Slashdot Mirror


19 megabits on 3G

haligan writes "Bell Labs research arm announced the development of two prototype chips that would allow mobile devices to receive more than 19 megabits of data per second on 3G networks." Power consumption is low enough for cel phone type applications.

11 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Coverage by michrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the area in which I have decided to make my home, this won't matter for a while. It would be nice to have, however, if there were a plan with a HUGE pool of minutes (or unlimited, even if after a certian time of day). If the technology really works, I won't half to wait for CenturyTel to get off their collective asses and give the town in which I live the DSL that so many of us have expressed an interest in.

    *sigh*

    --
    bork bork bork!
  2. Re:laptops by batboy78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be nice to have this in a laptop. I was sitting in the Minneapolis airport for a few hours this morning, and I was noticing all the laptops that are in an airport. Now Minneapolis has 802.11b access through most of the terminals, but the cost is 10 dollars for a day. Now if I could pay for 3G access on my monthly phone bill, and be able to use it on my laptop at no extra charge from anywhere in the country.

    Hey I can't dream can't I

  3. RJ45 by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So does this mean we might see phones with 10BaseT RJ45 jacks in them?

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  4. 3G ISPs? by Q3vi1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With all this development of 3G networks for phones, when might we see a true wireless internet over this network instead of the breadth of DSL and Cable companies? Surely there cannot be that much of a technology gap between making the 3G network accesible to wireless services, it would be a great last-mile solution in areas that have cellular coverage, but are outside of the range of an operations center.

  5. new unobtrusive way to bootleg concerts! by Monofilament · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey with a phone that has that good data transfer it probably can transfer some high quality realtime audio over the airwaves. So no say I want bootleg a concert (lets say one thats not friendly to bootlegging). They'll check for recording devices but won't think twice about a cell phone. BWAH HAHA thats where you got them.. All you do is have your phone start downloading the audio to your computer's hard drive and voila! sneaky bootlegging.. thats quality recording. Though I guess this might be limited by the quality of the mic on your phone but hey I just come up with these crazy ideas. If you're hardcore enough and a hardware hacker I'm sure you could fix a crappy mic problem pretty easy :)

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
  6. Health issues? by Ryu2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A corrolary of Shannon's theorem on channel capacity is that the greater the capacity of the channel, given an amount of noise, the greater power is necessary for it to maintain a given rate of information transmission. In other words, the faster you want to pump the data, the more power needed to transmit.

    Therefore, while these chips may need little power to receive, what about transmissions? Would possibly thousands of 19 mbit/s transmissions floating around in the GHz band possibly have an increased detrimental effect on living things? Sure it's small, but would it be a factor at all?

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  7. Cell Phone and bandwidth by molywi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would anyone need 19megabits to a cell phone? In Slovakia cell phone users can watch live TV streams on their phones using "only" GPRS which is .1 megabit which is the first service of this kind in the world. Check out the URL to a http://media.a3boot.com/ta3/16102002/mobilvizia.as f . I dont see the need for 19 megabits. This cellphone would require an insane amount of storage to make this even remotely useful. -Keep the Trolls out'-

  8. Intranet? by davisshaver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How hard/costly/innefficient would it be to build a LAN out of this? If it is higher than 802.11b, wouldnt it be a better network? I am a kid, so just tell me if this was a stupid idea.

    --
    "What we have here is a failure to communicate"
    The Warden, Cool Hand Luke
  9. Upsteam bandwidth concerns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    19 megabits is great... until you consider that there are more mobile phones in use in the UK than PC's. The entire network is based on aerial microwave transmitters which would not get anywhere near the bandwidth required to allow multiple users to actually use the full 19 megabits down to the handset. You'd need gigabit backbones etc. etc, which would need to be fibre or copper using current technology.

    Back to digging up roads then...

  10. How about: You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who uses 2.3mb/sec while browsing the internet?
    Lets do the math.

    320x240 (which is way better resolution than most full color screens) at 24 bit (RGB) is 230400 bytes at 10 f/s uncompressed video thats about 2.3mb/s. If you want to watch full color video at 320x480 on your phone for 10 minuites, then you deserve to pay $14

  11. Looks similar to Download accelerator! by krazyninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The technology looks like: Take a data stream, split it into 4 streams, transmit them in separate channels, detect and re-assemble them in the same order. Isnt this something we already use in our download accelerator products? If not, how is this different?

    --
    "Do something man. Right now."