Also, nudity is often surplus to the plot. Shooting someone in the face brings the plot along, because that character is now dead. Seeing some chicks ass doesn't move the plot alon in the same way most of the time. It's just eye candy. So its easier to look down on and condemn. Which film would make more sense if you saw a penis in it? Which would make less sense without the tits? Without the guns? without the swearing?

      Personally - I'd throw it all in and let people make and show what they want. Clockwork Orange was a good film. Fifth Element was not. Nothing to do with the tit count, gun count, or how many times a big guy says 'Shit!' as someone comes into shot.

  7. Nothing much to see here; carry on by ekrout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just like one of the posters said on the accompanying message board, this is nothing but capitalism working as it normally does, and working quite well.

    "Developers have the right to make it. Stores have the right to carry it or shun it. We have the right to buy it, ignore it or shop elsewhere."

    Sure, it serves as an eye-popper and conversation piece for news outlets since there's (gasp!) nudity in a video game, but it's not like 99.6% of all 15-year old guys haven't already seen a naked woman on video, in a magazine, or (hopefully ;-D) in person.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  8. Re:Walmart sells R rated movies, but not X rated by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't these stores taking "responsibility", its them acknowledging that the parents who can't police their children properly will shove their responsibility (that of the parents) onto the store. The fact is, if parents were able to actually take care of their children, it wouldn't matter if hard-core pornography was shelved next to Barney cartoons - the kids wouldn't ever actually get access. My parents made it quite clear whenever I was not to be doing something, and when I went behind their backs I was inevitably punished. More importantly, they explained their reasons for each edict, and as a result I respected their decisions as my parents instead of resenting them blindly. Thats the lesson the stores are teaching parents: if you dont take care of your kids, we'll do it for you. Thats plain fucking lazy.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  9. Not a big deal unless its legislated. by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People will do as they want. If stores didnt carry Grand Theft Auto 3, they would be losing out on a good chunk of change.

    If this game gets that popular, then either they will sell it or miss out on the profit.

    I really dont have a problem with things like this unless it is the government (federal, state, or local) saying that something can't be sold in town, state, or country. If Wal-Mart et al want to not sell it, frankly, its their business.

    Of course it is good that the public stays informed... Wal-mart doesnt get my money when I need paper towels any more if they choose to censor this.

    But that their choice, and I imagine plenty of other people who like dirty games will continue to buy their paper towels at Wal-Mart.

    1. Re:Not a big deal unless its legislated. by ultramk · · Score: 4, Funny

      of course, the real question is, what are you doing with all those paper towels?

      hmmm?

      nevermind. i don't want to know.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    2. Re:Not a big deal unless its legislated. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK you got some things wrong here. The Guns they sell at Walmart are not AK-47's! Sure you can kill people with it, but most of the folks that would buy a gun there are not going to do that. They are going to shoot a 8 point buck for FOOD! Venison is quite good. Paying 20 bucks or so for a deer tag and when you shoot one you get like 100-200 pounds of good meat is a great deal! Sure it's violent. Some folks hunt because they have to not because they want to. I don't think that hunting for food is bad. I do think hunting just to hunt is a bad thing though. I have a friend who loves to hunt, but more because of what he can do with it then the sheer thrill of it. Sure hunting thrills him, but mostly its because he's going to have a full freezer and not have to buy meat for a winter.

      --

      Gorkman

  10. Re:Walmart sells R rated movies, but not X rated by Ashcrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From reading the blurb from the acclaim site I would say it is not near X rated. While I do think it is compleatly distastefull, I think you can find more sexual content in "Not Another Teen Movie" or "Too High".

  11. This just means... by Cytlid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... I won't *buy* it at Wal-mart, Best Buy...

    --
    FLR
  12. Thank You from Acclaim! by Perdo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Walmart,

    Thank you for insuring that our new game "BMX XXX" becomes the most sought after title to ever hit the market. You see, in our business there is no such thing as bad publicity, which you have provided us in spades. We are now the "Sopranos" of the gaming world. There is nothing like controversy to insure we have an audience.

    Again, Thank You.

    P.S. We're sorry you are going to miss the sales revenue generated by this sleeper cult classic... On second thought, we could care less about your puritanical revenue model destroyed by a week's loss in imports.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  13. Acclaim... by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...is the greasy turd on the game industry. What with buying ad space on tombstones, to paying people to change their names to "Turok", to paying speeding tickets for people on their way to buy their racing game, they're scum (though all these promotions did originate in the U.K.). Plus, Acclaim is the "quick and dirty" game house - when you want your property made into a game qucikly and don't give a crap about the game being good (any South Park game, any of the Batman movie games), Acclaim will proudly take your money and make you some piece of crap in a record amount of time.

    Acclaim is to the game industry what Troma is to the movie industry.

    On a related note, does anyone know if this game will use the extremely rare "AO" (Adults Only) ESRB rating?

    1. Re:Acclaim... by macrom · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.esrb.org/power_search.asp?type=game

      Select "Adults Only" and then search. You should get 15 titles, none of which sound familiar. Maybe Hastings (as mentioned above) has them on the top shelf with the Penthouse entertainment.

  14. GTA 3 comparisons? by sielwolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the article's comparisons to GTA 3 are unfounded. Why? Because GTA 3 had some very innovative gameplay: a continuous and hugely interactive world with missions taking place directly in the environment, a wide variety of exploration options leading to a huge replay value.

    BMX XXX is a.... bmx game. Now I'm not going to say that GTA 3 is a Goodfellas or even a Sopranos but it at least had a semi-adult theme: criminal underworld. It was about as accurate as... I dunno, a CBS Sunday Night movie on the mob. And so there was little stretching the imagination to see that prostitution and drugs and violence would be involved.

    But a BMX game? It's like trying to get people to switch to Linux by lacing nekkid girlie pictures into the kernel. A shallow attempt to spice something up.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:GTA 3 comparisons? by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like trying to get people to switch to Linux by lacing nekkid girlie pictures into the kernel. A shallow attempt to spice something up.

      Link?

  15. comment by sstory · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can't see that this is a big deal. I'm a member of the ACLU, and don't see anything wrong with Acclaim making the game, or people buying it, but is it a big deal that a store doesn't want to sell a bmx game with naked chicks in it? No. I can't even remember the last time I was in a Wal-Mart.

    On another note, this game might be just what it takes to get me into gaming. Final Fantasy didn't do it, but if Aki had been naked....

  16. Doesn't affect me.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... until Kazaa users turn ethical.

  17. X rated!?! by penguin_punk · · Score: 4, Funny

    now THAT's more like it. I haven't seen this good of a game since Leisure Suit Larry!

    screenshot

    oh baby! - Jenni-cam move aside.

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
  18. Acclaim Responds To Criticism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When Acclaim was asked to comment on the current situation, the CEO had this to say:

    "I am outraged that consumers are even THINKING that we are targeting children. Every CD bought comes with a EULA that requires them to return the merchandise if they are not at least 21 years old."

    When asked why Acclaim gives 5 packs of Pokemon Trading Cards with each purchase, he had no comment.

  19. Re:Eminem by Powercntrl · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the following sample of Eminem lyrics

    That's actually Ja Rule. Eminem has made a point of the fact that he won't say "nigga" because he is white and for a white man to refer to a black man as a "nigga" is considered derogatory. If you actually listen to Eminem's message, it's basically self-parody. He's got a point that if this country was truly so shocked by what he had to say, NO ONE WOULD BUY HIS ALBUMS.

    A better analogy would be that Wal-Mart sells shotguns. Killing animals with firearms = good, playing a video game with virtual tits and ass = bad. That's just typical good ol' boy thinking anyway - it's to be expected from Wal-Mart.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  20. Re:Walmart sells R rated movies, but not X rated by reallocate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doubtful that there's connection between this and lax parental responsibility. Different parents raise their kids differently.

    This is about WalMart, et al, making a decision about what they'll sell or not sell, and also avoiding a great deal of bad publicity by carrying the games. The game section of these stores are meccas for kids; no store manager wants to explain to the local news folks why they let school kids buy the games.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  21. Game Details: by stockpile · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a store manager for one of the video game chains that will be selling BMX XXX, and last month I got a chance to hear about the game from the people at Akklaim and even saw a bit of game footage. Here is what I took away from the preview: 1) This game plays like the old dave mirra games, but with more plot thrown into each stage ( pimps yelling at their employees, monkeys throwing poo, dogs fornicating) 2) Somebody went to great pains to give you the ultimate control in the create a skater mode including breast size and (abscence of) choice of clothes. 3) If you get enough money, you get to go to Scores gentleman's club to watch a video clip of a real dancer. 4) The Gamecube and XBOX versions will have a raunch-o-meter to let you turn off nudity and bad language while the PS2 version will automatically be a little more tame (no full nudity). 5) They made sure to stay in the M rating, as an Ao would mean that the rest of the chains that are selling the game would also drop it from their shelves.
    Basically, it looks like annother lame BMX game that Akklaim is trying to boost sales of by tossing in a little raunch. A good buy, if you have no life or acess to better adult materials.

  22. In other news... by Fished · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And, in other news, Toys-R-Us has declined to give shelf space to "Anal-Sex Barbie". This decision was greeted with shock and derision by free speech advocates, who felt that the elimination of one "slippery slope" might destroy them all."

    I must admit, I'm a bit confused as to when, in the eyes of "Your Smut Online" retailers lost the right of choosing how to stock their shelves while, somehow, you retain the right to buy it. You have a right to speak: you don't have a right to make me or anyone else listen.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  23. Christians LIKE sex! by anomaly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a zealous Christian, (dare I admit that I might be categorized as a 'fundie' by the /. crowd?)

    I can say that I am not afraid of the human body. I like sex quite a bit, too.

    That having been said, I believe that God designed sex to be expressed in the context of an emotionally intimate committed relationship. One reference that discusses sexual satifaction survey results is here
    Apparently Christians have higher rates of sexual satisfaction than non-Christians.

    With regard to censorship, perhaps Walmart is making decisions based on what their customers want. The marketplace is free, and I don't get up in arms when your favorite pr0n store refuses to carry Jonah - If you want the game, you know where you can find it - Google is your friend.

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly
    BTW - God loves you and longs for relationship with you.
    If you would like to know more, please email me.

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  24. double standards by NeoCode · · Score: 4, Informative

    "We're not going to carry any software with any vulgarity or nudity -- we're just not going to do it."

    I just don't get these double standards. They sell all kinds of movies and videos where sex and violence are rampant. Walmart sells Sopranos, American Pie and some other R-rated dvds. I am guessing (and hoping) that they don't sell such videos/dvds to underage children.

    Then why in the world they refuse to acknowledge the ratings on the games. The rating are there for a purpose. Of all the big games that are out/coming out, violence is a big part of them. And of course, as we all know from TV, sex follows. Read and understand the the ratings on the games and stick to them. Sell the games like cigarettes if you have to, just don't give me your double standards.

  25. So let me get this straight... by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being from NZ an' all...

    Wal-mart won't sell a computer game because of a little bit of nudity, yet it continues to sell guns.

    Is there anyone _inside_ the US that doesn't find that just a tad strange?

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  26. First with full action nudity? I think not by mfos.org · · Score: 4, Informative

    Custer's Revenge for the Atari 2600 was probably the first game that retailers would refuse to sell. Check it out here

  27. Re:Walmart sells R rated movies, but not X rated by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does Walmart sell Penthouse / Playboy / Hustler? No?

    Do they sell Time / Field & Stream / Sports Illustrated? Yes?

    Then why isn't everyone here getting their panties in a bunch over _that_ bias? Why would not the clear policy they have for which print media they retail carry across into the electronic media they stock? Why should a retailer like Walmart make an exception for a one-trick pony console game?

    Hey, Mr. Magazine Man! Yeah, you! You're selling House & Garden, but I don't see no Juggs! What kind of friggin' hypocrite are you? Don't you know this is America, Land of the Free, and I gotta right to buy what I want where I want to? [spit]


    [sigh]
    Sometimes it seems everybody is spoilin' for a fight, but all these Walmart guys are doing is looking to make a living and not piss off their core clientele. Seems to me they're behaving sensibly.

  28. Re:Walmart sells R rated movies, but not X rated by neocon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, I think you're missing the point -- the fact that parents have a responsibility to take care of their kids does not in any way take away a store-owner's right to decide what type of establishment he wants to run.

    Nor is this `just' about morality -- the storeowner (in this case WalMart) is making a clear business decision based on the fact that many customers will choose a store without porn in it over a store with porn in it when they take their kids shopping.

  29. Re:Walmart sells R rated movies, but not X rated by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only topless nudity. The dialogue and such isn't anything worse than GTA3. No full frontals, definately no sex .. just alot of attitude. Really, if they dont sell this, they shouldn't sell GTA3.

    [sarcasm]
    yeah, its way more moral to carjack and kill people in GTA3 than it is to ride a skateboard and look at women's boobs ....
    [/sarcasm]

    This society has a rediculous double standard when it comes to what kids see and watch .. graphic violence is fine, easily found on their shelves, the heavens forbid we should see a nipple! For crying out loud ...

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  30. Sex in the Gameplay by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 5, Funny

    VGs with violence always integrate it into the gameplay but VGs with nudity or sexual content make it some side bonus that isn't really part of the game.

    What if there was a video game that did integrate sex into the gameplay? In Japan they've had point-and-click dating games, but what if nudity/love/sex were part of other genres?

    For example, the Japanese have a comic book about a sex sport where a man and woman try to make the other person come first. What if there was a video game about that, styled after 1 on 1 fighting games? There'd be the usual selection of characters and backdrops, but instead of a damage bar there'd be a horniness bar. There'd be plenty of flashy special moves, but instead of doing damage they'd be foreplay moves that raise the other person's horniness bar. Horniness would also be represented visually by clothes falling off, blushing, trembling and heavy breathing. Instead of Mortal Kombat's "Fatalities" or Street Fighter's "Super Finishers" there'd be orgasm moves. I'd want an anime-style game company doing this because the Japanese put sex in their entertainment way better than Americans do.

    I also wonder if abstract or "cartoonized" sex is better than realistic sex. Think of the arguments about realistic violence vs cartoon violence. Some say that kids will be less harmed by seeing fake, cartoon violence because perhaps if kids don't see the real thing, they won't do the real thing. Others say that kids will be less harmed by seeing realistic violence because they'll see the real consequences and fear them. I don't know the answer to that argument, but I do ask: Is fake looking sex or realistic looking sex better for kids? If that 1-on-1 sex game kept the moves but hid the crotches, would it be OK for kids of all ages?

  31. walmart censorship by (startx) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes walmart sells r-rated movies, but censored. They also sell sensored audio cds. For instance, I made the mistake of buying a Cake cd. CAKE for christ's sake, and it was censored. It doesn't suprise me in the least they'd refuse to sell even a censored version of the game.

  32. Uh oh, the secret is out! by jasonditz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its only a matter of time until Namco announces Cocksucker Pacman

  33. It goes like this: by ActiveSX · · Score: 5, Funny

    |
    R |
    e |
    s |
    p |
    e |
    c | Acclaim's somewhere around here
    t | X
    +--------------------
    Free Advertisement

  34. Wal�Mart's big mistake by goon+america · · Score: 5, Funny
    I don't know about you folks, but I know what I want is a place to buy shotguns, Nirvana albums, nudity-containing video games and R-rated movies. I only want to buy these things at a single location.

    What if a store wanted to sell me a shotgun, a Nirvana album and an R-rated movie, but no nudity-containing video game? Well I'd settle for a few porn magazines. Point is, I need a one-stop-shop, and WalMart ain't got it.

    Please, Walmart, for the decent people out there, give us a place to buy recordings of violent acts, endorsements of violence, instruments of violence and porno. Think of the children.

  35. View from an employee by hirebrand · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A Wal-Mart spokesman stated "We're not going to carry any software with any vulgarity or nudity -- we're just not going to do it."
    Ahem.

    I am a Wal Mart electronics associate.

    We carry Fallout (vulgarity, text), Die Hard (vulgarity, audio). We'll be carrying GTA4: Vice city (audio vulgarity ?).

    We carry very violent games.. (PS2) GTA3, (XBOX) Dead to Rights, the new Mortal Kombat game, (PS2) Mark of Kri, (PC) Mafia, etc etc.

    The register prompts whether the customer is 17 when you ring a [M] rated game, or [R] rated movie. I let every parent know what they're buying -- and kids don't get mature games from me. :)

  36. I hate this kind of marketing drek by marhar · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Acclaim has definitely been following a downward path. They were delisted from NASDAQ and are potentially in danger of being delisted from NASDAQ Small Cap. They just issued an earning warning.

    Now some guys in suits play the "we da bad boyz" card with a well-orchestrated PR blitz, stupid Walmart plays right into their hands, and all the usual comments are made.

    Scott Adams, call your office!

  37. For those of you whining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...about how "In America, kids watching sex on TV == bad but kids watching violence is OK" really need to learn something about American kids.

    We'd rather have them kill each other than reproduce. It's all part of a master plan.

    "Kill your family, kill the band, then kill yourself. Please make sure you get your WHOLE HEAD in front of the shotgun."

  38. Simple by Bastian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ya know that US stereotype of a cowboy - the guy who carries at least one gun on him at all times, but doesn't even take his clothes off to bathe?

    That's us.

    We still think violence is an excellent way to solve problems, and are largely inured to it - hence the reason why we're one of the last countries in the world to allow captial punishment for mentally retarded individuals.

    Besides, violence raises few anxieties in people that affect them directly. Sex, on the other hand, raises all sorts of issues that Americans never deal with - like our own lack of comfort with our bodies. I still think one of the biggest reasons why there is basically no full-frontal male nudity in movies as opposed to female full-frontal nudity, which is quite common, is related to size issues. I wouldn't be surprised if there are guys out there who have refused to se The Pillow Book because they know they'd have to see Ewan McGregor's big dick.

    Of course, I can't really say this is all that much different from other cultures, since I have never lived anywhere but the USA. Let's hope I'm providing some insight, though - I'd be depressed if this is the way it is around the world.

  39. Re:Guns are necessary for a free society. by achurch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Furthermore, if guns were not freely available, then I'd say its more likely that a criminal would have a gun than a law abiding, sedentary female.

    Here in Japan, guns are illegal. And yet the number of people (outside of gang members) who get shot a year is on the order of 20-25. In the whole country.

    Hmm.

  40. Desperate attempt by Acclaim... by DeathPenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to regain their reputation as a company pushing the envelope in video game vulgarity. Remember how big of a hit Mortal Kombat was when it first came out? Pure shock value. Acclaim made a killing off it, as well as MK2, and even made a movie out of it the video game.

    Since then we've had countless other fighting games, some of which were purely copycat games, others which introduced new technology such as 3D arenas, which Acclaim hasn't really been keeping up with. Now that gore fest fighting games are no longer so offensive, perhaps even tame compared to gore fest shooters like Quake 3 and Unreal Tournament, they decide to make money off the next most provocative cultural taboo--Sex.

    What's next? A game about wife beaters? Kids who set fire to animals? No, I'm not some paranoid Rosie 'O Donnel wannabe, and I'm glad id won their lawsuit against those neglegent deadbeat Columbine parents, but there is a point when it just becomes painfully obvious that some in the entertainment business are out to take advantage of stupid kids with too much money by offering them the forbidden fruit in a medium their parents are likely very ill-informed about.

  41. Ummm.... yeah. by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many billions of dollars in sales does Wal-Mart do each year? If you honestly think they are staying up late at night because of the missed revenue for a single video game title, you are sadly mistaken.

    And frankly, there are larger marketing issues here which I'm sure you can't appreciate. Wal-Mart has spent a lot of money to cultivate a family-friendly image. A BMX game that overtly promotes sexuality would cost more to repair the PR damage than the revenue it would generate.

  42. Death == good, Boobies == bad by supabeast! · · Score: 4, Funny

    So Wal-Mart will glady sell me a pump shotgun, ammo, and a bandoleer strap, everything needed for a killing spree, but they won't sell me a video game with titties in it?

    Christian America has some very, very fucked up priorities.