Slashdot Mirror


Hardware Manufacturing in China's 'Hot Zone'

solferino writes "'Anything you can make for $100, we can make for $40,' Chen says, summing up his commercial philosophy. An interesting profile in Wired magazine of the computer hardware manufacturing 'hot zone', situated around the pearl river delta in mainland china, just outside Hong Kong. The factories are mostly financed and operated by Taiwanese business interests. The article looks at life and business in the city mainly from the point-of-view of these 'foreigners'."

139 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Foreigners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Overseas Chinese, especially Taiwanese, are not foreigners. Many of those over 50 were born in Mainland China. They're returning to their native land and regaining some of the money and property that was unjustly stolen from them.

    1. Re:Foreigners? by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      regaining some of the money and property that was unjustly stolen from them

      Sure... returning to exploit the Chinese population and in the process making huge sums for themselves and the Communist leadership.

      Oh the brave and courageous ex-patriot Taiwanese!

    2. Re:Foreigners? by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      Same usual Taiwanese drivel. Almost all Taiwanese ARE Han Chinese. The fact that they lived here a bit more than others does not in one way change their ethnicity. Furthermore, and more releveantly, Taiwan has NEVER been politically independent from China, other than during Japanese occupation. China considered Taiwan as part of itself LONG before Communism.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    3. Re:Foreigners? by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      Same usual separatist Taiwanese drivel. Almost all Taiwanese ARE Han Chinese. The fact that they lived here a bit more than others does not in one way change their ethnicity. Furthermore, and more releveantly, Taiwan has NEVER been politically independent from China, other than during Japanese occupation, despite what you independently minded Taiwanese want to think. China considered Taiwan as part of itself LONG before the advent of Communism.

      If the Nationalist Chinese did not come and "subjugate" you, the Communists would have done so in short order. I'm not saying the Nationalists were sinless in their treatment of Taiwanese at times, but they are definitely the lesser of two evils.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    4. Re:Foreigners? by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      I would also like to point out that Taiwan is politically independant of China today.

      Hmmm... then I must have missed Taiwan's announcement of independence, and I've visited both Taiwan and China many, many times, and follow news from both places. Would you kindly point me to it?

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  2. Yup. Sweatshops by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's hear it for sweatshops!

  3. Poor worker^H^H^H^H^H slaves by yuri82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $40 eh ?

    Lemmesee, at the current minimum wage over there, this means that $39.96 is cost+profits and $.04 is the wage of about thirty 14 year old kids...

    --
    Who is this Karma guy and why is he bad ??
    1. Re:Poor worker^H^H^H^H^H slaves by bluprint · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People that willingly enter into contracts can't be called slaves....it's an insult to people who actually were/are slaves.

      If you were to remove these so-called "sweatshops", do you really think life would suddenly improve for those working there? Don't you think that those people might actually know what is good for themselves better than you do? I know it's hard to imagine...but try. If someone takes a job making what we consider to be very low, then it must be better than the alternative (for that person)...else they wouldn't have taken the job.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    2. Re:Poor worker^H^H^H^H^H slaves by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are around 75 million urban unemployed in the PRC. There are about 150 million "surplus rural" workers. That makes about 225 million people who are simply idle. If they can make *enough* sweatshop jobs to take most of these unemployed out of circulation, wages will start to rise but it's going to take a lot more changes in the legal code to make that happen.

      It's a slow process to make a capitalist country. Hopefully, the PRC will make it with a minimum launch of nukes along the way.

    3. Re:Poor worker^H^H^H^H^H slaves by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      If you were to remove these so-called "sweatshops", do you really think life would suddenly improve for those working there?

      So... we are doing these workers a favour by exploiting them?

      Who knew that the multi-nationals are just trying help out! What humanitarians!


      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    4. Re:Poor worker^H^H^H^H^H slaves by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      Whatever the intent, it's a moot point. The point is that the workers are helped. The standard of living increases.

      Spoken like a true imperialist! This is the same sort of argument the colonial empires used to justify their actions in the past. It was a dishonest self-serving justification then and it has not improved with age.

      I suppose that given a choice between starvation and feudal subjugation one would choose not to starve. At the same time, it is highly patronizing to claim that the expoited are better off as a result. Sure, they will live a bit longer, but the quality of that life is far from the comfortable middle-class lifestyle most of us here at /. enjoy.

      And they are free-thinking humans who should be allowed to make thier own decisions without having to worry about all-knowing western do-gooders (or an oppressive government).

      You might be right if it was a freely-made, fair choice. Unfortunately, the article indicates that the workers do not have much by way of options. They can choose to starve or choose to work is a sweatshop. The women get a third option - they can choose to become prostitutes.

      Are you sure that you read the same article I did?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    5. Re:Poor worker^H^H^H^H^H slaves by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      HOWEVER... before the factory came in, these people were doing something that they enjoyed even less. That is, subsistence farming, starving, or some even lower-paying job.

      I agree. However, I do not agree that this in any way justifies the exploitation. We cannot claim the moral high ground that even though their existence is really crappy now, they were worse off before.

      So they pay $1 per day ... do you have any idea how much $1 US buys in (wherever)? Until you do, it makes no sense to complain about how low the wages are.

      Go ahead - try to find a place where I can live the good life for US$1/day. Just don't try too hard because there is no such place. Nobody is going to suggest that these workers should receive the same pay and benefits that we in the first world receive. But they are certainly entitled to a living wage that permits them to feed, house, and clothe their families. I very much doubt that it would bankrupt Nike if they had to pat US$2/day instead of US$1/day to the people who make those shoes that cost in excess of US$100.00.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  4. Cheap by e8johan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We want cheap computers, but don't care for politics. Lets use (next to) slave labour in a communist contry!

    My biggest problem with semi-conductor companies producing in 3rd world contries is that these factories do no require much manual labour so the money saved isn't that much. Of course land and construction will be cheap.

    It is also nice to see the communist government claiming to be more "fair" letting the "evil" market economy enter whenever it is profitable. This makes them even worse, clinging to a lye preventing the people to gain privileges and a better standard while letting the "right" businesses in. I can't help it, but I suspect that bribes and corruption is very wide spread in this kind of areas.

    1. Re:Cheap by alistair · · Score: 2

      Is this not a necessary stage in the development of every modern democracy? If you look at the UK, arguably the birthpace of modern capitalism, you had an industrial revolution with appauling working conditions long before you had a modern democracy. The same pattern was repeated in various forms in Europe and the US, and is currently being played out in the former USSR.

      The growth of industry leads to the growth of skilled profesionals and the emergence of a middle class. These people in return need the freedom to manage their capital and labour relations which leads to a complex legal structure which is best managed by a "democratic" system.

      Even Karl Marx noted that Capitalism was the most revolutionary form of society and observed that the interests of capitalists often coinceded wth the growth of "democratic" society.

      So I would fully support all industrialisation as a precursor to challenging all non democratic countries. Policies of isolation and non - industrialisation in states such as North Korea and Cuba have clearly failed, free trade is the only way to generate free societies (and while we are on this subject, what are all those steel traiffs about ...)

    2. Re:Cheap by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 2

      Actually, what often happens in places like China and Southeast Asia is that companies sign agreements to employ X number of workers. The nice thing (to the companies) is that the workers are so cheap that they can often cost less money to employ to do the machinery's job once you consider the cost of upkeeping the machines. Even if you dont come out ahead, the difference is minimal to these companies that still get to hire all those people for labor intensive work for dirt cheap. I think you are a little off base by assuming that machines do most of the work. These companies do move there for a reason, and while lax laws are a big part of that, I think saving on labor costs is still number 1. I mean people still need to unpack trucks and maintain the facilities and things like that. In the US, guys like that make $12-20 an hour. Over there, they make a few dollars a day at the very most? So you are talking about HUGE savings. Even the most sophisticated automated chip plants employ hundreds of people. It adds up very quick.

    3. Re:Cheap by Flakeloaf · · Score: 2

      We want cheap computers, but don't care for politics. Lets use (next to) slave labour in a communist contry!

      Does this not remind you of the stink Craig Kielburger kicked up a few years back about rug weavers in India? He started this great campaign involving world leaders, showed pictures of four and five year-old kids tying knots in rundown shacks and brought up sob stories about how parents rented their children out so they could pay for a few years' food.

      Apparently Mr. Kielburger belives that children in those countries don't deserve to weave rugs, and should instead be garbage-pickers or prostitutes.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    4. Re:Cheap by e8johan · · Score: 2

      I'm not only complaining about the ignorance of buying products for these contries and the way our western companies invade the market to exploit the cheap labour. I'm primarily complaining over the chinese way of claiming to be communistic, but then selling the labour of their own citizens for a few bucks a month. I say "selling", as the people allowing the companies to enter the market probably require quite alot of bribing. As for the companies doing this, brinbing is illegal (even in China) and I do not think that "it is worth it".

      As for this being the way to industrialisation, then democracy and that this is the way that it goes everywhere. Where are the dreamers. I was hoping for a transition of the 3rd world into industry and knowledge without making all the misstakes we made. Lets not pollute so much, lets have fair labour rules, lets make sure that corruption and bribes don't work, etc. It is we who supply the money, why don't we supply them with some demands too?

      As for me prefering or not prefering to do the job myself. I do not mind working on an assembly line, in face, I have been working in the industry for a few years. Now I've got a degree, but I still work close to the production.

      Please consider this a reply to all who has been complaining about my previous comment!

  5. Why China may become the next Hegemony. by _Sambo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What made the US a super power? (Besides the threat of Nuclear War) The people in the US that were willing to work all sorts of hours. The US became the Hegemony because the US culture has, to varying degrees, penetrated every other culture in the world.

    Now China has the most valuable resource: cheaper than hell labor. Now all China needs is to reinvent its culture (again, for the umpteenth time) and, again, the middle kingdom could be the Hegemony.

    1. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by s20451 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people in the US that were willing to work all sorts of hours.

      About fifteen years ago they were saying the same thing about Japan and look what happened. The American advantage is adaptability -- the ability to see a threat to their industries and respond forcefully. Again, in the case of Japan, the domestic auto industry transformed itself within a few years after seeing that the Japanese were providing what people wanted: cheap, reliable cars.

      Now China has the most valuable resource: cheaper than hell labor.

      Many companies that export labour under free trade agreements discover that paying 50 cents an hour gets you 50 cents an hour worth of labour -- in other words, it makes sense to pay higher wages to better-motivated workers, because the goods they produce are of better quality.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, sort of. If the US had the most productive workers in the world (and we don't, West Europe does) we still don't have enough of them to make everything so it pays to trade and it pays to move some industries to places like the PRC. That's the essence of comparative advantage. Essentially, the more efficient country should concentrate on high value added goods and the less efficient producers should concentrate on low value added goods. If you look around, this is actually a pretty good fit to the real world.

    3. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      What made the US a super power?

      The size, freedom, military strength, and relatively free market economy enjoyed in this country.

      The people in the US that were willing to work all sorts of hours.

      There are people like this everywhere in the world. Where are the other superpowers?

      The British have some of the freedom and some of the free market economy needed to become a super power, but not the size.

      The Chinese have the size and the military strength (maybe), but not the freedom or free market economy.

      US became the Hegemony because the US culture has, to varying degrees, penetrated every other culture in the world.

      Exactly -- due to our free market economy which has been ingrained into our psyche since the start of the nation.

      Now China has the most valuable resource: cheaper than hell labor.

      The most valuable resource is intelligence, and following that, an education.

      Now all China needs is to reinvent its culture

      Translation -- switch from a communist regime to a capitalist regime. Much blood-shed will be required.

      and, again, the middle kingdom could be the Hegemony.

      And then Neal Stephenson would again be seen as a prophet, but I doubt it.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by fobbman · · Score: 2

      "Now China has the most valuable resource: cheaper than hell labor."

      I'm sorry, but if I had a large number of captive employees who I could make work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week without pay and without benefits I certainly would be able to undercut some piddly Communist country.

      You put me in charge of Hell and I'll turn a profit.

    5. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by LiamRandall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree- the US became a super power because of World War II; it was a watershed event for this country. While the rest of the world was taking turns blowing up each others factories, decimating their populations, and sowing the seeds of political strife we were ramping up capacity, production, and developing business. The US is a super power for one simple reason- economic power. Think about it- we don't have the largest population, the most educated population, or even the longest life expectancy. We just out spend (usually on R&D) every other country in the world on defense; we even subsidize other country's purchase of our arms, regardless of ethics, to protect our economic interests. Money is the master of (ORWELL=offense)"defense"(/ORWELL). Why are your tax dollars spent in this fashion? Corporate lobbyists own our government.

      At the end of the day though, what matters to a country is manufacturing, products, such as software, cars, widgets, etc. It doesn't matter to a country how well your software streamlines production, how many widgets marketing & sales can distribute, or how efficient the line can be if you're not paying employees in your own country to then buy those widgets. Third world countries are smart to follow in Japans footsteps. I know that this is a complicated issue, but I sometimes feel that the relentless American profit machine is its' own worst enemy.

      --
      Great occasions do not make heroes or cowards; they simply unveil them to the eyes. -Bishop Westcott
    6. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

      The American advantage is adaptability -- the ability to see a threat to their industries and respond forcefully. Again, in the case of Japan, the domestic auto industry transformed itself within a few years after seeing that the Japanese were providing what people wanted: cheap, reliable cars

      A few years? Try a decade. The first reliable Hondas and Toyotas rolled into the US in the 70's. What was the US response? The Pinto? The Chevette? The Nova? To help the domestic auto industry compete, the US used it's greatest weapon... tariffs on Japanese cars. That helped Detroit lumber along until Ford got the Taurus up and running.

      In every situation where foreign competitors outpace domestic industries, the industries petition the goverment for protection in the form of tariffs. I'm not saying that's bad, but that's a long ways from saying our domestic industries were quick to respond or responded forcefully.

      Ditto with consumer electronics. When Sony and Panasonic started producing quality radios, how did GE and RCA respond? They asked the goverment for protection, getting import restrictions and high tariffs. Clothes from China? Tariffs. Honduran Bananas? Tariffs (well, before NAFTA).

      And yet, the US complains when Japan tries to protect its industries from American products. The US complains when the EU puts high tariffs on US products. When it comes down to it, it's the same on both sides, using tariffs and import restrictions to protect domestic industries.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    7. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by e2d2 · · Score: 2

      Why are your tax dollars spent in this fashion? Corporate lobbyists [opensecrets.org] own our government.

      Or it could be because people are trying to kill us...

    8. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by timeOday · · Score: 2
      If the US had the most productive workers in the world (and we don't, West Europe does)

      Here's a fact check on that statement:

      1997 GDP per Capita

      Switzerland $43,479.93
      Japan $42,736.09
      Denmark $36,656.21
      Norway $36,206.64
      Singapore $31,600.89
      Germany $30,493.78
      Austria $29,485.56
      United States $29,142.63

      Granted, it's 5 years old. I wonder if Japan has slipped.

    9. Re:Why China may become the next Hegemony. by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      Out of the 7 countries beating us, 5 are in W. Europe including the top of the list. I think that this is close enough to true for Slashdot.

  6. Oh yeah? by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, anything you can make for $40 I can break for free!

    Beat that!

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  7. Probably not news to most of us by ekrout · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Anything you can make for $100, we can make for $40,' Chen says, summing up his commercial philosophy.
    Yeah, and KIA cars cost $8,000 and a mid-level Mercedes is around $45,000. But if I had a choice, I'd definitely tend to side with the German-engineered, reliable Mercedes over the quickly-slapped-together-in-as-little-time-and-for -as-little-$-as-possible KIA.

    EricKrout.com
    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:Probably not news to most of us by Ab0rtRetryFail · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I realize that Kia may elicit a scoff from many an American now... but let us not forget history.

      In 1975, how many people would rather take a sturdy, well-engineered Chevrolet than a quickly-slapped-together Honda? A sturdy, well-built RCA instead of a cheapo Sony?

      Notice how much that's changed in the 25 years since?

      China (and also, to a lesser extent, South Korea) is in the position that Japan was 25 years ago. Wait another 15 or so years (maybe less, given China's huge population) and you may be forgoing Japanese electronics for Chinese ones.

    2. Re:Probably not news to most of us by dzym · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And by then the Chinese alternative will cost just as much as the (current) major brands. You didn't complete the other section of your trend analysis.

    3. Re:Probably not news to most of us by foistboinder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, and KIA cars cost $8,000 and a mid-level Mercedes is around $45,000.

      For the record, KIA is a Korean company and KIA cars (at least the ones made in Korea) aren't cheap because of labor costs (labor in Korea is much more expensive than in China).

    4. Re:Probably not news to most of us by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      How many Stealth Bombers, nuclear subs, and mars probes are made in China?

      China is a nuclear power and has been for many years. Their weapons technology is quite high AFAIK.

    5. Re:Probably not news to most of us by dzym · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's why the pride of their People's Liberation Army Air Force are some MiGs from the former USSR and F16s.

      Their level of technology is not particularly high--the USA has much better toys.

    6. Re:Probably not news to most of us by AlgUSF · · Score: 2

      Nuclear power subs, not nuclear weapons. There is quite a difference between a nuclear sub, and a nuclear device. The pride of their military (as another poster said) is some crude short range nuclear missles (only capable of reaching taiwan), and some Russian MiGs.

      They spend most of their labor force on making toys for happy meals, computer cases, computer cases, etc. While we make the good stuff like microelectronics (mostly the design end), airplanes, space shuttles, software, etc.

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    7. Re:Probably not news to most of us by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but our software is junk, especially that made in Redmond, Washington. Don't equate American software with American airplanes and microelectronics.

    8. Re:Probably not news to most of us by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Two words--Lease return. 0% finanicing is killing the market prices for used cars, which aren't subsidized. You can get some sweet deals on a nearly new car from almost all the auto companies.

      You're still spending a relative fortune to (potentially) buy someone else's problems. I'd have a hard time forking over more than $2-3k on a used car, unless it's something special (like an old muscle car) and I can verify that it's still in decent shape. If you're looking at spending a five-figure amount on a vehicle, I think it'd make more sense to buy new.

      Then again, I don't trade in for something different every 2-3 years, as too many people seem to do. I bought an '02 S10 earlier this year, and I see no reason why I can't get at least 15 years (if not more) out of it. The salesman was a bit surprised that I didn't go for something "spiffier," but I don't buy status symbols. I don't need the people-hauling capacity of an SUV, and a V6 is plenty for getting to/from work or down the highway (hell, it actually delivers more power and torque and better mileage than the 33%-larger V8 in my '77 Cutlass Supreme). I'm sure I could've gotten a used Tahoe (or maybe even a Suburban) for about what I paid for a new S10, but I'm not complaining...there's no telling what abuse a previous bonehead owner would've heaped on a used vehicle (missed oil changes, jackrabbit starts, etc.).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:Probably not news to most of us by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, you do have a point there. MS crap is so dominant that I completely forgot anyone in this country ever made any decent software!

      Software in the US seems like some other industries: the US pioneered it, and made great products and great advances in technology (look at the ultra-reliable operating systems, mainframes, etc. of past decades, as well as various other non-software technologies), but after a while it stagnated and got surpassed by other countries. Other similar industries: automotive (started by America and Germany, now dominated technologically by Germany and Japan), nuclear power (check out France to see how nuclear power should be implemented), space (NASA seems to be getting worse and worse, while other countries are beginning to get into it). The only place where the US really has a lead I think is in military hardware, which I wouldn't mind so much if it weren't the only place where the US is so far ahead.

    10. Re:Probably not news to most of us by jafac · · Score: 2

      yeah, but that quickly-slapped-together-in-as-little-time-and-for -as-little-$-as-possible KIA has a 10 year warranty. Chrysler^H^H^H^H^HMercedes can't touch that.

      (though $45k spent on a Mercedes is often money well spent, those cars will run 300k miles quite often without a hiccup. And so will your typical Volvo, at about 2/3 the price)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  8. quality? by Palmguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But is the quality of the $40 one made "just outside Hong Kong" the same as the $100 made in the USA?

    1. Re:quality? by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      But is the quality of the $40 one made "just outside Hong Kong" the same as the $100 made in the USA?

      Having worked with several US and Taiwanese manufacturers, I would say it's a toss-up. Some US manufacturers are far more expensive and the quality is so poor you'd think it were assembled by chimps.

  9. China Activity by webword · · Score: 5, Informative

    China is extremely hot right now. I know for a fact that many companies are getting serious about sending their manufacturing to China for cost reasons. Also, the Chinese market is growing at a rapid clip. It won't be long before they are sucking up as much oil as we are, and expecting a higher standard of living.

    This might interest some people: The New Silk Road - Secrets of Business Success in China Today. As I indicate in my review, I think the book is good, especially for people who want a 30,000 foot view of doing business in China. I also liked Chinese Business Etiquette: A Guide to Protocol, Manners, and Culture in the People's Republic of China (ISBN: 0446673870). This Etiquette book is more ground level, "tactical", and person-to-person. Combined, these two books will give you a good taste for doing business in China.

    In any event, I know that going offshore is having an impact. Not just in manufacturing, but in other areas too, such as programming. It is strange to see whitecollar jobs fly away from the U.S. to places like Hungary, India, Russia, and China. Why? Well, when I was younger, I thought these "brain" jobs couldn't be easily replaced by lower cost labor. Well, that's just not true. The internet has had a lot to do with that, of course. I'd be interested to hear what other folks have to say about outsourcing "brain" work.

    1. Re:China Activity by aburnsio.com · · Score: 4, Insightful
      About third-world outsourcing brain work: don't do it.

      Every company I've heard of doing this, and every programmer I've talked to that's had to work with these third-world outsourcing companies, has had absolutely nothing good to say about it. There may be exceptions, but in every case I know if it's nothing short of a disaster.

      First, there's the distance problem. Having disparate groups from across the world work together in free software or academia is possible, but it doesn't work in corporations. The cultural and political barriers cause more headaches than is already prevalent in the corporate world.

      Second, there's the time problem. It really is hard to work with people on the other side of the earth because your schedule rarely overlaps. To have any meetings, someone has to come in early, or someone has to stay in late. Turnaround time for any question takes days instead of hours (for same time zone) or minutes (for the next cubicle). When facing corporate deadlines this can really bite you.

      Third is quality. I don't want to sound pompous and say that third world programmers are no good, but usually they are no good. The good ones have left and have come to the first world, or are in universities studying to come to the first world. They're not going to be sweating away doing the same job in the third world getting paid 1/4 of what they can get in the first world. You can get away with that for lower class labor, who can't afford a plane ticket or immigration costs, but for university-educated third world, they have a reasonable capability of coming to the first world.

      Fourth is culture. It's really, really hard to work with people who don't agree on culture; by this I mean work culture, not necessarily the same thing as culture in general. It's the reason sales and development in the same office are so often at eachother's throats. Even though developers in the first world come from all different backgrounds, countries, and cultures, there is a common work ethic among good first-world workers. The third world is often much more laid back, and people don't react to schedule pressure in the same way you might expect. There are more misunderstandings which hinders the group from working together.

      In summary, there are several key problems with outsourcing brain power to the third world that prevent it from being a success. The real core of the problem is that, contrary to the views of many executives and MBAs, intellectual workers are not assembly line workers and cannot be managed in the same way. Programming, or brain work in general, is not a repeatable, repetitive, explicitly definable operation which can be performed by unskilled laborours in any part of the world. This makes it especially unsuited to third-world outsourcing.

      If you or your company is considering this, save yourself a lot of headache: "Just Say No".

    2. Re:China Activity by Sarin · · Score: 2

      It's quite a biased assumption you make there. I've worked with several companies from Bangladesh, Colombia, Nepal and Jamaica.

      Ofcourse there are bad companies, but they are everywhere.
      It's all about good management of your outsourcing project. If it's software, provide them with good abstract data about your software project like the pre/post conditions failure conditions and everything, if you don't give em good documentation about your project, they will end up filling in the gaps you left in it.

      Second, yes many people in third world countries studied abroad and no they didn't stay there. They went back to their countries and are in charge of your outsourcing project over there.

    3. Re:China Activity by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Programming, or brain work in general, is not a repeatable, repetitive, explicitly definable operation which can be performed by unskilled laborours in any part of the world.

      Actually the higher the quality control, the nearer programming becomes a repeatable, repetitive, explicitly definable operation. Unfortuantely this also makes it extremely boring.

      I've done programming for "mission critical" systems for some major international banks. The scope for creativity was zero. Everything has a precise methodology, down to the last full stop, and everything was checked and rechecked. As a creative person, it drove me nuts. But I could see it could be something that would be ideal for outsourcing to China or India (which is what I believe many banks now do).

    4. Re:China Activity by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      if you don't give em good documentation about your project, they will end up filling in the gaps you left in it.

      It does seem to be the case that the better defined (documented) the requirements are, the easier it is to pass it off to somebody at a distance. However, this in itself is time-consuming and tedius labor, and requires a lot of up-front planning.

      Many companies want to grow the software somewhat "organically" rather than plan it all up front. It takes a fair amount of interaction to do such.

      Wether outsourcing works seems to depend a lot on how much you can or want to plan and document up front. Each project or each company may be different in this regard. For example, one area where software outsourcing seems successful is language translations; for example, translating a Cobol program to Java. This is because the Cobol program is self-describing, but a labor-intensive process to read and translate it. In this case the original program is the "authority" on what the result is to look like and not a distant manager.

      Anecdote: I once worked with an H-1B programmer who used a lot of *single letter* variable names, like A = B + C. We joked that he learned on 1960's BASIC where one letter was all that was allowed. Perhaps we were right, who knows what equipment he learned on in India. Unfortunately for under-employed US tech workers, not all H-1B's have such poor training.

    5. Re:China Activity by willis · · Score: 2
      I work for an big bank, and we outsource some of our stuff...

      It's nice - all of the sexy applications (pricing, front-office, etc) get done at major offices (I work in London). When you've got a mature, stable, un-exciting project that's in a maintainance cycle, it might get shipped overseas. We had a bunch of crappy perl scripts for this hack of a webpage that some traders were using -- it broke every once-in-a-while, and the author was long gone. Just recently we had a guy from overseas take over it (no more maintainance for me!).

      Seriously, developing an business specific application should probably be done at the home office, where the users/money/bosses/company programmers are. Once something is well designed and in a patch+fix mode with a stable release cycle, why not ship it overseas and let the kids at home work on new and interesting stuff?

      --

      there is no thing
      what else could you want?
  10. Anything?? by ksplatter · · Score: 4, Funny

    American Translation: Anything that you can do for 100 dollars we can do for 40 but now its gonna be made out of cardboard, cheap plastic and rubberbands. Maybe a paperclip or two if necessary.

  11. Re:Pass the savings onto you.. by Astrorunner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, lets all assume its slave labor.

    My father-in-law, now retired, was an electrical engineer in China. He made a decent living, by Chinese standards. How much did he make? About $125 US a month.

    THAT is where the savings are coming from. You're paying 20 times as much here.

  12. Can you say "exploitation"? by Ratface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "It works" only if you are looking at the equation from the point of view of money. As the book "No Logo" explains well, there are similar economic zones in vvarious developing countries around the world where people are exploited to produce things at extra low prices so we in the West can get our fix of technology/fashion.

    China has a terrible record on human rights and so is a popular place to set up sweatshops. The fact that they are owned by Taiwanese immigrants makes no difference - an exploiter is an exploiter no matter what their race!

    I just wish there were more examples of companies using these services listed in the article so that we knew who to boycott!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Can you say "exploitation"? by tweek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's right! Let's move those evil companies out of China.

      That will leave the people better off! Jobs are bad for them. Maybe they'll just die and then we won't have to worry about it?

      I don't like the idea of those countries with horrible human rights violations but until the people see the benifit of a freemarket where everyone has a chance at "making it", things will never change. If the people are unemployeed and hungry and destitute, the only recource is crime and corruption and turning to an even MORE corrupt government than what communism provides.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:Can you say "exploitation"? by mamahuhu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've got to be kidding me.... Exploitation - you are confusing dollar cost with purchase power parity.... and even that measure is biased by the baseline requirements of a Westerner's need to buy western food, western clothes, western houses and western goods.

      If you think about it these people are able to SAVE money and send it home to their families. This means that they have disposable income - given the fact that a huge number of Americans live well beyond their means and are digging a debt hole into their lives I think you should take time to pause. Perhaps these guys are better off than many Americans.

      These people want to work here - they travel HUGE distances to do so - in a way they are exploiting their employers because they value the money they are receiving more than the time they spend... ie they are making money from the gullibility of the employer who is giving them money for their time and work.

      Come on - don't think about it in US$ terms - they are working hard and receiving cash that they can do things with - and the deal is good for them - they're not stupid - they would run otherwise. It's called capitalism - and it has worked for the west and will work for the Chinese.

      I work in Hong Kong and have done for 10 years. My salary is enormous compared to that in my home country of New Zealand, and even what I could earn in the US - and NZers don't consider themselves ripped off by the (comparatively) paltry salary they recieve - nor do most Americans. What? You get $USD15 per hour - I get $USD40 in Hong Kong... you're being ripped off!!!!

      It is all a matter of context - you don't pay $USD2000 per month for a shoe box apartment like I do in Hong Kong either....

      Just because the numbers are low does not equate to slave labour. In fact the anti-globalisation idjeets are working against the wishes of the poorer countries who want more globalisation and more access to western markets - even if they are being paid at $USD2 per hour.

      Think about it.

  13. Less Cost vs. Cheaper by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anything you can make for $100, we can make for $40,'

    Sounds like the reasoning behind something mentioned under the Power Supply Review, a couple days back, regarding produce it fast enough and let quantity make up for the high failure rates.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  14. Re:heh by misterhaan · · Score: 2, Funny

    and in a related note, 97% of all statistics are made up.

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  15. Karioke hostess,eh? by Choco-man · · Score: 4, Funny

    See picture on the first page of the story.

    Is that a mouse in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

    Man, if I had benefits like that at work, I'd work harder too!

  16. Cheaper but not better by quantax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was working for a designer lighting manufacturer as a network admin, we were currently in the process of moving our manufacturing process out of Germany over to China, for the simple reason that it was A LOT cheaper. Now, this isn't even electronics, merely simple electrical work w/ designer casings. However, I noted many a time that the German versions were much higher quality than the Chinese varients, though the Chinese ones were often 2x - 4x less expensive, though not 2x worst than the German ones. As far as electronics go, this is not surprising, but quality control is a MAJOR issue here. Things like Abit's exploding/leaking capacitors and such are signs of shoddy parts. There is NO point to buying something for 1/2 the price if you are going to have to RMA it in under a year.

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    1. Re:Cheaper but not better by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      People who believe that they can cut costs in half without any reduction in quality are, in general, foolish. Such coincidences can happen with changes in technology, but not purely as a matter of process or location. However, that is not, as a rule, the what is expected. The expectation is that costs are cut 50% and quality is still acceptable.

      For instance, I have a couple halogen lamps. They are cheap, are falling apart, but they still light my rooms.I could have spent more, but I didn't have the extra income to pay for quality. I would not, as some people, claim that I got a good deal on a quality product, or laugh at people who wasted money on the quality product, but merely say I bought at an appropriate quality level for my needs.

      I wish people had money to purchase excessively quality products. I might still have a fun job. However, the reality is that if something is 75% cheaper, it may make a lot of sense to set up a process to routinely RMA defective products every 9-12 months.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  17. What do I get for 10 dollars? by Astrorunner · · Score: 3, Funny

    "any ting you want."

    "Anything?"

    "Anyting"

  18. Re:No Logo by lovebyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I liked the No Logo book. Naomi Klein takes examples of child/slave/appalingly cheap labor for making IBM hard disks (if I remember correctly). She mentions China as one of the top countries for cheap, slave AND child labor.
    Let's hear it for China!

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  19. Fair? Good luck. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amen brother.

    I doubt that China will let freedom of speech reign supreme. Does anyone think these people want to make anything but crap wages their whole lives? Give them a better life, and you'll have the whole system collapse when they want something more for themselves.

    Yes, I know the counterargument about this one. Heard it a lot. "Blah blah best wages they ever had blah blah." So here is my response.

    Don't you want to make better wages right now? Doesn't everyone? What if they want to unionize? What if they want to speak out against unfair working conditions? What if the corporation is going to have unsanitary and toxic byproducts spilling out all over China...

    No wait. We know that one already. Pollute away. Happens everywhere in starting industry. As long as the PRoC gets a little profit, its all good.

    I am not saying that it isn't good for the Chinese people that they are getting manufacturing jobs. I am saying that we should excourage them to be as free and open with their work as everyone else. That we should not be satisfied until everyone is livign a standard liek we are, if not better.

    Honestly, I really hate the idea that just because a bunch of people live under a jackboot thug regime, it means that they we somehow desrve to be better off and recieve the fruits of exploitation.

  20. Who has $40? by jocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the manufacturing is taking place in China and the money is going to China who is going to be able to buy the product?

    For example, we are constantly seeing people being made redundant, unemployment rising throught Europe. I can only assume that the US is also suffering. In the long term if the production of most of our goods ships to China, the wealth of the nations will also be shipped there too.

    That leaves us in the "West" impovrished, disenfranchised and unable to purchase any of these goods. Sorry to be gloomy but this is NOT good news.

    1. Re:Who has $40? by davejenkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your entire argument depends on a 'zero-sum' view of wealth: there is only so much gold on the planet, and for every ounce that China gains, the US, Germany, France, or someone must lose an ounce.

      However, that is simply not true. Wealth is measured many different ways: cost-of-living, purchase ability, GDP, etc. And economics are founded on a virtual platform: money. All currencies are completely artificial (since the dollar left the Gold standard in 1972). As such, the total wealth of the planet can grow (or shrink) without any direct tie to a physical asset (theoretically).

      In direct reference to your comment: just because China's arrow is pointed up (for the moment), and the West's is pointed down (for the moment), don't assume doomsday. In reality, All those Chinese shipping companies, manufacturers, etc. are financed by New Yorkers, Londoners, and anyone else who wants to buy stock. This can only benefit the bottom line: as labor becomes more efficient (by finding cheaper workers in China), then products become cheaper, and your purchasing power increases: because a computer only takes 5% of your salary, instead of 25%, you now have 20% to spend on candy and pr0n.

      Eventually (hopefully), the Chinese WILL be just as rich as the West. Then there won't be any real reason to point missiles at each other, and ther will be 1B people to buy more stuff.

    2. Re:Who has $40? by keyed · · Score: 2, Informative
      For example, we are constantly seeing people being made redundant, unemployment rising throught Europe. I can only assume that the US is also suffering. In the long term if the production of most of our goods ships to China, the wealth of the nations will also be shipped there too.

      That leaves us in the "West" impovrished, disenfranchised and unable to purchase any of these goods. Sorry to be gloomy but this is NOT good news.
      A lot of manufacturing already left the US, starting in the 80s. While it did take a lot of jobs out of the country, the US economy has compensated and become more of a service economy than manufacturing.

      If you live in Europe, I'd be worried. While the manufacturing is of much higher quality than China, the quality of Chinese goods can only go up in time. Japan did it, and now it's happening to them in turn.

      Japan has been floating in and out of a recession for the last decade and while it's their banking system that keeps them in it, the fact that Japanese corporations are moving their manufacturing out of Japan with no signs of new jobs being created to replace the ones lost doesn't help.
    3. Re:Who has $40? by RobinH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the long term if the production of most of our goods ships to China, the wealth of the nations will also be shipped there too.

      Actually, all this does for your (I'm guessing) European country is free up your labour. If you can free up 1000 workers with higher educations by moving the work to a country with a less educated/skilled workforce (I'm talking line workers here), then you free up 1000 educated/skilled people for your work force. That makes the world economy more efficient (i.e. the least skilled person who is qualified for a job should be the one doing it). Those 1000 Chinese who got jobs just became consumers, and some of them would probably like to buy something made in Europe. In return, Europeans get to save 60% on their computer equipment, meaning their businesses can now operate more efficiently too.

      Your job is not to bitch and complain, but to get off your sorry ass and think of a way to better exploit the workers in your own country. Dream up a new product that you can produce with those 1000 new (relatively highly skilled, compared to the 3rd world) workers. Start a business, hire them! Have you not learned the reasons why capitalism DOES actually work sometimes?

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  21. Re:Yup. Sweatshops by Neil+Watson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Certainly not. However, is it not hard to find computer equipment that isn't made in countries with questionable labour laws?

    As I sit here and look at my compter:

    • Logitech optical mouse: Made in China
    • Altec Lansing speakers: Made in China
    • Microsoft Natural keyboard: Made in Mexico
    • ViewSonice monitor: Made in Korea
    • Asus motherboard: Made in Taiwain
    • Matrox video card: Assembled in China
    • IBM hard drive: Made in Hungary
  22. Chinese Business and Politics by MaximumBob · · Score: 2

    Well, for starters, China is a communist country, which means that business IS properly poltical in their view.

    The seizure of assets by China years ago, as well as the present opening up of the market, are both political issues, and there's little you can do to change that fact.

  23. Environmental issues? by 21mhz · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    ...manufacturing 'hot zone', situated around the pearl river delta...

    Reading this gives me creeps, even though I'm not a radical tree-hugger. Seriously, what are the policies of the Chinese government on industrial pollution? Let them all dump as long as cash flows in? Or something more sensible?

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    1. Re:Environmental issues? by Herkum01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, no you got it right the first time, dump as much trash as long as the cash flows on in.



      The thing most people forget was that alot of the modern industrial countries had to go through this phase to get to were they are. Somehow people believe(especially in the US), that the poorest of the poor countries should start at the minimum standards that we are currently are at, instead of realizing they ain't got no money.



      Do I like the fact that these people are treated horribly, paid poorly, and live and work what we would consider a hell-hole, NO! The thing everyone seems to ignore is how to develop a developing economy. The two things China has going for it are cheap labor and are willing to ignore environmental controls, that is really what China is trading, no matter what they make

  24. a population of 40 million by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Minnesota (where I live) has a population of roughly 5 mil. What are they doing with the waste products of 40 million people? Burning? Ocean Dumping? Recycling?? MN has problems with pollution, and nowhere near 40 Million.

    That's just too damn many people. Apparently, they can make those 40 dollar items by brute force. Hell, they could make diamonds by having everyone pile on a piece of coal.

  25. Re:Pass the savings onto you.. by bluprint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It can't be slave labor when people do it willingly. Assume some hero liberal had the power to remove these "slave" driven corporations. Do you think those people who have now lost thier jobs would really be better off? If so, why don't they just quit, if it would indeed make them better off? Here's a thought. Maybe, just maybe, those people know what is best for themselves. I know it's hard to imagine for a "westerner" that people in other countries actually have the ability to think and make rational decisions...

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  26. Do I feel a song coming on? by Lovejoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything you can make, We can make cheaper-
    We can make anything cheaper than you!

    --
    Now seriously. This is really sickening:

    No reliable legal system enforces contracts. Theft of intellectual property is routine. Business disputes are often settled by hired thugs; on occasion, those thugs are the local police. But though it can feel like Dodge City, Dongguan works more like 19th-century Manchester, as perhaps the world's most extensive and systematic exploitation of transient labor by mobile capital. And the people who oversee this system -- and profit handsomely from it -- are the officials of the world's largest Communist Party.

    While I am not an blind supporter of Amnesty International, I think they are spot-on with regard to China."

    We have normalized trade relations with them, coddled them, and deceived ourselves under the banner of "engagement." We should not accept super-cheap components as a result of slave-labor or child-labor. Communism is bad enough, but now we have the worst of both worlds - totalitarian communism and ruthless robber-baron-style capitalism.

    Let me be clear - I have nothing against Chinese people, just their government's practices.

    What do /.ers suggest to contribute to the solution? Stop buying consumer goods made in China? Write to congress? To be honest, it seems rather hopeless.

    1. Re:Do I feel a song coming on? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      The chinese will solve it themselves but first they've got to get over the hump of having 225M unemployed. Once they've got enough sweatshops and the cheap labor runs out, they'll climb up the quality ladder just like everybody else and start spending their wealth fixing the problems they're creating now.

    2. Re:Do I feel a song coming on? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      I hope they find a better way of doing it because these communists have a horrible, callous disregard for the dignity of human life. Would they nuke theire own? I don't want to find out. We're down wind.

  27. It's not suprising... by MoThugz · · Score: 2, Insightful


    that many of the West-based posters here talk about inexpensive being bad quality and Asian factories ran as sweatshops. It's in the political environment many of you were raised in.

    Almost all your political foes are of opposing principles from which you hold. Wake up call: your ideals (often misquoted as democracy) are not as free as you see it.
    </offtopic>

    These sweatshops amount to a whole lot of (for example) the electronic things you use. I dare say that the computer you're using right now also contains these cheap components. Without these inexpensive products, the US economy no matter how massively independent you thought it was, won't be the way it is today. Why do you thing that China (which has so many times be flamed as a human-rights offender by the US) is a preferred trade partner? I guess when it comes to making uncle sam's pocket fatter human-rights can fuck off and die.

    Now think before you post anything mindless like sweatshops and poor quality goods from China, Taiwan or any other Asian economy... your lovely AMD processors too come from an Asian country, Malaysia.

  28. Re:-1 (troll + flamebait) by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    Business done for a long-term return is done quite differently from a smash and grab, always have a suitcase packed and an escape route planned business. The political climate ensures that those who know the PRC best (and these ROC entrepreneurs qualify) will practice smash and grab business. Westerners who don't understand that are likely to get burned.

    The political climate is part of the business climate and relevant, especially in an article that explicitly brings it up.

  29. Re:Yup. Sweatshops by Nept · · Score: 2

    Right...we just pay the import tarrifs/overhead of the stores we buy from when we purchase the same items here.

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  30. The word "foreigner" isn't even in the article by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2

    I read the entire article and fail to see how your post has anything to do with it.

    Do moderators even read the subject at hand before they mod? Or do they just mod on which one "sounds" cool/hip/post-moderern?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  31. Re:Cheap crap? No, on the contrary... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    No, no that's the PLA run factories that are a slavers dream. They use prisoner labor. At least these ROC run factories pay above average wages and start to climb the PRC up the long road to capitalist wealth.

  32. Goddammit, miderators by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Can't you realize sarcasm when you hear it?

  33. Re:Japan-Korea-SEAsia-Taiwan-China-India-?? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    If you stick enough factories into a place, even the PRC eventually runs out of unemployed and then labor competition will drive prices up just like every other place.

  34. Just on TV... by martijnd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Just watching TV (Taiwan channel) on how an MBA/MA/MSc won't get you a good job anymore in Taiwan. And even with some serious work experience on top you are still not guaranteed a job.

    The main gripe of these MBA's et al seems to be that their counterparts graduating across the Taiwan Strait in China seem to be lined up for fat salaries (China style) even before (now where do we remember this from?) graduation or (horror) are even dropping out of college just for the money.

  35. Here today, gone tomorrow. by Shanep · · Score: 4, Funny

    "'Anything you can make work for 1 year, we can make work for 4 days,' Chen says, summing up his commercial philosophy.'"

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  36. The Next Pulp Novel by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    "It was a dark and stormy night. My name is Jonny Wong. I'm employed at a company in Dongguan that makes the ~/` key for keyboards."

    "We've been having problems with a competitor that makes Black ~/` keys. Ours are white or ivory. They're trying to muscle in on our buisiness, they want to take our 2/3rds of the market."

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  37. Reverse engineering by twoslice · · Score: 2

    In the mid-80's I worked for a company that sold clone IBM's (who didn't in those days?). The owners had contacts in Taiwan who were saying that if we could ship over a motherboard, or anything else for that matter, they could reverse engineer it and have it produced in a few months.

    In those day's multi-layer mobo's were not common and ASIC's were rare so it was not too difficult to do. The reason they could cut their costs was the fact that there was no real innovation just R&D (Rip off and Deploy).

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  38. Re:Fair? Good luck. by dbrutus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are 225 million chinese unemployed (counting both rural and urban unemployed) in the PRC that would desperately want these jobs. Out of an estimated 800 million strong labor force that works out to about 28% unemployment. The unemployment rate in the US, last I checked, was 5.9% and people are already very nervous about jobs, nobody's hiring, people are taking a lot more abuse from their bosses, etc.

    Get real. As long as PRC employment is so high, people are going to be scared to lose what they have. So what kind of companies are going to go to such a country where the politicians are all corrupt, the bureaucracy is mind numbing, and objectively the whole government has no business being stable with multi-year 20%+ unemployment levels and growth petering out? You betcha you're going to see lots of sweat shops. If the world's really lucky we're going avoid seeing the prospect of a chinese civil war complete with nukes tossed around. But we need to be very lucky for that to happen.

  39. made in the US? by raal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know of a list of computer hardware that is actually made in the US? What companies acutally still make things here? Or for that fact electronics in general? or heck even more just items in general??

  40. Re:Yup. Sweatshops by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah, yes.

    You see, a few people protesting sweatshops *do* have a valid point -- if what they're doing is specifically trying to get existing sweatshops to pay out more money.

    The thing is that the entire movement was started by and is a tool for the US labor protectionists.

    What you're doing right there neatly falls into the propoganda being put out. You're trying to avoid countries with "unfair labor laws" *entirely*, not trying to figure out what companies there pay their workers more. You're simply avoiding non-US products.

    And in doing so, you cause far more damage to the "poor, exploited" foreign workers than the Nike-buyers. You see, the reason those workers are working under such extreme conditions is because they *have* to to avoid starving. Companies can get away with said wages because people there are *starving*.

    So, you've been swayed by AFL/CIO images of "giving a poor, exploited foreign worker better wages", and are ending up depriving them of jobs and starving them. Wonderful.

    Until there's a labor *shortage* instead of surplus in said countries, there will never be wage increases. Not going to happen.

    Ironically enough, buying products from companies with production facilities in said countries is likely to help the workers, since it increases demand for local labor. If the levels of demand can produce a labor shortage...then sure enough, wages will rise.

    Any other solution, like government-mandated minimum wages, just produces inflation, as the enconomy corrects itself to keep the buying power of those on the bottom the same.

  41. What does this portend? by CTD · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Chen doesn't understand these people," Lou complains. "They're Communists. If you don't have any limits, people will move everything over here. And then we are trapped." It's a common fear in Taiwan, that once the island's industrial base has moved to the mainland, the "renegade province" will lose its leverage.


    Trade the word Taiwan for the US and "renegade province" for "nation" and think on that for a moment. We are gleefully tearing our manufactureing base apart for cheap labor and the resulting cheap goods. Once the conversion is complete and our nation is 90%+ 'consumer' and 10%- 'producer'.

    What does that bode for the US? What does that bode for the Western World in general?

    I think that the long term effect for China is that the nation does change into something else. Too much money, influence, and information is feeding into that nation from the "outside world" their wall will fall too. What the long term effect is for the West? I do not know.
    --
    Grimwell - old, cranky, mean, obsessive
    1. Re:What does this portend? by da_Den_man · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sorry, I would have to say this has ALREADY happened.

      Where are the Manufacturing Jobs? Where has our "technology" taken us that we have to import the chips that are designed HERE from a foreign nation and pay THEM and their workers cash that as a nation we NEED.

      America as a nation needs to stop playing "Police" for the world and take a look at our OWN economy. Sure, the guy says "Anything you can build" but we WOULD NOT have to pay other workers for that priviledge. We as a nation need to realize that there is only SO Much Crap we can BUY.

      We need to go back to a more industrialized nation. It was INDUSTRY that lifted us out of the Depression. Industry, the ability to make the products, to hire the workers, to rebuild OUR economy, needs to start HERE. Not elsewhere. We can make it cheaper to build here, and the reason we HAVEN'T is because Corporations DON'T want to spend the money needed. Why should they when they can sell us the same product made elsewhere for the same price....and half the cost for them to manufacture?

      America needs to wake up to the reality that we are NO LONGER A PRODUCING nation. We are just a "dirty cop" and even worse to the rest of the world.

      Oops....I am writing this like it means anything.....nevermind.

      --
      You keep going until you die..."Me".
  42. Re:No Logo by why-is-it · · Score: 2

    I liked the No Logo book. Naomi Klein takes examples of child/slave/appalingly cheap labor for making IBM hard disks (if I remember correctly). She mentions China as one of the top countries for cheap, slave AND child labor.

    It is a good book. I learned a great deal and she documents all of her sources with an extensive bibliography. While there are many potential upsides to globalization of manufacturing and trade, we in the first world have really failed the people in the third world. We have relaxed the restrictions on capital, but not raised the bar on things like environmental standards and working conditions. Who would have thought that feudalism was a viable alternative in 2002!

    It is a shame that the moderator who decided that my post was flamebait hasn't taken the time to read the book.

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  43. Sony and our guilt. by twitter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In 1975, how many people would rather take a sturdy, well-engineered Chevrolet than a quickly-slapped-together Honda? A sturdy, well-built RCA instead of a cheapo Sony?

    Who said RCA was well built in 1975? Sony cleaned up the electronics market by 1985 by making stuff that was superior.

    Today, much of what Sony does is not superior because they have opted to use Chinese slave labor. Seen a dream cube lately? Twenty years ago they were rock solid with a flourescent tube display that auto dimmed but was bright enough to see in daylight. Today, that same machine has a poorly fitting switch and cheap LEDs for a display. But then again, who esle is making anything? The dream cube sits on a shelf next to an even more repulsive RCA from a similar factory.

    Wait did I say "slave labor"? Yes I did. China is a command economy run by a party which will enforce it's line by death. No dissent is allowed because there is no free press. Workers may flock to this place, but that is because they are left with few alternatives. Comfort is realative and people are easier to control when you make things we take for granted special and only for the privaleged. Most people, even the special ones are have little choice about what they do. As in 1984, purge is continual for the special.

    This system is only working for a few, and only because they have a free economy to sap. Look at the former USSR, now that you can. They had a highly technicaly educated society, yet most things we take for granted were rare, vehicle ownership, TVs, even radios in a country that would love for everyone to have propaganda everywhere! Most if not all women were forced to work so child rearing was communal, as it always was for peasants in Russia. The command economy works by creating artificial scaricty. Without trade with free economies, most ordinary people lived only to labor in what we would consider poverty. This in a country with more land mass than any other and vast resources. Bigwigs lived well, sent their children to good schools and risked a bullet in the back of the head. Communists are always like this. The only difference betweeen China and the former USSR is that countries of the free economies are dumb enough to risk all their capital in a place that will surely take it all when the money stops flowing in.

    The article sums it up nicely as it tells us the sickening life of self abuse in wine slop the lucky live we pay for and then the average story. This is you, and the woman is your would be wife:

    ... [Chinese] hometowns are bad enough that they're willing to travel hundreds of miles for the chance to earn Primax's starting wage of 300 yuan a month -- $36, or 21 cents an hour for a normal 40-hour week -- a typical figure in the Pearl River Delta. Routine overtime can push that up to 450 yuan, and Primax's worker dormitories offer free room and board.

    In background and motives, these workers differ little from Zhang Ping, the hostess at the nightclub. She graduated from high school in Harbin but flunked the college entrance exams (only about half of test takers pass). For two years she worked for 200 yuan a month in a state-owned wholesale company, but it went bankrupt. Then she tried a stint behind a sales counter, but no one was buying much in a city with 25 percent unemployment. Finally, a girlfriend from down south wrote to say there was good work at the nightclub.

    Free room and board for slaves and whores who work overtime everyday, how repulsive. That's what you get without laws, contracts and free speach. Surely our trade with such an economy is dragging us down more than it's lifting them up.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Sony and our guilt. by Poligraf · · Score: 2

      First of all, about Sony.

      I have read an article in Forbes a few years ago.
      When Sony bought out troubled Aiwa in mid-eighties, they have installed a manager who was the first one to build factories in Taiwan. It resulted in savings that allowed Aiwa to slash prices and become number 3 in market share.

      About USSR.
      No bigwig risked a bullet in their head, even though they lived somewhat differet life (like Orwell's "Internal Party"). Some of their children studied in the same schools with "commoners". It were some of the universities where mere mortals could hardly get.

      As for the child rearing, guess how many women can be housewives in the modern US, and how much time can working parents afford to their children. And it might be better or worse to be in a "community" rather than have an individual babysitter. I'd say that lack of parents' attention is a problem of any technologically advanced society.

      Speaking of the command economy, it is not driven by the scarcity. In the USSR it was driven by the ideology, so the consumer goods were a second, if not the third, priority. It could have been the other way around.

      Also, I would not put all the crap on just Communists. Any system based on the hierarchy is like that. Saudi rulers don't differ form Soviet Communists or Chinese Emperors that much. It was the genius of Orwell who had shown the 3-level system of such a society.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  44. Well, Almost. by IPFreely · · Score: 2
    Cheaper and better are different.

    As I like to ask my boss:
    You can have it
    1. Better.
    2. Faster (sooner).
    3. Cheaper.
    Pick any two.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  45. ...and... by zozzi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    > Anything you can make for $100, we can make for $40


    Anything you sell us for $40 we resell for $100 elsewhere

    :-)

    --
    ---
  46. Pathetic by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just how are you going to boycot?
    I doubt many people will pay $300 for a mobo and
    $600 for the processor just so some guys in china they never heard about will make money.


    So, for $200 you'd be willling to sell your fellow human beings into serfdom.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Pathetic by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Okay, let's assume everyone in the world has a spasm of supporting human rights, and stops buying all Chinese products this instant. All the Chinese factories shut down, and all those Chinese workers are out of a job.

      So now what? I really want to hear your solution for what to do with all those newly-unemployed Chinese.

      There sure as hell aren't enough farms for them to go back to (even if that weren't backbreaking labour, typically with little or no cash income). So what ARE they going to do now -- starve?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Pathetic by hey! · · Score: 2

      It doesn't work that way. The problem I have is not that China can produce goods cheaper than other people, its that the people doing the producing benefit so little from it.

      Chinese workers can't organize an independent union. They can't even petition their government for better working conditions.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Pathetic by Reziac · · Score: 2

      But the difference is -- the Chinese workers can either work in these factories, and get SOME benefit, or they can go back to subsistance farming, and get NO benefit. Which do you suppose gives the average Chinese more of a view of how things COULD be? Which do you think offers more incentive for both the people and the gov't to reconsider their old methods?

      There is NO practical freedom except economic freedom. Don't think so? Let's say you have the right to go anywhere you wish, but you have no money. How are you going to get there? If you're dead broke, that's functionally the same as having no freedom to travel. You can't get very far at any speed on just your own two feet (especially if you can't buy food along the way, because you're broke).

      Suggested reading wrt why people wind up with the gov'ts that they do: a 1950s inside view called "Why They Behave Like Russians".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  47. Article pretty accurate, but misses a few points by Conspire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an expat who has lived in Asia for 11 years, roaming factories and companies both low and high tech all over the region, I must say that this little expose` on Dongguan was pretty damn accurate. The article and several posters did, however, miss a few points:

    1. The savings these mfg companies realize compared with US or European based is not only labor and tax. Industrial environmental waste processing is next to nill in Southern China. The place makes Taiwan look like a park refuge, and I tell you, Taiwan is no place for a scenic vacation unless you are into touring large polluted industrial zones, most of them abandoned now. For most tech companies, waste processing is a large cost, sometimes MORE than labor in industrialized nations. That is why so many fabs get moved over.

    2. Software piracy is an issue, but it is not SAP, Oracle, Sun and our favorite M$ that lose out the most. Most of these Taiwanese companies are using native Taiwanese ERP software. About 50% of it is pirated, and the other 50% is licensed legally from the Taiwan ERP co's with branch offices in China. Either way, Taiwanese ERP software is WAY cheaper than western solutions.

    3. MS has taken a "soft stance" on piracy in China. If they took the same stance they did with companies and individuals alike in China as they have done in Taiwan, there would be an exodus from thier beloved desktop. Taiwan has cracked down hard over the past years, but because the general public can afford it, they still shell out for MS solutions. If China cracked down like that tomorrow, it would not fuel massive MS sales, but would fuel a massive move to GNU/linux and other solutions.

    4. I have watched foreign buyer after foreign buyer be entertained daily over weeks of factory visits in China. As a marketing and sales department, try to imagine the budget a firm would need to do that with clients in New York, London, or even Nebraska for that matter. You just can't get your clients so happy for so little after a hard day's work anywhere in the world. And, thier wives are not around and yes there are plenty of things for the client to do at night. And, happy clients come back to buy more.

    5. A LOT of Taiwanese money in China is the result of one or a combination of the following:

    a. Taiwan firm borrows heavily, boss runs off to China with all the money, firm goes bust. Boss starts new factory in China with money he never has to pay back.

    b. Taiwan firm gets money from Taiwan investors (or private lenders), runs off to China, gives shareholders minimum or no return (or defaults on private loans)

    c. Taiwan firm has uncompetitive business but nice pension fund built up. Taiwan boss transfers pension fund to China, starts new factory. Taiwan employees left with nothing as Taiwan company goes bust.

    d. Taiwan firm some how burns down in flames, literally!!!. Fortunately, boss had insurance, and decides that the insurance payout is better invested in China. Oh, and he had two policies so doubled his capital.

    Of all four above, I have personally known of a firm in each case that has done it and got away with it. Cheap capital (as in extorted), is just another competitive advantage these guys have.

    So, why does China let them get away with it? Because China is the next manufacturing superpower. That's right, in 5 years you will be lucky if you can find 10% of the goods on US shelves made in the USA. Even if they have the tag, those goods are probably assembled in the USA from components and sub assemblies made in China, Mexico, Indonesia, India, or wherever it is cheaper than the US. There are just too many arbitragers out there looking for a buck.

    --
    Real men don't need signitures!!!
  48. Re:You'd rather push your Chevy? Good. You'll need by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    I'm currently driving a 1986 Honda Accord that has 245 THOUSAND miles on it. The worst problem it has had so far was the alternator needing to be replaced. It runs great still. Heck, the radio doesn't work and the heat/ac is broken. But it drives!

    I love Japanese cars.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  49. Follow the money. by hey! · · Score: 2

    Here's the way it works. The guy in the article says that what other people can sell for $100, he can sell for $40.

    This doesn't mean that the world gets a motherboard for $40 instead of $100. It means they get that motherboard for $99, with the difference of $59 dollars being split betwen the entrepreneur and corrupt local officials. The workers aren't heroically sacrificing to provide the world cheap goods, they are sacrificing to enrich a class of parasites.

    The kind of massive labor cost differential could not last long in a place where government officials are responsible to the people, and the workers had a right to independent unions. It is supported by a government that is run like a mafia to exploit the labor of the workers.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  50. $100 dollar bills by Virtex · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Anything you can make for $100, we can make for $40'

    I can produce $100 bills for $100 each. If I can purchase some from you for $40 each (and I want real US $100 bills, not those cheap counterfits), I will buy all you have.

    Hmmm... but I guess you guys don't actually make money, do you?

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  51. Re:Anything Wired can write, Slashdot can link to by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    Should just be a slashbox that has all of the wired headlines in it, then whenever Wired updates the headline goes there, and all stories about wired articles are automatically rejected.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  52. As a chinese student studying in US by didiken · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a chinese student studying in US, I do have something to say.

    > by Anonymous Coward
    > Overseas Chinese, especially Taiwanese, are not foreigners.
    > Many of those over 50 were born in Mainland China. They're
    > returning to their native land and regaining some of the money
    > and property that was unjustly stolen from them.

    Usually every time Slashdot has a story anything related to China, communist bashing usually follows. You know this world is full of catch-22s. Nationalist's land taken over by communist. But wfterall, what the United States did build on is their strong military power. Quoted from Black Hawk Down, "When bullets go pass your head, politics go right out of the window." But guns speak for politics. Every countries struggle like this, think about history of Texas and Israel. They fight. Power struggle.

    For human right records, China certainly does not have a word to say. Lest not forget Tiananmen Square, but watched out for next 5 to 10 years. Power struggles and in-fights in the regime be taken account over this

    >Asia feels heat as sofware piracy rises
    >http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconva lley/43 5 0115.htm [siliconvalley.com]
    >
    >Microsoft Corp said on Wednesday software piracy was on the rise worldwide and
    >China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Indonesia were the "hotspots" in Asia
    >where major counterfeiting activities thrived.

    Yes, you are absolutely right. Now think about this, if you are a student, your monthly wages is less than $125 USD and you want to do 3D graphics just like you slashdot readers do, will you choose to buy a Maya 4.0 student version for a pirated $4 USD CD or $400 USD student version ?

    Globalization hits every corners of the world. China is forced to open its market and they have to change, but standards has yet to follow. You really can't compare the wage of average Chinese wages with a piece of Microsoft Office.

    By the way, ask yourself, did you ever you Napster, LimeWire, Gnutella and Hotline grab your favourite MP3's and Warez ? Pretty much the same moral story you know. It spares money (for more beer).

    And of course again, that's why Linux is pretty hot. Watch out for the Redflag Linux.

    > by aburnsio.com
    >About third-world outsourcing brain work: don't do it.
    >
    >Every company I've heard of doing this, and every programmer I've talked to that's had
    >to work with these third-world outsourcing companies, has had absolutely nothing good
    >to say about it. There may be exceptions, but in every case I know if it's nothing short of a disaster.
    >
    >I don't want to sound pompous and say that third world programmers are no good, but usually they are no good.

    First, think about should you classify China as a third-world country. Frankly it's kind of hazy to classify it between developed country and developing country.

    It really depends on what kind of jobs for outsourcing isn't it ? Humans are hard to manage anyway. My analogy is to think about long distance love. Some do work out some don't. I bet you can't ask them to to a lexical analysis stuff but I'm sure most Chinese CS students have no trouble competing contracts on Visual Basic and MS SQL, and many MCSE, Cisco and Orcale stuff. In case you don't know, many favourite CS books in the States such as "UNIX Network Programming" by W.Richard Stevens have been licensed by academic publishers of Tsinghua, (I got one for $9), so watch your back and work hard on your CS class......

    Watch out for Microsoft Research in Beijing. They do a lot of SQL stuff don't they ?

    >by Astrorunner
    >"any ting you want."
    >
    >"Anything?"
    >
    >"Anyting"

    I don't find this particularly funny. There're many good Chinese that speaks English well too, those who speaks English AND Chinese well will earn a lot there. I know many Asian American friends see this trend.

    And again, many Japaneses don't speak good English, but money speaks, saving speaks. Look at your logitech mouse.

    1. Re:As a chinese student studying in US by willis · · Score: 2
      Usually every time Slashdot has a story anything related to China, communist bashing usually follows

      Yeah, Slashdot is full of people who know little about China, and speak of this little bit with lots of conviction. I'm not really sure why this is, but it has been like this for a long while. Same thing with making fun about accents -- I'd like to see them speak Chinese.

      First, think about should you classify China as a third-world country. Frankly it's kind of hazy to classify it between developed country and developing country.

      I agree with most of what you say, except this (and I'd rather not debate the US).
      Shanghai, Beijing, and maybe Shenzhen don't look like 3rd world counries at first glance (i.e. nanjinglu, wangfujing, jianguomen, etc), but let's not joke -- just around the corner are some 3rd world-ish scenes. Last time I was in Beijing, I went to visit a friend in Tongxian (east of Beijing by 10km? not too far, anyhow), and I saw semi-decent apartment blocks with mud roads leading to them. In Shanghai, off of Nanjinglu by 1k or so, there are people in construction yard shanty-towns living with little light and showering in the street. Both of those are developed-ish cities.

      What about Chongqing (China's biggest 'city')? Guizhou? Gansu? Even places like the fringes of Guangdong and Zhejiang are really poor/undeveloped. Not just "we're building big buildings, come back soon" undeveloped, we're talking poverty, collapsing schools, real 3rd world shit.

      From my view, there's a lot more Chongqing, Guizhou, Heilongjiang, Hunan, etc, in China than there is Beijing or Shanghai. I agree that China's moving really fast, but there's a _lot_ of ground to cover, esp. away from the coast.

      --

      there is no thing
      what else could you want?
  53. ..but *our* workers get PAID! by jbischof · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't know much about manufacturing hardware, but I know that in the processor realm they cannot make anything cheaper than we can.

    Processor prices are limited by yield (aka. how many good processors come out of the factory) which is entirely limited by technology. Their fabrication technology is not better than ours right now. If anything, it is far far behind. There is no way that they can produce chips cheaper than we can.

    Of course they could possibly get some non-proprietary hardware cheaper, and make their workers work for less. However chip errors occur because of microscopic particles in the air and slight jolts and bumps from a mechanical handler. These are not things that foreign manufacturers have a better handle on than we do. The number of working dies(the chip before its packaged) per silicon wafer is the most important factor in chip price.

    1. Re:..but *our* workers get PAID! by jbischof · · Score: 2
      P4's are made all over the world, you are correct. That means not just in China! It is world-wide technology created by an American company. I don't think anyone can quantify how much of the technology comes from "America" specifically, versus other labs and offices around the world, but I still think it qualifies as "*our*".

      Also, the latest and greatest fab that Intel just built in Rio Rancho, New Mexico!. This fab features larger 300mm wafers for an important reason that I tried to illustrate before.

      The point is: the processor YIELD determines the cost. The cost of labor and environmental codes is not a large factor (Intel factories all follow the same environmental codes anyway!). The larger wafers will let us get more working processors out of the same wafer, thereby increasing yield and letting Intel sell processors cheaper!

      It may also be worth pointing out that much of the handling in the new fab is now automated, creating a reduced labor cost.

      Explanation - a rough calculation
      Say intel can fit 20 Pentium 4's on a 300mm wafer. That wafer costs Intel $1,000 to process using all the cool .13u transistor technology (the price of the wafer isn't important and I just guessed). Little air particles, stress fractures, and errors in processing cause half of the Pentium 4's to have errors and get discarded. This means the Pentium 4's cost $100 ea. to make. Now imagine that they improve the process technology, and there are a tenth of the errors that there used to be. This improvement results in only a quarter of the Pentium 4's on a wafer being damaged. Now we get 15 good processors per die, and they cost Intel only $66.6 to make. Intel just saved a third of the price of making a Pentium 4. Now multiply that savings by the millions of P4's sold and you can see why the yield is so important.

  54. familiar by hndrcks · · Score: 2

    'Anything you can make for $100, we can make for $40,'

    I heard Olin King, former CEO of SCI Systems, Inc., say something to that effect about 25 years ago - and they made it to the Fortune 500 on just that kind of attitude.

    Unfortunately, there were no karaoke hostesses in Huntsville, AL., at that time.

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
  55. Chevy Nova '86 from NUMI by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    I can do you one better. We have a car that was developed jointly by Chevrolet and Toyota, and assembled in Fremont, CA, US. It is basically an '86 Toyota Corolla with Chevy badging. Ugly little car with a weird beige paint job, but damn, it runs and runs and runs. The original sticker says that it does 25MPG in stop-and-go city driving and 30MPG on the highway. It still maintains that kind of fuel economy today, 16 years later.

    Shows you what a little cooperation can do...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Chevy Nova '86 from NUMI by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lift the hood open on recent Geo Prizm's, and you'll find a Toyota Corolla engine within.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  56. So you approve of child labour? by fantomas · · Score: 2

    I'd say one indicator of exploitation is where people work in very unsafe working conditions, with little chance of improving them, and suffer health problems as a result of working. A second one is child labour.


    I accept that the reason people work in these conditions is because this is better than the option (starving). But do you approve of child labour or unsafe working conditions? Don't you think we should be trying to find ways to improve social as well as economic conditions?


    I accept that protectionist first world countries are terrified of trade barriers coming down because there won't be any industry left in NZ or USA or UK or other first world countries if companies can outsource their production to developing countries for far less cost. Joe Public will be happier when his new auto and tv cost less.

  57. An interesting quote... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    All this business functions in the absence of what we consider the bedrock rules of a modern economy. No reliable legal system enforces contracts. Theft of intellectual property is routine.

    And, oddly enough, this lack of IP law does have consequences (in this case, leaky capacitors screwing up most motherboards coming from Taiwan in the last 6 months) in a global economy:


    Read here and here.

    As much as a lot of Slashdot readers might not want to hear this, when information is totally free, things suck. Things also suck when rules put in place to protect information are enforced too rigidly or unevenly. The secret is to find a moderating system that finds the proper balance - something that Lessig has been saying all along...

    --
    That is all.
  58. Why does everyone forget WW2? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    It was a matter of unique geographical location that saved the US and let it keep its toys to make bigger toys. No bullies grew up in our backyard. That is the real secret of American dominance. Perhaps people forget it because they are determined to stick with one idea, rather than be equally proud of the truth. There's nothing shameful about being in place and taking advantage of chance. To pretend that a "can-do" spirit was responsible for everything America has now is a rather biased and reckless opinion of history. You'll find inspirational spirit and exceptional people in every culture on earth- America was just in the right place at the right time.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  59. Lesson from Hungaria by bstadil · · Score: 2
    You might want to check todays story over at theInquirer where shoddy workmanship at a lowcost Hungarian plant sunk IBM's diskdrive division.

    There is much more to the equation than cost of labor. Today labor only constitute 15% +- of cost of product. A few month earlier to market will negate any cost advantage that you will find off-shore. Maybe the stagnant PC industry is an exception as the concept of early to market has gone. Read: No innovations.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  60. outsourcing everything by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    --western businessmen hauling their assets to china are short term thinkers and profiters who care not about anything but money. They sell their soul for a few more dollars. This IS going to bite all of them in the butt when china is strong enough and decides that the middle eastern oil fields are their's for the taking. And every time a US company closes shop, lays off and fires workers and moves to china, they also layoff and fire customers. And all of them doing it? The US is headed towards utter bankruptcy soon, IMO. We got strong and grew the world's largest and most successful middle class by being a manufacturing country, and trading within our own 50 state "common market" union. We bout/sold/traded with our neighbors inside the States, this WORKED and worked well for many years, but NO, got to let some CEO's suck down a few zillion more.

    Bottom line it's a heinous security risk being financial enablers of china-just read their own public docs on who they consider their prime enemy, and we are destroying our economy and improving their's as fast as the fatcat CEO's can pull the plug and move to china for a few years short term profit, which will dry up eventually as even at reduced prices with no one working no one will be buying anything. If this move to china crap worked, we WOULDN'T be running a hundred billion plus trade deficit, so there's the dang PROOF it don't work. the only thing china is buying from us is advanced tooling to make more tools and to get stronger, while we layoff people, close factories and become dependent on them. this is NUTS!

    And they slap lie about so many things, take unemployment figures. They don't count long term unemployed who have exhausted unemployment insurance benfits but are still unemployed. Try doubling the "official" US dot gov figures for a more realistic number. Cost of living-try re-adding in food and fuel like they REMOVED from the official US dot gov data figures a few years ago to keep the numbers lower than they really are. And how about the corpro/fascist theft of money where the "government" give tax breaks to companies moving to slave/serf nations like china? If that ain't a ripoff or whut. Takingmoney at gunpoint out of Joe USA workers pocket so the company he works for can have their management close shop and move to china. ya some real mastermind economists at work there on that one. short term thinking leading to short term profits and long term DISASTER.

    And freeking illegal alien invasion, completely totally irresponsible and out of control, T-totally. Our small county has to build two new schools and the hospital is seriously running in the red to support the masses of ILLEGAL aliens who moved here in just the past few years and get away with breaking the law. A few local big fatcats make money off using these people, everyone else gets their property taxes raised to pay for these profits. Regular folks who only a few years ago could afford a very modest home with one spouse working and the other actually raising their children at home like God intended now have to work two jobs for the same place and have their kids dumped into the lowest common denominator brave new world creche "daycare" where strangers raise your kids. Ya, compete my butt, hard to compete when it's ignored the "recent arrivals" live 12 to a one bedroom apartment, run the same twelve from the same old ratty van with some plate slapped on it and no nuthing else.

    The "second worlding" of the US is in full swing, won't be long before there is little left of the middle class. I am old enough to remember any normal blue collar job could afford home ownership, car, and a flock of kids, now that just ain't happening too much more. These globalist goons want a two class society, I call it technofuedalism, the elites, then everyone else. Throw the serfs a few bones now and then and use their mercenary paramilitarypolice to keep the populations in check, EXACTLY like china, which is their model poster boy nation setup. masters/serfs. Gee what a swell model to emulate-NOT!

    Here is decent url for anyone interested in being part of the solution rather than the problem when it comes to purchasing products.

    http://www.buyamerica.com/home.asp

    As to the rest, we have an election coming up, do research see how your local congress critter bozos have been voting on freedom and on USA-first economic issues, and vote accordingly, ignoring those stupid D or R labels. If needs be vote third party or independent, ANYTHING but voting in the same old tired and disastrous loyal to the NWO bozos we got running things now if at all possible. /rant

  61. Re:Cheap crap? by Tassach · · Score: 2

    It's amazing how much you can cut costs when you use slave labor.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  62. Push my Chevy by nuggz · · Score: 2

    I bought my car to go places.

    I don't know why you'd rather push your car then ride in it, but that's your choice.

  63. Re:Japan-Korea-SEAsia-Taiwan-China-India-?? by Tassach · · Score: 2

    Nope, they just need to change the laws to create a larger prison population, providing a nearly limitless pool of cheap slave labor.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  64. Re:Child labor is a beneficial institution by fantomas · · Score: 2

    The average age of death for industrial workers in Europe at this time was approximately 40. I assume your posting was a troll. Certainly it was anonymous.

  65. Re:Yup. Sweatshops by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    It probably has more to do with the fact that IBM has had a horrible problem with quality problems in their hard drives, turning them from everyone's favorite and most trusted hard drive to the manufacturer that no one will ever buy from again because they had so many failures. If I'm not mistaken, that entire line of bad hard drives was manufactured in the Hungary plant. I guess Hungarians can't be trusted to build high-quality high-precision components, so they're moving someplace where people can.

  66. Hold on, I think you misinterpereted... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...we should not be satisfied until everyone is living a standard like we are, if not better.


    I think you missed what I said. I meant that people the whole world over need to live better. I don't disagree with your points. Nor am I some kook lefty. If I was a kook lefty, I would assume that everyone around me is not as eduated, blindingly noble, and clued in as I AM. I don't believe that at all.

    I beleive we should never be satisfied with other people in terrible poverty. Just like the USA is never satisfied with a country until elections occur. As for the Chinese people... MORE POWER TO THEM. As for the Chinese government... screw them. If that make me a lefty, then you really need to establish a difference between what a lefty and a hardcore, freedom nut righty like me really thinks. Cuz it ain't the same.

    Also, food aid is usually a UN situation, the last time I checked. Those derelict-duty model-humpers in the UN can't keep their own countries in check, and then try to pass legislation that is biased against those that can.

    Oh, and if your nation has a name that has not changed since the time before the bible, Torah, or the al'Quaran, perhaps you need to be taken off of the "developing countries list." That isn't development, its retardation.

  67. My experiences in China by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

    While China may indeed be a source of purported 'cheap' labor, one should really pay the country a visit, and try doing business with these people to see their true colors, and really see if China is the most viable option for long-term stability. I'm an American businessman in the import- export business, so as you might guess, my frequent travels take me to many places around the world, on every continent.
    I wanted to share my experience in the "great" country of China, in the very part described by the article.

    So, I was in Shenzhen China last December for about a week on business. A bit of background: Shenzhen, like Hong Kong and a few other places, is a "Special Economic Zone" that the Chinese government set up to try and give foreigners the illusion that China really ISN'T a drab, decaying fascist state that's economically languishing behind the rest of the world. Here, rules are relaxed and capitalism is encouraged, not surppressed. Well, let me tell you this, if this is China's best, then I'd hate to see the worst.

    Anyways, when I stepped off the train from Hong Kong (which was no paradise itself, as that place has gone down the shitter since the Brits left) I was shocked. The whole place smelled like a combination of vomit and dog shit that had been left out in the sun for a day or so. And it was probably BECAUSE there was vomit and dog shit all over. I almost retched, and I've certainly been in some sketchy places in my travels but NOTHING like this.

    People spit everywhere. Trash litters the streets. I found myself looking DOWNWARD much more than looking FORWARD when I walked.

    Noise pollution is endemic. It doesn't help that their infernal language consists of abrupt rapid fire tones that is a cacophony for any human ear to bear. How do they speak and listen to that shit without going crazy all day long is beyond me.

    Anyways, Chinamen stink -- literally. There is no concept of personal hygiene whatsoever. Meetings with even top officials were hourlong sessions of having to endure hot sweaty bodies and rancid breath eminating from mouths missing a few teeth. Geez, at least use deodorant for crying out loud.

    The hypocrisy, corruption, and double-standards from the highest levels of government on over are the norm at the same time China opens up to the world. Foreigners get charged as much as five times for transportation, lodging, food, and everything else.

    Traffic is horrible. Rules are non-existent except for at traffic lights: red means to go fast, green means to go REALLY REALLY fast.

    The Chinese people themselve are pretty apathetic and everyone just wants to get out of that hell hole, so you see smuggling rings shipping people out hidden in truck beds and ships, all too often with tragic results.

    The whole country, in my assessment is a lost case. Even the cheap labor can be found in Southeast Asia or Mexico. Same goes for pirated stuff -- SE Asia and Eastern Europe will keep on churning them out.

    Anyways, the one redeeming quality were the girls. I paid 100 yuan (about $12 US) for a great fuck, with a 16 year old who seemed quite new and "unblemished" if you get my drift. Boy, was she tight, made all the right noises, sucked and fucked all night long and let me cum all over her. Much better than even the vaunted Thai whores, and worlds apart from anything in Las Vegas or in Europe. Best bargain I have EVER found in my life!

    So yeah, screw the hell hole that's China. It's a lost cause of a country suspsended by a hollow facade of so-called new capitalism that's just show more than anything.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  68. Re:Yup. Sweatshops by blincoln · · Score: 2

    Until there's a labor *shortage* instead of surplus in said countries, there will never be wage increases.

    Somehow I doubt there will ever be a shortage of cheap labour in a country with over a billion inhabitants, at least in terms of making goods for countries like the US which have populations of 1/3 of that or less.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  69. Nope! by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    It matters a lot to a country how well my software streamlines production.

    Have you heard about the curse of efficiency?

    Every inefficiency has some group of people feeding from it. This inefficiency (and their living) is paid by the general populace through the taxes or higher purchase prices.

    Making some inefficient process efficient causes these people to lose their source of living. Since we have both democracy (one person - one voice), consumer-driven economy (then more I consume, then better it is for the economy) and more or less advanced social institutions (nobody dies from hunger; society feeds them one way or another), the government is directly interested in preserving these inefficiencies.

    However, it can't always stop the progress (if we can call it progress).

    As for the US becoming a superpower, WWII played a great role as an enabler. However, it was not the biggest contributing factor. The biggest factor is IMHO competitiveness that is engrained in the American culture. It has always been survival of the fittest until the most recent times when whiny leftists took over the media.

    I've had big article on the subject, but it is in Russian. This article shows real goals of globalization, and why/how it is gonna work. It shows why the globalization is absolutely necessary to save the humankind.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  70. Re:Pass the savings onto you.. by Reziac · · Score: 2

    There's also the issue of income relative to expenses. If your rent is $1200/month, a wage of $125/month sounds horrifying. If your rent is $50/month, an income of $125/mo. is no worse than the rent-to-income ratio for labour in the U.S., and in fact is relatively better than what some Americans make. I know when I was a kid in U.S. farm country during the 1960s, *half* of what we made went to pay the rent... and we didn't live in a mansion by any stretch.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  71. Re:Cheap crap? Not anymore! by Reziac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember when Chinese computer components first came into the local market (Los Angeles) in large quantities. At first they were complete crap, cheaply made and clearly with no concept of quality control, and could be counted to barely scrape by and have a short lifespan.

    But 3 or 4 years ago, that began to change, and now Chinese products are pretty much on a par with everyone else quality-wise. I no longer cringe when I see "Made in China". This is a good thing all around -- I can save money buying a product whose quality I'm adequately comfortable with, and the money it brings Chinese workers is surely welcome there as well.

    It's been the same for every startup-manufacturing process in every country -- they all take a while to get volume and quality on an even keel. We old folks remember when a Japanese car was a wobbly tincan with wheels. About the time Japanese quality went up, Korea came on the scene as the next big cheap manufacturing base, and at first everything from Korea sucked too. And if you go far enough back, you'll find 19th century Europeans' complaints about those manufacturing upstarts in America, flooding the world market with cheap crap. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  72. Faulty Thinking by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    There are two problems.
    1) You don't have the need for a 1000 more educated employees in France; you can't afford to pay them more, and you can't just educate 1000 uneducated workers that lost their jobs.

    They won't care much about somewhat* cheaper prices in stores if they don't have any income. And they will need to be fed by the society through the taxation of ones who still have jobs.

    2) Look at Taiwan and Japan; as soon as manufacturing took off there, it became inefficient just to use foreign designs and have foreign managers. Modern production requires a lot of skilled professionals, so they invest money in local universities and schools.

    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_ 43 /b3805001.htm

    In a short time they take over design, then they take over research. Who cares than that a company is partially owned by some American investors?

    Majority of the American population are not these investors.

    *Somewhat cheaper because the production and delivery cost is just a part of the retail price. Some goods have pretty high retail margin.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  73. Also ... by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    Cheaper labor is not just lower wages.

    It is also much less spent on benefits (healthcare), and labor funds, and labor-related litigation. Lawyers made EVERYTHING US EXTREMELY expensive.

    http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/o ct 2002/tc20021023_1339.htm

    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/oct2 00 2/nf20021023_1209.htm

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  74. On pricing applications... by Giant+Robot · · Score: 2

    Hi willis,

    I know that pricing apps have to be updated very often (as new derivitavie pricing models on new products are developed). In practice, whould they just be quick hacks written in VBA (probably made by the trader or local quant) that just work, or are they "component"ized and put into the boring but stable framework you describe?

    I know its a bit off topic, but I'm interested in this area!

    1. Re:On pricing applications... by willis · · Score: 2
      Hey GR (any relation to the magazine?)

      From what I've seen/heard, VBA, etc is good for getting the job done quickly, and may work well for a few guys, but it quickly grows unmanageable (different versions on different computers, no way of ensuring the quality of the model, etc). I've heard guys complaining about having to convert a bunch of excel macros to a better engineered environment -- it's supposed to be a well-known pain.

      The boring but stable frameworks that I mentioned don't deal with pricing at all (this is a bank's speciality, no way outsourcers can compete, and no way we'd want the knowledge to flow out). I'm talking more about trade reporting/completion or other crusty mainframe programs that have been written and working for many, many years, and that have strong specs and stable release schedules.

      Lastly, I help write the frameworks that deal with pricing models -- if you'd like to ask some more questions, you can drop me a line at shoney at alum dot calberkeley dot org. Might take a while to get back to you, but I will.

      --

      there is no thing
      what else could you want?
  75. Re:Article pretty accurate, but misses a few point by solferino · · Score: 2

    thanks for your comment - i found it interesting and informative

    i was the submitter of this story, and i was hoping for more comments like yours on the taiwan-china aspect which is discussed in the article. i've spent some time in taiwan (though none in china) and i find this relationship very interesting. unfortunately any mention of china seems to provoke some sort of blind response in a large number of americans and most of the comments prior to yours were disappointing 'china is an evil regime that exploits it's own ppl and is getting bigger all the time and we are scared' type diatribes that add nothing of value to the discussion

  76. Re:i think i'm turning japanese. i really think so by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    Anyways, remember when Honda and Nissan were crap in the 70's? Then NAFTA was signed and more than a 100,000 manufacturing jobs in the Southeast of America went south with the now famous sucking sound

    Japanese cars weren't crap at all in the 70's!!!
    It was just the American perception of Jap cars. My parents bought a Datsun in 72 and it ran just fine until they sold it in '87.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  77. The Links by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    Here is the main article: http://www.cofe.ru/appleubb/noncgi/Forum13/HTML/00 0763.html

    It has some links, but ones you must read are two Dolnick's articles.

    Also of interest might be http://www.cofe.ru/appleubb/noncgi/Forum13/HTML/00 0420.html
    where I talk about China and Iraq, and http://www.cofe.ru/appleubb/noncgi/Forum13/HTML/00 1039-2.html where I talk about liberals and a bit about human's development.

    If you have a feedback, publish it there or e-mail me to the address in the profile at cofe.ru (my nickname is mu-mu ;).

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  78. Re:Cheap crap? No, on the contrary... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    No, no, don't get me wrong. I know that the conditions are comparatively much worse in the PRC under pretty much any circumstances. Any system with 225M unemployed (rural + urban) is going to have very poor working conditions for those fortunate to have a job.

    The point I was making was that the PLA prisoner staffed factories do have a significant difference to the sweatshops run by ROC entrepreneurs. The sweatshop employees are worried about losing their jobs and falling back into the misery of unemployment, the prisoners in the PLA run system are worried more about beatings and executions than not being able to stay longer. I hope you would agree that it is a significant difference.

  79. Re:Japan-Korea-SEAsia-Taiwan-China-India-?? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    Nope, you have to have a significant part of your population outside of prison and the regime will become less stable the higher their wages go up. Reducing the supply of non-prisoner labor will drive their wages higher. Arbitrary arrest in a poor country constantly on the edge of starvation is not as serious as in a country with a decent wage rate. Once the income rises to a certain point, people won't stand for it anymore and they'll have the resources to work a change.

    The real question is where are the relevant income levels and how will the crack up proceed.

  80. Re:Fair? Good luck. by osolemirnix · · Score: 2
    Now try to imagine what would happen if China wasn't a communist country that keeps its people in the country, but a "free" form of government that would let people leave if they wanted.
    They would flood the US like a tsunami tidal wave, just like they flood into HongKong now. And they wouldn't care about green cards either (maybe an armada of illegal ships like in Neal Stephensons Snow Crash).

    So aren't you glad that China is communist after all? And don't you hope it stays that way a little longer?

    Strange if you look at it this way, isn't it?

    --

    Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
  81. Re:Fair? Good luck. by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    Actually, no I'm not glad they're communist. I have a fundamental faith that human ingenuity and hard work when encouraged by a governing system under the rule of law and aimed at human freedom makes a society that's alive, vibrant, and that creates more than it destroys.

    Communism is a net black hole, a sink of corruption, human misery, and wasted potential. The few great things it achieves are far outweighed by the price paid, a price which the system spends an inordinate amount of time and effort hiding.

    In reality if the criminal ancients who run the PRC all disappeared tomorrow, some would leave but a large number would stay, a situation similar to what really happened to most of E. Europe when the Berlin wall came down. You might get a million or two wave heading out but a lot of those people would head towards places with traditional, longstanding chinese communities because that's where uncle or cousin is already established with a job waiting for them.

    Yes, it would be a pain in our ass for 5-10 years but frankly the PRC has been a pain in our ass for 40 years so I'd prefer the solution that led to a net increase in human happiness *and* eventually will end the problem.

  82. Re:Fair? Good luck. by osolemirnix · · Score: 2
    Don't get me wrong, I'm not glad they are communists either, having been to Tibet myself. I completely agree with your asessment there.

    I guess I was rather trying to ask hwo much people are willing to give up themselves as a price to pay for communism in another country to end. Or for the situation of others to improve.

    You seem to express the hope that for you there would be not much change, because they would not come to your country.

    To use your example, after the fall of the iron curtain a lot of german descendant Russians from Russia in fact came to Germany, because Germany has this strange law that grants them the right to do so and get German citizenship if they have german ancestors.
    The net result is that some communities in Germany now have a population of up to 30% of these Russian Germans most of whom only speak russian and are unemployed. As you can imagine this is not appreciated by all and leads to conflicts.

    So would you be willing to live in a community with 30% Chinese immigrants if that would mean no more communism in China?

    --

    Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
  83. Re:Fair? Good luck. by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    I wasn't trying to say they wouldn't also come to the US, but that they wouldn't only come to the US. Some would be absorbed by traditional chinese expat communities around the world, others would try their luck in Canada, Australia, or South Africa, still others would come here. The impulse would be to make money with large numbers selecting the US but not all of them doing so. The effects of their arrival would be variable but let's assume the worst and that most of them would be illegals. Agricultural workers would suffer as mexican illegals were partially displaced by chinese ones, construction would have the same issue, there would be a gambling boom (and yes, this is from firsthand observation) and the local police would have to track a new set of ethnic crime families. In other words, nothing that we haven't seen before in the US.

    The difference between the US and Germany is that in the US we make room for poor, hardworking people with just the clothes on their back to come in and integrate into the country. It's structurally set up that way which is a large reason why we don't have fool proof internal ID papers, entire industry sectors subsist on illegal workers, and many of our government segments won't admit to other sections of our government where the illegal aliens are even though they know perfectly well.

    Would I trade a decade of inconvenience for the liberation of a quarter of mankind from repression? You bet, in a heartbeat just as I don't regret the liberation of Russia though we now have to deal with the Russian mafiya when we really didn't have to worry about it before.