Slashdot Mirror


Satellite Radio in Fiscal Trouble

prostoalex writes "It looks like Sirius Satellite Radio is going through its worse times. From the same article XM Satellite does not seem to be doing well either, even with 200K customers. Will it signify the end of the satellite radio?"

18 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. The best damned service I've seen in a long time. by jrwillis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Will it signify the end of the satellite radio?
    As someone whose has XM I really hope that they pull through. It's one of the best services I've seen in a long time and just about the only way to get some good blues and jazz in your car outside of cd's. I'd pay twice as much for the service just to keep it alive.

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  2. Less "discretionary" cash to spend? by viking099 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe people are feeling the squeeze on their wallets from all the market problems we've been having, and are unwilling to commit to something that seems to be almost 100% luxury.
    I know that if I were concerned about my retirement fund, I'd be cutting back where I could to put more money there.
    When this thing came out, many people didn't say "can't" or "shouldn't" when it came to luxury purchases. Now, though, people are keeping their wallets in their pockets a bit more.

  3. Wait.... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean satellite radio ever began? I mean, sure, I've seen commercials for it, but I know of no-one who has it, and I know so many tech-geeks who go out and buy the latest and greatest just because it's new (well, okay, not so often in this economy), and yet none of them have it.

    I can think of a lot of reasons why it wouldn't be doing so well though... how much does it cost to put a satellite into orbit or "rent" one of the ones already up there? And how much are they charging customers per month for the service?

    200,000 customers? In a major metropolitan area, like New York City, one radio station can have that many listeners. It sounds like a lot, but it isn't.

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re:Wait.... by phil+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with the satellite radio model is the huge up-front costs -- nearly a billion dollars to get the satellites up, ground stations established, and then repeaters in major metropolitian areas to help out when you don't have a good view of the sky. So, these two companies get this far, then this recession hits and people try not to spend too much. It's no wonder they are hurting.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  4. Re:The best damned service I've seen in a long tim by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd pay twice as much for the service just to keep it alive.

    Not wanting to speak on their behalf, but I'm fairly sure that if you offer they'll accept :-)

    --
    Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Re:too damn expensive by GLX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But you're forgetting about the exposure to new music factor... Sure, we can all program what we like to listen to in the car - burn some CD's and we're set...

    But, if we stop listening to FM radio because everything on there is commercial-laden crap, then the terrorists have already won! er, then we're not as exposed to new and upcoming music (XM has a *lot* of indie stuff, as well as stuff that'll never get signed) - I've never heard so much Wilco in one place.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  7. It was a dumb idea. by standards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. I mostly listen to the radio when I'm in my car. Since I live in a big city, I'm rarely in my car.

    2. And when I am in my car, I listen to traffic, weather, or my own music collection or local radio.

    3. The exception is long distance trips. Perhaps one multi-hour drive a month.

    4. At home, I have a big music collection. Stuff I actually bought over the years. (Don't blame MP3s in my case). I also have digital TV, with it's music channels. Plus a collection of reasonable local radio stations (and many more unreasonable ones)

    So! Someone has to remind me why I should spend $$$ for this service. I can see why some people would spring for it. Just not me.

    Damn, it's snowing... there goes summer...

    1. Re:It was a dumb idea. by techno-at-nni.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

      1. I live in country, no large GOOD radio stations.. And since I'm in the country I'm always in my car

      2) I have a 30 minute commute, listen to traffic for 5 mins then have 25 more minutes to listen to good (and honest to god) NEW music without having some idiot rattle on and on about what they are playing..

      3) Since I'm in the country all my friends live atleast 30 mins to 1 hour away.. not exactly long trips but the XM radio makes them go alot quicker.

      4) I have a fairly large music collection myself at home and yes, even some MP3's I downloaded.. Secondly I don't have digital cable because I'm really thinking it's a complete rip off.. Something along the lines of 50 Bucks for the same old crap on normal cable BUT with music channels (I get the music channels on XM for a lot less).

      There yah go.. This here hick boy really enjoys listening to the music I want to when I want to.. I can tune in on 3 different types of trance/techno music and also listen to Alternative with a quick flip of the button.. It's all relative and I suggest keeping a slightly more open mind.. never know when you'll get fired and have to move out in the good ol' country...

  8. Re:Yeah by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative
    Under the new plan, which is subject to regulatory and shareholder approval, current holders of Sirius common stock will together hold 8 percent of the new common stock.

    Uh, yeah, I know I'd vote for that. :)

    Well, Sirius has backing to get them through next year if this happens, whereas a vote against it means they exit in early 2003, which I've never understood. I've seen debtholders refuse to sell or accept a lower price, only to see what they had become utterly worthless because the sum of the assets was worth less than the whole.

    Personally, I'd like Sirius to keep going, since I signed up this summer and it's great, I scarcely listen to the local radio stations anymore, since commercial free really does spoil you (with the exception of Sirius' own occasional plugs for what's going on other channels)

    With luck, enough new cars will sell to help boost the numbers. I think XM indicated they need 2 million to break even and Sirius about 4 million, but don't quote me on that. It's a lean market and people are pinching pennies.

    The real barrier to satellite radio isn't your subscription, it's the cost of the special receiver and antenna, which can be about $300 combined, though I know there's a $75 rebate out there for something from Sirius and/or Kenwood.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  9. Digital Radio by chicagothad · · Score: 5, Funny

    The FCC just announce standards for Digital Radio: fcc.gov

    If "clear signal" is one of the key benefits of satelite radio, I would call this a major killer of the industry. Can you say "I-R-I-D-I-U-M"? I plan to be operating XM Radio in 6 months after I pick it up on EBay for $50.

  10. Yeah, whatever. by jridley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am personally kind of surprised that they were even able to get online. Sure there's a market for coast-to-coast single channel coverage, but how much of the market can truck drivers cover?

    Most people spend 99%+ of their time driving within 50 miles of home, where one radio station will cover them. Anyone who's all that picky about what they listen to will probably want to listen to CDs anyway. Personally I'm probably going to get a car MP3 player (I was waiting for an OGG player but I'm tired of waiting).

    I spend $120 a year but I send it to public radio.

    1. Re:Yeah, whatever. by Asprin · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Ummmm, I agree that this whole coast-to-coast coverage thing is completely overrated, but I have a different tack on it. To wit:

      Most people spend 99%+ of their time driving within 50 miles of home, where one radio station will cover them. Anyone who's all that picky about what they listen to will probably want to listen to CDs anyway. Personally I'm probably going to get a car MP3 player (I was waiting for an OGG player but I'm tired of waiting).

      Yeah - and one of the cool things about going on vacation every year is that I get to listen to all the radio stations from other towns along the way -- It's *great* to hear something different once in a while. I also like to go out to McDonald's for dinner while I'm at the beach - can't get a flavor like that at home!

      Seriously, though, it really used to be kinda fun hearing radio from other parts of the universe when driving at night on vacation -- especially sportstalk and talk radio. But that was before the dark times.... before the ClearChannel...

      By virtue of the ClearChannel fiat, doesn't broadcast radio enjoy coast-to-coast coverage now?

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  11. Re:too damn expensive by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Not a good business model when your competiton is free.

    Free? Maybe public broadcasting or community radio, but commercial radio? Nothing like hearing your music interupted by ads for zit creme, Bud, soda, etc. Maybe you've gotten accustomed to it, but man, lemme tell ya, it ain't free!

    Now imagine what a piss-poor business model selling people TV over a wire and STILL including commercials and THEN charging for premium channels.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  12. I hate "per-month" charges by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know about anything else, but the attempt to shift everything from a "purchase" to "rental" model bothers me enormously.

    I don't mind in the least paying $300 or $400 for a nifty gadget.

    I have VERY HIGH SALES RESISTANCE to anything that carries a "monthly" fee for anything. My nifty gadgets OFTEN last for, say, 100 months (a bit over 8 years) and I am quite capable of multiplying a monthly fee by 100.

    When I buy a $20,000 car, I'm quite agreeable to considering a $300 or $500 add-on.

    But a MONTHLY fee? Forget about it.

    Give-away-the-razor-and-make-money-on-the-blades is one thing. Sure, inkjet consumables are a ripoff, but at least the thing doesn't eat money when I'm not using it. But if someone tried to sell me a printer for $150, plus $20 per ink cartridge, PLUS $5.99 PER MONTH, I would behave badly.

    Perhaps I'm not the only consumer who can multiply by 100 in my head.

  13. Re:too damn expensive by mjh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    XM has a *lot* of indie stuff, as well as stuff that'll never get signed

    That may be the case, but it's probably not a good enough biz model to sustain them. What they ought to think about doing is providing a large commercial-laden offering for free, and a "premium" offering for money. That way the business is sustained by a large enough revenue stream (advertising) and those who want the indie stuff can still get it, but it costs them more. 200k customers may seem like a lot, but think about the amount of money they must be paying to run the service.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  14. Good Riddance, I Say by Caoch93 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought an XM radio kit with some of my signing bonus last year. Since I was going to commute one hour each way down the interstate, I justified the cost to myself as a nice way to have better programming for my commute. The station guide seemed interesting enough...I could get BBC radio, CNN, CNet, a channel of standup comedy, selections of music that interest me, and so on. The $10 each month seemed very reasonable for commercial-free options that I'd enjoy.

    So, I bought the kit and I installed everything as per the manual. I activated my account. I got everything in order. I started listening that night. It was really cool to be able to get a continuous mix of house techno and, with the spin of the dial, CNet news. I loved that, if I wanted a laugh in the morning, I could listen to comedians with talent instead of shock-jocks with carnival barker voices. Everything was all well and good...

    ...until the first time I actually tried to drive any actual distance with the thing. My commute is on an often-used 60-mile corridor in Florida from Tampa to Sarasota, and I couldn't get a signal for more than a few parts of it. So, I called XM technical support. The support lady was nice and said she'd file a trouble ticket. It was a very new system at the time, so I gave them the benefit of the doubt.

    And then two weeks went by, and I still couldn't keep a signal over my commute. I also started noting that I couldn't keep a signal in-town all that well. I also made a couple drives through the major metro areas of central Florida and could not keep a signal. This started becoming frustrating. It was about this time, though, that I noticed the programming wasn't all that good. The comedy channels just played the same handful of routines by trite comedians over and over again. The 80's station wasn't really covering what I wanted to hear, either. Slowly, the stations I was enjoying just became boring.

    After letting XM take two weeks to try and resolve their issues, I called again, only to be told by the support rep that there were not any such problems and that everything was my fault. I explained my configuration to her and she agreed I hadn't done anything wrong. I told her that XM had been given a month of opportunity to communicate with me and hadn't done so, and so I needed to cancel my account. She then asked me to hold the phone for a minute. When she came back, she reported that there was indeed a problem in my area and, if I could just sit tight a little bit longer, it'd be fixed.

    By this point, I'd given XM a month, and I needed to return the radio soon or I wouldn't be able to get a refund from Best Buy. I cancelled my account and took the radio out of my car. I was a little disappointed that I lost my alternative to crappy commercial radio, filled with advertisements, music I hated, shock DJs, and insipid conservative commentary on the news stations. Then I discovered I really rather enjoyed the one alternative I had left- NPR. I started listening to Morning Edition and All Things Considered over my commute, both of which are pleasant and informative shows, and both of which are provided commercial-free.

    So, I save my $10 every month and, every third month or so, I use the money to treat myself to a new audiobook or a couple of CDs when I want an alternative to NPR. I really have to say, if you're going to get XM just to have an alternative to standard radio, see if there aren't some local or public stations you like first. Here in Tampa, we have something like two NPR stations and a local, commercial-free station that runs some excellent world news, commentary, and music you'd never find even on XM.

    1. Re:Good Riddance, I Say by foo+fighter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just want to say that if you really like NPR you should consider giving that $10 a month to the public radio station you listen to instead of XM.

      $120 a year isn't much to most upwardly mobile middle class Americans, and I believe public radio is worth at least that.

      I listen almost exclusively to North Dakota Public Radio. Even here in ND the radio market is saturated with Clear Channel crap. I've found NDPR, to be informative, entertaining, and to have regional content that the now Clear Channel stations no longer carry.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies