Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

US Secrecy Efforts Hurting Scientific Research

Posted by michael on from the cause-and-effect dept.

EnlightenmentFan writes "The new, ultra-vague category "sensitive but unclassified" is being used to stop publication of research, according to this NY Times article (Registration required, but it's free). Bruce Alberts (President, National Academy of Sciences), William A. Wulf (President, National Academy of Engineering), and Harvey V. Fineberg (President, Institute of Medicine) made a joint statement after bureaucrats declared a major NAS report on bioterrorism unpublishable."

4 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. NY Times... by Keebler71 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are NY Times articles sensitive but unclassified? Is that why they require a logon?

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  2. We dont burn books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we just remove them! :)

  3. News at 11. by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is Action 5 reporter Mike Manlee, we are in front of the Metropolis Water Power Generation complex. In these times of terrorism, we want to inform the public of the possible target the power complex. We are informed that the Security guard takes his stroll around the complex at 5-7pm nightly, while the front desk would be un-supervised. This would be the perfect time for a terrorist to attack the power complex.

    Back to you Dan.
    -
    Facts are stupid things. - Ronald Reagan

  4. Re:Wow by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Funny

    I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands...

    Old news. (-;